Stakeholder and Public Involvement in Risk Governance

Abstract

Stakeholder involvement has been a major requirement for effective, efficient, and fair risk governance. Since risk management includes uncertain outcomes that affect different parts of the population to different degrees it is essential to integrate the knowledge, values, and interests of stakeholders into the risk policy making process. The article provides insights into how to structure and organize stakeholder participation and how to cope with the challenges of complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity. For each of the three challenges there is a need for specific input from stakeholders. The article describes these requirements and explains the formats that have been tested for providing this input to the risk governance process.

Keywords

Participatory formats / Public participation / Risk governance / Stakeholder involvement

References

[1] Aven T, Renn O. Risk management and risk governance, 2010, Heidelberg: Springer

[2] Baughman M. Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P. Mediation. Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Evaluating new models for environmental discourse, 1995, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic 253-266

[3] Benarie M. Delphi and Delphi like approaches with special regard to environmental standard setting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1988, 33(2): 149-158

[4] Checkoway B. The politics of public hearings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1981, 17(4): 566-582

[5] Dienel PC. Vlek C, Cvetkovich G. Contributing to social decision methodology: Citizen reports on technological projects. Social decision methodology for technological projects, 1989, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic 133-151

[6] Dreyer M, Renn O. Dreyer M, Renn O. A structured approach to participation. Food safety governance. Integrating science, precaution and public involvement, 2009, Heidelberg: Springer 110-120.

[7] Dürrenberger G, Kastenholz H, Behringer J. Integrated assessment focus groups: Bridging the gap between science and policy?. Science and Public Policy, 1999, 26(5): 341-349

[8] Entman RM. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 1993, 43(4): 51-58

[9] Grimble R, Chan MK. Stakeholder analysis for natural resources management in developing countries. Some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. Natural Resources Forum, 1995, 19(2): 113-124

[10] Hadden S. A Citizen’s right to know: Risk communication and public policy, 1989, Boulder: Westview Press

[11] Horlick-Jones T. Meaning and contextualization in risk assessment. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 1998, 59(2): 79-89

[12] IRGC (International Risk Governance Council). 2005. Risk governance: Towards an integrative approach. White paper No. 1, IRGC, Geneva. http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_WP_No_1_Risk_Governance__reprinted_version_.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2015.

[13] IRGC (International Risk Governance Council). 2007. An introduction to the IRGC risk governance framework. Policy Brief, IRGC, Geneva.

[14] Jones J, Hunter D. Qualitative research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal, 1995, 311(7001): 376-380

[15] Joss S. Danish consensus as a model of participatory technology assessment: An impact study of consensus conferences on Danish parliament and Danish public debate. Science and Public Policy, 1998, 25(1): 2-22.

[16] Kemp R. Forester J. Planning, political hearings, and the politics of discourse. Critical theory and public life, 1985, Cambridge: MIT Press 177-201.

[17] Klinke A, Renn O. Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 2012, 15(3): 273-292

[18] Klinke A, Renn O. Expertise and experience: A deliberative system of a functional division of labor for post-normal risk governance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2014, 27(4): 442-465.

[19] Löftsedt R. Risk management in post trust societies, 2005, London: Palgrave Macmillan

[20] Lynne F, Kartez JD. Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P. The redemption of citizen advisory committees: A perspective from critical theory. Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Evaluating new models for environmental discourse, 1995, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic 87-102

[21] Pahl-Wostl C. Participative and stakeholder-based policy design, analysis and evaluation processes. Integrated Assessment, 2002, 3(1): 3-14

[22] Renn O. Risk governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world, 2008, London: Earthscan

[23] Renn O. The contribution of different types of knowledge towards understanding, sharing and communicating risk concepts. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 2010, 2(2): 177-195

[24] Renn O. Stakeholder involvement in risk governance, 2014, London: Ark Publications

[25] Renn O, Schweizer P. Inclusive risk governance: Concepts and application to environmental policy making. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2009, 19(3): 174-185

[26] Renn O, Klinke A, van Asselt M. Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. AMBIO, 2011, 40(2): 231-246

[27] Renn O, Webler Th, Rakel H, Dienel PC, Johnson B. Public participation in decision making: A three-step-procedure. Policy Sciences, 1993, 26(3): 189-214

[28] Rich A. Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise, 2004, New York: Cambridge University Press

[29] Rowe G, Frewer LJ. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2000, 25(1): 3-29

[30] Sunstein C. Risk and reason, 2002, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[31] Tang SY, Tang C, Wing-hung Lo C. Public participation and environmental impact assessment in mainland China and Taiwan: Political foundations of environmental management. The Journal of Development Studies, 2005, 41(1): 1-32

[32] US EPA/SAB (United States Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board). 2001. Improved science-based environmental stakeholder processes. EPA–SAB–EC–COM–01–006, EPA/SAB, Washington, DC.

[33] van Asselt MBA, Renn O. Risk governance. Risk Research, 2011, 1(4): 431-449

[34] von Winterfeldt D. Kleindorfer PR, Kunreuther HC. Value tree analysis: An introduction and an application to offshore oil drilling. Insuring and managing hazardous risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and beyond, 1987, Berlin: Springer 349-385

[35] Viklund MJ. Trust and risk perception in Western Europe: A cross-national study. Risk Analysis, 2003, 23(5): 727-738

[36] Webler Th, Levine D, Rakel H, Renn O. A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1991, 39(3): 253-263