Understanding risk governance: Introducing sociological neoinstitutionalism and foucauldian governmentality for further theorizing

Abstract

This article traces the career of risk across prominent theoretical approaches by highlighting their key assumptions and premises, specifically the technical approach found in the physical sciences, and economics, psychology, and sociology in the social sciences. In each discipline, the strengths and limitations of each theoretical approach are pointed out. The discussion focuses on sociology in particular because other approaches—in treating risks as dominantly technical, psychological, or economic phenomena—tend to downplay the broader historical and socio-political context that impinges on risk construction and production, and its differential impact across society. This exploration points out that institutions play an important role in creating, managing, and distributing risks in society. After highlighting the integrated risk governance framework as a nascent practice-oriented framework, the framework is examined theoretically using sociological neoinstitutionalism and Foucault’s concept of governmentality. The conclusion elaborates the challenges of using these two bodies of knowledge to study risk governance of extreme events. Although Foucault’s concept of governmentality corrects neoinstitutional theory’s ambivalence toward power, more work needs to be done in order to reconcile their divergent intellectual commitments.

Keywords

governmentality / risk / risk governance / sociological neoinstitutionalism

References

[1] Archibald M. E.. Between Isomorphism and Market Partitioning: How Organizational Competencies and Resources Foster Cultural and Sociocultural Legitimacy, and Promote Organizational Survival. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Legitimacy Processes in Organizations, 2004, 22: 171-211 10.1016/S0733-558X(04)22006-7

[2] Baldi, B. 1995. Institutional Change versus Institutional Persistence? The Transformation of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission since Three Mile Island. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center Preliminary Paper 236.

[3] Beck U.. World Risk Society, 1999, Cambridge: Polity Press

[4] Berger P. L., Luckmann T. [.. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, 1966, New York: Penguin Books

[5] Bernstein P. L.. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk, 1996, New York: John Wiley & Sons

[6] Blaikie P., Cannon T., Wisner B.. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters, 2001, New York: Routledge

[7] Bradbury J. A.. The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1989, 14(4): 380-99 10.1177/016224398901400404

[8] Christensen S., Molin J.. Scott W. R., Christensen S.. Origin and Transformation of Organizations: Institutional Analysis of the Danish Red Cross. The Institutional Construction of Organizations, 1995, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 67-90.

[9] Clarke L.. Explaining Choices among Technological Risks. Social Problems, 1988, 35(1): 22-35 10.1525/sp.1988.35.1.03a00020

[10] Clarke L., Short J. F. J.. Social Organization and Risk: Some Current Controversies. Annual Review of Sociology, 1993, 19(1): 375-99 10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.002111

[11] Cooper D. J., Ezzamel M., Willmott H.. Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K., Suddaby R.. Examining “Institutionalism”: A Critical Theoretic Perspective. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2008, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 673-701

[12] Daft R. L., Weick K. E.. Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 284-95.

[13] Dean M.. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2010 2nd ed Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

[14] Deephouse D. L.. Does Isomorphism Legitimate?. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(4): 1024-39 10.2307/256722

[15] Deephouse D. L., Suchman M.. Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K., Suddaby R.. Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2004, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 49-77.

[16] Deuchars R.. Towards the Global Social: Sociological Reflections on Governance and Risk in the Context of the Current Financial Crisis. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2010, 23(1): 107-125 10.1080/09557570903433662

[17] DiMaggio P. J.. Zucker L. G.. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, 1988, Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company 3-21.

[18] DiMaggio P. J.. Smelser N. J., Swedberg R.. Culture and Economy. The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 1994, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 27-57.

[19] DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W.. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147-60 10.2307/2095101

[20] DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W.. Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J.. Introduction. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 1991, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1-38.

[21] Douglas M.. Risk as a Forensic Resource. Daedalus, 1990, 119(4): 1-16.

[22] Douglas M., Wildavsky A.. Risk and Culture, 1982, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press

[23] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 2003. Final Report on Price Manipulation in Western Markets (March 2003): Summary of Findings.

[24] Feinstein J.. Auerswald P. E., Branscomb L. M., La Porte T. M., Michel-Kerjan E. O.. Managing Reliability in Electric Power Companies. Seeds of Disasters, Roots of Response: How Private Action Can Reduce Public Vulnerability, 2006, New York: Cambridge University Press 164-83 10.1017/CBO9780511509735.014

[25] Fischhoff B.. Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process. Risk Analysis, 1995, 15(2): 137-45 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x

[26] Foucault M. [.. Discipline and Punish, 1995 2nd ed New York: Vintage Books

[27] Foucault M. [1977].. Senellart M.. 8 February 1978. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78, 2007, New York: Palgrave Macmillan 115-34 10.1057/9780230245075

[28] Freudenburg W. R.. Nothing Recedes Like Success? Risk Analysis and the Organizational Amplification of Risks. Risk, 1992, 3(1): 1-35.

[29] Freudenburg W. R.. Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions. Social Forces, 1993, 71(4): 909-32

[30] Freudenburg W. R., Gramling R., Laska S., Erikson K. T.. Katrina: Unlearned Lessons. World Watch, 2007, 20(5): 14-19.

[31] Friedland R., Alford R. R.. Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J.. Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 1991, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 232-63.

[32] Gordon C.. Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P.. Governmental Rationality: An introduction. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, 1991, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[33] Hansson S. O.. Risk: Objective or Subjective, Facts or Values. Journal of Risk Research, 2010, 13(2): 231-38 10.1080/13669870903126226

[34] Hutter B. M.. Taylor-Gooby P., Zinn J. O.. Risk, Regulation, and Management. Risk in Social Science, 2006, New York: Oxford University Press 202-27.

[35] Jaeger C. C., Renn O., Rosa E. A., Webler T.. Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action, 2001, London: Earthscan

[36] Jasanoff S.. American Exceptionalism and the Political Acknowledgment of Risk. Daedalus, 1990, 119(4): 61-81.

[37] Jasanoff S.. Lakoff A.. Beyond Calculation: A Democratic Response to Risk. Disaster and the Politics of Intervention, 2010, New York: Columbia University Press 14-40.

[38] Jepperson, R. L. 2002. The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism. In New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by J. Berger and M. Zelditch Jr., 229–66.

[39] Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

[40] Jepperson R. L., Meyer J. W.. Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J.. The Public Order and the Construction of Formal Organizations. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 1991, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 204-31.

[41] Kahneman D., Lovallo D.. Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk-Taking. Management Science, 1993, 39(1): 17-31 10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17

[42] Kasperson R. E.. Krimsky S., Golding D.. The Social Amplification of Risk: Progress in Developing an Integrative Framework. Social Theories of Risk, 1992, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers 153-78.

[43] Kasperson R. E., Ortwin R., Slovic P., Brown H. S., Emel J., Goble R., Kasperson J. X., Ratick S.. The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis, 1988, 8(2): 177-87 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x

[44] Latour B.. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, 1987, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

[45] Latour B., Woolgar S.. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, 1979, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

[46] Leblebici H., Salancik G. R., Copay A., King T.. Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, 36(3): 333-63 10.2307/2393200

[47] Lemke T.. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Remaking Marxism, 2002, 14(3): 49-64 10.1080/089356902101242288

[48] Luhmann N.. Risk: A Sociological Theory, 1993, New York: Aldine de Gruyter 10.1515/9783110870343

[49] Manning P. K.. Managing Risk: Managing Uncertainty in the British Nuclear Installations Inspectorate. Law and Policy, 1989, 11(3): 350-69

[50] Masuda J. R., Garvin T.. Place, Culture, and the Social Amplification of Risk. Risk Analysis, 2006, 26(2): 437-54 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00749.x

[51] Meyer J. W.. Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K., Suddaby R.. Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2008, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 790-812

[52] Meyer J. W., Rowan B.. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83(2): 340-63 10.1086/226550

[53] Meyer J. W., Scott W. R.. Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, 1983, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

[54] Mohr J. W., Friedland R.. Theorizing the Institution: Foundation, Duality, and Data. Theory and Society, 2008, 37: 421-26 10.1007/s11186-008-9071-3

[55] North D. C.. Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(3): 358-68.

[56] Nye J. S., Donahue J. D.. Governance in a Globalizing World, 2000, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press

[57] O’Neill K. M., Calia J. M., Chess C., Clarke L.. Miscommunication during the Anthrax Attacks: How Events Reveal Organizational Failures. Human Ecology Review, 2007, 14(2): 119-29.

[58] Oliver C.. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(1): 145-79.

[59] Onishi, N., and K. Belson. 2011. Culture of Complicity Tied to Stricken Nuclear Plant. The New York Times, April 26, 2011, New York edition, A1.

[60] Otway H., Thomas K.. Reflections on Risk Perception and Policy. Risk Analysis, 1982, 2(2): 69-82 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01368.x

[61] Perrow C.. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, 1984, New York: Basic Books

[62] Perrow C.. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 1986 3rd ed New York: Newbery Award Records

[63] Perrow C.. The Next Catastrophe: Reducing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Attacks, 2011, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

[64] Pidgeon N., Kasperson R. E., Slovic P.. The Social Amplification of Risk, 2003, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511550461

[65] Pinch T. J., Bijker W. E.. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 1984, 14(3): 399-441 10.1177/030631284014003004

[66] Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J.. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 1991, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[67] Power M.. Foucault and Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 2011, 37: 35-56 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150133

[68] Quarantelli E. L.. Perry R. W., Quarantelli E. L.. A Social Science Research Agenda for the Disasters of the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Issues and Their Professional Implementation. What Is a Disaster?: New Answers to Old Questions, 2005, Philadelphia: Xlibris 325-96.

[69] Renn O.. Krimsky S., Golding D.. Concepts of Risks: A Classification. Social Theories of Risk, 1992, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers 53-79.

[70] Renn O.. Three Decades of Risk Research. Journal of Risk Research, 1998, 1(1): 49-71 10.1080/136698798377321

[71] Renn O.. Concepts of Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review. GAIA — Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 2008, 17(1): 50-66.

[72] Renn O.. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, 2008, London: Earthscan

[73] Renn O., Walker K. D.. Global Risk Governance: Concept and Practice Using the IRGC Framework, 2008, Dordrecht: Springer

[74] Rose N.. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self, 1999 2nd ed London: Free Association Books

[75] Sapolsky H. M.. The Politics of Risk. Daedalus, 1990, 119(4): 83-96.

[76] Schmidt V.. Hay C., Lister M., Marsh D.. Institutionalism. The State: Theories and Issues, 2006, New York: Palgrave Macmillan 98-117.

[77] Schneiberg M., Bartley T.. Regulating American Industries: Markets, Politics, and the Institutional Determinants of Fire Insurance Regulation. American Journal of Sociology, 2001, 107(1): 101-46 10.1086/323574

[78] Scott W. R.. Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J.. Unpacking Institutional Arrangements. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 1991, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 164-82.

[79] Scott W. R.. Institutions and Organizations, 2001 2nd ed Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

[80] Selznick P.. Institutionalism: “Old” and “new”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(2): 270-77 10.2307/2393719

[81] Short J. F. Jr The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis. American Sociological Review, 1984, 49(6): 711-25 10.2307/2095526

[82] Shrader-Frechette K. S.. Risk Analysis and Scientific Method: Methodological and Ethical Problems with Evaluating Societal Hazards, 1985, Dodrecht: D. Reidel

[83] Slovic P.. Perception of Risk. Science, 1987, 236(4799): 280-85 10.1126/science.3563507

[84] Slovic P.. Krimsky S., Golding D.. Perceptions of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm. Social Theories of Risk, 1992, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers 117-52.

[85] Slovic P.. Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk Assessment Battlefield. Risk Analysis, 1999, 19(4): 689-701.

[86] Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters E., MacGregor D. G.. Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality. Risk Analysis, 2004, 24(2): 311-22 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x

[87] Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S.. Why Study Risk Perceptions?. Risk Analysis, 1982, 2(2): 83-93 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01369.x

[88] Stallings R. A.. Promoting Risk: Constructing the Earthquake Threat, 1995, New York: Aldine de Gruyter

[89] Starr C.. Social Benefit versus Technological Risk. Science, 1969, 165(3899): 1232-38 10.1126/science.165.3899.1232

[90] Starr C., Whipple C.. Risks of Risk Decisions. Science, 1980, 208(4448): 1114-19 10.1126/science.208.4448.1114

[91] Starr C., Whipple C.. A Perspective on Health and Safety Risk Analysis. Management Science, 1984, 30(4): 452-63 10.1287/mnsc.30.4.452

[92] Suchman M.. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 571-610.

[93] Taylor-Gooby P., Zinn J. O.. Current Directions in Risk Research: New Developments in Psychology and Sociology. Risk Analysis, 2006, 26(2): 397-411 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00746.x

[94] Tierney K. J.. Towards a Critical Sociology of Risk. Sociological Forum, 1999, 14(2): 215-42 10.1023/A:1021414628203

[95] Tierney K. J.. Daniels R. J., Kettl D. F., Kunreuther H.. Social Inequality, Hazards and Disasters. On Risk and Disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina, 2005, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 109-28.

[96] Tierney K. J., Bevc C.. Brunsma D. L., Overfelt D., Picou J. S.. Disaster as War: Militarism and the Social Construction of Disaster in New Orleans. The Sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on A Modern Catastrophe, 2007, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc 35-50.

[97] Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G.. Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28(1): 22-39 10.2307/2392383

[98] Turner B. A.. The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disasters. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21(3): 378-97 10.2307/2391850

[99] Turner B. A.. The Social Aetiology of Disasters. Disasters, 1979, 3(1): 53-59 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1979.tb00198.x

[100] Tversky A., Kahneman D.. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 1981, 211(4481): 453-58 10.1126/science.7455683

[101] U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force. 2004. Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations. https://reports.energy.gov/BlackoutFinal-Web.pdf.

[102] Vaughan D.. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA, 1996, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[103] Vaughan D.. The Role of Organization in the Production of Techno-Scientific Knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 1999, 29(6): 913-43 10.1177/030631299029006005

[104] Vaughan D.. Theorizing Disaster: Analogy, Historical Ethnography, and the Challenger Accident. Ethnography, 2004, 5(3): 315-47 10.1177/1466138104045659

[105] Weinberg A. M.. Science and Trans-Science. Minerva, 1972, 10(2): 209-22 10.1007/BF01682418

[106] Williamson O. E.. Smelser N. J., Swedberg R.. Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory. Handbook of Economic Sociology, 1994, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 77-107.

[107] Zucker L. G.. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, 1988, Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company