Loss and Damage as an Alternative to Resilience and Vulnerability? Preliminary Reflections on an Emerging Climate Change Adaptation Discourse
Alexander Fekete , Patrick Sakdapolrak
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2014, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 88 -93.
Loss and Damage as an Alternative to Resilience and Vulnerability? Preliminary Reflections on an Emerging Climate Change Adaptation Discourse
One relatively novel way of assessing the characteristics and limitations of resilience and vulnerability (R&V) is undertaken in this article by investigating a growing alternative paradigm—loss and damage (L&D) policy. The idea of L&D as an emerging policy may be surprising to many in the disaster risk management community, and so we first outline the origins of this trend, and then explore the potential benefits and pitfalls of adopting it. This short article represents our preliminary opinions and observations regarding this reintroduction of a long-established concept. We also present results from a very brief peer-group survey on some of the first immediate reactions towards L&D policy. At this early stage, this article cannot offer a full-fledged analysis, but our reflections may serve as a starting point to encourage further discussion.
Climate change adaptation / Loss and damage / Resilience / Vulnerability
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Fekete, A., G. Hufschmidt, and S. Kruse. 2014. Benefits and challenges of resilience and vulnerability for disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 5(1). doi:10.1007/s13753-014-0008-3. |
| [3] |
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1996. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): SLG 101, Guide for all-hazard emergency operations planning. Washington, DC. |
| [4] |
Gunderson, L.H., and C.S. Holling. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press. |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Oliver-Smith, A., S. Cutter, K. Warner, K. Corendea, and C. Yuzva. 2013. Addressing loss and damage in the context of social vulnerability and resilience. Policy Brief 7. Bonn: United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS). |
| [10] |
Roberts, E. 2012. Loss and damage in vulnerable countries initiative: Bangladesh leading the way on loss and damage. http://www.loss-and-damage.net/download/6491.pdf. |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Making cities resilient report 2012, 2012, Geneva: UNISDR |
| [13] |
U.S. Government. 1996. The President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP), Executive Order 13010. Washington, DC. |
| [14] |
U.S. NRC (National Research Council) Disaster resilience: A national imperative, 2012, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press |
| [15] |
Warner, K., K. van der Geest, S. Kreft, S. Huq, S. Harmeling, K. Kusters, and A. de Sherbinin. 2012. Evidence from the frontlines of climate change: Loss and damage to communities despite coping and adaptation. Loss and damage in vulnerable countries initiative. Report No. 9. Bonn: United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS). http://www.loss-and-damage.net/4820. |
| [16] |
Warner, K., and S.A. Zakieldeen. 2012. Loss and damage due to climate change. An overview of the UNFCCC negotiations. European Capacity Building Initiative Background Papers. http://www.eurocapacity.org/downloads/LossandDamage.pdf. |
| [17] |
Wrathall, D., A. Oliver-Smith, A. Fekete, E. Gencer, M. Lepana, and P. Sakdapolrak. Accepted. Problematizing loss and damage. International Journal of Global Warming. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |