Technologies to Support Community Flood Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract

Floods affect more people globally than any other type of natural hazard. Great potential exists for new technologies to support flood disaster risk reduction. In addition to existing expert-based data collection and analysis, direct input from communities and citizens across the globe may also be used to monitor, validate, and reduce flood risk. New technologies have already been proven to effectively aid in humanitarian response and recovery. However, while ex-ante technologies are increasingly utilized to collect information on exposure, efforts directed towards assessing and monitoring hazards and vulnerability remain limited. Hazard model validation and social vulnerability assessment deserve particular attention. New technologies offer great potential for engaging people and facilitating the coproduction of knowledge.

Keywords

Crowdsourcing / Disaster risk reduction / Flood resilience / Social media / Volunteered geographic information (VGI)

References

[1] Abel, F., C. Hauff, G.-J. Houben, R. Stronkman, and K. Tao. 2012. Twitcident: Fighting fire with information from social web streams. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 305–308. WWW’12 Companion. Lyon, France: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2187980.2188035.

[2] Cardona, O.D., M.K. van Aalst, J. Birkmann, M. Fordham, G. McGregor, R. Perez, R.S. Pulwarty, E.L.F. Schipper, and B.T. Sinh. 2012. Determinants of risk: Exposure and vulnerability. In Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaption. A special report of the Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, et al., 65–108. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

[3] Chingombe W, Pedzisai E, Manatsa D, Mukwada G, Taru P. A participatory approach in GIS data collection for flood risk management, Muzarabani district. Zimbabwe. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2015, 8(2): 1029-1040

[4] Clark, L. 2015. How Nepal’s earthquake was mapped in 48 hours. Wired UK. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2015-04/28/mapping-nepal-after-the-earthquake. Accessed 23 May 2016.

[5] de Andrade MMN, Szlafsztein CF. Community participation in flood mapping in the Amazon through interdisciplinary methods. Natural Hazards, 2015, 78(3): 1491-1500

[6] Earle PS, Bowden DC, Guy M. Twitter earthquake detection: Earthquake monitoring in a social world. Annals of Geophysics, 2012, 54(6): 708-715.

[7] Enenkel M, See L, Karner M, Alvarez MD, Rogenhofer E, Baraldes C, Lanusse C, Salse N. Food security monitoring via mobile data collection and remote sensing: Results from the Central African Republic. PLoS One, 2015, 10(11): e0142030

[8] GFDRR (Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery). 2014. Understanding risk: The evolution of disaster risk assessment. http://www.drrinacp.org/sites/drrinacp.org/files/publication/_Understanding_Risk-Web_Version-rev_1.7.3.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2016.

[9] GFDRR (Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery). 2015. Bringing resilience to scale, GFDRR Annual Report’14. Washington, DC: GFDRR. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/gfdrr/files/publication/GFDRR%20ANNUAL%20REPORT%202014.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2016.

[10] Gómez D, Bernardos AM, Portillo JI, Tarrío P, Casar JR. Corchado JM, Bajo J, Kozlak J, Pawlewski P, Molina JM, Julian V, Silveira RA, Unland R, Giroux S. A review on mobile applications for citizen emergency management. Highlights on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems, 2013, Berlin: Springer 190-201

[11] Government Office for Science. 2012. Foresight reducing risks of future disasters: Priorities for decision makers. Executive Summary. London: The Government Office for Science. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/286480/12-1322-reducing-risks-of-future-disasters-summary.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2016.

[12] Hallegatte, S. 2011. How economic growth and rational decisions can make disaster losses grow faster than wealth. Policy research working paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.

[13] Helgeson, J.F., S. Dietz, and S. Hochrainer-Stigler. 2013. Vulnerability to weather disasters: The choice of coping strategies in rural Uganda. Ecology and Society 18(2): Article no. 2. doi:10.5751/ES-05390-180202.

[14] Hochrainer S. Macroeconomic risk management against natural disasters, 2006, Wiesbaden: German University Publisher

[15] Holderness, T., and E. Turpin. 2015. PetaJakarta.org: Assessing the role of social media for civic co-management during monsoon flooding in Jakarta, Indonesia. White paper. SMART Infrastructure Facility, University of Wollongong.

[16] Howe J. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 2006, 14(6): 1-4.

[17] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. ed. C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, et al. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

[18] Jung, C. 2011. Mobile data collection systems: A review of the current state of the field. Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales. http://www.parkdatabase.org/files/documents/nomad_mdc_research.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2016.

[19] Kienberger S. Participatory mapping of flood hazard risk in Munamicua, District of Búzi. Mozambique. Journal of Maps, 2014, 10(2): 269-275

[20] Kongthon A, Haruechaiyasak C, Pailai J, Kongyoung S. The role of Twitter during a natural disaster: Case study of 2011 Thai flood. 2012 Proceedings of PICMET’12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, 29 July–2 August 2012, 2012, BC: Vancouver 2227-2232.

[21] Lowry CS, Fienen MN. CrowdHydrology: Crowdsourcing hydrologic data and engaging citizen scientists. Ground Water, 2013, 51(1): 151-156

[22] Mechler R, Bouwer LM. Understanding trends and projections of disaster losses and climate change: Is vulnerability the missing link?. Climatic Change, 2014, 133(1): 23-35

[23] Mileti D. Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States, 1999, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press

[24] Moel H, Jongman B, Kreibich H, Merz B, Penning-Rowsell E, Ward PJ. Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015, 20(6): 865-890

[25] Norheim-Hagtun I, Meier P. Crowdsourcing for crisis mapping in Haiti. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2010, 5(4): 81-89

[26] Pastor-Escuredo, D., A. Morales-Guzman, Y. Torres-Fernandez, J.-M. Bauer, A. Wadhwa, C. Castro-Correa, L. Romanoff, J.G. Lee, A. Rutherford, V. Frias-Martinez, N. Oliver, E. Frias-Martinez, and M. Luengo-Oroz. 2014. Flooding through the lens of mobile phone activity. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, 10–13 October 2014, San Jose, CA, 279–286.

[27] Poblet M, García-Cuesta E, Casanovas P. Casanovas P, Pagallo U, Palmirani M, Sartor G. Crowdsourcing tools for disaster management: A review of platforms and methods. AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems, 2014, Berlin: Springer 261-274.

[28] Schnebele E, Cervone G, Waters N. Road assessment after flood events using non-authoritative data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2014, 14: 1007-1015

[29] See, L., P. Mooney, G. Foody, L. Bastin, A. Comber, J. Estima, S. Fritz, et al. 2016. Crowdsourcing, citizen science or volunteered geographic information? The current state of crowdsourced geographic information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 5(5): Article no. 55. doi:10.3390/ijgi5050055.

[30] Thaler T, Levin-Keitel M. Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management—A question of roles and power: Lessons from England. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016, 55: 292-301

[31] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Making development sustainable: The future of disaster risk management. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction, 2015, Geneva: UNISDR

[32] Zook M, Graham M, Shelton T, Gorman S. Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2010, 2(2): 7-33