Community disaster management assets: A case study of the farm community in Sussex County, Delaware
Yvonne Rademacher
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2013, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 33 -47.
While government mandates and programs continue to expand to meet the increasing challenges of disaster management, there is growing recognition that government cannot do it all alone. This has led to a quest to better understand local capacities, through partnerships with the private sector and volunteer organizations but also in relation to individual citizens. The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) recent Whole Community initiative constitutes a policy shift towards more local engagement and responsibility. However, before devising strategies to better engage and support various actors, the nature of their disaster management resources needs to be more clearly understood. What disaster management resources do communities supply? This case study examined the assets of one community group, the farm community in Sussex County, Delaware. The conceptual framework was based on a community asset approach, which currently recognizes eight types of community capital and is comprised of active, inactive, positive, and negative resources. The study found a striking discrepancy between actually used and perceived community resources. Farm community resources were primarily used for implementation activities during disaster preparedness. The types of resources used fell into three broad categories: equipment/supplies; experience/lessons learned; and access to other community and professional networks. The findings highlighted the use of four community capitals—human, social, physical, financial—and the existence of active, inactive, negative, and positive resources. Tools currently employed to register community resources, such as the National Incident Management System (NIMS) resource inventory management for rural communities, are designed for professional emergency services but do not recognize the full range of potentially relevant community assets.
community assets / Delaware / disaster management resources / FEMA / NIMS
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Board on Natural Disasters. National Research Council. Mitigation Emerges as Major Strategy for Reducing Losses Caused by Natural Disasters. Science, 1999, 284(5422): 1943-1947 10.1126/science.284.5422.1943 |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
DHS Department of Homeland Security. Office of the Inspector General. Improvement Needed in Federal Emergency Management Agency Monitoring of Grantees, 2009, Washington, DC: Office of Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security |
| [9] |
Homeland Security Affairs, 2006, 2(2): |
| [10] |
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency. MGT 339: Resource Inventory Management for Rural Communities — Non— Procedure Participant Guide, 2010 |
| [11] |
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency. A Whole Community Approach to Emergency Management: Principles, Themes, and Pathways for Action, 2011, Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Sussex County Emergency Operations Center. Sussex County Emergency Operations Plan, 2004, Delaware: Sussex County |
| [26] |
Sussex County Emergency Operations Center. 2010 Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazard Mitigation Plan Update, 2010, Delaware: Sussex County |
| [27] |
UN United Nations. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, 2011, Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction |
| [28] |
U.S. Census Bureau. State & County Quickfacts: Sussex County, D.E., 2010 |
| [29] |
USDA United States Department of Agriculture. 2007 Census of Agriculture, 2009 |
| [30] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |