Reflections on a Science and Technology Agenda for 21st Century Disaster Risk Reduction

Amina Aitsi-Selmi , Virginia Murray , Chadia Wannous , Chloe Dickinson , David Johnston , Akiyuki Kawasaki , Anne-Sophie Stevance , Tiffany Yeung

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2016, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -29.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2016, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -29. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-016-0081-x
Article

Reflections on a Science and Technology Agenda for 21st Century Disaster Risk Reduction

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The first international conference for the post-2015 United Nations landmark agreements (Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, Sustainable Development Goals, and Paris Agreement on Climate Change) was held in January 2016 to discuss the role of science and technology in implementing the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. The UNISDR Science and Technology Conference on the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 aimed to discuss and endorse plans that maximize science’s contribution to reducing disaster risks and losses in the coming 15 years and bring together the diversity of stakeholders producing and using disaster risk reduction (DRR) science and technology. This article describes the evolution of the role of science and technology in the policy process building up to the Sendai Framework adoption that resulted in an unprecedented emphasis on science in the text agreed on by 187 United Nations member states in March 2015 and endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly in June 2015. Contributions assembled by the Conference Organizing Committee and teams including the conference concept notes and the conference discussions that involved a broad range of scientists and decision makers are summarized in this article. The conference emphasized how partnerships and networks can advance multidisciplinary research and bring together science, policy, and practice; how disaster risk is understood, and how risks are assessed and early warning systems are designed; what data, standards, and innovative practices would be needed to measure and report on risk reduction; what research and capacity gaps exist and how difficulties in creating and using science for effective DRR can be overcome. The Science and Technology Conference achieved two main outcomes: (1) initiating the UNISDR Science and Technology Partnership for the implementation of the Sendai Framework; and (2) generating discussion and agreement regarding the content and endorsement process of the UNISDR Science and Technology Road Map to 2030.

Keywords

Disaster risk reduction / Sendai Framework implementation / Science and Technology Conference / Science-policy interface

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Amina Aitsi-Selmi, Virginia Murray, Chadia Wannous, Chloe Dickinson, David Johnston, Akiyuki Kawasaki, Anne-Sophie Stevance, Tiffany Yeung. Reflections on a Science and Technology Agenda for 21st Century Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(1): 1-29 DOI:10.1007/s13753-016-0081-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aitsi-Selmi, A., K. Blanchard, D. Al-Khudhairy, W. Ammann, P. Basabe, D. Johnston, L. Ogallo, T. Onishi, O. Renn, A. Revi, C. Roth, P. Shi, J. Schneider, D. Wenger, and V. Murray. 2015. UNISDR Science and Technical Advisory Group report 2015: Science is used for disaster risk reduction. http://preventionweb.net/go/42848. Accessed 08 Feb 2016.

[2]

Alcántara-Ayala, I., O. Altan, D. Baker, S. Briceño, S. Cutter, H. Gupta, A. Holloway, A. Ismail-Zadeh, et al. 2015. Disaster risks research and assessment to promote risk reduction and management. Paris: ICSU. http://www.icsu.org/science-for-policy/disaster-risk/documents/DRRsynthesisPaper_2015.pdf. Accessed 01 Mar 2016.

[3]

Burton, C.G., and V. Silva. 2014. Integrated risk modelling within the Global Earthquake Model (GEM): Test case application for Portugal. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 25–29 August 2014, Istanbul.

[4]

Calkins J. Moving forward after Sendai: How countries want to use science, evidence and technology for disaster risk reduction. PLOS Currents Disasters, 2015

[5]

Cannon T. Gender and climate hazards in Bangladesh. Gender and Development, 2002, 10(2): 45-50

[6]

Carabine E. Revitalising evidence-based policy for the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030: Lessons from existing international science partnerships. PLOS Currents Disasters, 2015

[7]

Cardona OD, Carreño ML. Birkmann J. System of indicators of disaster risk and risk management for the Americas: Recent updating and application of the IDB-IDEA approach. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Toward disaster resilient societies, 2013 2 Tokyo: United Nations University Press 251-276.

[8]

Carreño M-L, Cardona OD, Barbat AH. Urban seismic risk evaluation: A holistic approach. Natural Hazards, 2007, 40(1): 137-172

[9]

CDKN (Climate and Development Knowledge Network). 2012. Promoting extreme event learning through serious fun. http://cdkn.org/2012/05/promoting-extreme-event-learning-through-serious-fun/. Accessed 03 Mar 2016.

[10]

Corbane, C., T. De Groeve, D. Ehrlich, and K. Poljansek. 2015. A European framework for recording and sharing disaster damage and loss data. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-3/W3: 277–283.

[11]

Corfee-Morlot J, Cochran I, Hallegatte S, Teasdale PJ. Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Climatic Change, 2011, 104(1): 169-197

[12]

CSDH (The Commission on the Social Determinants of Health). 2008. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43943/1/9789241563703_eng.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.

[13]

Cutter SL, Gall M. Sendai targets at risk. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5(8): 707-709

[14]

Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 2003, 84(2): 242-261

[15]

Cutter SL, Ismail-Zadeh A, Alcántara-Ayala I, Altan O, Baker DN, Briceño S, Gupta H, Holloway A, Johnston D, McBean G, Ogawa Y, Paton D, Porio E, Silbereisen RK, Takeuchi K, Valsecchi GB, Vogel C, Wu G. Global risks: Pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature, 2015, 522(7556): 277-279

[16]

Daniell J, Simpson A, Murnane R, Tijssen A, Nunez A, Deparday V, Gunasekera R, Baca A, Ishizawa O, Schäfer A. Review of open source and open access software packages available to quantify risk from natural hazards, 2014, Washington, DC: World Bank and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery

[17]

De Groeve T, Poljansek K, Ehrlich D. Recording disaster losses: Recommendations for a European approach, 2013, Ispra: European Commission Joint Research Centre

[18]

Enarson E, Morrow BH. The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women’s eyes, 1998, New York: Praeget

[19]

Fordham M. Pelling M. Gender, disaster and development: The necessity for integration. Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world, 2003, London: Routledge 57-74.

[20]

Foresight. 2012. Reducing risks of future disasters: Priorities for decision makers. London: The Government Office for Science. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/286476/12-1289-reducing-risks-of-future-disasters-report.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.

[21]

Gaillard JC, Mercer J. From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 2012, 37(1): 93-114

[22]

Gill JC, Malamud BD. Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Reviews of Geophysics, 2014, 52(4): 680-722

[23]

Gill JC, Malamud BD. Hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) within multi-hazard methodologies. Earth System Dynamics, 2016

[24]

Group of Eight. 2013. The changing Ph.D. Discussion paper. Canberra: The Group of Eight House. https://go8.edu.au/publication/discussion-paper-changing-phd. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[25]

Henrici, J.M., A.S. Helmith, and J. Bruan. 2010. Women, disasters, and Hurricane Katrina. Institute for Women’s Policy Research – Fact sheet. http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/women-disasters-and-hurricane-katrina. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.

[26]

Hines RI. Natural disasters and gender inequalities: The 2004 tsunami and the case of India. Race, Gender & Class, 2007, 4(1): 60-68.

[27]

Holloway A. Crafting disaster risk science: Environmental and geographical science sans frontières. International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 2009, 2: 98-118.

[28]

Horton R, Little C, Gornitz V, Bader D, Oppenheimer M. New York City Panel on Climate Change 2015 report chapter 2: Sea level rise and coastal storms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2015, 1336: 36-44

[29]

HSI (Helvetas Swiss Intercooperation). 2011. Disaster risk reduction & development: Towards mainstreaming disaster risk reduction in development efforts. https://assets.helvetas.org/downloads/37_disasterriskreductionanddevelopmentdrr_global_red_final_engl_a4_portrait.pdf. Accessed 09 Feb 2016.

[30]

ICSU (International Council for Science). 2008. A science plan for integrated research on disaster risk: Addressing the challenge of natural and human-induced environmental hazards. http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/IRDR-science-plan/irdr-science-plan.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2016.

[31]

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[32]

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. C.B. Field, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[33]

IRDR (Integrated Research on Disaster Risk). 2014. IRDR peril classification and hazard glossary. http://www.irdrinternational.org/2014/03/28/irdr-peril-classification-and-hazard-glossary/. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[34]

Ishigaki, K., and J. Mochizuki. 2014. Post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction: A proposal for monitoring progress. Planet@Risk 2(5): 304–307.

[35]

Jensen SJ, Feldmann-Jensen S, Johnston DM, Brown NA. The emergence of a globalized system for disaster risk management and challenges for appropriate governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(1): 87-93

[36]

Jones, L. 2012. The (not so) easy task of translating research into policy and practice. http://www.researchtoaction.org/2012/10/the-not-so-easy-task-of-translating-research-into-policy-and-practice/. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[37]

Kawasaki A, Berman LB, Guan W. The growing role of web-based geospatial technology in disaster response and support. Disasters, 2013, 37(2): 201-221

[38]

Kumasaki M, King M, Arai M, Yang L. Anatomy of cascading natural disasters in Japan: Main modes and linkages. Natural Hazards, 2016, 80(3): 1425-1441

[39]

Lin, T. 2011. Cracking open the scientific process. New York Times, 16 January 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?_r=0. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[40]

Meyer M. The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication, 2010, 32(1): 118-127

[41]

Mileti DS. Disasters by design, 1999, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press

[42]

Murray V. Disaster risk reduction, health, and the post-2015 United Nations landmark agreements. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2014, 8: 283-287

[43]

ODI (Overseas Development Institute). 2013. Disaster risk management in post-2015 development goals: Potential targets and indicators. www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odiassets/publications-opinion-files/8354.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.

[44]

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2006. OECD studies in risk management: Japan earthquakes. http://www.oecd.org/japan/37377837.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2016.

[45]

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2014. Improving the evidence base on the costs of disasters to inform better policy making for disaster risk management: Toward a framework for accounting national risk management expenditures and losses of disasters. http://www.oecd.org/gov/risk/improving-the-evidence-base-on-the-costs-of-disasters.htm. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[46]

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2015. Scientific advice for policy making: The role and responsibility of expert bodies and individual scientists. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers. doi:10.1787/5js33l1jcpwb-en.

[47]

Ofir, Z., and M. Mentz. 2015. Periperi U phase III summative evaluation. Report submitted to the research alliance for disaster and risk reduction. http://www.riskreductionafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/PPU-Phase-III-Evaluation-Report-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.

[48]

Pearce L. Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 2003, 28(2–3): 211-228

[49]

Pearson L, Pelling M. The UN Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030: Negotiation process and prospects for science and practice. Journal of Extreme Events, 2015, 2(1): 1571001

[50]

Quarantelli EL. Converting disaster scholarship into effective disaster planning and managing: Possibilities and limitations. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1993, 11(1): 15-39.

[51]

Rufat S, Tate E, Burton CG, Sayeed MA. Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, 14: 470-486

[52]

Schipper L, Pelling M. Disaster risk, climate change and international development: Scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters, 2006, 30(1): 19-38

[53]

Shi P, Karsperson R. World atlas of natural disaster risk, 2015, Heidelberg: Springer

[54]

Shi P, Li N, Ye Q, Dong W, Han G, Fang W. Research on integrated disaster risk governance in the context of global environmental change. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2010, 1(1): 17-23.

[55]

Terry JP, Goff J. Natural hazards in the Asia-Pacific region: Recent advances and emerging concepts, 2012, London: Geological Society

[56]

Tierney K. The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience, 2014, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press

[57]

Trainor JE, Subbio T. Issues in disaster science and management: A critical dialogue between researchers and practitioners, 2014, Emmitsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency Higher Education Program

[58]

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2004. Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development. http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/crisis%20prevention/disaster/asia_pacific/Reducing%20Disaster%20risk%20a%20Challenge%20for%20development.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[59]

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2007. Science, technology and gender: An international report. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001540/154045e.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.

[60]

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2010. Women’s and girls’ access to and participation in science and technology. http://www.uis.unesco.org/ScienceTechnology/Documents/unesco-egm-science-tech-gender-2010-en.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.

[61]

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2015. UNESCO intergovernmental oceanographic commission tsunami programme. http://www.ioc-tsunami.org/. Accessed 06 Nov 2015.

[62]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2006. Global survey of early warning systems: An assessment of capacities, gaps and opportunities towards building a comprehensive global early warning system for all natural hazards. http://www.unisdr.org/2006/ppew/info-resources/ewc3/Global-Survey-of-Early-Warning-Systems.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[63]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2009. Terminology on disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/7817. Accessed 19 Jun 2015.

[64]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2011. Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Mid-term review 2010–2011. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/18197. Accessed 08 Feb 2016.

[65]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2013. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2013. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2013/en/home/index.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[66]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2014. Suggested elements for the post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction (June 2014). https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/37865. Accessed 09 Feb 2016.

[67]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015a. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2015. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2015/en/home/. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[68]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015b. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 20152030. http://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[69]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015c. Proposed updated terminology on disaster risk reduction: A technical review (August 2015). http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45462_backgoundpaperonterminologyaugust20.pdf. Accessed 09 Feb 2016.

[70]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015d. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Concept note. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_conceptnoteunisdrstconference2729ja.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

[71]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015e. Terms of reference of the scientific and technical partnership for the implementation of the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_torofunisdrstpartnership.pdf. Accessed 04 Mar 2016.

[72]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016a. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 1, working group 1. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrconceptnoteofws1.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[73]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016b. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 2, working group 1. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws2wg1earlywarningandhazard.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[74]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016c. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 2, working Group 2. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws2wg2vulnerabilityandexpos.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[75]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016d. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 2, working group 3. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws2wg3riskassessmentandmang.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[76]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016e. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 3, working group 1. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws3wg1standardsandprotocols.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[77]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016f. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 3, working group 2. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws3wg2syenthesesandsharingd.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[78]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016g. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 3, working group 3. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws3wg3sharinginnovations.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[79]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016h. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 4, working group 1. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws4wg1leveragingscience.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[80]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016i. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 4, working group 2. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws4wg2capacitydevelopment.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[81]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016j. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Work stream 4, working group 3. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnws4wg3researchgaps.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[82]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016k. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Side event. Knowledge sharing for DRR science for the implementation of the Sendai framework: The role of knowledge hubs. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnknowledgehubssideevent.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[83]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016 l. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Side event. Science and technology for addressing gender inequality of disaster risk. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrwomeninstfordrrconceptnote.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[84]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016m. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Side event. Supportive publishing practices in DRR: Leaving no scientist behind. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnpublishingpracticesindrr.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[85]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016n. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Side event. The role of youth in the application of science for disaster risk reduction. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrconceptnotetheroleofyouthindr.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[86]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016o. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Side event. Bioethics and ethics of science and technology in DRR. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnethicssideevent.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[87]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016p. Launching UNISDR science and technology partnership and the science and technology road map to 2030. Short concept note: Side event. Research funding. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrcnresearchfunderssideevent.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.

[88]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016q. The science and technology roadmap to support the implementation of the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrscienceandtechnologyroadmap.pdf. Accessed 04 Mar 2016.

[89]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2016r. Key messages. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrscienceandtechnologyconferenc[2].pdf. Accessed 04 Mar 2016.

[90]

van Kerkhoff, L.E., and L. Lebel. 2015. Coproductive capacities: Rethinking science-governance relations in a diverse world. Ecology and Society 20(1). doi:10.5751/ES-07188-200114.

[91]

Weichselgartner J, Kasperson R. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(2): 266-277

[92]

White GF, Kates RW, Burton I. Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazard management. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 2001, 3(3–4): 81-92

[93]

WHO (World Health Organization). 2008a. Report of the WHO commission on the social determinants of health. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.

[94]

WHO (World Health Organization) International Health Regulations (2005), 2008 2 Switzerland: World Health Organization

[95]

WHO (World Health Organization). 2013. Statement to the 4th session of the global platform for disaster risk reduction 2013. http://www.preventionweb.net/globalplatform/2013/programme/statements. Accessed 19 Jun 2015.

[96]

Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2004, London: Routledge

[97]

Witze, A. 2014. Tsunami alerts fail to bridge the “last mile”. Nature News, 10 December 2014. http://www.nature.com/news/tsunami-alerts-fail-to-bridge-the-last-mile-1.16516. Accessed 09 Feb 2016.

[98]

World Bank Building resilience: Integrating climate and disaster risk into development, 2013, Washington, DC: Global Facility for Disaster Risk Reduction, World Bank

[99]

World Bank The Sendai report: Managing disaster risks for a resilient future, 2015, Washington, DC: Global Facility for Disaster Risk Reduction, World Bank

[100]

Zhou HJ, Wang X, Yuan Y. Risk assessment of disaster chain: Experience from Wenchuan earthquake-induced landslides in China. Journal of mountain science, 2015, 12(5): 1169-1180

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

103

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/