Impact of Temporal Population Distribution on Earthquake Loss Estimation: A Case Study on Sylhet, Bangladesh
Sharmin Ara
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2014, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 296 -312.
To estimate human loss in an earthquake-prone area, it is necessary to analyze the role played by the spatiotemporal distribution of the area’s resident population. In order to evaluate earthquake impact, this article focuses on the spatiotemporal distribution of population and five scenario earthquakes that form the basis for loss estimation in the city of Sylhet, Bangladesh. Four temporal contexts (weekday, weekly holiday, the 30 days of Ramadan, and strike days) expand the more typical daytime and nighttime settings in which to examine hazard risk. The population distribution for every 2 hour interval in a day is developed for each type of day. A relationship between the occupancy classes and average space (persons per 100 m2) is used to distribute people in each building regardless of building locations. A total daytime and nighttime population is obtained for each building and the estimated nighttime population is used to model the population for four temporal scenarios in a year based on different factors and weights. The resulting data are employed to estimate population loss for each of the temporal and earthquake scenarios. This study used building-specific human vulnerability curves developed by the Central American Probabilistic Risk Assessment (CAPRA) to obtain possible loss of life estimates. The results reveal that there is a high positive correlation between the spatiotemporal distribution of population and the potential number of casualties.
Bangladesh / CAPRA / Distribution modeling / Earthquake loss estimation / Spatiotemporal population distribution / Temporal scenarios
| [1] |
Agrawal, S.K., and C. Ajay. 2004. Estimation of seismic vulnerability of buildings in Delhi. In World Congress on Natural Disaster Mitigations, 12. New Delhi: Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council (BMTPC). |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Ansary, M.A. 2002. Earthquake damage scenario for Sylhet, Bangladesh. In Seventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Boston, Massachusetts, USA. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Ansary, M.A., and M. Sharfuddin. 2000. Earthquake hazard scenario in greater Sylhet region. Paper presented at village infrastructure to cope with the environment conference, November 2000, Dhaka, Bangladesh. |
| [6] |
Applied Technology Council Earthquake damage data for California (ATC-13), 1985, California: Readwood City |
| [7] |
Ara, S. 2013. Analyzing population distribution and its effect on earthquake loss estimation in Sylhet, Bangladesh. Applied Earth Science Faculty of Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) Bangladesh population and housing census 2011: Community report on Sylhet Zila, 2011, Sylhet: Ministry of Planning |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
CAPRA (Central American Probabilistic Risk Assessment). 2012. The probabilistic risk assessment initiative. http://www.ecapra.org/about. Accessed 16 Nov 2014. |
| [13] |
CDMP (Comprehensive Disaster Management Program) Report on earthquake vulnerability assessment of Dhaka, Chittagong and Sylhet City Corporation Area, 2009, Dhaka: Government of Bangladesh |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Chiroiu, L., and G. André. 2001. Damage assessment using high resolution satellite imagery: Application to 2001 Bhuj, India, earthquake. http://preventionweb.net/go/2966. Accessed 16 Nov 2014. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Elnashai, A.S., and J.F. Hajjar. 2006. Mid-America earthquake center program in consequence based seismic risk management. Paper presented at the 100th anniversary earthquake conference: Managing risk in earthquake country, at San Francisco, CA. |
| [23] |
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2003. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology—Earthquake model. In HAZUS-MH MR4: Technical Manual. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security. |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
GEM (Global Earthquake Model). 2012. Open quake. GEM Foundation. http://beta.globalquakemodel.org/. Accessed 8 Jan 2013. |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
HBRI-BSTI (Housing and Building Research Institute and Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution). 1993. Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC), 1993. Dhaka. |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
IDNDR (International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction). 1999. RADIUS-risk assessment tools for diagnosis of urban areas against seismic disasters. UN-IDNDR. http://www.geohaz.org/projects/radius.html. Accessed 30 May 2012. |
| [31] |
Jaiswal, K.S., D.J. Wald, P.S. Earle, K.A. Porter, and M. Hearne. 2011. Earthquake casualty models within the USGS prompt assessment of global earthquakes for response (PAGER) system in human casualties in earthquakes: Progress in modelling and mitigation, ed. R. Spence, E. So, and C. Scawthorn. Dordrecht: Springer. |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)-Bangladesh. 2005. Beyond hartals: Towards democratic dialogue in Bangladesh. Dhaka: United Nations Development Programme. |
| [40] |
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Terminology on disaster risk reduction, 2009, Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |