A reduced-form rapid economic consequence estimating model: Application to property damage from U.S. earthquakes

Abstract

Modeling the economic consequences of disasters has reached a high level of maturity and accuracy in recent years. Methods for providing reasonably accurate rapid estimates of economic losses, however, are still limited. This article presents the case for “reduced-form” models for rapid economic consequence estimation for disasters, and specifies and statistically estimates a regression equation for property damage from significant U.S. earthquakes. Explanatory variables are of two categories: (1) hazard-related variables pertaining to earthquake characteristics; and (2) exposure-related variables pertaining to socioeconomic conditions. Comparisons to other available earthquake damage estimates indicate that our Reduced-Form Model yields reasonably good results, including several statistically significant variables that are consistent with a priori hypotheses. The article concludes with a discussion of how the research can be enhanced through the collection of data on additional variables, and of the potential for the extension of the reduced-form modeling approach to other hazard types.

Keywords

earthquakes / natural hazard loss estimation / property damage / rapid estimation / reduced-form modeling / United States

References

[1] BEA U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Regional Economic Accounts, 2012

[2] Chan L S, Chen Y, Chen Q, Chen L, Liu J, Dong W, Shah H. Assessment of Global Seismic Loss Based on Macroeconomic Indicators. Natural Hazards, 1998, 17(3): 269-283 10.1023/A:1008060510137

[3] Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2010, 7(1):

[4] ECLAC Economic Commission for Latin Americathe Caribbean. Handbook for Estimating the Socio—Economic and Environmental Effects of Disasters, 2003

[5] Erdik M, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu M B, Hancilar U, Zulfikar C. Rapid Earthquake Loss Assessment after Damaging Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(2): 247-266 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.03.009

[6] ESRI. ArcGIS Software Program, 2010

[7] FEMA U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency. HAZUS Website, 2012

[8] GEM GEM Foundation. OpenQuake Book, 2011

[9] Giesecke J, Burns W, Barrett A, Bayrak E, Rose A, Slovic P, Suher M. Assessment of the Regional Economic Impacts of Catastrophic Events: A CGE Analysis of Resource Loss and Behavioral Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Attack Scenario. Risk Analysis, 2012, 32(4): 583-600 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01567.x

[10] Huyck C K, Chung H-C, Cho S, Mio M Z, Ghosh S, Eguchi R T, Mehrotra S. Diaz A A, Wu H F, Doctor S R, Bar-Cohen Y. Centralized Web-Based Loss Estimation Tool: INLET for Disaster Response. INLET for Disaster Response. Nonintrusive Inspection, Structures Monitoring, and Smart Systems for Homeland Security, 2006

[11] Jaiswal K S, Wald D J. Rapid Estimation of the Economic Consequences of Global Earthquakes, 2011

[12] Knittle A. Virginia Quake’s Aftermath Helps Officials in Oklahoma. The Oklahoman, 2011

[13] Loayza N V, Olaberria E, Rigolini J, Christiaensen L. Natural Disasters and Growth: Going Beyond the Averages. World Development, 2012, 40(7): 1317-1336 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.002

[14] MathWorks, Inc. Matlab Software Program, 2011

[15] Morello C, Wiggins O. Region Tallies Earthquake Damage, Mostly Uninsured. Washington Post, 2011

[16] NGDC National Geophysical Data Center. Significant Earthquake Database, 2011

[17] NHC U.S. National Hurricane Center. Latitude/Longitude Distance Calculator, 2010

[18] NRC National Research Council. National Earthquake Resilience: Research, Implementation and Outreach, 2009, Washington, DC: National Academy Press

[19] Rose A. Okuyama Y, Chang S. Economic Principles, Issues, and Research Priorities in Natural Hazard Loss Estimation. Natural Hazard Loss Estimation. Modeling the Spatial Economic Impacts of Natural Hazards, 2004, Heidelberg: Springer 13-36

[20] Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2009, 6(1):

[21] Rose A. Smith V K, Mansfield C. Macroeconomic Consequences of Terrorist Attacks: Estimation for the Analysis of Policies and Rules. Estimation for the Analysis of Policies and Rules. Benefit Transfer for the Analysis of DHS Policies and Rules, 2013, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Company

[22] Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, 2010, 16(1):

[23] Rose A, Wei D, Wein A. Economic Impacts of the ShakeOut Scenario. Earthquake Spectra: Special Issue on the ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario, 2011, 27(2): 539-557 10.1193/1.3587204

[24] Schumacher I, Strobl E. Economic Development and Losses Due to Natural Disasters: The Role of Hazard Exposure. Ecological Economics, 2011, 72: 97-105 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.002

[25] SSHELDUS (Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United States, Version 9.0). 2011. Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute, University of South Carolina. http://webra.cas.sc.edu/hvri/products/sheldus.aspx.

[26] Stover C W, Coffman J L. Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (revised), 1993, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

[27] Stover F. Governor Estimates Earthquake Damages May Exceed $43 Million. Humboldt Beacon, 2010

[28] Sue Wing I, Rose A, Wein A Porter K, Wein A, Alpers C, Baez A, Barnard P, Corsi J C A, Costner J, Cox D, Das T, Dettinger M, Done J, Eymann C E M, Ferris J, Gunturi P, Hughes M, Jarrett R, Le-Griffin L J H D, Mitchell D, Morman S, Neiman P, Perry A O S, Plumlee G, Ralph M, Reynolds D, Rose A Economic Impacts of the ARkStorm Scenario. ARkStorm Scenario. Overview of the ARkStorm Scenario, 2010

[29] U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2010

[30] U.S. Census Bureau. Centers of Population for the 2010 Census, 2012

[31] U.S. Census Bureau. State and County QuickFacts, 2012

[32] USGS U.S. Geological Survey. PAGER — Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response, 2012

[33] USGS U.S. Geological Survey. ShakeMaps, 2012