SlERF.D2-mediated antagonism between ethylene and ABA signaling pathways modulates osmotic stress adaptation in tomato

Abstract

Ethylene response factors (ERFs) are pivotal regulators in mediating plant stress adaptation; however, the roles of osmotic stress-responsive ERFs in tomato remain poorly characterized. Here, we comprehensively investigate the function of SlERF.D2, a member of the ERF transcription factor family, in modulating osmotic stress adaptation. Expression profiling indicated that SlERF.D2 responded to diverse abiotic stimuli, such as drought and salt, as well as ethylene and abscisic acid (ABA). Combined physiological and metabolomic analyses of SlERF.D2 overexpression and knockout lines revealed a negative regulatory role of SlERF.D2 in tomato's osmotic stress adaptation. Biochemical and molecular assays further revealed that SlERF.D2 directly targets the promoter of SlPP2C1, an ABA signaling suppressor, to activate its expression, thereby impairing ABA-dependent stomatal closure and accelerating water loss. Notably, ethylene-induced SlERF.D2 expression required the direct binding of SlEIL1/2/3/4 to the SlERF.D2 promoter. Furthermore, ethylene activated SlPP2C1 transcription in an SlERF.D2-dependent manner through direct transcriptional regulation by SlERF.D2. Thus, the ethylene-SlEIL1/2/3/4-SlERF.D2-SlPP2C1 transcriptional cascade module is involved in the antagonism of ABA-induced stomatal closure. Concurrently, transcriptomic profiling and metabolic analyses further demonstrated that SlERF.D2 repressed the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway, leading to a reduced anthocyanin content and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Our findings delineate a novel regulatory module wherein SlERF.D2 coordinates stomatal closure and ROS homeostasis to modulate the sensitivity of tomato plant to osmotic stresses, providing an applicable target for improving osmotic stress adaptation in tomato.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070323; to B.K.).

Authors contributions

N.L. and B.K. originated the research idea and designed the study protocol. N.L. and F.L. performed the experimental procedures and undertook the data analysis. N.L. drafted the manuscript. B.K. and F.L. provided a substantial amount of editing to the manuscript. All authors collaborated on manuscript polishing, analyzed the results, and approved the final submission version.

Data availability

All datasets associated with this work are presented in the main manuscript and its supplementary data.

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1] Angon PB, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Samin SI. et al. How do plants respond to combined drought and salinity stress?—a system-atic review. Plants (Basel). 2022; 11:2884

[2] Li Q, Zhu P, Yu X. et al. Physiological and molecular mecha-nisms of rice tolerance to salt and drought stress: advances and future directions. Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25:9404

[3] Li Z, Ahammed GJ. Hormonal regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis for improved stress tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023; 201:107835

[4] Juenger TE, Verslues PE. Time for a drought experiment: do you know your plants’ water status? Plant Cell. 2022; 35:10-23

[5] Ding ZJ, Yan JY, Xu XY. et al. Transcription factor WRKY46 regulates osmotic stress responses and stomatal movement independently in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2014; 79:13-27

[6] Soma F, Takahashi F, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. et al. Cellular phosphorylation signaling and gene expression in drought stress responses: ABA-dependent and ABA-independent reg-ulatory systems. Plants (Basel). 2021; 10:10

[7] Zhang H, Zhu J, Gong Z. et al. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat Rev Genet. 2022; 23:104-19

[8] Chen X, Ding Y, Yang Y. et al. Protein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021; 63:53-78

[9] Geiger D, Scherzer S, Mumm P. et al. Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106:21425-30

[10] Saez A, Robert N, Maktabi MH. et al. Enhancement of abscisic acid sensitivity and reduction of water consump-tion in Arabidopsis by combined inactivation of the pro-tein phosphatases type 2C ABI1 and HAB1. Plant Physiol. 2006; 141:1389-99

[11] Li Q, Wang J, Yin Z. et al. SlPP2C2 interacts with FZY/SAUR and regulates tomato development via signaling crosstalk of ABA and auxin. Plant J. 2024; 119:1073-90

[12] Min MK, Choi EH, Kim JA. et al. Two clade a phosphatase 2Cs expressed in guard cells physically interact with abscisic acid signaling components to induce stomatal closure in rice. Rice (N Y). 2019; 12:37

[13] Hasan MM, Liu X-D, Yao G-Q. et al. Ethylene-mediated stomatal responses to dehydration and rehydration in seed plants. J Exp Bot. 2024; 75:6719-32

[14] Tanaka Y, Sano T, Tamaoki M. et al. Ethylene inhibits abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005; 138:2337-43

[15] Azoulay-Shemer T, Schulze S, Nissan-Roda D. et al. A role for ethylene signaling and biosynthesis in regulating and acceler-ating CO(2)- and abscisic acid-mediated stomatal movements in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2023; 238:2460-75

[16] Song Z, Zhao L, Ma W. et al. Ethylene inhibits ABA-induced stomatal closure via regulating NtMYB184-mediated flavonol biosynthesis in tobacco. J Exp Bot. 2023; 74:6735-48

[17] Yu Y, Wang J, Li S. et al. Ascorbic acid integrates the antagonistic modulation of ethylene and abscisic acid in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species. Plant Physiol. 2019; 179:1861-75

[18] Liu H, Song S, Zhang H. et al. Signaling transduction of ABA, ROS, and Ca(2+) in plant stomatal closure in response to drought. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23:23

[19] Wang P, Liu WC, Han C. et al. Reactive oxygen species: multidi-mensional regulators of plant adaptation to abiotic stress and development. J Integr Plant Biol. 2024; 66:330-67

[20] Wu X, Liu Z, Liu Y. et al. SlPHL1 is involved in low phosphate stress promoting anthocyanin biosynthesis by directly upreg-ulation of genes SlF3H, SlF3’H, and SlLDOX in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023; 200:107801

[21] Nakabayashi R, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Urano K. et al. Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in Arabidop-sis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids. Plant J. 2014; 77:367-79

[22] Kim D, Jeon SJ, Yanders S. et al. MYB3 plays an impor-tant role in lignin and anthocyanin biosynthesis under salt stress condition in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2022; 41: 1549-60

[23] Chen Y, Kim P, Kong L. et al. A dual-function transcription fac-tor, SlJAF13, promotes anthocyanin biosynthesis in tomato. J Exp Bot. 2022; 73:5559-80

[24] An J-P, Zhang X-W, Bi S-Q. et al. The ERF transcription fac-tor MdERF38 promotes drought stress-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in apple. Plant J. 2020; 101:573-89

[25] Li Z, Tian Y, Xu J. et al. A tomato ERF transcription fac-tor, SlERF84, confers enhanced tolerance to drought and salt stress but negatively regulates immunity against Pseu-domonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018; 132:683-95

[26] Cheng M-C, Liao P-M, Kuo W-W. et al. The Arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol. 2013; 162:1566-82

[27] Park S-J, Park S, Kim Y. et al. Ethylene responsive fac-tor34 mediates stress-induced leaf senescence by regulat-ing salt stress-responsive genes. Plant Cell Environ. 2022; 45: 1719-33

[28] Zhang Z, Wang J, Zhang R. et al. The ethylene response factor AtERF98 enhances tolerance to salt through the transcrip-tional activation of ascorbic acid synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012; 71:273-87

[29] Zhao Q, Hu R-S, Liu D. et al. The AP2 transcription factor NtERF172 confers drought resistance by modifying NtCAT. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18:2444-55

[30] Pan Y, Seymour GB, Lu C. et al.An ethylene response factor (ERF5) promoting adaptation to drought and salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Rep. 2012; 31:349-60

[31] Wang Y, Xia D, Li W. et al. Overexpression of a tomato AP2/ERF transcription factor SlERF.B1 increases sensitivity to salt and drought stresses. Sci Hortic. 2022; 304:111332

[32] Zhao T, Wu T, Zhang J. et al. Genome-wide analyses of the genetic screening of C(2)H(2)-type zinc finger transcription factors and abiotic and biotic stress responses in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) based on RNA-Seq data. Front Genet. 2020; 11:540

[33] Zhao Y, Chan Z, Gao J. et al. ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. PNAS. 2016; 113: 1949-54

[34] Zhang TY, Li ZQ, Zhao YD. et al. Ethylene-induced stomatal closure is mediated via MKK1/3-MPK3/6 cascade to EIN2 and EIN3. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021; 63:1324-40

[35] Hsu PK, Dubeaux G, Takahashi Y. et al. Signaling mecha-nisms in abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure. Plant J. 2021; 105:307-21

[36] Desikan R, Last K, Harrett-Williams R. et al. Ethylene-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis occurs via AtrbohF-mediated hydrogen peroxide synthesis. Plant J. 2006; 47:907-16

[37] Ge XM, Cai HL, Lei X. et al. Heterotrimeric G protein medi-ates ethylene-induced stomatal closure via hydrogen perox-ide synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015; 82:138-50

[38] Zhang Y, Li Q, Jiang L. et al. Suppressing type 2C protein phosphatases alters fruit ripening and the stress response in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017; 59:142-54

[39] Zhao W, Huang H, Wang J. et al. Jasmonic acid enhances osmotic stress responses by MYC2-mediated inhibition of pro-tein phosphatase 2C1 and response regulators 26 transcrip-tion factor in tomato. Plant J. 2023; 113:546-61

[40] Wu Y, Li X, Zhang J. et al. ERF subfamily transcription factors and their function in plant responses to abiotic stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1042084

[41] Zhang L, Chen L, Pang S. et al. Function analysis of the ERF and DREB subfamilies in tomato fruit development and ripening. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:849048

[42] Liu M, Gomes BL, Mila I. et al. Comprehensive profiling of ethylene response factor expression identifies ripening-associated ERF genes and their link to key regulators of fruit ripening in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2016; 170:1732-44

[43] Liu Y, Guo P, Gao Z. et al. Silencing of SlMYB78-like reduces the tolerance to drought and salt stress via the ABA pathway in tomato. Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25:25

[44] Singh A, Roychoudhury A. Abscisic acid in plants under abiotic stress: crosstalk with major phytohormones. Plant Cell Rep. 2023; 42:961-74

[45] Mohorović P, Geldhof B, Holsteens K. et al. Effect of ethylene pretreatment on tomato plant responses to salt, drought, and waterlogging stress. Plant Direct. 2023; 7:e548

[46] Liu M, Wei J-W, Liu W. et al. S-nitrosylation of ACO homolog 4 improves ethylene synthesis and salt tolerance in tomato. New Phytol. 2023; 239:159-73

[47] Sun Y, Liang B, Wang J. et al. SlPti4 affects regulation of fruit ripening, seed germination and stress responses by modu-lating ABA signaling in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018; 59: 1956-65

[48] Li L, Zhu Z, Liu J. et al. Transcription factor GmERF105 nega-tively regulates salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants (Basel). 2023; 12:3007

[49] Liu Z, Li J, Li S. et al. The 1R-MYB transcription factor SlMYB1L modulates drought tolerance via an ABA-dependent pathway in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025; 222:109721

[50] Negi Y, Kumar K. OsWNK 9 mitigates salt stress by promot-ing root growth and stomatal closure in rice. Physiol Plant. 2025; 177:e70129

[51] Duan B, Xie X, Jiang Y. et al. GhMYB44 enhances stomatal closure to confer drought stress tolerance in cotton and Ara-bidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023; 198:107692

[52] Deng L, Yang T, Li Q. et al. Tomato MED25 regulates fruit ripening by interacting with EIN3-like transcription factors. Plant Cell. 2022; 35:1038-57

[53] Dabravolski SA, Isayenkov SV. The role of anthocyanins in plant tolerance to drought and salt stresses. Plants (Basel). 2023; 12:2558

[54] Naing AH, Kim CK. Abiotic stress-induced anthocyanins in plants: their role in tolerance to abiotic stresses. Physiol Plan-tarum. 2021; 172:1711-23

[55] Ni J, Premathilake AT, Gao Y. et al. Ethylene-activated PpERF105 induces the expression of the repressor-type R2R3-MYB gene PpMYB140 to inhibit anthocyanin biosynthesis in red pear fruit. Plant J. 2021; 105:167-81

[56] Faqir Napar WP, Kaleri AR, Ahmed A. et al. The anthocyanin-rich tomato genotype LA-1996 displays superior efficiency of mechanisms of tolerance to salinity and drought. J Plant Physiol. 2022; 271:153662

[57] Chen P, Sun YF, Kai WB. et al. Interactions of ABA signaling core components (SlPYLs, SlPP2Cs, and SlSnRK2s) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon). J Plant Physiol. 2016; 205:67-74

[58] Wang J, Xu Y, Zhang W. et al. Tomato SlPP2C5 is involved in the regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021; 62:1760-9

[59] Liang B, Sun Y, Wang J. et al. Tomato protein phosphatase 2C influences the onset of fruit ripening and fruit glossiness. J Exp Bot. 2020; 72:2403-18

[60] Shen X, Nan H, Jiang Y. et al. Genome-wide identification, expression and interaction analysis of GmSnRK2 and type a PP2C genes in response to abscisic acid treatment and drought stress in soybean plant. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23:23

[61] Li J, Guo X, Zhang M. et al. OsERF71 confers drought tolerance via modulating ABA signaling and proline biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2018; 270:131-9

[62] Chen HY, Hsieh EJ, Cheng MC. et al. ORA47 (octadecanoid-responsive AP2/ERF-domain transcription factor 47) regu-lates jasmonic acid and abscisic acid biosynthesis and sig-naling through binding to a novel cis-element. New Phytol. 2016; 211:599-613

[63] Zhang D, Zhu Z, Gao J. et al. The NPR1-WRKY46-WRKY6 sig-naling cascade mediates probenazole/salicylic acid-elicited leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021; 63:924-36

[64] Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Virus-induced gene silenc-ing in tomato. Plant J. 2002; 31:777-86

[65] Yu J, Zhou C, Li D. et al. A PtrLBD39-mediated transcrip-tional network regulates tension wood formation in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Commun. 2022; 3:100250

[66] Sun H-J, Uchii S, Watanabe S. et al. A highly efficient transformation protocol for micro-tom, a model cultivar for tomato functional genomics. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006; 47:426-31

[67] Tang Y, Wang X, Wang Y. et al. Heterologous expression of physic nut JcHDZ25 confers tolerance to drought stress in transgenic rice. BMC Genomics. 2025; 26:366

[68] Zhang D, Wu S, Li N. et al. Chemical induction of leaf senes-cence and powdery mildew resistance involves ethylene-mediated chlorophyll degradation and ROS metabolism in cucumber. Hortic Res. 2022;9:uhac101

[69] Ma L, Yang Y, Wang Y. et al. SlRBP 1 promotes translational efficiency via SleIF4A2 to maintain chloroplast function in tomato. Plant Cell. 2022; 34:2747-64

[70] Chen Y, Feng P, Zhang X. et al. Silencing of SlMYB50 affects tolerance to drought and salt stress in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022; 193:139-52

[71] Luo D, Xiong C, Lin A. et al. SlBBX20 interacts with the COP9 signalosome subunit SlCSN5-2 to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis by activating SlDFR expression in tomato. Hortic Res. 2021; 8:163.