Integrative genomics for mango genetics and breeding

Bilal Ahmad , Ying Su , Rida Arshad , Tayyaba Razzaq , Yi Zhang , Ting Hou , Chaochao Li , Zhongxin Jin , Chengjie Chen , Peng Wang , Melanie J. Wilkinson , Yibo Bai , Yeyuan Chen , Yu Zhang , Zhiguo Dang , Yongfeng Zhou , Xinmin Tian , Jianfeng Huang

Horticulture Research ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 260

PDF (1485KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) :260 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhaf260
Review Articles
research-article
Integrative genomics for mango genetics and breeding
Author information +
History +
PDF (1485KB)

Abstract

Mango is the second most important tropical fruit crop. Due to ever-changing environmental conditions, world mango production is facing challenges such as diseases (anthracnose and mango malformation), physiological disorders (alternate bearing), low fruit setting, poor fruit quality, short shelf life, and climate change adaptation. Breeding efforts are hindered by the long juvenile period, outdated breeding system, and high heterozygosity, resulting in a slow pace of mango improvement programs. However, over the last decade, significant advances in high-quality genome assemblies, pangenomics, genetic mapping, multiomics data, and phenomics of large populations have accelerated crop genetics and breeding. Here, we summarize recent progress on the origin and domestication of mango, advancements in genome assemblies, development of genetic maps, functional and comparative genomics, evolutionary insights, and assessments of global phenotypic and genotypic diversity, including species at risk. We also discuss the integration of multiomics approaches with quantitative genetics for crop improvement. Furthermore, we highlight the key research gaps that limit breeding efficiency and propose integrative strategies combining pangenomics, multiomics, and machine learning with improved transformation protocols and multienvironment testing to accelerate the development of climate-resilient, high-quality mango cultivars.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bilal Ahmad, Ying Su, Rida Arshad, Tayyaba Razzaq, Yi Zhang, Ting Hou, Chaochao Li, Zhongxin Jin, Chengjie Chen, Peng Wang, Melanie J. Wilkinson, Yibo Bai, Yeyuan Chen, Yu Zhang, Zhiguo Dang, Yongfeng Zhou, Xinmin Tian, Jianfeng Huang. Integrative genomics for mango genetics and breeding. Horticulture Research, 2026, 13(1): 260 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhaf260

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2024YFE0214700), the Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development Projects of China (no. 2023ZYZX1224), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 32372662), and the Hainan Mango Agriculture Research System (grant no. HNARS-07). Additional support was provided by the Project of National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding (no. NKLTCB-RC202501) and the State Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding (no. SKLTCBYWF202507; no. NKLTCBCXTD40 ).

Author contributions

Y.Z. and X.T. conceived the project. B.A. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, and B.A., Y.S., R.A., C.C., P. W., M.J.W., Y.C., Y.B., Z.D., J.H., X.T., and Y.Z. thoroughly edited the paper. B.A., T.R., Y.Z., T.H., Y.Z., C.L., and Z.J. performed the figure and table drawings. All authors contributed to the proofreading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]

Mukherjee SK, Litz RE. Introduction: Botany and Importance. Wallingford: CABI; 2009:

[2]

Mango Genome Consortium, Bally ISE, Bombarely A. et al. The ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango genome reveals candidate genes for fruit quality. BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21:108

[3]

Singh Z, Singh RK, Sane VA. et al. Mango - posthar-vest biology and biotechnology. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2013; 32:217-36

[4]

Naidua GM, Naidu GR. Marketing strategies for exporting mangoes and mango products from India. Acta Hortic. 2009; 1:79-96

[5]

FAO. 2021. Major Tropical Fruits: Market Review 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy

[6]

Kostermans AJGH, Koestermans AGH, Bompard JM.The Mangoes: Their Botany, Nomenclature, Horticulture and Uti-lization. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1993:

[7]

Lim TK. Mangifera odorata. In: Lim TK,ed. Edible Medicinal and Non-Medicinal Plants: Volume 1, Fruits. Springer Nether-lands: Dordrecht, 2012,127-30

[8]

Iyer CPA, Dinesh MR. Advances in classical breeding and genetics in mango. Acta Hortic. 1997; 1:252-67

[9]

Viruel MA, Escribano P, Barbieri M. et al. Fingerprint-ing,embryo type and geographic differentiation in mango (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae) with microsatellites. Mol Breed. 2005; 15:383-93

[10]

Yamanaka S, Hosaka F, Matsumura M. et al. Genetic diversity and relatedness of mango cultivars assessed by SSR mark-ers. Breed Sci. 2019; 69:332-44

[11]

Shukla M, Babu R, Mathur VK. et al. Diverse genetic bases of Indian polyembryonic and monoembryonic mango (Mangifera indica L) cultivars. Curr Sci. 2004; 85:870-1

[12]

Singh LB. Botany, Cultivation, and Utilization. Leonard Hill: London, UK. 1960 https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:113531234.

[13]

Knight RJ, Schnell RJ. Mango introduction in Florida and the haden cultivars significance to the modern industry. Econ Bot. 1994; 48:139-45

[14]

Bally ISE, Dillon NL. Mango (Mangifera indica L.) breeding. In: Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies:Fruits. Al-Khayri, J. M., Jain, S.M., Johnson, D.V., Eds. Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018,

[15]

Mukherjee SK. Mango: its allopolyploid nature. Nature. 1950; 166:196-7

[16]

Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species nuclear DNA content material and methods. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1991; 9:415

[17]

Duval MF, Bunel J, Sitbon C. et al. Development of microsatellite markers for mango (Mangifera indica L.). Mol Ecol Notes. 2005; 5:824-6

[18]

Schnell RJ, Brown JS, Olano CT. et al. Mango genetic diversity analysis and pedigree inferences for Florida cul-tivars using microsatellite markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2006; 131:214-24

[19]

Wang P, Luo Y, Huang J. et al. The genome evolution and domestication of tropical fruit mango. Genome Biol. 2020; 21:60

[20]

Ma X, Luo X, Wei Y. et al. Chromosome-scale genome and comparative transcriptomic analysis reveal transcriptional regulators of beta-carotene biosynthesis in mango. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:749108

[21]

Wijesundara UK, Masouleh AK, Furtado A. et al. A chromosome-level genome of mango exclusively from long-read sequence data. Plant Genome. 2024; 17:e20441

[22]

Li W, Zhu X-G, Zhang Q-J. et al. SMRT sequencing generates the chromosome-scale reference genome of tropical fruit mango, Mangifera indica biorxiv.org

[23]

Ahmad B, Su Y, Hao Y. et al. Mango pangenome reveals dramatic impacts of reference bias on population genomic analyses. Hortic Res. 2025; 12:uhaf166

[24]

Zhang C, Yi H, Ye X. et al. Gapless genome assembly and pop-ulation genomics highlights diversity of mango germplasms. Hortic Res. 2025; 12:uhaf007

[25]

Sherman A, Rubinstein M, Eshed R. et al. Mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm diversity based on single nucleotide polymorphisms derived from the transcriptome. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15:277

[26]

Azim MK, Khan IA, Zhang Y.Characterization of mango (Mangifera indica L.) transcriptome and chloroplast genome. Plant Mol Biol. 2014; 85:193-208

[27]

Dautt-Castro M, Ochoa-Leyva A, Contreras-Vergara CA. et al. Mango ( Mangifera indica L. cv. Kent fruit mesocarp de novo transcriptome assembly identifies gene families important for ripening. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6:62

[28]

Dautt-Castro M, Ochoa-Leyva A, Contreras-Vergara CA. et al. Mesocarp RNA-Seq analysis of mango (Mangifera indica L.) identify quarantine postharvest treatment effects on gene expression. Sci Hortic. 2018; 227:146-53

[29]

Luria N, Sela N, Yaari M. et al. De-novo assembly of mango fruit peel transcriptome reveals mechanisms of mango response to hot water treatment. BMC Genomics. 2014; 15:957

[30]

Dillon NL, Bally ISE, Wright CL. et al. Genetic diversity of the Australian National Mango Genebank. Sci Hortic. 2013; 150:213-26

[31]

Dillon NL, Innes DJ, Bally ISE. et al. Expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) marker resources for diversity analysis of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Diversity (Basel). 2014; 6:72-87

[32]

Kuhn DN, Dillon N, Bally I. et al. Estimation of genetic diver-sity and relatedness in a mango germplasm collection using SNP markers and a simplified visual analysis method. Sci Hortic. 2019; 252:156-68

[33]

Kuhn DN, Dillon NL, Innes DJ. et al. Development of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers from the mango (Mangifera indica) transcriptome for mapping and estima-tion of genetic diversity. Acta Hortic. 2016; 1:315-22

[34]

Warschefsky EJ,von Wettberg EJB. Population genomic analysis of mango (Mangifera indica) suggests a complex history of domestication. New Phytol. 2019; 222:2023-37

[35]

YuH, LuoC, Fan Y. et al. Isolation and characterization of two APETALA1-like genes from mango (Mangifera indica L.). Sci Hortic. 2020; 259:108814

[36]

Cortaga CQ, Lachica JAP, Lantican DV. et al. Genome-wide SNP and InDel analysis of three Philippine mango species inferred from whole-genome sequencing. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2022; 20:46

[37]

Wilkinson MJ, McLay K, Kainer D. et al. Centromeres are hotspots for chromosomal inversions and breeding traits in mango. New Phytol. 2024; 245:899-913

[38]

Huang X, Huang S, Han B. et al. The integrated genomics of crop domestication and breeding. Cell. 2022; 185:2828-39

[39]

Fosberg FR, Whitmore TC. Tropical rain forest of the Far East. Taxon. 1976; 25:510

[40]

Weeks A, Zapata F, Pell SK. et al. To move or to evolve: contrasting patterns of intercontinental connectivity and cli-matic niche evolution in ‘Terebinthaceae’ (Anacardiaceae and Burseraceae). Front Genet. 2014; 5:00409

[41]

Bompard JM. Taxonomy and Systematics. Wallingford: CABI; 2009:19-41

[42]

Hooker JD, Thomson T.The Flora of British India. Cambridge University Press: London, UK; 2011

[43]

Matsuoka Y. Centers of origin of cultivated plants. N I Vavilov origin and geography of cultivated plants. Genetike i Selekcii. 1926; 55:17-80

[44]

Srivastava G, Mehrotra RC. Endemism due to climate change: evidence from Poeciloneuron Bedd.(Clusiaceae) leaf fos-sil from Assam, India. Journal of Earth System Science. 2013; 122:283-8

[45]

IV.—Records of the Geological Survey of India. Geol Mag. 1912; 9:567-8

[46]

Iyer CPA. Recent advances in varietal improvement in mango. Acta Hortic. 1991; 1:109-32

[47]

IUCN.The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesVersion2025-1. International Union for Conservation of Nature; Cambridge, UK; 2025:

[48]

Popenoe W. Manual of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, Exclud-ing the Banana, Coconut, Pineapple, Citrus Fruits, Olive, and Fig. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1920:

[49]

Mukherjee SK. The mango and its wild relatives. Sci Cult. 1949; 26:5-9

[50]

Wilkinson MJ, Yamashita R, James ME. et al. The influence of genetic structure on phenotypic diversity in the Australian mango (Mangifera indica) gene pool. Sci Rep. 2022; 12:20614

[51]

Origin of Cultivated Plants. New York: D. Apple-ton; 1884:

[52]

Bose TK, Mitra SK, Sanyal D. Fruits: Tropical and Subtropical. Naya Udyog: Calcutta, India; 2001:

[53]

Ma X, Wu H, Liu B. et al. Genomic diversity, population struc-ture, and genome-wide association reveal genetic differenti-ation and trait improvements in mango. Hortic Res. 2024; 11: uhae153

[54]

Singh NK. Origin, diversity and genome sequence of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Indian J Hist Sci. 2016; 51:353-68

[55]

Johnson GI. Introduction of the mango to Australia. Proceed-ings of the Royal Society of Queensland. 2000; 109:83-90

[56]

Jain SM, Priyadarshan PM. Breeding Plantation Tree Crops:Tropical Species. New York, NY: Springer; 2009

[57]

IPGRI. Descriptors for Mango (Mangifera indica L.). Interna-tional Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. 2006

[58]

Singh AK, Shivran JS, Singh NK. et al. Morphological and biochemical diversity of promising mango (Mangifera indica L.) indigenous cultivars in India. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2025; 72:7821-46

[59]

Wang S-B, Wu H-X, Ma W-H. et al. Evaluation of sixteen intro-duced mango cultivars in Zhanjiang, CHINA. Acta Hortic. 2013; 1:211-9

[60]

Grewal AG, Zafar MS, Qureshi MA. et al. Fruiting behavior and fruit quality of leading mango cultivars grown in South Punjab-Pakistan. Agricultural Sciences Journal. 2024; 6: 59-72

[61]

Crane JH. Expanding mango consumption phase 1: mango (Mangifera indica) cultivar evaluation for the National Mango Board. Proc Fla State Hort Soc. 2021; 134:56-9

[62]

Zhang Y, Pang X, Li M. et al. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal that GA3ox regulates the dwarf trait in mango (Mangifera indica L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24:1025

[63]

Arogundade O, Matthew JO, Akinyoola OI. et al. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of mango cultivars in South-west Nigeria. International Journal of Fruit Science. 2022; 22: 151-9

[64]

Fuller DQ, Denham T, Allaby R. Plant domestication and agricultural ecologies. Curr Biol. 2023; 33:R636-49

[65]

Washburn JD, Bird KA, Conant GC. et al. Convergent evo-lution and the origin of complex phenotypes in the age of systems biology. Int J Plant Sci. 2016; 177:305-18

[66]

Kuhn DN, Bally ISE, Dillon NL. et al. Genetic map of mango: a tool for mango breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 00577

[67]

dos Santos Ribeiro ICN, Lima Neto FP, Santos CAF. Allelic database and accession divergence of a Brazilian mango collection based on microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Res. 2012; 11:4564-74

[68]

Luo C, He XH, Chen H. et al. Genetic diversity of mango cultivars estimated using SCoT and ISSR markers. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2011; 39:676-84

[69]

Sennhenn A, Prinz K, Gebauer J. et al. Identification of mango (Mangifera indica L.) landraces from Eastern and Cen-tral Kenya using a morphological and molecular approach. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2014; 61:7-22

[70]

Hirano R, Oo TH, Watanabe KN. Myanmar mango landraces reveal genetic uniqueness over common cultivars from Florida, India, and Southeast Asia. Genome. 2010; 53:321-30

[71]

Diaz-Matallana M, Schuler-Garcia I, Ruiz-Garcia M. et al. Anal-ysis of diversity among six populations of Colombian mango (Mangifera indica L. cvar. Hilacha) using RAPDs markers. Elec-tron J Biotechnol. 2009;12:

[72]

Shamili M, Fatahi R, Hormaza JI.Characterization and evalu-ation of genetic diversity of Iranian mango (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae) genotypes using microsatellites. Sci Hor-tic. 2012; 148:230-4

[73]

Ravishankar KV, Anand L, Dinesh MR. Assessment of genetic relatedness among mango cultivars of India using RAPD markers. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology. 2000; 75:198-201

[74]

Ravishankar KV, Bommisetty P, Bajpai A. et al. Genetic diver-sity and population structure analysis of mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars assessed by microsatellite markers. Trees-Structure and Function. 2015; 29:775-83

[75]

Surapaneni M, Vemireddy LR, Begum H. et al. Population structure and genetic analysis of different utility types of mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm of Andhra Pradesh state of India using microsatellite markers. Plant Syst Evol. 2013; 299: 1215-29

[76]

Jena RC, Chand PK. Multiple DNA marker-assisted diversity analysis of Indian mango (Mangifera indica L.) populations. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:10345

[77]

Bassil NV, Davis TM, Zhang H. et al. Development and pre-liminary evaluation of a 90 K Axiom® SNP array for the allo-octoploid cultivated strawberry Fragaria × ananassa. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16:155

[78]

Peace C, Bassil N, Main D. et al. Development and evaluation of a genome-wide 6K SNP Array for diploid sweet cherry and tetraploid sour cherry. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e48305

[79]

Bianco L, Cestaro A, Linsmith G. et al. Development and validation of the Axiom® Apple480K SNP genotyping array. Plant J. 2016; 86:62-74

[80]

Bianco L, Cestaro A, Sargent DJ. et al. Development and validation of a 20K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) whole genome genotyping array for apple (Malus × domes-tica Borkh). PLoS One. 2014; 9:e110377

[81]

Alam MS, Samsuzzaman M, Mazed Miah MA. et al. Evaluation and genetic diversity analysis of local mango germplasm. Acta Scientifica Malaysia. 2022; 6:23-7

[82]

Souza IGB, Valente SES, Britto FB. et al. RAPD analysis of the genetic diversity of mango (Mangifera indica) germplasm in Brazil. Genet Mol Res. 2011; 10:3080-9

[83]

Zhou L, He XH, Yu HX. et al. Evaluation of the genetic diver-sity of mango (Mangifera indica L.) seedling germplasm resources and their potential parents with start codon tar-geted (SCoT) markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2020; 67:41-58

[84]

Abdelsalam NR, Elshikh MS, Ibrahem EG. et al. Genetic and morphological characterization of Mangifera indica L. grow-ing in Egypt. HortScience. 2018; 53:1266-70

[85]

Fitmawati HA. Phylogenetic study of Mangifera laurina and its related species using cpDNA trnL-F spacer markers. Hay-ati. 2010; 17:9-14

[86]

Gálvez-lópez D, Salvador-figueroa M, Adriano-anaya MDL. et al. Morphological characterization of native mangos from Chiapas, Mexico. Subtropical Plant Sci. 2010; 62:18-26

[87]

Nazish T, Shabbir G, Ali A. et al. Molecular diversity of Pakistani mango ( Mangifera indica L.) varieties based on microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Res. 2017;16:

[88]

Eiadthong W, Yonemori K, Sugiura A. et al. Identification of mango cultivars of Thailand and evaluation of their genetic variation using the amplified fragments by simple sequence repeat-(SSR-) anchored primers. Sci Hortic. 1999; 82: 57-66

[89]

Ho VT, Tu NT. Genetic characterization of mango accessions through RAPD and ISSR markers in Vietnam. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2019; 51:252-65

[90]

Iquebal MA, Jaiswal S, Mahato AK. et al. MiSNPDb: a web-based genomic resources of tropical ecology fruit mango (Mangifera indica L.) for phylogeography and varietal differ-entiation. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:14968

[91]

Qamar-ul-Islam T, Khan MA, Faizan R. et al. MGDb: an ana-lyzed database and a genomic resource of mango (Mangifera Indica L.) cultivars for mango researchbioRxiv. 2018

[92]

Gomez-Olle A, Bullones A, Hormaza JI. et al. MangoBase: a genomics portal and gene expression atlas for Mangifera indica. Plants (Basel). 2023; 12:1273

[93]

Soltis DE, Soltis PS. The role of phylogenetics in comparative genetics. Plant Physiol. 2003; 132:1790-800

[94]

Singh NK, Mahato AK, Jayaswal PK. The genome sequence and transcriptome studies in mango (Mangifera indica L.). In: Kole C,ed. The Mango Genome. Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021,165-86

[95]

Singh A, Rai V, Sevanthi AM. et al. A draft genome of the king of fruit mango (Marigifera indica L.). In:Proceedings of Plant and Animal Genome XXII Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 2014

[96]

Dillon NL, David J, Ming Y. et al. Drafting the Kensington pride mango genome. 2016

[97]

Zhang C, Yang Z, Tang D. et al. Genome design of hybrid potato. Cell. 2021; 184:3873-3883.e12

[98]

Qamar M, Sadaqat M, Zhu X-T. et al. Comparative genomics profiling revealed multi-stress responsive roles of the CC-NBS-LRR genes in three mango cultivars. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1285547

[99]

Hasan N, Choudhary S, Naaz N. et al. Recent advancements in molecular marker-assisted selection and applications in plant breeding programmes. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 2021; 19:128

[100]

Lantican DV, Strickler SR, Canama AO. et al. De novo genome sequence assembly of dwarf coconut (Cocos nucifera L. ‘Catigan green dwarf’) provides insights into genomic vari-ation between coconut types and related palm species. G3 (Bethesda). 2019; 9:2377-93

[101]

Lantican DV, Cortaga CQ, Manohar ANC. et al. Resistance gene analogs of mango: insights on molecular defenses and evolutionary dynamics. Philipp J Sci. 2020; 149: 915-34

[102]

Leister D. Retrograde signaling in plants: from simple to com-plex scenarios. Front Plant Sci. 2012; 3:135

[103]

Unseld M, Marienfeld JR, Brandt P. et al. The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366,924 nucleotides. Nat Genet. 1997; 15:57-61

[104]

Wijesundara UK, Furtado A, Dillon NL. et al. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Mangifera based on whole chloro-plast genome and nuclear genome sequences. Tropical Plants. 2024; 3:0

[105]

Bally ISE. Australian National Mango Genebank. In: Redona E, The 14th Australasian Plant Breeding Conference and 11th Society for the Advancement of Breeding Research in Asia and Oceania SABRAO. Congress ed. 2009,Aug 10-14; Cairns, Australia. Bangkok (TH): Society for the Advancement of Breeding Research in Asia and Oceania

[106]

Litz R. Mango Botany, Production and Uses. 2nd ed. Walling-ford: CABI; 2009:

[107]

Kashkush K, Jinggui F, Tomer E. et al. Cultivar identification and genetic map of mango (Mangifera indica). Euphytica. 2001; 122:129-36

[108]

Chunwongse J, Chunwongse J, Barbrasert C. et al. Molecular mapping of mango cultivars ‘Alphonso’ and ‘Palmer’. Acta Hortic. 2000; 509:193-206

[109]

Jinggui F, Dajun L, Zhengqiang M. Constructiong mango (Mangifera indica L.) genetic map using markers for double heterozygous loci. Mol Plant Breed. 2003; 1:313-9

[110]

Luo C, Shu B, Yao Q. et al. Construction of a high-density genetic map based on large-scale marker development in mango using specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:01310

[111]

Chunwongse C, Phumichai C, Tongyoo P. et al. Development of di-nucleotide microsatellite markers and construction of genetic linkage map in mango (Mangifera indica L.).Songk-lanakarin. J Sci Technol. 2015; 37:119-27

[112]

Srivastav M, Radadiya N, Ramachandra S. et al. High res-olution mapping of QTLs for fruit color and firmness in Amrapali/Sensation mango hybrids. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14: 1135285

[113]

Deshpande AB, Anamika K, Jha V. et al. Transcriptional tran-sitions in Alphonso mango (Mangifera indica L.) during fruit development and ripening explain its distinct aroma and shelf life characteristics. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:8711

[114]

Srivastava P, Vyas VK, Variya B. et al. Synthesis, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) inhibition activities, and molecular docking study of 7-substituted coumarin derivatives. Bioorg Chem. 2016; 67:130-8

[115]

Sandip M, Makwana AN, Barad AV. et al. Physiology of flowering-the case of mango. Int J Appl Res. 2015; 1: 1008-12

[116]

Sharma N, Singh AK, Singh SK. et al. Comparative RNA sequencing based transcriptome profiling of regular bearing and alternate bearing mango (Mangifera indica L.) varieties reveals novel insights into the regulatory mechanisms underlying alternate bearing. Biotechnol Lett. 2020; 42:1035-50

[117]

Lal S, Singh AK, Singh SK. et al. Association analysis for pomological traits in mango (Mangifera indica L.) by genic-SSR markers. Trees. 2017; 31:1391-409

[118]

Nakagawa M, Honsho C, Kanzaki S. et al. Isolation and expression analysis of FLOWERING LOCUS T-like and gib-berellin metabolism genes in biennial-bearing mango trees. Sci Hortic. 2012; 139:108-17

[119]

Yadav A, Jayaswal PK, Raman KV. et al. Transcriptome analy-sis of flowering genes in mango in relation to floral malfor-mation (vol 33, pg 789, 2020). J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2020; 29:571-2

[120]

Kaur H, Sidhu GS, Mittal A. et al. Comparative transcriptomics in alternate bearing cultivar Dashehari reveals the genetic model of flowering in mango. Front Genet. 2023; 13:1061168

[121]

Wang Y-H, He XH, Yu HX. et al. Overexpression of four MiTFL 1 genes from mango delays the flowering time in transgenic Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21:407

[122]

Wang YH, Yu HX, He XH. et al. Isolation and functional char-acterization of a gene in mango. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23:3974

[123]

Guo C, Qin L, Ma Y. et al. Integrated metabolomic and tran-scriptomic analyses of the parasitic plant Cuscuta japonica Choisy on host and non-host plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22: 393

[124]

Fan Z-Y, He XH, Fan Y. et al. Isolation and functional char-acterization of three MiFTs genes from mango. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020; 155:169-76

[125]

Mo X, Luo C, Yu H. et al. Isolation and functional characteri-zation of two SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE homologous genes from mango. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22:9802

[126]

Liu Y, Luo C, Guo Y. et al. Isolation and functional charac-terization of two CONSTANS-like 16 (MiCOL16) genes from mango. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23:3075

[127]

Bajpai A, Khan K, Muthukumar M. et al. Molecular analysis of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway genes and their differen-tial expression in mango peel. Genome. 2018; 61:157-66

[128]

Yungyuen W, Vo TT, Uthairatanakij A. et al. Carotenoid accu-mulation and the expression of carotenoid metabolic genes in mango during fruit development and ripening. Appl Sci. 2021; 11:4249

[129]

Srivastava S, Singh RK, Pathak G. et al. Comparative tran-scriptome analysis of unripe and mid-ripe fruit of Mangifera indica (var. “Dashehari”) unravels ripening associated genes. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:32557

[130]

Sane VA, Chourasia A, Nath P.Softening in mango (Mangifera indica cv. Dashehari) is correlated with the expression of an early ethylene responsive, ripening related expansin gene, MiExpA1. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2005; 38:223-30

[131]

Hong K, Gong D, Zhang L. et al. Transcriptome characteriza-tion and expression profiles of the related defense genes in postharvest mango fruit against Colletotrichum gloeospori-oides. Gene. 2016; 576:275-83

[132]

Li JJ, Luo C, Yang XZ. et al. Genome-wide identification of the mango pathogenesis-related 1 (PR1) gene family and functional analysis of genes in transgenic Arabidopsis. Sci Hortic. 2023; 321:112254

[133]

Liu Y, Luo C, Liang R. et al. Genome-wide identification of the mango CONSTANS (CO) family and functional analysis of two MiCOL 9 genes in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1028987

[134]

Guo Y-H, Luo C, Liu Y. et al. Isolation and functional analysis of two CONSTANS-like 1 genes from mango. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022; 172:125-35

[135]

Bastawros MB. Mango malformation in Egypt. Acta Hortic. 1996; 1:566-74

[136]

Bally ISE, Akem CN, Dillon NL, Grice C, Lakhesar D, Stock-dale K. Screening and breeding for genetic resistance to anthracnose in mango. In: Lu P, IX International Mango Symposium, International Society for Horticultural Science;ed. 992. 2010, pp. 239-44.

[137]

Sanchez-Arizpe A, Galindo-Cepeda ME, Arispe-Vazquez JL. et al. Natural resistance of two mango “Mangifera indica” L. commercial cultivars to anthracnose caused by “Col-letotrichum gloeosporioides” Penz. Penz and Sacc. Aust J Crop Sci. 2021; 15:1198-203

[138]

Felipe JEL, Lachica JAP, dela Cueva FM. et al. Validation and molecular analysis of β-1, 3-GLU2 SNP marker asso-ciated with resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2022; 118:101804

[139]

Alseekh S, Kostova D, Bulut M. et al. Genome-wide associa-tion studies: assessing trait characteristics in model and crop plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021; 78:5743-54

[140]

Wang RZ, Li XL, Sun MY. et al. Genomic insights into domesti-cation and genetic improvement of fruit crops. Plant Physiol. 2023; 192:2604-27

[141]

Li Y, Cao K, Zhu G. et al. Genomic analyses of an exten-sive collection of wild and cultivated accessions provide new insights into peach breeding history. Genome Biol. 2019; 20:36

[142]

Tongyoo P, Duangjit J, Sharma N. et al. Molecular mapping and breeding in mango. In: Kole C,ed. The Mango Genome. Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021,153-63

[143]

Oak P, Jha V, Deshpande A. et al. Transcriptional and trans-lational perturbation in abiotic stress induced physiologi-cal activities and metabolic pathway networks in spongy tissue disorder of mango fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2022; 188:111880

[144]

Wu S, Wu D, Song J. et al. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal new insights into the role of abscisic acid in modulating mango fruit ripening. Hortic Res. 2022; 9:uhac102

[145]

Pathak G, Dudhagi SS, Raizada S. et al. Transcriptomic insight into aroma pathway genes and effect of ripening difference on expression of aroma genes in different mango cultivars. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2023; 41:145-63

[146]

Sudheeran PK, Sela N, Carmeli-Weissberg M. et al. Induced defense response in red mango fruit against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Hortic Res. 2021; 8:17

[147]

Lebrun M, Plotto A, Goodner K. et al. Discrimination of mango fruit maturity by volatiles using the electronic nose and gas chromatography. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2008; 48:122-31

[148]

Pandit SS, Kulkarni RS, Giri AP. et al. Expression profiling of various genes during the fruit development and ripening of mango. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010; 48:426-33

[149]

White IR, Blake RS, Taylor AJ. et al. Metabolite profiling of the ripening of mangoes Mangifera indica L. cv. ‘Tommy Atkins’ by real-time measurement of volatile organic compounds. Metabolomics. 2016; 12:57

[150]

Dar MS, Dholakia BB, Shanmugam H. et al. Differential mod-ulation in metabolites revealed with the improvement in the shelf-life of alphonso fruits. Mol Biotechnol. 2020; 62:508-20

[151]

Suh JH, Madden RT, Sung J. et al. Pathway-based metabolomics analysis reveals biosynthesis of key flavor compounds in mango. J Agric Food Chem. 2022; 70:10389-99

[152]

Li L, Wu HX, Ma XW. et al. Transcriptional mechanism of differential sugar accumulation in pulp of two con-trasting mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars. Genomics. 2020; 112:4505-15

[153]

Monribot-Villanueva JL, Elizalde-Contreras JM, Aluja M. et al. Endorsing and extending the repertory of nutraceutical and antioxidant sources in mangoes during postharvest shelf life. Food Chem. 2019; 285:119-29

[154]

Khanum Z, Tiznado-Hernandez ME, Ali A. et al. Adaptation mechanism of mango fruit ( Mangifera indica L. cv. Chaunsa White) to heat suggest modulation in several metabolic path-ways. RSC Adv. 2020; 10:35531-44

[155]

Farag MA, Abdelwareth A, Zayed A. et al. A comparative metabolomics approach for Egyptian mango fruits classi-fication based on UV and UPLC/MS and in relation to its antioxidant effect. Foods. 2022;11

[156]

Renuse S, Harsha HC, Kumar P. et al. Proteomic analysis of an unsequenced plant - Mangifera indica. J Proteome. 2012; 75:5793-6

[157]

Andrade J, Toledo TT, Nogueira SB. et al. 2D-DIGE anal-ysis of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit reveals major proteomic changes associated with ripening. J Proteome. 2012; 75:3331-41

[158]

Chin CF, Teoh EY, Chee MJY. et al. Comparative proteomic analysis on fruit ripening processes in two varieties of tropi-cal mango (Mangifera indica). Protein J. 2019; 38:704-15

[159]

Wu H, Jia HM, Ma XW. et al. Transcriptome and proteomic analysis of mango (Mangifera indica Linn) fruits. J Proteome. 2014; 105:19-30

[160]

Miao Z, Humphreys BD, McMahon AP. et al. Multi-omics inte-gration in the age of million single-cell data. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021; 17:710-24

[161]

Visser T. The relation between growth, juvenile period and fruiting of apple seedlings and its use to improve breeding efficiency. Euphytica. 1970; 19:293-302

[162]

Zimmerman RH. Juvenility and flowering in woody plants: a review1. HortScience. 1972; 7:447-55

[163]

Aldwinckle HS.Flowering of apple seedlings16-20 months after germination1. HortScience. 1975; 10:124-6

[164]

Endo T, Shimada T, Fujii H. et al. Ectopic expression of an homolog from confers an early flowering phenotype on tri-foliate orange ( L. Raf.). Transgenic Res. 2005; 14:703-12

[165]

Srinivasan C, Dardick C, Callahan A. et al. Plum (Prunus domestica) trees transformed with poplar result in altered architecture, dormancy requirement, and continuous flow-ering. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e40715

[166]

Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 2009; 49:1-12

[167]

Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001; 157:1819-29

[168]

Sun MY, Zhang M, Kumar S. et al. Genomic selection of eight fruit traits in pear. Hortic Plant J. 2024; 10:318-26

[169]

Roth M, Muranty H, Di Guardo M. et al. Genomic prediction of fruit texture and training population optimization towards the application of genomic selection in apple. Hortic Res. 2020; 7:148

[170]

Brault C, Segura V, Roques M. et al. Enhancing grapevine breeding efficiency through genomic prediction and selec-tion index. G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14:jkae038

[171]

Jia HG, Orbovic V, Wang N. CRISPR-LbCas12a-mediated modification of citrus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17:1928-37

[172]

Osakabe Y, Liang Z, Ren C. et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in apple and grapevine. Nat Protoc. 2018; 13:2844-63

[173]

Gao C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell. 2021; 184:1621-35

[174]

Wallace JG, Rodgers-Melnick E, Buckler ES. On the road to breeding 4.0: unraveling the good, the bad, and the boring of crop quantitative genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 2018; 52:421-44

[175]

Li T, Yang X, Yu Y. et al. Domestication of wild tomato is accel-erated by genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36:1160-3

[176]

Lourenco VM, Ogutu JO, Rodrigues RAP. et al. Genomic pre-diction using machine learning: a comparison of the perfor-mance of regularized regression, ensemble, instance-based and deep learning methods on synthetic and empirical data. BMC Genomics. 2024; 25:152

[177]

Wu L, Han L, Li Q. et al. Using interactome big data to crack genetic mysteries and enhance future crop breeding. Mol Plant. 2021; 14:77-94

PDF (1485KB)

225

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/