Loss and Damage as an Alternative to Resilience and Vulnerability? Preliminary Reflections on an Emerging Climate Change Adaptation Discourse

Alexander Fekete , Patrick Sakdapolrak

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2014, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 88 -93.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2014, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 88 -93. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-014-0012-7
Short Article

Loss and Damage as an Alternative to Resilience and Vulnerability? Preliminary Reflections on an Emerging Climate Change Adaptation Discourse

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

One relatively novel way of assessing the characteristics and limitations of resilience and vulnerability (R&V) is undertaken in this article by investigating a growing alternative paradigm—loss and damage (L&D) policy. The idea of L&D as an emerging policy may be surprising to many in the disaster risk management community, and so we first outline the origins of this trend, and then explore the potential benefits and pitfalls of adopting it. This short article represents our preliminary opinions and observations regarding this reintroduction of a long-established concept. We also present results from a very brief peer-group survey on some of the first immediate reactions towards L&D policy. At this early stage, this article cannot offer a full-fledged analysis, but our reflections may serve as a starting point to encourage further discussion.

Keywords

Climate change adaptation / Loss and damage / Resilience / Vulnerability

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Alexander Fekete, Patrick Sakdapolrak. Loss and Damage as an Alternative to Resilience and Vulnerability? Preliminary Reflections on an Emerging Climate Change Adaptation Discourse. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2014, 5(1): 88-93 DOI:10.1007/s13753-014-0012-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Edwards C. Resilient nation, 2009, London: Demos

[2]

Fekete, A., G. Hufschmidt, and S. Kruse. 2014. Benefits and challenges of resilience and vulnerability for disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 5(1). doi:10.1007/s13753-014-0008-3.

[3]

FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1996. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): SLG 101, Guide for all-hazard emergency operations planning. Washington, DC.

[4]

Gunderson, L.H., and C.S. Holling. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

[5]

Keck M, Sakdapolrak P. What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde, 2013, 67(1): 5-19 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.02

[6]

Koski C.. Committed to protection? Partnerships in critical infrastructure protection. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2011, 8(1): 1-18.

[7]

Murphy BL. Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management. Natural Hazards, 2007, 41(2): 297-315 10.1007/s11069-006-9037-6

[8]

O’Keefe P, Westgate K, Wisner B. Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 1976, 260(5552): 566-567 10.1038/260566a0

[9]

Oliver-Smith, A., S. Cutter, K. Warner, K. Corendea, and C. Yuzva. 2013. Addressing loss and damage in the context of social vulnerability and resilience. Policy Brief 7. Bonn: United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS).

[10]

Roberts, E. 2012. Loss and damage in vulnerable countries initiative: Bangladesh leading the way on loss and damage. http://www.loss-and-damage.net/download/6491.pdf.

[11]

Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100(14): 8074-8079 10.1073/pnas.1231335100

[12]

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) Making cities resilient report 2012, 2012, Geneva: UNISDR

[13]

U.S. Government. 1996. The President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP), Executive Order 13010. Washington, DC.

[14]

U.S. NRC (National Research Council) Disaster resilience: A national imperative, 2012, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

[15]

Warner, K., K. van der Geest, S. Kreft, S. Huq, S. Harmeling, K. Kusters, and A. de Sherbinin. 2012. Evidence from the frontlines of climate change: Loss and damage to communities despite coping and adaptation. Loss and damage in vulnerable countries initiative. Report No. 9. Bonn: United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS). http://www.loss-and-damage.net/4820.

[16]

Warner, K., and S.A. Zakieldeen. 2012. Loss and damage due to climate change. An overview of the UNFCCC negotiations. European Capacity Building Initiative Background Papers. http://www.eurocapacity.org/downloads/LossandDamage.pdf.

[17]

Wrathall, D., A. Oliver-Smith, A. Fekete, E. Gencer, M. Lepana, and P. Sakdapolrak. Accepted. Problematizing loss and damage. International Journal of Global Warming.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

134

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/