The Role of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract

Disaster risk reduction policy and practice require knowledge for informed decision making and coordinated action. Although the knowledge production and implementation processes are critical for disaster risk reduction, these issues are seldom systematically addressed in-depth in disaster studies and policy programs. While efforts and improvements have been made with regard to data and information, only limited resources are committed to improving knowledge management structures and integrating knowledge systems at different spatial levels. The recently adopted Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 addresses knowledge-related issues and provides the opportunity to highlight the critical role of knowledge in disaster risk reduction. This article presents insights into potential conceptualizations of knowledge that would advance disaster research and policy. We use cases from France to illustrate challenges of and pathways to disaster risk reduction. We suggest to further strengthen efforts that improve our understanding of the connections between disaster risk, knowledge, and learning. A better integration of multiple scales, different societal actors, various knowledge sources, and diverse disciplines into disaster risk research will increase its relevance for decision-makers in policy and practice. Well-targeted incentives and political backing will improve the coherence, coordination, and sharing of knowledge among various actors and arenas.

Keywords

Disaster risk reduction / France / Information management / Knowledge systems / Natural hazards / Risk prevention

References

[1] Ackoff RL. From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 1989, 16: 3-9.

[2] André, C. 2013. Analysis of damage associated with coastal flooding and evaluation of costs incurred to homes from insurance data (Analyse des dommages liés aux submersions marines et évaluation des coûts induits aux habitations à partir des données d’assurance). Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest.

[3] Argyris C, Schön D. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, 1978, Reading: Addison Wesley

[4] Bourguignon, B. 2014. Events and territories: The costs of floods in France. Spatiotemporal analysis of insured damages (Evénements et territoires: le coût des inondations en France. Analyses spatio-temporelles des dommages assurés). Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paul Valéry—Montpellier III, Montpellier.

[5] Briceño S. Looking back and beyond Sendai: 25 years of international policy experience on disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(1): 1-7

[6] Cleveland H. Information as resource. The Futurist, 1982, 16(6): 34-39.

[7] Cour des comptes Lessons of the 2010 flooding on the Atlantic coast (Xynthia) and in the Var (Les enseignements des inondations de 2010 sur le littoral atlantique (Xynthia) et dans le Var). Rapport public thématique, 2012, Paris: Cour des comptes

[8] Davenport T, Prusak L. Working knowledge, 1998, Boston: Harvard Business School Press

[9] DKKV (Deutsches Komitee für Katastrophenvorsorge) Flood risk reduction in Germany: Lessons learned from the 2002 disaster in the Elbe region. DKKV publication 29e, 2004, Bonn: German Committee for Disaster Reduction

[10] Gaillard JC, Mercer J. From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 2013, 37(1): 93-114

[11] Gall M, Nguyen K, Cutter SL. Integrated research on disaster risk: Is it really integrated?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, 12: 255-267

[12] Gérin, S. 2011. A method for assessing risks prevention plans as tools linked with insurance of natural disasters: Contribution to having more prevention-oriented public policies (Une démarche évaluative des Plans de Prévention des Risques dans le contexte de l’assurance des catastrophes naturelles: Contribution au changement de l’action publique de prévention). Ph.D dissertation, Université Paris-Diderot - Paris VII, Paris, France.

[13] Glantz MH. Shades of chaos: Lessons learned about lessons learned about forecasting El Niño and its impacts. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(1): 94-103

[14] Glantz MH, Baudoin M-A. Hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction: A survey of lessons learned for resilient adaptation to a changing climate, 2014, Boulder: Consortium for Capacity Building, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado

[15] Groeve T, Poljansek K, Ehrlich D, Corbance C. Current status and best practices for disaster loss data recording in EU member states, 2014, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union

[16] Kasperson RE, Berberian M. Integrating science and policy: Vulnerability and resilience in global environmental change, 2011, London: Earthscan

[17] Kelman, I. 2015. Climate change and the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6(2). doi:10.1007/s13753-015-0046-5.

[18] Kelman I, Gaillard JC, Mercer J. Climate change’s role in disaster risk reduction’s future: Beyond vulnerability and resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(1): 21-27

[19] Kolen B, Slomp R, van Balen W, Terpstra T, Bottema M, Nieuwenhuis S. Learning from French experiences with storm Xynthia: Damages after a flood, 2010, AC Lelystad: Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst

[20] López-Peláez J, Pigeon P. Co-evolution between structural mitigation measures and urbanization in France and Colombia: A comparative analysis of disaster risk management policies based on disaster database. Habitat International, 2011, 35(4): 573-581

[21] Milton NJ. Findings from international surveys providing a snapshot of the state of KM from a practitioner point of view. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 2014, 10(1): 109-127.

[22] Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge creating company, 1995, New York: Oxford University Press

[23] Nussbaum, R., and P. Pigeon. 2015. A national Public Private Partnership (PPP) platform for risk data sharing to stimulate DRR participative governance in France. A case study series published by the UNISDR Scientific and Technical Advisory Group. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/workspace/7935_rnussbaumpppdrrinfrance.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2015.

[24] Pahl-Wostl C. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 2009, 19(3): 354-365

[25] Pahl-Wostl, C., G. Becker, C. Knieper, and J. Sendzimir. 2013. How multilevel societal learning processes facilitate transformative change: A comparative case study analysis on flood management. Ecology and Society 18(4). Article no. 58.

[26] Pigeon, P. 2012a. Contributions of resilience to the geography of risks: The example of La Faute-sur-Mer (Vendée, France) (Apports de la résilience à la géographie des risques: l’exemple de La Faute-sur-Mer (Vendée, France)). VertigO—la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 12(1). http://www.vertigo.revues.org/12031. Accessed 12 Apr 2015.

[27] Pigeon P. Paradoxes of urbanization (Paradoxes de l’urbanisation), 2012, Paris: L’Harmattan

[28] Pigeon P. Warner JF, van Buuren A, Edelenbos J. Flood risk and watershed management conflicts in France: Upper catchment management of the river Rhone. Making space for the river: Governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and in Europe, 2013, London: IWA Publishing 149-161.

[29] Polanyi M. The tacit dimension, 1967, New York: Anchor Books

[30] Renaud FG, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Estrella MS. The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction, 2013, Tokyo: UNU Press

[31] Renn O. Stakeholder and public involvement in risk governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(1): 8-20

[32] Rowley J. The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 2007, 33(2): 163-180

[33] Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. 2006. A failure of initiative. Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

[34] Senge PM. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization, 1990, London: Random House

[35] Spiekermann R, Kienberger S, Norton J, Briones F, Weichselgartner J. The disaster-knowledge matrix: Reframing and evaluating the knowledge challenges in disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, 13: 96-108

[36] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2014. HFA Thematic Review: Research Area 2. Priority for Action 3—Core Indicator 1: Relevant information on disasters is available and accessible at all levels, to all stakeholders (through networks, development of information sharing systems etc.). Background paper prepared for the 2015 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva: UNISDR.

[37] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction) Making development sustainable: The future of disaster risk management, 2015, Geneva: UNISDR

[38] UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015b. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. http://www.wcdrr.org/preparatory/post2015. Accessed 17 Apr 2015.

[39] Vogel C, Moser SC, Kasperson RE, Dabelko GD. Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 17(3–4): 349-364

[40] Weichselgartner J, Brévière E. Dowty RA, Allen BL. The 2002 flood disaster in the Elbe region, Germany: A lack of context-sensitive knowledge. Dynamics of disaster: Lessons on risk, response, and recovery, 2011, London: Earthscan 141-158.

[41] Weichselgartner J, Kasperson RE. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(2): 266-277

[42] Weichselgartner J, Obersteiner M. Knowing sufficient and applying more: Challenges in hazards management. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 2002, 4(2–3): 73-77

[43] Weichselgartner J, Truffer B. Werlen B. From co-production of knowledge to transdisciplinary research: Lessons from the quest for producing socially robust knowledge. Global sustainability, cultural perspectives and challenges for transdisciplinary integrated research, 2015, Berlin: Springer 89-106.

[44] White GF, Kates RW, Burton I. Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazard management. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 2001, 3(3–4): 81-92

[45] Zia, A., and C.H. Wagner. 2015. Mainstreaming early warning systems in development and planning processes: Multilevel implementation of Sendai framework in Indus and Sahel. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6(2). doi:10.1007/s13753-015-0048-3.