Suture versus tacker closure of the peritoneum in transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A prospective comparative cohort study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia (TAPP) is routinely done by general surgeons. (1) One crucial step is peritoneal closure post-mesh placement to prevent contact with the bowel. (2) There are various techniques available for peritoneal closure. (3) This prospective comparative cohort study compares the effectiveness of sutures versus tackers in terms of time efficiency, cost, postoperative patient comfort, and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective comparative cohort study included patients undergoing unilateral TAPP at a tertiary care hospital in South India from December 2022 to April 2024. A total of 80 patients were included in the study, of which 50 underwent peritoneal closure by tackers and 30 underwent peritoneal closure by sutures based on the standard of care of the operating surgeon. These patients were observed intra-operatively, post-operatively, and during the first follow-up visit at 10–14 days and at 3 months.

RESULTS: Peritoneal closure time was significantly lower for the tacker group (2.78 min vs. 11.17min, P < 0.001). The tacker group had a higher cost (₹5313 vs. ₹1855, P < 0.001) and experienced increased postoperative pain at both 10–14 days (36% vs. 10%, P = 0.011) and 3 months (24% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION: This study shows that although suturing for peritoneal closure is more time-consuming and technically challenging, it can significantly reduce the material cost and reduce both early and late postoperative pain. Using barbed suture materials can help reduce operative times.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study registered under the Clinical Trial Registry of India. CTRI Number: CTRI/2022/11/047211.

Keywords

Hernia / inguinal / laparoscopy / sutures / tackers

References

[1] Bittner R , Felix E . History of inguinal hernia repair, laparoendoscopic techniques, implementation in surgical praxis, and future perspectives: Considerations of two pioneers. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 2021; 4: 133.

[2] Oguz H , Karagulle E , Turk E , Moray G . Comparison of peritoneal closure techniques in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomized study. Hernia 2015; 19: 879- 85.

[3] Aiolfi A , Cavalli M , Del Ferraro S , Manfredini L , Lombardo F , Bonitta G , et al. Total extraperitoneal (TEP) versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty: Systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia. 2021; 25: 1147- 57.

[4] Xie J , Koo DC , Lee MJ , Sugiyama G . The evolution of minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2024; 9: 13.

[5] Stabilini C , Van Veenendaal N , Aasvang E , Agresta F , Aufenacker T , Berrevoet F , et al. Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management. BJS Open 2023; 7: zrad080.

[6] Townsend CM Jr , editor. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. 21^st ed. Texas: The University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston; 2021. p. 1105- 33.

[7] Chao TC , Tung HY , Tsai CH , Pen CM , Wu CC , Liao CH , et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic TAPP/TEP inguinal hernia repair: A multicenter, propensity score weighted study. Hernia 2023; 28: 199- 209.

[8] Ross SW , Oommen B , Kim M , Walters AL , Augenstein VA , Todd Heniford B . Tacks, staples, or suture: Method of peritoneal closure in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair effects early quality of life. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 1686- 93.

[9] Ross SW , Groene SA , Prasad T , Lincourt AE , Kercher KW , Augenstein VA , et al. Does peritoneal flap closure technique following transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair make a difference in postoperative pain? A long-term quality of life comparison. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 2548- 59.

[10] Thalheimer A , Vonlanthen R , Ivanova S , Stoupis C , Bueter M . Mind the gap - Small bowel obstruction due to preperitoneal herniation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair - A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2021; 88: 106532.

[11] Huguenin-Dezot M , Peisl S , Georgiou E , Candinas D , Beldi G , Helbling C , et al. Glued suture-less peritoneum closure in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair reduces acute postoperative pain. Sci Rep 2024; 14: 11786- 94.

[12] Dauser B , Szyszkowitz A , Seitinger G , Fortelny RH , Herbst F . A novel glue device for fixation of mesh and peritoneal closure during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: Short- and medium-term results. Eur Surg 2017; 49: 27- 31.

[13] Kane ED , Leduc M , Schlosser K , Parentela N , Wilson D , Romanelli JR . Comparison of peritoneal closure versus non-closure in laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with coated mesh. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 627- 37.

[14] Singhal VK , Alaswad FD , Ojha V , Singhal VVV . Closure of peritoneal in Inguinal hernia transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) by intracorporeal suturing versus tackers. Int Surg J 2023; 10: 842- 6.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow