A cover technique to verify the reliability of a model for calculating fuzzy probabilities

Chongfu Huang

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2011, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3) : 1 -10.

PDF
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science ›› 2011, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3) : 1 -10. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-011-0011-x
Article

A cover technique to verify the reliability of a model for calculating fuzzy probabilities

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Many models have been suggested to calculate fuzzy probabilities in risk analysis. In general, the reliability of a model is demonstrated by practical effects or proved theoretically. In this article we suggest a new approach called the cover technique to verify the model’s reliability. The technique is based on a hypothesis that a statistical result can approximately confirm a fuzzy probability as a fuzzy-set-valued probability. A cover is constructed by many biprobability distributions. The consistency degree of a cover and a fuzzy probability distribution is employed to verify the reliability of a model. We present a case that shows how to construct a distribution-cover and calculate the consistency degree of the cover and a possibility-probability distribution. A series of numerical experiments with random samples from a normal distribution verify the reliability of the interior-outer-set model.

Keywords

cover technique / fuzzy probability / histogram / interior-outer-set model / possibility-probability distribution

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chongfu Huang. A cover technique to verify the reliability of a model for calculating fuzzy probabilities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2011, 2(3): 1-10 DOI:10.1007/s13753-011-0011-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

de Cooman G.. A Behavioural Model for Vague Probability Assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2005, 154(3): 305-58 10.1016/j.fss.2005.01.005

[2]

Dubois D., Prade H.. Fuzzy Sets, Probability, and Measurement. European Journal of Operational Research, 1989, 40(2): 135-54 10.1016/0377-2217(89)90326-3

[3]

de Finetti B.. La Prévision: ses Lois Logiques, ses Sources Subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, 1937, 7(1): 1-68.

[4]

Freeling A. N. S.. Fuzzy Sets and Decision Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1980, SMC-10(7): 341-54 10.1109/TSMC.1980.4308515

[5]

Huang, C. F. 1998. Concepts and Methods of Fuzzy Risk Analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st China-Japan Conference on Risk Assessment and Management, 12–23, Beijing, China, 1998.

[6]

Huang C. F.. Demonstration of Benefit of Information Distribution for Probability Estimation. Signal Processing, 2000, 80(6): 1037-48 10.1016/S0165-1684(00)00018-9

[7]

Huang C. F.. An Application of Calculated Fuzzy Risk. Information Sciences, 2002, 142(1): 37-56 10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00156-1

[8]

Huang C. F.. Information Diffusion Techniques and Small Sample Problem. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 2002, 1(2): 229-49 10.1142/S0219622002000142

[9]

Huang C. F., Jia D. Y.. Histogram-Covering Approach to Verify Model Reliability. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 2008, 14(3–5): 265-75.

[10]

Huang C. F., Moraga C.. A fuzzy Risk Model and its Matrix Algorithm. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2002, 10(4): 347-62 10.1142/S0218488502001521

[11]

Huang C. F., Ruan D.. Fuzzy Risks and an Updating Algorithm with New Observations. Risk Analysis, 2008, 28(3): 681-94 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01057.x

[12]

Huang C. F., Shi Y.. Towards Efficient Fuzzy Information Processing—Using the Principle of Information Diffusion, 2002, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag

[13]

Karimi I., Hülermeier E.. Risk Assessment System of Natural Hazards: A New Approach Based on Fuzzy Probability. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2007, 158(9): 987-99 10.1016/j.fss.2006.12.013

[14]

Moeller B., Beer M.. Fuzzy Randomness, 2003, Berlin: Springer

[15]

Moraga, C., and C. F Huang. 2003. Learning Subjective Probabilities from a Small Data Set. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, 355–60, Tokyo, Japan, 2003.

[16]

Otness R. K., Encysin L.. Digital Time Series Analysis, 1972, New York: John Wiley

[17]

Ramsey F. P.. Braithwaite R. B.. Truth and Probability. The Foundations of Mathematics, 1931, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 156-98.

[18]

Tanaka H., Fan C., Toguchi K.. Fault Tree Analysis by Fuzzy Probability. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1983, R-32(5): 453-57 10.1109/TR.1983.5221727

[19]

Walley P.. Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, 1991, London: Chapman & Hall

[20]

Watson S. R., Weiss J. J., Donnell M. L.. Fuzzy Decision Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1979, SMC-9(1): 1-9 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310067

[21]

Williams P. M.. Notes on Conditional Previsions, 1975, UK: School of Mathematical and Physical Science, University of Sussex

[22]

Zadeh L. A.. Probability Measures of Fuzzy Events. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 1968, 23(2): 421-27 10.1016/0022-247X(68)90078-4

[23]

Zadeh L. A.. Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1978, 1(1): 3-28 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5

[24]

Zhang J. X.. Study on Theory and Method of New Generation of Natural Disaster Risk Zoning-Taking Earthquake Disaster as an Example, 2005, Beijing: Beijing Normal University

[25]

Zong, T. 2004. Improvement on Interior-Outer-Set Model for Estimating Fuzzy Probability. In Proceedings of 2004 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 578–583. Banff, Canada, 2004.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

139

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/