Fukushima fallout: Gauging the change in Japanese nuclear energy policy
Elena Shadrina
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2012, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 69 -83.
Fukushima fallout: Gauging the change in Japanese nuclear energy policy
The Fukushima nuclear disaster is a special case: a major twin natural disaster (earthquake and tsunami) incited a large-scale technological disaster, which resulted in a serious nuclear accident. Because the various costs are so tremendous, this triple disaster has had a pervasive impact on all aspects of life in Japan. This article describes nuclear energy policy transformation in the aftermath of the Fukushim a disaster. The study draws on theoretical propositions of governance and disaster risk governance, and demonstrates that a vested interest perspective is important to understanding the results of Japan’s energy policy before Fukushima. Safety, democracy, and openness were the fundamental principles of Japan’s nuclear energy policy when the country decided to diversify its energy sources in the 1950s. But these basic premises were undermined by the vested interests that controlled policy administration and implementation as the nuclear energy industry developed. Analysis of Japan’s recent nuclear energy policy transformation covers such dimensions as policy targets, policy issues such as safety, the fuel cycle, waste disposal, administrative structure, public awareness, and national and local policy considerations. The study identifies process deficiencies in Japan’s post-Fukushima nuclear energy policy transformation and evaluates possible ways to eliminate defects through administrative reorganization and independent safety oversight.
Japan / nuclear energy policy / nuclear safety / vested interest structure
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Aoki, M., and G. Rothwell. 2011. Coordination under Large Uncertainty: An Analysis of the Fukushima Catastrophe. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1940207. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Cabinet Secretariat. 2011. Recommendation from Advisory Committee for Prevention of Nuclear Accident. http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/genpatsujiko/info/teigen/recommendation.pdf. |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
DeWit, A. 2011a. Fallout From the Fukushima Shock: Japan’s Emerging Energy Policy. The Asia-Pacific Journal 9(45): No. 5. |
| [7] |
—. 2011b. Japan’s Nuclear Village Wages War on Renewable Energy and the Feed-in Tariff. The Asia-Pacific Journal. 08 December 2011. http://www.japanfocus.org/events/view/119. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2012. IAEA Mission to Review NISA’s Approach to the “Comprehensive Assessments for the Safety of Existing Power Reactor Facilities” Preliminary Summary. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fukushima/pre_report310112.pdf. |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
Ishibashi, K. 2007. Why Worry? Japan’s Nuclear Plants at Grave Risk from Quake Damage. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. 11 August 2007. http://www.japanfocus.org/-Ishibashi-Katsuhiko/2495. |
| [16] |
JAEC (Japan Atomic Energy Commission). 2009. White Paper on Energy (Enerugii hakusho). http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/about/hakusho/hakusho2009/index.htm (in Japanese). |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
JAIF (Japan Atomic Industrial Forum). 2012. Japanese Political Parties Begin Debate on New Nuclear Power Regulatory Organization in Lower House. http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1338802034P.pdf. |
| [19] |
Japan Energy Economics Institute. 2012. Japan Energy Brief No. 17, January 2012. http://eneken.ieej.or.jp/en/jeb/1201.pdf. |
| [20] |
The Japan Times. 2012a. Nuclear Watchdog Autonomy. 14 May 2012. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/eo20120514a1.html. |
| [21] |
—. 2012b. Kansai Governors: Oi Reactors Restart is State’s Call. 31 May 2012. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20120531a3.html. |
| [22] |
—. 2012c. Policy of Recycling All Spent Nuclear Fuel May Be Axed. 23 June 2012. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20120623a3.html. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Kanashima, H. 2012. Government Shows Plan for 15% Power Cut in Kansai. The Yomiuri Shimbun. 16 May 2012. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-290494921/govt-shows-plan-15.html. |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Kiyonaga, Y., and Y. Saito. 2012. Noda Shows Unyielding Stance on N-Reactors. The Yomiuri Shimbun. 10 June 2012. http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T120609003006.htm. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Legewie, J. 2012. For Better or Worse, Japan Might Remain Nuclear-Free Forever. The Japan Times. 21 May 2012. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nb20120521ve.html. |
| [30] |
Lesbirel, H. S. 1990. Implementing Nuclear Energy Policy in Japan. Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives. Energy Policy 1990 (April): 267–281. |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Matsuo, Y., Y. Nagatomi, and T. Murakami. 2011. Thermal and Nuclear Generations Cost Estimates Using Corporate Financial Statements. Japan Energy Economics Institute. http://eneken.ieej.or.jp/data/4103.pdf. |
| [35] |
METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry). 2008. Cool Earth-Innovative Energy Technology Program. March 2008. http://www.meti.go.jp/english/newtopics/data/pdf/031320CoolEarth.pdf. |
| [36] |
—. 2011. White Paper on Energy (Enerugii hakusho). http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/topics/hakusho/2011/index.htm (in Japanese). |
| [37] |
—. 2012. Reform of Japan’s Nuclear Safety Regulation. http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/genpatsujiko/info/kokusaiws/siryo/reform_of_regulation.pdf. |
| [38] |
Minoura, K., and S. Nakaya. 1991. Traces of Tsunami Preserved in Inter-Tidal Lacustrine and Marsh Deposits: Some Examples from Northeast Japan. Journal of Geology 99(2). http://www.jstor.org/pss/30081120. |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
Morita, Y. 2011. Japan’s Issues and Concerns on Energy Supply and Demand after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Report. Japan Institute of Energy Economics. http://www.pecj.or.jp/japanese/overseas/conference/pdf/conference08-07.pdf. |
| [42] |
Nagata, K. 2012. Further Restarts Hinge on New Watchdog. The Japan Times. 17 June 2012. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20120617b4.html. |
| [43] |
The National Government Organization Law. Law No. 120. 1948. http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/constitution_and_government/the_national_goverment_low.html. |
| [44] |
National Policy Unit. 2011. Strategy for Rebirth of Japan. http://www.%20npu.go.jp/policy/pdf/20120127/20120127_en1.pdf. |
| [45] |
NISA (Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency). 2011. Comprehensive Assessments for the Safety of Existing Power Reactor Facilities. http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/press/2011/08/en20110831-2-1.pdf. |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Nuclear Safety Commission. 1955. Atomic Energy Basic Act. Act No. 186. http://www.nsc.go.jp/NSCenglish/documents/laws/1.pdf. |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
Onitsuka, H. 2012. Hooked on Nuclear Power: Japanese State-Local Relations and the Vicious Cycle of Nuclear Dependence. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. http://www.japanfocus.org/-Hiroshi-Onitsuka/3676#. |
| [50] |
Pew Research Center. 2012. Disaster Weakened Nation. http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/06/05/japanese-wary-of-nuclear-energy/. |
| [51] |
Podvig, P. 2012. Japanese Mislead About Spent Fuel Reprocessing Costs. IPFM Blog. http://fissilematerials.org/blog/2012/01/japanese_mislead_about_sp.html. |
| [52] |
Prime Minister and His Cabinet. 2012. Press Conference by Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, 8 June 2012. http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/noda/statement/201206/08kaiken_e.html. |
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
Toki, M. 2012. Fukushima’s Impact on Japan’s Nuclear Fuel Cycle Policy. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. http://wmdjunction.com/120309_fukushima_japan_nuclear.htm. |
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
The Yomiuri Shimbun. 2011. Nuclear Crisis: How it Happened. “Nuclear Power Village” a Cozy, Closed Community. 16 June 2011. http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110615005652.htm. |
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |