The Emergence of a Globalized System for Disaster Risk Management and Challenges for Appropriate Governance

Abstract

Disaster risk management (DRM) is undergoing noteworthy changes, reflecting the broader shifts in global and local levels of governance. At the global level two significant changes are of interest: (1) the shift from monolithic structures of global governance to a wide range of organizations that can be brought together for specific purposes and (2) the emergence of a globalized system of DRM, with technological, organizational, and institutional capacities enhancing DRM’s ability as a unit in near real time across the globe. At the local level there is an increase in ability to govern and develop creative solutions for complex problems that follow rapid urbanization. The importance of getting the global–local interface to work in tandem has been highlighted by recent hazard events, such as the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami. From a broad view of global and local shifts, a strategic role is becoming clearer at the national level for enhancing the relationships between the global and local levels. Through the influence of a globalized system of DRM, the local level can significantly improve its capacity without the heavy investment that might have been required to develop these capacities in isolation. One key to achieving this is a diffusion of DRM higher education, supported by an enhanced system of information flow.

Keywords

Disaster risk management / Global governance / Globalization / Globalized systems / Local governance / National governance

References

[1] Ball P. Crisis response: The new history. Nature, 2011, 480(7378): 447-448

[2] Barnett T. The Pentagon’s new map: War and peace in the twenty-first century, 2005, New York: Penguin

[3] Carmichael, P. 2002. Review of public administration briefing paper: Multi-level governance. http://www.rpani.gov.uk/multilevel.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2015.

[4] Castells M. The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture, 1996, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell

[5] Castells M. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008, 616(1): 78-93

[6] Castells M. Communication power, 2009, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

[7] Castells M, Cardoso G. The network society: From knowledge to policy, 2005, Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations

[8] Cleveland H. The future is uncentralized. Public Administration Review, 2002, 60(4): 293-297

[9] Duit A, Galaz V. Governance and complexity: Emerging issues for governance theory. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 2008, 21(3): 311-335

[10] Glaeser E. Cities: Engines of innovation. Scientific American, 2011, 305(3): 50-55

[11] King A. Avoiding ecological surprise: Lessons from long-standing communities. The Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(4): 961-985.

[12] La Porte T. High reliability organizations: Unlikely, demanding, and at risk. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1996, 4(2): 60-67

[13] March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87

[14] McCarney, P., M. Halfani, and R. Stren. 1995. Towards an understanding of governance: The emergence of an idea and its implications for urban research in developing countries. In Urban research in developing countries, ed. R. Stren, 95–98. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto.

[15] NRC (National Research Council) Improving disaster management: The role of IT in mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery, 2007, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

[16] Patrick, S. 2014. The unruled world: The case for good enough global governance. In Foreign Affairs January/February 2014. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140343/stewart-patrick/the-unruled-world. Accessed 26 Jan 2015.

[17] UN (United Nations), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2014. World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352).

[18] Wildavsky A. Searching for safety, 1988, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books

[19] WHO (World Health Organization). 2015. Report by the Director-General to the Special Session of the Executive Board on Ebola. 25 January 2015. Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/dg/speeches/2015/executive-board-ebola/en/. Accessed 17 Feb 2015.

[20] WEF (World Economic Forum). 2011. Global redesign initiative. http://www.weforum.org/issues/global-redesign-initiative/index.html. Accessed 17 Feb 2015.

[21] WEF (World Economic Forum). 2014. Global risk report. http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-risks-2014-report. Accessed 26 Jan 2015.