CrWRKY57 and CrABF3 cooperatively activate CrCYCD6;1 to modulate drought tolerance and root development

Abstract

Drought is a major abiotic stress. WRKYs are one of the largest families of transcription factors (TFs) in plants. The effects of most WRKYs on developmental regulation and drought adaptation in Citrus remain largely unclear. Citrus reticulata cv. Sanhu hongju (Sanhu) is a drought-tolerant variety from Jiangxi Province, China. Here, we report a differentially expressed CrWRKY57 gene in drought-treated Sanhu leaves through transcriptome analysis. Its transcriptional expression could be induced by abscisic acid (ABA) treatment and water deficit. Overexpression of CrWRKY57 in lemon (Citrus limon) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) confers enhanced drought tolerance, while RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated silencing in Sanhu increases dehydration susceptibility and reduces root volume. Moreover, virus-induced gene silencing-mediated knockdown of CrWRKY57 in Sanhu reduces primary root length and lateral root number by nearly 50% compared to the control. The results of yeast two-hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation assays and bimolecular fluorescence complementation demonstrate that CrWRKY57 interacts with CrABF3, a key TF in ABA signaling. Silencing ClABF3, its homolog in lemon, also increases drought sensitivity and disrupts root system development. Together, CrWRKY57 and CrABF3 directly activate the promoter of the cell cycle gene CrCYCD6;1 by binding to W-box and ABRE elements, respectively. Furthermore, silencing CrCYCD6;1 in Sanhu also severely reduces primary root length and lateral root number. Collectively, our findings provide a new perspective of CrWRKY57 as a positive player in drought response and highlight the role of the CrWRKY57-CrABF-CrCYCD6;1 module in enhancing drought tolerance by modulating root development.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260749, 31760563) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20212ACB205001).

Author contributions

T.P. designed the study, supervised the research, and drafted the manuscript. J.M., X.X., and Z.Z. performed experiments, analyzed data, and contributed equally. L.L., Y.X., W.M., and W.D. conducted experiments. S.Z. participated in review and editing. All authors discussed the results and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

All relevant data in this study can be found in the article and its supporting files.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1] Kim J, Kidokoro S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. et al. Regulatory networks in plant responses to drought and cold stress. Plant Physiol. 2024; 195:170-89

[2] Wang Z, Zhong R, Lai C. et al. Climate change enhances the severity and variability of drought in the Pearl River Basin in South China in the 21st century. Agric Forest Meteorol. 2018; 249: 149-62

[3] Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado AI. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science. 2020; 368:266-9

[4] Du L, Huang X, Ding L. et al. TaERF87 and TaAKS1 synergisti-cally regulate TaP5CS1/TaP5CR1-mediated proline biosynthesis to enhance drought tolerance in wheat. New Phytol. 2023; 237: 232-50

[5] Luan Y, Chen Z, Fang Z. et al. PoWRKY69-PoVQ11 module posi-tively regulates drought tolerance by accumulating fructose in Paeonia ostii. Plant J. 2024; 119:1782-99

[6] Mandal D, Datta S, Mitra S. et al. ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3 promotes auxin signalling by regulating SHY2 expression to control primary root growth in response to dehydration stress. JExp Bot. 2024; 75:5111-29

[7] Yang Y, Li H, Wang J. et al. ABF3 enhances drought toler-ance via promoting ABA-induced stomatal closure by directly regulating ADF5 in Populus euphratica. JExp Bo.t 2020; 71: 7270-85

[8] Zhang Q, Wang M, Hu J. et al. PtrABF of Poncirus trifoliata func-tions in dehydration tolerance by reducing stomatal density and maintaining reactive oxygen species homeostasis. JExp Bot. 2015; 66:5911-27

[9] Dahro B, Li C, Liu JH. Overlapping responses to multiple abiotic stresses in citrus: from mechanism understanding to genetic improvement. Hortic Adv. 2023; 1:4

[10] Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Robatzek S. et al. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000; 5:199-206

[11] Wang H, Chen W, Xu Z. et al. Functions of WRKYs in plant growth and development. Trends Plant Sci. 2023; 28:630-45

[12] Rushton DL, Tripathi P, Rabara RC. et al. WRKY transcription fac-tors: key components in abscisic acid signalling. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012; 10:2-11

[13] Li S, Khoso MA, Wu J. et al. Exploring the mechanisms of WRKY transcription factors and regulated pathways in response to abiotic stress. Plant Stress. 2024b; 12:100429

[14] Ayadi M, Hanana M, Kharrat N. et al. The WRKY transcrip-tion factor family in Citrus: valuable and useful candidate genes for Citrus breeding. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2016; 180: 516-43

[15] Gong X, Zhang J, Hu J. et al. FcWRKY70, a WRKY protein of For-tunella crassifolia, functions in drought tolerance and modulates putrescine synthesis by regulating arginine decarboxylase gene. Plant Cell Environ. 2015; 38:2248-62

[16] Dai W, Wang M, Gong X. et al. The transcription factor FcWRKY40 of Fortunella crassifolia functions positively in salt tolerance through modulation of ion homeostasis and proline biosynthe-sis by directly regulating SOS2 and P5CS1 homologs. New Phytol. 2018; 219:972-89

[17] Chen K, Li GJ, Bressan RA. et al. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020; 62:25-54

[18] Kang JY, Choi HI, Im MY. et al. Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper proteins that mediate stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell. 2002; 14:343-57

[19] Kuromori T, Fujita M, Takahashi F. et al. Inter-tissue and inter-organ signaling in drought stress response and phenotyping of drought tolerance. Plant J. 2022; 109:342-58

[20] Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016; 167:313-24

[21] Soon FF, Ng LM, Zhou XE. et al. Molecular mimicry regulates ABA signaling by SnRK2 kinases and PP2C phosphatases. Science. 2012; 335:85-8

[22] Wang X, Guo C, Peng J. et al. ABRE-BINDING FACTORS play a role in the feedback regulation of ABA signaling by mediating rapid ABA induction of ABA co-receptor genes. New Phytol. 2019; 221: 341-55

[23] Ma Y, Szostkiewicz I, Korte A. et al. Regulators of PP2C phos-phatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science. 2009; 324:1064-8

[24] YoshidaT, FujitaY, MaruyamaK. et al. Four Arabidopsis ARE-B/ABF transcription factors function predominantly in gene expression downstream of SnRK2 kinases in abscisic acid sig-nalling in response to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2015; 38: 35-49

[25] Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R. et al. AREB1 is a transcription acti-vator of novel ABRE-dependent ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 3470-88

[26] Song J, Sun P, Kong W. et al. SnRK2.4-mediated phosphoryla-tion of ABF2 regulates ARGININE DECARBOXYLASE expression and putrescine accumulation under drought stress. New Phytol. 2023; 238:216-36

[27] Uno Y, Furihata T, Abe H. et al. Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper transcription factors involved in an abscisic acid-dependent signal transduction pathway under drought and high-salinity conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97:11632-7

[28] Liu J, Shu D, Tan Z. et al. The Arabidopsis IDD14 transcription fac-tor interacts with bZIP-type ABFs/AREBs and cooperatively reg-ulates ABA-mediated drought tolerance. New Phytol. 2022; 236: 929-42

[29] Hwang K, Susila H, Nasim Z. et al. Arabidopsis ABF3 and ABF4 transcription factors act with the NF-YC complex to regulate SOC1 expression and mediate drought-accelerated flowering. Mol Plant. 2019; 12:489-505

[30] Inzé D, de Veylder L. Cell cycle regulation in plant development. Annu Rev Genet. 2006; 40:77-105

[31] Menges M, Pavesi G, Morandini P. et al. Genomic organization and evolutionary conservation of plant D-type cyclins. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145:1558-76

[32] Sozzani R, Cui H, Moreno-Risueno MA. et al. Spatiotemporal regulation of cell-cycle genes by SHORTROOT links patterning and growth. Nature. 2010; 466:128-32

[33] Xie C, Li C, Wang F. et al. NAC1 regulates root ground tissue maturation by coordinating with the SCR/SHR-CYCD6;1 module in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2023; 16:709-25

[34] Gonçalves LP, Boscariol Camargo RL, Takita MA. et al. Rootstock-induced molecular responses associated with drought toler-ance in sweet orange as revealed by RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20:110

[35] Vives-Peris V, Pérez-Clemente RM, Gómez-Cadenas A. et al. Involvement of citrus shoots in response and tolerance to abiotic stress. Hortic Adv. 2024; 2:597

[36] Zhong ZF, Zhang LJ, Gao SS. et al. Leaf cytological characteris-tics and resistance comparison of four Citrus rootstocks under drought stress. Acta Hortic Sin. 2021; 48:1579-88

[37] Jiang Y, Liang G, Yu D. Activated expression of WRKY57 confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2012; 5:1375-88

[38] Ahammed GJ, Li X, Yang Y. et al. Tomato WRKY81 acts as a negative regulator for drought tolerance by modulating guard cell H2O2-mediated stomatal closure. Environ Exp Bot. 2020; 171:103960

[39] Hu Z, Wang R, Zheng M. et al. TaWRKY51 promotes lateral root formation through negative regulation of ethylene biosynthesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant J. 2018; 96:372-88

[40] Lim C, Kang K, Shim Y. et al. Inactivating transcription factor OsWRKY5 enhances drought tolerance through abscisic acid signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. 2022; 188:1900-16

[41] Yu F, Wang Z, Shi D. et al. Understanding the role of GsWRKY transcription factors modulating the biosynthesis of schaftoside in Grona styracifolia. Hortic Adv. 2023; 1:16

[42] Jiang Y, Qiu Y, Hu Y. et al. Heterologous expression of AtWRKY57 confers drought tolerance in Oryza sativa. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:145

[43] Fang Y, Wang D, Xiao L. et al. Allelic variation in transcription factor PtoWRKY68 contributes to drought tolerance in Populus. Plant Physiol. 2023; 193:736-55

[44] Shang Y, Yan L, Liu Z-Q. et al. The Mg-chelatase H subunit of Ara-bidopsis antagonizes a group of WRKY transcription repressors to relieve ABA-responsive genes of inhibition. Plant Cell. 2010; 22: 1909-35

[45] Wang D, Jiang C, Liu W. et al. The WRKY53 transcription factor enhances stilbene synthesis and disease resistance by interact-ing with MYB14 and MYB15 in Chinese wild grape. JExp Bot. 2020; 71:3211-26

[46] Pincelli-Souza RP, Tang Q, Miller BM. et al. Horticultural potential of chemical biology to improve adventitious rooting. Hortic Adv. 2024; 2:859

[47] Ramachandran P, Ramirez A, Dinneny JR. Rooting for survival: how plants tackle a challenging environment through a diversity of root forms and functions. Plant Physiol. 2024;197:kiae586

[48] Feng X, Jia L, Cai Y. et al. ABA-inducible DEEPER ROOTING 1 improves adaptation of maize to water deficiency. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022; 20:2077-88

[49] Duan L, Dietrich D, Ng CH. et al. Endodermal ABA signaling promotes lateral root quiescence during salt stress in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell. 2013; 25:324-41

[50] Zhang H, Han W, de Smet I. et al. ABA promotes quiescence of the quiescent centre and suppresses stem cell differentiation in the Arabidopsis primary root meristem. Plant J. 2010; 64:764-74

[51] Luo X, Xu J, Zheng C. et al. Abscisic acid inhibits primary root growth by impairing ABI4-mediated cell cycle and auxin biosyn-thesis. Plant Physiol. 2023; 191:265-79

[52] Qin H, Wang J, Zhou J. et al. Abscisic acid promotes auxin biosyn-thesis to inhibit primary root elongation in rice. Plant Physiol. 2023; 191:1953-67

[53] Yoshida T, Fujita Y, Sayama H. et al. AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tol-erance and require ABA for full activation. Plant J. 2010; 61: 672-85

[54] Li C, Chen Y, Hu Q. et al. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 3b and transcription factor ABF3 modulate abscisic acid-dependent drought stress response in soybean. Plant Physiol. 2024; 195: 3053-71

[55] Liang T, Yu S, Pan Y. et al. The interplay between the circa-dian clock and abiotic stress responses mediated by ABF3 and CCA1/LHY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121:e2316825121

[56] Masubelele NH, Dewitte W, Menges M. et al. D-type cyclins activate division in the root apex to promote seed germination in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102:15694-9

[57] Chang J, Hu J, Wu L. et al. Three RLKs integrate SHR-SCR and gib-berellins to regulate root ground tissue patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol. 2024; 34:5295-5306.e5

[58] Tian Y, Zhao N, Wang M. et al. Integrated regulation of periclinal cell division by transcriptional module of BZR1-SHR in Arabidop-sis roots. New Phytol. 2022; 233:795-808

[59] Stoeckle D, Thellmann M, Vermeer JE. Breakout-lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018; 41: 67-72

[60] Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36

[61] Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M. et al. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25

[62] Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28:511-5

[63] Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK. et al. Gene ontology anal-ysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R14

[64] Ai C, Kong L. CGPS: a machine learning-based approach inte-grating multiple gene set analysis tools for better prioritization of biologically relevant pathways. J Genet Genomics. 2018; 45: 489-504

[65] Zheng Y, Jiao C, Sun H. et al. iTAK: a program for genome-wide prediction and classification of plant transcription factors, transcriptional regulators, and protein kinases. Mol Plant. 2016; 9: 1667-70

[66] Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25:402-8

[67] Peng T, Zhu XF, Duan N. et al. PtrBAM1,a β-amylase-coding gene of Poncirus trifoliata, is a CBF regulon member with function in cold tolerance by modulating soluble sugar levels. Plant Cell Environ. 2014; 37:2754-67

[68] Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL. et al. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985; 227: 1229-31

[69] Peng T, You X-S, Guo L. et al. Transcriptome analysis of Chongyi wild mandarin, a wild species more cold-tolerant than Poncirus trifoliata, reveals key pathways in response to cold. Environ Exp Bot. 2021; 184:104371

[70] Orozco-Cardenas M, Ryan CA. Hydrogen peroxide is generated systemically in plant leaves by wounding and systemin via the octadecanoid pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96:6553-7

[71] Wong HL, Pinontoan R, Hayashi K. et al. Regulation of rice NADPH oxidase by binding of rac GTPase to its N-terminal extension. Plant Cell. 2007; 19:4022-34

[72] Bureau C, Lanau N, Ingouff M. et al. A protocol combiningmul-tiphoton microscopy and propidium iodide for deep 3D root meristem imaging in rice: application for the screening and identification of tissue-specific enhancer trap lines. Plant Meth-ods. 2018; 14:96

[73] Liu L, Zhang Y, Tang S. et al. An efficient system to detect protein ubiquitination by agroinfiltration in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2010; 61:893-903