Genomic prediction and association analyses for breeding parthenocarpic blueberries

Abstract

Parthenocarpy is a desirable trait that enables fruit set in the absence of fertilization. While blueberries typically depend on pollination for optimal yield, certain genotypes can produce seedless fruits through facultative parthenocarpy, eliminating the need for pollination. However, the development of parthenocarpic cultivars has remained limited by the challenge of evaluating large breeding populations. Thus, establishing molecular breeding tools can greatly accelerate genetic gain for this trait. In the present study, we evaluated two blueberry breeding populations for parthenocarpic fruit set and performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify markers and candidate genes associated with parthenocarpy. We also compared the predictive ability (PA) of three molecular breeding approaches, including (i) genomic selection (GS); (ii) GS de novo GWAS (GSdnGWAS), which incorporates significant GWAS markers into the GS model as prior information; and (iii) in silico marker-assisted selection (MAS), where markers from GWAS were fitted as fixed effects with no additional marker information. GWAS analyses identified 55 marker-trait associations, revealing candidate genes related to phytohormones, cell cycle regulation, and seed development. Predictive analysis showed that GSdnGWAS consistently outperformed GS and MAS, with PAs ranging from 0.21 to 0.36 depending on the population of study and the specific markers utilized. MAS showed PAs comparable to GS in some cases, suggesting it could be a cost-effective alternative to genome-wide sequencing. Together, these findings demonstrate that molecular breeding techniques can be used to improve facultative parthenocarpy, offering new avenues to develop high-yielding blueberry varieties that are less reliant on pollination.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Straughn Farms LLC for their continued support of the University of Florida Blueberry Breeding Program. We also thank Ben Covert, Haley Dabbs, Andrew Komatz, Jordyn Lind, Taylor Sawyer, and Chaz Wilhoite for their assistance in phenotyping efforts. This work was supported by royalties from the University of Florida Blueberry Breeding program.

Author contributions

J.B. and P.R.M. designed and supervised the experiment. J.C. and R.P.C. led phenotyping efforts. J.B. and L.F.V.F. prepared the genomic dataset. J.C., L.F.V.F., C.F.A., and F.E.R. devised the methodology for data analysis. J.C. conducted the analysis, candidate gene mining, and wrote the paper with guidance and revisions from all authors.

Data availability

The genomic and phenotypic data are available as supplementary material.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1] Aizen MA, Aguiar S, Biesmeijer JC. et al.Global agricultural productivity is threatened by increasing pollinator dependence without a parallel increase in crop diversification. Glob Chang Biol. 2019; 25:3516-27

[2] Aizen MA, Harder LD. The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollina-tion. Curr Biol. 2009; 19:915-8

[3] Smith MR, Singh GM, Mozaffarian D. et al. Effects of decreases of animal pollinators on human nutrition and global health: a modelling analysis. Lancet. 2015; 386:1964-72

[4] Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botías C. et al. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science. 2015; 347:347

[5] Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C. et al. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010; 25: 345-53

[6] Settele J, Bishop J, Potts SG. Climate change impacts on polli-nation. Nat Plants. 2016; 2:1-3

[7] Dhatt AS, Kaur G. Parthenocarpy: a potential trait to exploit in vegetable crops: a review. Agric Rev. 2016; 37:300-8

[8] Knapp JL, Bartlett LJ, Osborne JL. Re-evaluating strategies for pollinator-dependent crops: how useful is parthenocarpy? J Appl Ecol. 2017; 54:1171-9

[9] Pandolfini T, Molesini B, Spena A. Parthenocarpy in crop plants. In: Ostergaard L ( Oxford,ed.), Fruit Development and Seed Dispersal. UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009; 38:326-45

[10] Picarella ME, Mazzucato A. The occurrence of seedlessness in higher plants; insights on roles and mechanisms of partheno-carpy. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 9:1997

[11] Brazelton C. Global state of the blueberry industry report. Inter-national Blueberry Organization. Santiago, Chile, 2023. Available at: https://www.internationalblueberry.org/2023-report

[12] Campbell JW, Kimmel CB, Bammer M. et al. Managed and wild bee flower visitors and their potential contribution to pol-lination services of low-chill highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.; Ericales: Ericaceae). J Econ Entomol. 2018; 111: 2011-6

[13] Dogterom MH, Winston ML, Mukai A. Effect of pollen load size and source (self, outcross) on seed and fruit production in highbush blueberry cv. “Bluecrop” (Vaccinium corymbosum; Ericaceae). Am J Bot. 2000; 87:1584-91

[14] Mallinger RE, Ternest JJ, Weaver SA. et al. Importance of insect pollinators for Florida agriculture: a systematic review of the literature. Fla Entomol. 2021; 104:222-9

[15] Taber SK, Olmstead JW. Impact of cross-and self-pollination on fruit set, fruit size, seed number, and harvest timing among 13 southern highbush blueberry cultivars. HortTechnology. 2016; 26: 213-9

[16] Benjamin FE, Winfree R. Lack of pollinators limits fruit pro-duction in commercial blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Environ Entomol. 2014; 43:1574-83

[17] Cavigliasso P, Negri P, Viel M. et al. Precision management of pollination services to blueberry crops. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:1-8

[18] DeVetter LW, Chabert S, Milbrath MO. et al. Toward evidence-based decision support systems to optimize pollination and yields in highbush blueberry. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2022; 6:1006201

[19] Eeraerts M, Devetter LW, Batáry P. et al. Synthesis of highbush blueberry pollination research reveals region-specific differ-ences in the contributions of honeybees and wild bees. J Appl Ecol. 2023; 60:2528-39

[20] Nicholson CC, Ricketts TH. Wild pollinators improve produc-tion, uniformity, and timing of blueberry crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2019; 272:29-37

[21] Tuell JK, Isaacs R. Weather during bloom affects pollination and yield of highbush blueberry. J Econ Entomol. 2010; 103:557-62

[22] Javorek SK, Mackenzie KE, Vander SP. Comparative pollination effectiveness among bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) on lowbush blueberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium angustifolium). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2002; 95:345-51

[23] Ramírez-Mejía AF, Lomáscolo S, Blendinger PG. Hummingbirds, honeybees, and wild insect pollinators affect yield and berry quality of blueberries depending on cultivar and farm’s spatial context. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023; 342:108229

[24] Sun Q, Zhao X, Wu L. et al. Differences in pollination efficiency among three bee species in a greenhouse and their effects on yield and fruit quality of northern highbush ‘Bluecrop’ blueberry. HortScience. 2021; 56:603-7

[25] Courcelles DMM, Button L, Elle E. Bee visit rates vary with floral morphology among highbush blueberry cultivars (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). J Appl Entomol. 2013; 137:693-701

[26] Cromie J, Ternest JJ, Komatz AP. et al. Genotypic variation in blueberry flower morphology and nectar reward content affects pollinator attraction in a diverse breeding population. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24:814-3

[27] Ehlenfeldt MK. Breeding blueberries for the new century. Acta Hortic. 1997; 446:227-34

[28] Ehlenfeldt MK. Breeding for parthenocarpic fruit development in blueberry. 2012; 12:261-8

[29] Lyrene PM. Some problems and opportunities in blueberry breeding. Acta Hortic. 1993; 346:63-71

[30] Joldersma D, Liu Z. The making of virgin fruit: the molecular and genetic basis of parthenocarpy. JExp Bot. 2018; 69:955-62

[31] Subbaraya U, Rajendran S, Simeon S. et al. Unravelling the regulatory network of transcription factors in parthenocarpy. Sci Hortic. 2020; 261:108920

[32] Ehlenfeldt MK, Stringer SJ. Evaluations of parthenocarpy in Vaccinium virgatum Aiton (Rabbiteye) blueberry cultivars. JAm Pomol Soc. 2018; 72:2-11

[33] MacKenzie KE. Pollination requirements of three highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cultivars. JAmSocHortic Sci. 1997; 122:891-6

[34] Cullen R, Cromie J, Sawyer T. et al. Parthenocarpic fruit quality and production under pollinator-exclusion in southern high-bush blueberry. Sci Hortic. 2024; 328:112935

[35] Miyashita C, Koito Y, Ogiwara I. Utility of parthenocarpic inter-specific hybrids between Vaccinium corymbosum and Vac-cinium virgatum for breeding blueberry cultivars suitable for cluster harvesting. Hort J. 2019; 88:180

[36] Miyatake K, Saito T, Negoro S. et al. Development of selec-tive markers linked to a major QTL for parthenocarpy in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 124: 1403-13

[37] Shinozaki Y, Ezura K. Tomato fruit set and its modification using molecular breeding techniques. In: Ezura H, Ariizumi T, Garcia-Mas J, Rose J ( Berlin,eds.), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Heidelberg: Springer, 2016, 93-112

[38] Tian S, Zhang Z, Qin G. et al. Parthenocarpy in Cucurbitaceae: advances for economic and environmental sustainability. Plan Theory. 2023, 2023; 12:3462

[39] Wang X, Liu Z, Zhang F. et al. Integrative genomics reveals the polygenic basis of seedlessness in grapevine. Curr Biol. 2024; 34:3763-3777.e5

[40] Klap C, Yeshayahou E, Bolger AM. et al. Tomato facultative parthenocarpy results from SlAGAMOUS-LIKE 6 loss of func-tion. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15:634-47

[41] Martí C, Orzáez D, Ellul P. et al. Silencing of DELLA induces facultative parthenocarpy in tomato fruits. Plant J. 2007; 52: 865-76

[42] Beraldi D, Picarella ME, Soressi GP. et al. Fine mapping of the parthenocarpic fruit (pat) mutation in tomato. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 108:209-16

[43] Devi S, Sharma PK, Behera TK. et al. Identification of a major QTL, Parth6.1 associated with parthenocarpic fruit devel-opment in slicing cucumber genotype, Pusa Parthenocarpic Cucumber-6. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1064556

[44] Gorguet B, Eggink PM, Ocaña J. et al. Mapping and characteriza-tion of novel parthenocarpy QTLs in tomato. Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 116:755-67

[45] Lietzow CD, Zhu H, Pandey S. et al. QTL mapping of partheno-carpic fruit set in North American processing cucumber. Theor Appl Genet. 2016; 129:2387-401

[46] Wu Z, Zhang T, Li L. et al. Identification of a stable major-effect QTL (Parth 2.1) controlling parthenocarpy in cucumber and associated candidate gene analysis via whole genome re-sequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2016; 16:182-14

[47] Yoshioka Y, Nashiki A, Zaelani A. et al. Identification of major quantitative trait loci for parthenocarpic ability in East Asian melon. bioRxiv. 2023;2023.02.16.528896

[48] Gou C, Zhu P, Meng Y. et al. Evaluation and genetic analy-sis of parthenocarpic germplasms in cucumber. Genes (Basel). 2022; 13:225

[49] Sun Z, Staub JE, Chung SM. et al. Identification and com-parative analysis of quantitative trait loci associated with parthenocarpy in processing cucumber. Plant Breed. 2006; 125: 281-7

[50] Ferrão LFV, Amadeu RR, Benevenuto J. et al. Genomic selection in an outcrossing autotetraploid fruit crop: lessons from blue-berry breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:1075

[51] Benevenuto J, Ferrão LFV, Amadeu RR. et al. How can a high-quality genome assembly help plant breeders? Gigascience. 2019; 8:1-4

[52] Colle M, Leisner CP, Wai CM. et al. Haplotype-phased genome and evolution of phytonutrient pathways of tetraploid blue-berry. GigaScience, 2019;8

[53] Lee WP, Stromberg MP, Ward A. et al. MOSAIK: a hash-based algorithm for accurate next-generation sequencing short-read mapping. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e90581

[54] Garrison E, Marth G.Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arxiv [pre-print]. 2012

[55] Gerard D, Ferrão LFV, Garcia AAF. et al. Genotyping Polyploids from Messy Sequencing Data. Genetics, 2018; 210:789-807

[56] Pastina MM, Malosetti M, Gazaffi R. et al. A mixed model QTL analysis for sugarcane multiple-harvest-location trial data. Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 124:835-49

[57] De Lara LAC, Santos MF, Jank L. et al. Genomic selec-tion with allele dosage in Panicum maximum Jacq. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics. 2019; 9:2463-75

[58] Amadeu R. R., Garcia, A. A. F., Munoz P. R., & Ferrão, L. F. V.(2023) AGHmatrix: genetic relationship matrices in R. Bioinfor-matics, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad445

[59] Kerr RJ, Li L, Tier B. et al. Use of the numerator relationship matrix in genetic analysis of autopolyploid species. Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 124:1271-82

[60] Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR. et al. ASReml-R Reference Manual Version 4.2 ASReml Estimates Variance Components Under a General Linear Mixed Model by Residual Maximum Likelihood (REML). Hemel Hempstead, HP2 4TP, UK: VSN International Ltd., 2023

[61] Rosyara UR, De Jong WS, Douches DS. et al. Software for genome-wide association studies in autopolyploids and its application to potato. Plant Genome. 2016;9:

[62] Moskvina V, Schmidt KM. On multiple-testing correction in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2008; 32: 567-73

[63] Törönen P, Medlar A, Holm L. PANNZER2: a rapid functional annotation web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W84-8

[64] Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP. et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. MolBiolEvol. 2017; 34:2115-22

[65] Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolution-ary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 38:3022-7

[66] Endelman JB. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome. 2011; 4:250-5

[67] Ferrão LFV, Johnson TS, Benevenuto J. et al. Genome-wide asso-ciation of volatiles reveals candidate loci for blueberry flavor. New Phytol. 2020; 226:1725-37

[68] Quesada MA, Sánchez-Roldán C, Heredia A. et al. Peroxidase and IAA oxidase activities and peroxidase isoenzymes in the pericarp of seeded and seedless “Redhaven” peach fruit. JPlant Growth Regul. 1992; 11:1-6

[69] Li Y, Chen X, Jingquan Y. Changes in activities of ascorbate peroxidase and ascorbate oxidase in N-(2-Chloropyridyl)-N’-Phenylurea(CPPU)-induced parthenocarpic fruits of Lagenaria leucantha. Acta Hortic. 2008;105-112:105-12

[70] Tsaniklidis G, Delis C, Nikoloudakis N. et al. L-ascorbic acid metabolism in parthenocarpic and seeded cherry tomatoes. Plant Growth Regul. 2014; 72:141-53

[71] Mubarok S, Nuraini A, Hamdani JS. et al. Antioxidative response of parthenocarpic tomato, iaa9-3 and iaa9- 5, under heat stress condition. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024; 207:108333

[72] Melnick RL, Marelli JP, Sicher RC. et al. The interaction of Theobroma cacao and Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of witches’ broom disease, during parthenocarpy. Tree Genet Genomes. 2012; 8:1261-79

[73] Huang C, Wang Q, Zhang C. et al. Identification and expres-sion analysis of autophagy-related gene family associated with embryonic development in seeded and seedless grapes (Vitis vinifera). NZJCropHorticSci. 2023;1-18

[74] Martinelli F, Uratsu SL, Reagan RL. et al. Gene regulation in parthenocarpic tomato fruit. JExp Bot. 2009; 60:3873-90

[75] Meng J, Li Y, Xu J. et al. Cloning and expression analysis of the Expansin gene CsEXPb1 in cucumber. Acta Hortic Sin. 2015; 42:679

[76] Ruiu F, Picarella ME, Imanishi S. et al. A transcriptomic approach to identify regulatory genes involved in fruit set of wild-type and parthenocarpic tomato genotypes. Plant Mol Biol. 2015; 89:263-78

[77] Ito T, Meyerowitz EM. Overexpression of a gene encoding a cytochrome P450, CYP78A9, induces large and seedless fruit in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2000; 12:1541-50

[78] Sotelo-Silveira M, Cucinotta M, Chauvin AL. et al. Cytochrome P450 CYP78A9 is involved in Arabidopsis reproductive develop-ment. Plant Physiol. 2013; 162:779-99

[79] Gupta SK, Barg R, Arazi T. Tomato agamous-like6 partheno-carpy is facilitated by ovule integument reprogramming involv-ing the growth regulator KLUH. Plant Physiol. 2021; 185:969-84

[80] Zhang H, Han W, Wang H. et al. Downstream of GA4, PbCYP78A6 participates in regulating cell cycle-related genes and parthenogenesis in pear (Pyrus bretshneideri Rehd.). BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21:292-13

[81] Wang L, Zhang SL, Jiao C. et al. QTL-seq analysis of the seed size trait in grape provides new molecular insights on seedlessness. J Integr Agric. 2022; 21:2910-25

[82] Cheng C, Jiao C, Singer SD. et al. Gibberellin-induced changes in the transcriptome of grapevine (Vitis labrusca × V. vinifera) cv. Kyoho flowers. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16:1-16

[83] Liu W, Chen M, Bai L. et al. Comprehensive transcriptomics and proteomics analyses of pollinated and parthenocarpic litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) fruits during early development. Sci Rep. 2017, 2017; 7:1-16

[84] Liu Y, Sun J, Zhang M. et al. Identification of key genes related to seedlessness by genome-wide detection of structural vari-ation and transcriptome analysis in ‘Shijiwuhe’ pear. Gene. 2020; 738:144480

[85] Jia Y, Wu YP, Wang FW. et al. Full-length transcriptome sequencing analysis and characterization of gene isoforms involved in flavonoid biosynthesis in the seedless kiwifruit cultivar ‘Chengxiang’ (Actinidia arguta). Diversity (Basel). 2022; 14:424

[86] Yin P, Ding W, Zhang H. et al. Morphological, physiological and molecular characteristics of the seedless ‘Hongjiangcheng’ sweet orange. Hortic Plant J. 2023; 9:437-49

[87] Jung CJ, Hur YY, Jung SM. et al. Transcriptional changes of gibberellin oxidase genes in grapevines with or without gib-berellin application during inflorescence development. JPlant Res. 2014; 127:359-71

[88] Pomares-Viciana T, Del Río-Celestino M, Román B. et al. First RNA-seq approach to study fruit set and partheno-carpy in zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 61-20

[89] Domingos S, Fino J, Paulo OS. et al. Molecular candidates for early-stage flower-to-fruit transition in stenospermocarpic table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) inflorescences ascribed by dif-ferential transcriptome and metabolome profiles. Plant Sci. 2016; 244:40-56

[90] Nishitani C, Yamaguchi-Nakamura A, Hosaka F. et al. Partheno-carpic genetic resources and gene expression related to parthenocarpy among four species in pear (Pyrus spp.). Sci Hortic. 2012; 136:101-9

[91] Olimpieri I, Siligato F, Caccia R. et al. Tomato fruit set driven by pollination or by the parthenocarpic fruit allele are mediated by transcriptionally regulated gibberellin biosynthesis. Planta. 2007; 226:877-88

[92] Mazzucato A, Picarella ME, Ruiu F.The interaction bewteen parthenocarpic fruit and curl indicates a role of class I KNOX genes in tomato fruit set. In:Proceedings of the 56th Italian Society of Agricultural Genetics Annual Congress. 2012; 51

[93] Tang N, Deng W, Hu G. et al. Transcriptome profiling reveals the regulatory mechanism underlying pollination dependent and parthenocarpic fruit set mainly mediated by auxin and gibberellin. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0125355

[94] Goetz M, Hooper LC, Johnson SD. et al. Expression of aberrant forms of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR8 stimulates parthenocarpy in Arabidopsis and tomato. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145:351-66

[95] Kumar R, Khurana A, Sharma AK. Role of plant hormones and their interplay in development and ripening of fleshy fruits. JExp Bot. 2014; 65:4561-75

[96] Su L, Rahat S, Ren N. et al. Cytokinin and auxin modulate cucumber parthenocarpy fruit development. Sci Hortic. 2021; 282:110026

[97] Liu L, Wang Z, Liu J. et al. Histological, hormonal and transcrip-tomic reveal the changes upon gibberellin-induced partheno-carpy in pear fruit. Hortic Res. 2018a, 2018; 5:1-13

[98] Liu R, How-Kit A, Stammitti L. et al. A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112:10804-9

[99] Li Y, Zhang S, Dong R. et al. The grapevine homeobox gene VvHB58 influences seed and fruit development through multi-ple hormonal signaling pathways. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19:1-18

[100] Hou Y, Li H, Zhai L. et al. Identification and functional char-acterization of the Aux/IAA gene VcIAA27 in blueberry. Plant Signal Behav. 2020; 15:1700327

[101] Ehlenfeldt M. K., & Vorsa N. (2007). Inheritance Patterns of Parthenocarpic Fruit Development in Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). HortScience, 42(5), 1127-1130. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.42.5.1127

[102] Barcelos E, De Almeida Rios S, Cunha RNV. et al. Oil palm natural diversity and the potential for yield improvement. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6:1-16

[103] Damayanti F, Lombardo F, Masuda JI. et al. Functional dis-ruption of the tomato putative ortholog of HAWAIIAN SKIRT results in facultative parthenocarpy, reduced fertility and leaf morphological defects. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:472730

[104] Liu M, Chen Y, Chen Y. et al. The tomato ethylene response fac-tor Sl-ERF.B3 integrates ethylene and auxin signaling via direct regulation of Sl-Aux/IAA27. New Phytol. 2018b; 219:631-40

[105] Su LY, Audran C, Bouzayen M. et al. The Aux/IAA, Sl-IAA17 regulates quality parameters over tomato fruit development. Plant Signal Behav. 2015; 10:e1071001

[106] Wang H, Schauer N, Usadel B. et al. Regulatory features under-lying pollination-dependent and -independent tomato fruit set revealed by transcript and primary metabolite profiling. Plant Cell. 2009; 21:1428-52

[107] Bassa C, Mila I, Bouzayen M. et al. Phenotypes associated with down-regulation of Sl-IAA27 support functional diversity among Aux/IAA family members in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012; 53:1583-95

[108] Hay A, Tsiantis M. KNOX genes: versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development. 2010; 137:3153-65

[109] Tanaka-Ueguchib M, Itoh H, Oyama N. et al. Over-expression of a tobacco homeobox gene, NTH15, decreases the expression of a gibberellin biosynthetic gene encoding GA 20-oxidase. Plant J. 1998; 15:391-400

[110] Dieter P. Calmodulin and calmodulin-mediated processes in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1984; 7:371-80

[111] Galon Y, Snir O, Fromm H. How calmodulin binding transcrip-tion activators (CAMTAs) mediate auxin responses. Plant Signal Behav. 2010; 5:1311-4

[112] Yang T, Poovaiah BW. Molecular and biochemical evidence for the involvement of calcium/calmodulin in auxin action. JBiol Chem. 2000; 275:3137-43

[113] Wang X, Yang F, Zhu P. et al. Cloning and functional anal-ysis of the promoter of CsCML25 gene related to deter-minate growth in cucumber. J Nanjing Agric Univ. 2020; 43: 621-8

[114] Liu J, Zhang L, Meng Y. et al. Study on cucumber parthenocarpy induced by over-expressing of calmodulin-like protein gene CML25-like. J Nanjing Agric Univ. 2019; 42:421-9

[115] Bernardo R. Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants.3rd ed. Woodbury, MN: Stemma Press; 2020:

[116] Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007; 124:323-30

[117] Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001; 157:1819-29

[118] Bernardo R. Genomewide selection when major genes are known. Crop Sci. 2014; 54:68-75

[119] Dekkers JC. Commercial application of marker-and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. JAnim Sci. 2004;82 E-Suppl:E313-28

[120] de Bem Oliveira I, Amadeu RR, Ferrão LFV. et al. Optimizing whole-genomic prediction for autotetraploid blueberry breed-ing. Heredity. 2020; 125:437-48

[121] Minamikawa MF, Kunihisa M, Moriya S. et al. Genomic pre-diction and genome-wide association study using combined genotypic data from different genotyping systems: application to apple fruit quality traits. Hortic Res. 2024;11:uhae131

[122] Sun M, Zhang M, Kumar S. et al. Genomic selection of eight fruit traits in pear. Hortic Plant J. 2024; 10:318-26

[123] Spindel JE, Begum H, Akdemir D. et al. Genome-wide prediction models that incorporate de novo GWAS are a powerful new tool for tropical rice improvement. Heredity. 2016, 2016; 116:395-408

[124] Haile TA, Walkowiak S, N’Diaye A. et al. Genomic prediction of agronomic traits in wheat using different models and cross-validation designs. Theor Appl Genet. 2021; 134:381-98