Carbon Footprint of Transitional Shelters

Abstract

Extreme weather events, sea level rise, and political disputes linked to climate change are driving masses to leave their homes. Their transitional settlements should be produced in a manner that causes minimum greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to prevent any further acceleration of climate change and the humanitarian crises it causes. This article presents a study of the carbon footprint and primary energy demand of the construction materials of eight different transitional shelters. The lowest carbon footprints were found from shelter models made from bamboo or timber. The highest emissions were caused by shelters that have either a short service life or that are made from metal-intensive structures. The choice of cladding materials was surprisingly important. The findings were further compared to the overall impacts of each construction project, to national per capita GHG emissions, and to construction costs. Some shelter projects had notable total energy consumption even compared to the annual energy use of industrialized countries. The study concludes that construction materials have an important impact on the carbon footprint of shelters. Comparisons should however be made only between similar functional units. Furthermore, benchmark values and more background data are urgently needed in order to give humanitarian nongovernmental organizations tools for lowering the carbon footprint of their construction operations.

Keywords

Carbon footprint / Humanitarian construction / Lifecycle assessment / Primary energy

References

[1] CEN (European Committee for Standardization) EN 15978:2011. Sustainability of construction works: Assessment of environmental performance of buildings—Calculation method, 2011, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization

[2] CEN (European Committee for Standardization) EN 15804:2012. Sustainability of construction works—Environmental product declarations—Core rules for the product category of construction products, 2012, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization

[3] CEN (European Committee for Standardization) EN 16485:2014. Round and sawn timber—Product category rules for wood and wood-based products for use in construction, 2014, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization

[4] Christian Aid Human tide: The real migration crisis. A Christian Aid report, 2007, London: Christian Aid

[5] Guggemos A, Horvath A. Comparison of environmental effects of steel and concrete framed buildings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2005, 11(2): 93-101

[6] Gustavsson L, Sathre R. Energy and CO₂ analysis of wood substitution in construction. Climatic Change, 2011, 105(1–2): 129-153

[7] Hafner, A., S. Winter, and A. Takano. 2012. Wooden products as building material in life cycle analysis. In Proceedings of the third international symposium on life-cycle civil engineering, 1530–1537. Vienna: Taylor & Francis Group.

[8] Hansen, J., P. Kharecha, M. Sato, V. Masson-Delmotte, F. Ackerman, D.J. Beerling, P.J. Hearty, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, et al. 2013. Assessing “dangerous climate change”: Required reduction of carbon emissions to protect young people, future generations and nature. PLoS One 12(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081648.

[9] Heinonen J, Säynäjoki A-J, Kuronen M, Junnila S. Are the greenhouse gas implications of new residential developments understood wrongly?. Energies, 2012, 5(8): 2874-2893

[10] Häkkinen, T. 2012. Sustainability and performance assessment of buildings—Final report. VTT publications 72. Espoo: VTT.

[11] Häkkinen T, Kuittinen M, Ruuska A, Jung N. Reducing embodied carbon during the design process of buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 2015, 4: 1-13

[12] IEA (International Energy Agency) Key world energy statistics. OECD/IEA, 2012, 2012, Paris: International Energy Agency

[13] IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) Transitional shelters—Eight designs, 2011, Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies

[14] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL. Summary for policymakers. Climate change 2007: Physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[15] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL Summary for policymakers. Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1-32.

[16] ISO (International Organization for Standardization) ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management: Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework, 2006, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization

[17] ISO (International Organization for Standardization) ISO 21930:2007. Sustainability in building construction—Environmental declaration of building products, 2007, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization

[18] ISO (International Organization for Standardization) ISO/TS 14067:2013. Greenhouse gases—Carbon footprint of products—Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication, 2013, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization

[19] Kuittinen M, Dodoo A, Gustavsson L, Peñaloza D, Sathre R, Takano A, Dolezal F, Mair am Tinkhof O Kuittinen M, Ludvig A, Weiss G Case studies. Wood in carbon efficient construction, 2013, Brussels: CEI-Bois 112-152.

[20] Kuittinen, M. 2015a. Strategies for low carbon humanitarian construction. In Sustainable futures in a changing climate, ed. A. Hatakka and J. Vehmas, 366–372. FFRC eBook 2/2015.

[21] Kuittinen M. Setting the carbon footprint criteria for public construction projects. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, 21: 154-161

[22] Mattila, T., T. Helin, R. Antikainen, S. Soimakallio, K. Pingoud, and H. Wessman. 2011. Land use and life cycle assessment. The Finnish Environment 24. Helsinki: SYKE. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/37049. Accessed 14 May 2014.

[23] NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2014. Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html#global_data. Accessed 21 May 2014.

[24] NPR (National Public Radio). 2012. Nuclear woes push Japan into a new energy future. Interview of economist Mitsutsune Yamaguchi from University of Tokyo at NPR radio station, 11 March 2012. http://www.npr.org/2012/03/11/148136383/nuclear-woes-push-japan-into-a-new-energy-future. Accessed 04 Aug 2014.

[25] Pagani M, Liu ZH, LaRiviere J, Ravelo AC. High earth-system climate sensitivity determined from Pliocene carbon concentrations. Nature Geoscience, 2010, 3: 27-30

[26] Reiner, M., M. Pitterle, and M. Whitaker. 2007. How do you define green? Embodied energy considerations in existing LEED credits. http://www.oriental-bamboo.co.za/reference/embodied_energy_considerations_in_existing_leed_credits.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014.

[27] Repo, P., J. Benick, G. von Gastrow, V. Vähänissi, F. Heinz, and J. Schön. 2013. Passivation of black silicon boron emitters with ALD Al₂O₃. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on crystalline silicon photovoltaics, 950–954. 25–27 March 2013, Hamelin, Germany.

[28] Ruuska, A., T. Häkkinen, S. Vares, M. Korhonen, and T. Myllymaa. 2013. Environmental impacts of building materials (Rakennusmateriaalien ympäristövaikutukset). Reports of the Ministry of the Environment 8. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment (in Finnish).

[29] Statistics Finland. 2013. Energy consumption in households. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. http://stat.fi/til/asen/2012/asen_2012_2013-11-13_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 10 Jun 2014.

[30] Statistics Finland. 2014. Greenhouse gases. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. http://stat.fi/til/khki/index_en.html. Accessed 10 Jun 2014.

[31] Stroeve, J., M.M. Holland, W. Meier, T. Scambos, and M. Serreze. 2007. Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast. Geophysical Research Letters 34(9). doi:10.1029/2007GL029703.

[32] The Shift Project Data Portal. 2013. Breakdown of GHG emissions by sector. http://www.tsp-data-portal.org/Breakdown-of-GHG-Emissions-by-Sector#tspQvChart. Accessed 10 Sept 2015.

[33] The Sphere Project. 2012. The sphere handbook. http://www.spherehandbook.org. Accessed 5 Jun 2014.

[34] UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative (SBCI). 2009. Buildings and climate change. Summary for decision makers. UNEP SBCI: 3. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

[35] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2012. Number of climate-related disasters around the world (1980–2011). http://www.preventionweb.net. Accessed 2 May 2014.

[36] University of Bath, Sustainable Energy Research Team (SERT). 2011. Inventory of carbon and energy (ICE), version 2. http://www.bath.ac.uk/mech-eng/research/sert/. Accessed 14 May 2014.

[37] Vogtländer J. Life cycle assessment and carbon sequestration. Bamboo products of MOSO Internaltional, 2011, Delft: TU Delft

[38] Wiedmann, T., and J. Minx. 2007. A definition of “Carbon footprint”. ISA ^UK research report 07-01. Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

[39] World Bank Turn down the heat: Why a 4°C warmer world must be avoided, 2012, Washington DC: World Bank

[40] World Bank. 2012b. CO₂ emissions (metric tons per capita). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC. Accessed 4 Apr 2014.

[41] World Bank Turn down the heat: Climate extremes, regional impacts and the case for resilience, 2013, Washington DC: World Bank