The Dynamic Knowledge Loop: Inter- and Transdisciplinary Cooperation and Adaptation of Climate Change Knowledge

Maria Hagemeier-Klose , Simone Annerose Beichler , Bart Jan Davidse , Sonja Deppisch

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2014, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 21 -32.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2014, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 21 -32. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-014-0015-4
Article

The Dynamic Knowledge Loop: Inter- and Transdisciplinary Cooperation and Adaptation of Climate Change Knowledge

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The “dynamic knowledge loop” explores processes of knowledge generation, knowledge exchange, and social learning in inter- and transdisciplinary cooperation and relates them to adaptive capacity. Adaptive capacity building can reduce vulnerabilities and enhance the resilience of urban regions towards the impacts of climate change. We use a mix of empirical methods and apply the dynamic knowledge loop as an innovative analytical tool. The added value of inter- and transdisciplinary cooperation concerning knowledge generation and facilitation of social learning is discussed by applying the dynamic knowledge loop to research about a scenario-planning process and a participatory mapping exercise in the urban region of Rostock, Germany. The results demonstrate that the scenario planning process allowed for a consideration of complex interrelations that have the potential for an integration of different influences, perspectives, and knowledge forms. Scenario planning facilitated social learning by creating a platform for integration and exchange of different epistemologies and for considering alternative futures. The participatory mapping exercise demonstrated the scientific value of the integration of local knowledge as well. Building upon these results, we stress the importance of knowledge generation, knowledge exchange, and social learning to build up adaptive capacity through different forms of cooperation between science and practice.

Keywords

Adaptive capacity / Climate change / Interdisciplinary cooperation / Knowledge exchange / Social learning / Transdisciplinary cooperation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Maria Hagemeier-Klose, Simone Annerose Beichler, Bart Jan Davidse, Sonja Deppisch. The Dynamic Knowledge Loop: Inter- and Transdisciplinary Cooperation and Adaptation of Climate Change Knowledge. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2014, 5(1): 21-32 DOI:10.1007/s13753-014-0015-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adger WN. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 2003, 79(4): 387-404 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x

[2]

Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE. Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 717-743.

[3]

Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K. Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance, 2009, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[4]

Albert C, Zimmermann T, Knieling J, von Haaren C. Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe valley biosphere reserve. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 105(4): 347-360 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.024

[5]

Argyris C, Schön D. The learning organization (Die lernende Organisation), 2002 2 Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta

[6]

Armitage D. Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management, 2005, 35(6): 703-715 10.1007/s00267-004-0076-z

[7]

Armitage D. Governance and the Commons in a multi-level world. International Journal of the Commons, 2008, 2(1): 7-32

[8]

Beichler, S.A. 2013. Exploring the use of participatory mapping in indicator development—The case of cultural ecosystem services in an urban region. In Proceedings of the joint workshop indication, integration and application of ecosystem services in decision making. Kiel, 6–8 May 2013.

[9]

Berkes F. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(5): 1-11 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001

[10]

Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, 2003, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[11]

Bläckler F. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organizational Studies, 1995, 16(6): 1021-1046 10.1177/017084069501600605

[12]

Bogner A, Menz W. Bogner A, Littig B, Menz W. The theory-generating expert interview: Cognitive interest, knowledge forms, interaction (Das theoriegenerierende Experteninterview: Erkenntnissinteresse, Wissensformen, Interaktion). Expert interviews: Theories, methods, application fields (Das Experteninterview: Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungsfelder), 2002, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien 33-70.

[13]

Burger P, Kamber R. Cognitive integration in transdisciplinary science: Knowledge as a key notion. Issues in Integrative Studies, 2003, 21: 43-73.

[14]

Ehrlich PR, Wolff G, Daily GC, Hughes JB, Daily S, Daltona M, Goulder L. Knowledge and the environment. Ecological Economics, 1999, 20(2): 267-284 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00130-X

[15]

Endres A. The knowledge society and its relation to informatics (Die Wissensgesellschaft und ihr Bezug zur Informatik). Informatik Spektrum, 2003, 26(3): 195-200.

[16]

Fabricius C, Folke C, Cundill G, Schultz L. Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: A synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society, 2007, 12(1): 29

[17]

Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N, Ndumbaro F, Khamis M. Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments—Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 18: 421-433 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004

[18]

Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I. Qualitative research: A handbook (Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch), 2009, Reinbek: Rowohlt

[19]

Flyvbjerg B. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice, 1998, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

[20]

Flyvbjerg B. Making social science matter, why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again, 2001, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511810503

[21]

Folke C. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 253-267 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002

[22]

Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Synthesis: Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, 2003, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 352-387.

[23]

Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J. Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2005, 30: 441-473 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

[24]

Frommer B. Climate change and resilient society: Utopia or realistic option for German regions. Natural Hazards, 2011, 58(1): 85-101 10.1007/s11069-010-9644-0

[25]

Fry P, Bachmann F, Bose L, Flury M, Förster R, Kläy A, Küffer C, Zingerli C. From implicit know-how to explicit theses: Inter- and transdisciplinary knowledge exchange (Vom impliziten Know-how zu expliziten Thesen: Inter- und transdisziplinärer Wissensaustausch). Gaia: Ökologische Perspektiven für Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft, 2008, 17(3): 318-320.

[26]

Grothmann T, Patt A. Adaptive capacity and human cognition. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15(3): 199-213 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002

[27]

Gunderson L. Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management—Antidotes for spurious certitude?. Conservation Ecology, 1999, 3(1): 7

[28]

Habermas J. The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society, 1984, Boston: Beacon Press

[29]

Habermas J. The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason, 1987, Boston: Beacon Press

[30]

Hagemeier-Klose, M., M. Albers, S. Beichler, B.J. Davidse, S. Deppisch, S. Hasibovic, and M. Richter. 2012. Results of the 3rd scenario workshop (Ergebnisbericht des 3. Szenario-Workshops). https://www.hcu-hamburg.de/research/forschungsprojekte/planbaltic/informationsmaterial/. Accessed 4 March 2014.

[31]

Hanger S, Pfenninger S, Dreyfus M, Patt A. Knowledge and information needs of adaptation policy-makers: A European study. Regional Environmental Change, 2012, 13(1): 91-101 10.1007/s10113-012-0317-2

[32]

Hargrove R. Masterful coaching, revised edition, 2002, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, Wiley

[33]

Hutton CW, Kienberger S, Johnson FA, Allan A, Giannini V, Allen R. Vulnerability to climate change: People, places and exposure to hazard. Advances in Science and Research, 2011, 7: 37-45 10.5194/asr-7-37-2011

[34]

Häberli R, Bill A, Klein JT, Scholz R, Welti M. Klein JT, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz R, Welti M. Synthesis. Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem-solving among science, technology, and society—An effective way for managing complexity, 2001, Basel: Birkhäuser 6-21 10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8_2

[35]

Irwin A, Dale A, Smith D. Irwin A, Wynne B. Science and hell’s kitchen: The local understanding of hazard issues. Misunderstanding science?, 1996, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 47-64 10.1017/CBO9780511563737.003

[36]

Jiggings J, Van Slobbe E, Röling N. The organisation of social learning in response to perceptions of crisis in the water sector of the Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 2007, 10(6): 526-536 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.006

[37]

Klein JT, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M. Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society—An effective way for managing complexity, 2001, Basel: Birkhäuser 10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8

[38]

Lebel L., Anderies J.H., Campbell B., Folke C., Hatfield-Dodds S., Hughes T.P., Wilson J.. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11: 19

[39]

Mayring P. Introduction to qualitative social research (Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung), 2002 5 Weinheim: Beltz Studium

[40]

McCrum G, Blackstock K, Matthews K, Rivington M, Miller D, Buchan K. Adapting to climate change in land management: The role of deliberative workshops in enhancing social learning. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2009, 19(6): 413-426 10.1002/eet.525

[41]

Meuser M, Nagel U. Garz D, Kraimer K. Expert interviews—Tried on numerous occasions, seldom heeded: An article on the qualitative method discussion (ExpertInneninterviews—vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht: Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion). Qualitative empirical social research: Concepts, methods, analyses (Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung: Konzepte, Methoden, Analysen), 1991, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag 441-471.

[42]

Mittelstraß J. Mittelstraß J. Keyword transdisciplinarity (Stichwort Transdisziplinarität). Encyclopedia philosophy and theory of science (Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie), 2004, Stuttgart: Metzler

[43]

Mobjörk M. Consulting versus participators transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures, 2010, 42(8): 866-873 10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003

[44]

Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, 1995, New York: Oxford University Press

[45]

O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Naess LO. Questioning complacency: Climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio, 2006, 35(2): 50-56 10.1579/0044-7447(2006)35[50:QCCCIV]2.0.CO;2

[46]

Pahl-Wostl C. Towards sustainability in the water sector: The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquatic Sciences, 2002, 64(4): 394-411 10.1007/PL00012594

[47]

Pahl-Wostl C.. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 10

[48]

Pahl-Wostl C. A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 2009, 19(3): 354-365 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

[49]

Pahl-Wostl, C., M. Craps, A. Dewulf, E. Mostert, D. Tabara, and T. Taillieu. 2007. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12 (2): Article 5.

[50]

Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research, 2007, Munich: Oekom Verlag

[51]

Reed MS. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(10): 2417-2431 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014

[52]

Reed MS, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B What is social learning?. Ecology and Society, 2010, 15(4): r1

[53]

Reid WV, Mooney HA, Cropper A. Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being—synthesis report, 2005, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute

[54]

Roux DJ, Rogers KH, Biggs HC, Ahston PJ, Sergeant A. Bridging the science-management divide: Moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 4

[55]

Sanchez-Rodriguez R. Learning to adapt to climate change in urban areas: A review of recent contributions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2009, 1(2): 201-206 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.005

[56]

Schreyögg G. Organizational change and organizational learning. Double course. Tutorial note for unit “Organization IV” (Organisationaler Wandel und organisationales Lernen. Doppelkurseinheit. Lehrbrief für Kurseinheit “Organisation IV”), 2002, Hagen: FernUniversität in Hagen

[57]

Simon HA. Models of man: Social and rational; mathematical essays on rational human behavior in society setting, 1957, New York: Wiley

[58]

Simon HA. Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P. Bounded rationality. The New Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, 1987 1 London: Palgrave Macmillan 266-268.

[59]

Smit B, Wandel J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 282-292 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008

[60]

Smit B, Pilifosova O, Burton I, Challenger B, Huq S, Klein RJT, Yohe G. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS. Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 877-912.

[61]

van Herk S, Zevenbergen C, Ashley R, Rijke J. Learning and action alliances for the integration of flood risk management into urban planning: A new framework from empirical evidence from The Netherlands. Environmental Science and Policy, 2011, 14(5): 543-554 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006

[62]

Walker B., Carpenter S., Anderies J., Abel N., Cumming G.S., Janssen M., Lebel L., Norberg J. Resilience management in social–ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 2002, 6: 14

[63]

Weber EU. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 2006, 77(1–2): 103-120 10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3

[64]

White GF, Kates R, Burton I. Knowing better and loosing even more: The use of knowledge in hazards management. Environmental Hazards, 2001, 3(3–4): 81-92.

[65]

Zierhofer W, Burger P. Disentangling transdisciplinarity: An analysis of knowledge integration in problem-oriented research. Science Studies, 2005, 20(1): 51-74.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

149

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/