Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction Following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: A Business Process Management Perspective

Abstract

The Tohoku Regional Bureau (TRB) of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) performed various actions in response to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. The total disaster recovery and reconstruction period is expected to last for 10 years, of which the first five years are regarded as the concentrated reconstruction period. As of 2013, a majority of the mega projects that involved restoration actions have been completed, which indicates a more effective rate of completion compared with the MLIT projects performed in normal non-disaster situations. This short article explains the management process of the recovery and reconstruction utilized by the TRB—an inter-organizational process—from a business process management (BPM) perspective and creates a simple organization construction diagram of the entire process. The study focused on the transactions and actor roles to identify their strengths. The findings indicate the utilization of different operational procedures in some parts of the process, the importance of liaison role, as well as some obstacles. The lessons learned from this analysis can assist managers and researchers in designing and managing restoration processes for future disasters.

Keywords

Business process management / Disaster reconstruction / Disaster recovery / 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

References

[1] Dietz JLG. Enterprise ontology—Theory and methodology, 2006, Berling: Springer

[2] GOJ (Government of Japan) Basic act on reconstruction in response to the Great East Japan Earthquake, 2011, Tokyo: GOJ

[3] IDI (Infrastructure Development Institute—Japan). The restorations from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. IDI Quarterly, 2011, 56: 1-12.

[4] IRP (International Recovery Platform Tanaka T, Shiozaki Y, Hokugo A, Bettencourt S. Reconstruction policy and planning, 2013, Washington, DC: World Bank

[5] Maly E, Shiozaki Y. Towards a policy that supports people-centered housing recovery—Learning from housing reconstruction after the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in Kobe, Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2012, 3(1): 56-65

[6] Marjanovic O, Hallikainen P. Disaster recovery—New challenges and opportunities for business process management research and practice. Pacific Asia Journal of the Assocication for Information Systems, 2013, 5(1): 23-44.

[7] Mileti DS. Disaster by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States, 1999, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press

[8] MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) White paper on land, infrastructure, transport and tourism in Japan, 2011, 2012, Tokyo: MLIT

[9] MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) White paper on land, infrastructure, transport and tourism in Japan, 2012, 2013, Tokyo: MLIT

[10] Murosaki Y. Lessons on reconstruction strategies from the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. Journal of Disaster Research, 2007, 2(5): 330-334.

[11] NPA (National Police Agency). 2011. Damage condition of the 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tohoku. http://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/higaijokyo.pdf. Accessed 26 Jul 2013 (in Japanese).

[12] Perinforma APC. The essence of organisation, 2012, South Holland: Sapio Enterprise Engineering

[13] Reconstruction Agency Basic guidelines for reconstruction in response to the Great East Japan Earthquake, 2011, Tokyo: Reconstruction Agency

[14] Sasaki, K. 2013. Three years into reconstruction. Current status and prospects. Tokyo: Institute for International Studies and Training. http://www.iist.or.jp/en-m/2013/0220-0894/. Accessed 2 Apr 2014.

[15] TRB (Tohoku Regional Bureau), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) Response of Tohoku Regional Bureau, MLIT, to the Great East Japan Earthquake, 2013, Miyagi: TRB