CHROMOMETHYLASE3 governs male fertility to affect seed production in tomato

Abstract

To produce mature seed, flowering plants must undergo successful male and female gametogenesis and pollination followed by fruit set, growth, and ripening. This sequential process involves complex genetic programming and less understood epigenetic reprogramming. Here we report a previously unidentified CHROMOMETHYLASE3-directed epi-control in pollen mother cell (PMC)-to-microspore transition that determines male fertility to affect seed formation. We generated and characterized hairpin RNA-mediated RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9 transgenic tomato lines in which CHROMOMETHYLASE3 (CMT3) was either knockdown (KD) or knockout (KO). CHROMOMETHYLASE3 has pleiotropic effects on vegetative and reproductive growth, including leaf, flower, and seed development, besides its influence on tomato ripening and fruit size. However, CMT3 KD plants exhibited stronger effects than KO plants in terms of these vegetative and reproductive processes. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis suggested that genetic compensation might contribute to the less impact of KO plants on pollen and seed development. Integrated RNA-seq and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing reveal that CMT3 functions as an epi-switch via a self-feedback mechanism to modulate gene expression and governs early development of microspores from PMCs prior to the tetrad stage during microsporogenesis to microgametogenesis, possibly through the pectin catabolic process, to establish pollen fertility that affects seed production in tomato.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601765 to W.C., 32372728 to L.H.), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LZ22C150001 to J.Y.; LY24C150007 to W.C.), Joint Agricultural Project of the Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province (202401BD070001-010), and Yunnan Province Ye Zhibiao Expert Workstation (202505AF350029).

Author contributions

J.Y., H.Z., and W.C. planned and designed the research; H.Z., W.C., and L.C. performed experiments. H.Z., W.C., Y.H., Z.Y., L.C., and L.H. analyzed data, and Y.J., H.Z., W.C., and Y.H. wrote the manuscript.

Data availability

All data in the main text and the supplementary materials are available upon request. WGBS and RNA-seq datasets have been deposited in NCBI under accession number PRJNA1175415.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1] Erbasol Serbes I, Palovaara J, Groß-Hardt R. Development and function of the flowering plant female gametophyte. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2019; 131:401-34

[2] Cheng Z, Song W, Zhang X. Genic male and female sterility in vegetable crops. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhac232

[3] Ashapkin VV, Kutueva LI, Aleksandrushkina NI. et al. Epigenetic regulation of plant gametophyte development. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20:3051

[4] Cao X, Jacobsen SE. Role of the Arabidopsis DRM methyltrans-ferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing. Curr Biol. 2002; 12:1138-44

[5] Jullien PE, Susaki D, Yelagandula R. et al. DNA methylation dynamics during sexual reproduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol. 2012; 22:1825-30

[6] Woo HR, Dittmer TA, Richards EJ. Three SRA-domain methylcytosine-binding proteins cooperate to maintain global CpG methylation and epigenetic silencing in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2008; 4:e1000156

[7] Johnson LM, Bostick M, Zhang X. et al. The SRA methyl-cytosine-binding domain links DNA and histone methylation. Curr Biol. 2007; 17:379-84

[8] Du J, Zhong X, Bernatavichute YV. et al. Dual binding of chro-momethylase domains to H3K9me2-containing nucleosomes directs DNA methylation in plants. Cell. 2012; 151:167-80

[9] Feng S, Jacobsen SE. Epigenetic modifications in plants: an evo-lutionary perspective. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011; 14:179-86

[10] Zemach A, Kim MY, Hsieh PH. et al. The Arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin. Cell. 2013; 153: 193-205

[11] Stroud H, Do T, Du J. et al. Non-CG methylation patterns shape the epigenetic landscape in Arabidopsis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014; 21:64-72

[12] Saze H, Mittelsten Scheid O, Paszkowski J. Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Nat Genet. 2003; 34:65-9

[13] Liu R, How-Kit A, Stammitti L. et al. A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA. 2015; 112:10804-9

[14] Khouider S, Borges F, LeBlanc C. et al. Male fertility in Arabidopsis requires active DNA demethylation of genes that control pollen tube function. Nat Commun. 2021; 12:410

[15] Hu L, Li N, Xu C. et al. Mutation of a major CG methylase in rice causes genome-wide hypomethylation, dysregulated genome expression, and seedling lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111:10642-7

[16] Yamauchi T, Johzuka-Hisatomi Y, Terada R. et al. The MET1b gene encoding a maintenance DNA methyltransferase is indis-pensable for normal development in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2014; 85: 219-32

[17] Yao M, Chen W, Kong J. et al. METHYLTRANSFERASE1 and ripen-ing modulate Vivipary during tomato fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2020; 183:1883-97

[18] Zhong S, Fei Z, Chen YR. et al. Single-base resolution methy-lomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome mod-ifications associated with ripening. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 154-9

[19] Walker J, Gao H, Zhang J. et al. Sexual-lineage-specific DNA methylation regulates meiosis in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet. 2018; 50: 130-7

[20] Zheng S, Li J, Ma L. et al. OsAGO 2 controls ROS production and the initiation of tapetal PCD by epigenetically regulating OsHXK1 expression in rice anthers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116: 7549-58

[21] Manning K, Tör M, Poole M. et al. A naturally occurring epi-genetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcrip-tion factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 948-52

[22] Wu C, Yang Y, Su D. et al. The SlHB8 acts as a negative regulator in tapetum development and pollen wall formation in tomato. Hortic Res. 2022;9:uhac185

[23] Chen W, Kong J, Qin C. et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHY LASE3 for somatic inheritance of the spontaneous tomato epimutation Colourless non-ripening. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:9192

[24] Chen W, Yu Z, Kong J. et al. Comparative WGBS iden-tifies genes that influence non-ripe phenotype in tomato epimutant Colourless non-ripening. Sci China Life Sci. 2018; 61: 244-52

[25] Lai T, Wang X, Ye B. et al. Molecular and functional characteriza-tion of the SBP-box transcription factor SPL-CNR in tomato fruit ripening and cell death. JExp Bot. 2020; 71:2995-3011

[26] Chen W, Zhang X, Fan Y. et al. A genetic network for systemic RNA silencing in plants. Plant Physiol. 2018; 176:2700-19

[27] Zhu H, Han G, Wang J. et al. CG hypermethylation of the bHLH39 promoter regulates its expression and Fe deficiency responses in tomato roots. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad104

[28] Gómez JF, Talle B, Wilson ZA. Anther and pollen development: a conserved developmental pathway. J Integr Plant Biol. 2015; 57: 876-91

[29] Jiang L, Yang S, Xie L. et al. VANGUARD1 encodes a pectin methylesterase that enhances pollen tube growth in the Arabidopsis style and transmitting tract. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 584-96

[30] Chebli Y, Geitmann A. Pectate lyase-like lubricates the male gametophyte’s path toward its mating partner. Plant Physiol. 2023; 194:124-36

[31] Ingouff M, Rademacher S, Holec S. et al. Zygotic resetting of the HISTONE 3 variant repertoire participates in epigenetic repro-gramming in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2010; 20:2137-43

[32] Houben A, Kumke K, Nagaki K. et al. CENH3 distribution and dif-ferential chromatin modifications during pollen development in rye (Secale cereale L.). Chromosome Res. 2011; 19:471-80

[33] Grant-Downton R, Hafidh S, Twell D. et al. Small RNA pathways are present and functional in the angiosperm male gameto-phyte. Mol Plant. 2009; 2:500-12

[34] Schoft VK, Chumak N, Choi Y. et al. Function of the DEMETER DNA glycosylase in the Arabidopsis thaliana male gametophyte. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:8042-7

[35] Grant-Downton R, Le Trionnaire G, Schmid R. et al. MicroRNA and tasiRNA diversity in mature pollen of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10:643

[36] Slotkin RK, Vaughn M, Borges F. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming and small RNA silencing of transposable elements in pollen. Cell. 2009; 136:461-72

[37] Martínez G, Panda K, Köhler C. et al. Silencing in sperm cells is directed by RNA movement from the surrounding nurse cell. Nat Plants. 2016; 2:16030

[38] Long J, Walker J, She W. et al. Nurse cell--derived small RNAs define paternal epigenetic inheritance in Arabidopsis. Science. 2021;373:eabh0556

[39] Shibuya K, Fukushima S, Takatsuji H. RNA-directed DNA methy-lation induces transcriptional activation in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106:1660-5

[40] Wang R, Angenent GC, Seymour G. et al. Revisiting the role of master regulators in tomato ripening. Trends Plant Sci. 2020; 25: 291-301

[41] Solís MT, Rodríguez-Serrano M, Meijón M. et al. DNA methyla-tion dynamics and MET1a-like gene expression changes during stress-induced pollen reprogramming to embryogenesis. JExp Bot. 2012; 63:6431-44

[42] Yin W, Yang H, Wang Y. et al. Oryza sativa PECTIN DEFEC-TIVE TAPETUM1 affects anther development through a pectin-mediated signaling pathway in rice. Plant Physiol. 2022; 189: 1570-86

[43] Xu J, Wang Z, Wang J. et al. Low phosphate represses histone deacetylase complex1 to regulate root system architecture remodeling in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2020; 225: 1732-45

[44] Zhang Z, Zhu J, Gao J. et al. Transcription factor AtMYB103 is required for anther development by regulating tapetum devel-opment, callose dissolution and exine formation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007; 52:528-38