Iterative Factors Favoring Collaboration for Interorganizational Resilience: The Case of the Greater Montréal Transportation Infrastructure

Abstract

Between members of a network, interorganizational resilience is favored by effective collaboration and coordination during a crisis. The quality of that collaboration depends on various iterative factors present between these organizations before the occurrence of a crisis. We find that these factors are iterative since collaboration factors follow a mutually reinforcing cycle: collaboration within a crisis management network is conditioned by a general agreement, which is in turn conditioned by the extent to which the institutions coordinate themselves prior to crisis. We evaluated the factors that promote collaboration between public and private organizations that manage the Greater Montréal transportation infrastructure. These factors are based on adaptive management processes such as mutual agreements, common organizational culture, knowledge and financial resources, levers of power, regulations, and pressure. Crisis management coordination represents the ability to build and assess the effectiveness of common response plans to risks to which they are exposed. We show how these processes vary depending on the links between private and public organizations.

Keywords

Adaptive management / Collaborative management / Interorganizational resilience / Montréal / Transportation infrastructure

References

[1] Accenture. 2012. Designing dynamic operations: How companies can turn permanent volatility into a permanent competitive advantage. http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture-Designing-Dynamic-Operations.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2014.

[2] Alexander ER. Interorganizational coordination: Theory and practice. Journal of Planning Literature, 1993, 7(4): 328-343

[3] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008, 18(4): 543-571

[4] Benson JK. The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20(2): 229-249

[5] Camarinha-Matos, L.M. 2014. Collaborative networks: A mechanism for enterprise agility and resilience. In Enterprise interoperability VI, ed. K. Mertins, F. Bénaben, R. Poler, and J.-P. Bourrières, pp. 3–11. Springer International Publishing.

[6] Comfort LK, Boin A, Demchak C. Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events, 2010, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press

[7] Comfort LK, Oh N, Ertan G, Scheinert S. Comfort LK, Boin A, Demchak C. Designing adaptive systems for disaster mitigation and response: The role of structure. Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events, 2010, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press 33-62.

[8] De Bruijne M, Boin A, van Eeten M. Comfort L, Boin A, Demchak C. Resilience: Exploring the concept and its meanings. Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events, 2010, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press 13-32.

[9] Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education. New York: Collier Books. (Collier edn. first published in 1963).

[10] Gilbert, C. 2003. Risk manufactures (La fabrique des risques). Cahiers internationaux de sociologie CXIV: pp. 55–72.

[11] Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, 1967, New York: Aldine Publishing Company

[12] Godbout, F. 2008. Federated states and security: The challenge of the post 11 September 2001 (États fédérés et sécurité : les défi s de l’après 11 septembre 2001). Laboratoire d’étude sur les politiques publiques et la mondialisation.

[13] Gray B. Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 1985, 38(10): 911-938

[14] Gray DE. Doing research in the real world, 2004, London: Sage

[15] Hlady Rispal M. The case method: Application to management research (La méthode des cas: application à la recherche en gestion), 2002, Brussels: Éditions De Boeck Université

[16] Innes JE, Booher DE. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1999, 65(4): 412-423

[17] Johnson, B.L. 1999. The role of adaptive management as an operational approach for resource management agencies. Conservation Ecology 3(2). Article 8.

[18] Klijn EH. Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Smith Ring P. Policy and implementation networks: Managing complex interactions. The Oxford handbook of interorganizational relations, 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press 118-146.

[19] Lindsay J. The power to react: Review and discussion of Canada’s emergency measures legislation. The International Journal of Human Rights, 2014, 18(2): 159-177

[20] Lotia N, Hardy C. Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Smith Ring P. Critical perspectives on collaboration. The Oxford handbook of interorganizational relations, 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press 366-389.

[21] Mandell MP, Steelman T. Understanding interorganizational innovations. Public Management Review, 2003, 5(2): 197-224

[22] Mansouri M, Ganguly A, Mostashari A. Evaluating agility in extended enterprise systems: a transportation network case. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 2011, 4(1): 142-152

[23] Patton D. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 2002 3 Newbury: Sage

[24] Québec, Gouvernement du. 1994. Determination of anthropogenic stress (Détermination des contraintes de nature anthropique). Direction générale de l’urbanisme et de l’aménagement du territoire du ministère des Affaires municipales du Québec.

[25] Québec, Gouvernement du. 1999. Guide to the establishment and operation of a municipal-industrial joint committee (CMMI) on the risk management of major industrial accidents (Guide pour la création et le fonctionnement d’un comité mixte municipal-industriel (CMMI) sur la gestion des risques d’accidents industriels majeurs). Robert Lapalme du ministère de la Sécurité publique du Québec.

[26] Québec, Gouvernement du. 2008. Disaster site coordination framework in Quebec (Cadre de coordination de site de sinistre au Québec).

[27] Québec, Gouvernement du. 2009. Framework of the government policy to increase the resilience of critical systems in Quebec (Cadre de référence de la démarche gouvernementale visant à accroître la résilience des systèmes essentiels au Québec). Sous-comité de l’Organisation de la sécurité civile du Québec (O.S.C.Q.), sur la résilience des systèmes essentiels.

[28] Québec, Gouvernement du. 2014. Québec civil security policy 2014–2024. Towards a more resilient to disasters Quebec society (Politique québécoise de sécurité civile 2014–2024. Vers une société québécoise plus résiliente aux catastrophes).

[29] Schermerhorn JR. Determinants of interorganizational cooperation. Academy of Management Review, 1975, 18(4): 846-856

[30] Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, 1990, Newbury Park, CA: Sage

[31] Therrien M-C. Resilience strategies and critical infrastructure (Stratégies de résilience et infrastructures essentielles). Télescope, 2010, 16(2): 154-171.

[32] Tremblay, M. 2010. Critical infrastructure: A challenge for the security of states (Les infrastructures essentielles: un défi pour la sécurité des États). Laboratoire d’étude sur les politiques publiques et la mondialisation.

[33] Valiquette L’Heureux A, Therrien M-C. Interorganizational dynamics and characteristics of critical infrastructure networks: The study of three critical infrastructures in the greater Montreal area. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2013, 21(4): 211-224

[34] Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, 2011 2 San Fransisco, CA: Wiley

[35] Wise CR. Organizing for homeland security after Katrina: Is adaptive management what’s missing?. Public Administration Review, 2006, 66(3): 302-318

[36] World Economic Forum. 2013. Building resilience in supply chains. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_RRN_MO_BuildingResilienceSupplyChains_Report_2013.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2013.