Epigenetic crop improvement: Integrating ENCODE strategies into horticultural breeding

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and RNA-associated silencing, play critical roles in regulating gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. In horticultural crops, these mechanisms control key biological processes, including fruit development and ripening, flowering time, stress adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity. Driven by high-throughput sequencing and multi-omics technologies, researchers have begun to uncover the dynamic landscape of plant epigenomes. Notably, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project was developed to systematically map functional elements within the genome. Inspired by this initiative, similar strategies have been increasingly applied to plants to identify regulatory elements, chromatin states, and transcriptional networks. This review integrates recent findings on epigenetic regulation in model and horticultural species, emphasizing the role of epigenomic tools and ENCODE-like approaches in annotating cis-regulatory elements, epigenetic markers, and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). We discuss how epigenetic modifications mediate developmental transitions and responses to environmental cues. Finally, we propose a framework for integrating ENCODE-derived insights with precision breeding to improve yield, quality, and stress resilience in horticultural crops. These advancements offer exciting opportunities for translating epigenomic knowledge into practical crop improvement strategies.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful for the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 32341043).

Author contributions

H.S. and X.Y. wrote the manuscript. I.N. and F.C.L.C. prepared the illustrations. S.Z. and L.Z. provided critical revisions. X.C. conceived the idea, and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Tossolini I, Mencia R, Arce AL. et al. The genome awakens: transposon-mediated gene regulation. Trends Plant Sci. 2025; 30: 857-71

[2] Yu M-H, Liao W-C, Wu K. Histone methylation in plant responses to abiotic stresses. JExp Bot. 2025;eraf058

[3] Zhang H, Lang Z, Zhu J-K. Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018; 19:489-506

[4] Holoch D, Moazed D. RNA-mediated epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 2015; 16:71-84

[5] Gayathiri E, Viswanathan D, Prakash P. et al. A critical review on epigenetics and epigenomics in plant development and stress resilience. Brazilian J Bot. 2025; 48:51

[6] Varotto S, Tani E, Abraham E. et al. Epigenetics: possible applica-tions in climate-smart crop breeding. JExpBot. 2020; 71:5223-36

[7] Springer NM, Schmitz RJ. Exploiting induced and natural epi-genetic variation for crop improvement. Nat Rev Genet. 2017; 18: 563-75

[8] Zhang H, Zhu JK. Epigenetic gene regulation in plants and its potential applications in crop improvement. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024; 26:51-67

[9] Gahlaut V, Zinta G, Jaiswal V. et al. Quantitative epigenetics: a new avenue for crop improvement. Epigenomes. 2020; 4:25

[10] Zhang Y, Huang D, Miao Y. Epigenetic control of plant senes-cence and cell death and its application in crop improvement. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1258487

[11] Fang W, Fasano C, Perrella G. Unlocking the secret to higher crop yield: the potential for histone modifications. Plants. 2023; 12:1712

[12] Hou Q, Wan X. Epigenome and epitranscriptome: potential resources for crop improvement. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22:12912

[13] Lü P, Yu S, Zhu N. et al. Genome encode analyses reveal the basis of convergent evolution of fleshy fruit ripening. Nat Plants. 2018; 4:784-91

[14] Mansilla N, Ferrero L, Ariel FD. et al. The potential use of the epigenetic remodeler LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 (LHP1) as a tool for crop improvement. Horticulturae. 2023; 9:199

[15] Rodríguez López CM, Wilkinson MJ. Epi-fingerprinting and epi-interventions for improved crop production and food quality. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6:397

[16] Varotto S, Krugman T, Aiese Cigliano R. et al. Exploitation of epi-genetic variation of crop wild relatives for crop improvement and agrobiodiversity preservation. Theor Appl Genet. 2022; 135: 3987-4003

[17] Lane AK, Niederhuth CE, Ji L. et al. pENCODE: a plant encyclo-pedia of DNA elements. Annu Rev Genet. 2014; 48:49-70

[18] Fu L-Y, Zhu T, Zhou X. et al. ChIP-Hub provides an inte-grative platform for exploring plant regulome. Nat Commun. 2022; 13:3413

[19] Chang Y, Zhu C, Jiang J. et al. Epigenetic regulation in plant abiotic stress responses. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020; 62:563-80

[20] Hannan Parker A, Wilkinson SW, Ton J. Epigenetics: a catalyst of plant immunity against pathogens. New Phytol. 2022; 233: 66-83

[21] Srikanth A, Schmid M. Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011; 68:2013-37

[22] Kim D-H, Doyle MR, Sung S. et al. Vernalization: winter and the timing of flowering in plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev. 2009; 25:277-99

[23] Khan MRG, Ai X, Zhang J. Genetic regulation of flowering time in annual and perennial plants. WileyInterdiscipRev RNA. 2014; 5:347-59

[24] Wang S-L, An HR, Tong C-G. et al. Flowering and flowering genes: from model plants to orchids. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2021; 62:135-48

[25] Shi M, Wang C, Wang P. et al. Role of methylation in vernaliza-tion and photoperiod pathway: a potential flowering regulator?Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad174

[26] Kakoulidou I, Avramidou EV, Baránek M. et al. Epigenetics for crop improvement in times of global change. Biology (Basel). 2021; 10:766

[27] Kondo, Shiraya T, Wada KC. et al. Induction of flowering by DNA demethylation in Perilla frutescens and Silene armeria:her-itability of 5-azacytidine-induced effects and alteration of the DNA methylation state by photoperiodic conditions. Plant Sci. 2010; 178:321-6

[28] Li SF, Zhang GJ, Yuan JH. et al. Effect of 5-azaC on the growth, flowering time and sexual phenotype of spinach. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2015; 62:670-5

[29] He Y, Li Z. Epigenetic environmental memories in plants: establishment, maintenance, and reprogramming. Trends Genet. 2018; 34:856-66

[30] Yang H, Howard M, Dean C. Antagonistic roles for H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in the cold-induced epigenetic switch at Ara-bidopsis FLC. Curr Biol. 2014; 24:1793-7

[31] Shao Y, Wong CE, Shen L. et al. N6-methyladenosine modifica-tion underlies messenger RNA metabolism and plant develop-ment. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2021; 63:102047

[32] Oliver SN, Finnegan EJ, Dennis ES. et al. Vernalization-induced flowering in cereals is associated with changes in histone methylation at the VERNALIZATION1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009; 106:8386-91

[33] Mylne JS, Barrett L, Tessadori F. et al. LHP1, the Arabidop-sis homologue of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, is required for epigenetic silencing of FLC. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006; 103: 5012-7

[34] Khan AR, Enjalbert J, Marsollier A-C. et al. Vernalization treatment induces site-specific DNA hypermethylation at the VERNALIZATION-A 1 (VRN-A1) locus in hexaploid winter wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2013; 13:209

[35] Yang Z, Yan H, Wang J. et al. DNA hypermethylation promotes the flowering of orchardgrass during vernalization. Plant Phys-iol. 2022; 190:1490-505

[36] Guzy-Wrobelska J, Filek M, Kaliciak A. et al. Vernalization and photoperiod-related changes in the DNA methylation state in winter and spring rapeseed. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013; 35: 817-27

[37] De Lucia F, Crevillen P, Jones AME. et al. A PHD-polycomb repressive complex 2 triggers the epigenetic silencing of FLC during vernalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008; 105:16831-6

[38] Wood CC, Robertson M, Tanner G. et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana vernalization response requires a polycomb-like protein com-plex that also includes VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006; 103:14631-6

[39] Swiezewski S, Liu F, Magusin A. et al. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature. 2009; 462:799-802

[40] Noncoding RNA. Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long Intronic. Science. 2011; 1197349:331

[41] Luo X, He Y. Experiencing winter for spring flowering: a molec-ular epigenetic perspective on vernalization. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020; 62:104-17

[42] Niu Y, Bai J, Zheng S. The regulation and function of histone methylation. J Plant Biol. 2018; 61:347-57

[43] Singh RK, Svystun T, AlDahmash B. et al. Photoperiod-and temperature-mediated control of phenology in trees—a molec-ular perspective. New Phytol. 2017; 213:511-24

[44] Zhu H, Chen P-Y, Zhong S. et al. Thermal-responsive genetic and epigenetic regulation of DAM cluster controlling dormancy and chilling requirement in peach floral buds. Hortic Res. 2020; 7:114

[45] Yuan S, Li Z, Yuan N. et al. MiR396 is involved in plant response to vernalization and flower development in Agrostis stolonifera. Hortic Res. 2020; 7:7

[46] Liu X, Luo M, Li M. et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals lncRNAs associated with flowering of Angelica sinensis during vernalization. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022; 44:1867-88

[47] Barton KA, Schattat MH, Jakob T. et al. Epidermal pavement cells of Arabidopsis have chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 2016; 171: 723-6

[48] Beltrán J, Wamboldt Y, Sanchez R. et al. Specialized plastids trigger tissue-specific signaling for systemic stress response in plants. Plant Physiol. 2018; 178:672-83

[49] Quinet M, Angosto T, Yuste-Lisbona FJ. et al. Tomato fruit development and metabolism. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:1554

[50] Lu Y, Zhu H. The regulation of nutrient and flavor metabolism in tomato fruit. Veg Res. 2022; 2:1-14

[51] Wei C, Liu H, Cao X. et al. Synthesis of flavour-related linalool is regulated by PpbHLH1 and associated with changes in DNA methylation during peach fruit ripening. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:2082-96

[52] Xu Y-Z, Arrieta-Montiel MP, Virdi KS. et al. MutS HOMOLOG1 is a nucleoid protein that alters mitochondrial and plastid properties and plant response to high light. Plant Cell. 2011; 23: 3428-41

[53] Xu Y-Z, Santamaria RR, Virdi KS. et al. The chloroplast trig-gers developmental reprogramming when MUTS HOMOLOG1 is suppressed in plants. Plant Physiol. 2012; 159:710-20

[54] Virdi KS, Wamboldt Y, Kundariya H. et al. MSH1 is a plant organellar DNA binding and thylakoid protein under precise spatial regulation to alter development. Mol Plant. 2016; 9: 245-60

[55] Shao M-R, Kumar Kenchanmane Raju S, Laurie JD. et al. Stress-responsive pathways and small RNA changes distinguish vari-able developmental phenotypes caused by MSH1 loss. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17:47

[56] Yang X, Sanchez R, Kundariya H. et al. Segregation of an MSH1 RNAi transgene produces heritable non-genetic memory in association with methylome reprogramming. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:2214

[57] Yang X, Kundariya H, Xu Y-Z. et al. MutS HOMOLOG1-derived epigenetic breeding potential in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2015; 168: 222-32

[58] Raju SKK, Shao M, Sanchez R. et al. An epigenetic breeding sys-tem in soybean for increased yield and stability. Plant Biotechnol J. 018;16:1836-47

[59] Kundariya H, Yang X, Morton K. et al. MSH1-induced heritable enhanced growth vigor through grafting is associated with the RdDM pathway in plants. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:5343

[60] Wilson PB, Estavillo GM, Field KJ. et al. The nucleotidase/phos-phatase SAL1 is a negative regulator of drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009; 58:299-317

[61] Horgan KJ, Henderson JO. miRNA mediated posttranscriptional gene regulation in response to abiotic stress in plants. J Stud Res. 2015; 4:21-8

[62] Gašparič MB, Lenassi M, Gostinčar C. et al. Insertion of a specific fungal 3’-phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphatase motif into a plant homologue improves halotolerance and drought tolerance of plants. PLoS One. 2013;8:e818f72

[63] Estavillo GM, Crisp PA, Pornsiriwong W. et al. Evidence for a SAL1-PAP chloroplast retrograde pathway that functions in drought and high light signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011; 23:3992-4012

[64] Fang X, Zhao G, Zhang S. et al. Chloroplast-to-nucleus signal-ing regulates microRNA biogenesis in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2019; 48:371-382.e4

[65] Pornsiriwong W, Estavillo GM, Chan KX. et al. A chloroplast retrograde signal, 3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphate, acts as a secondary messenger in abscisic acid signaling in stomatal closure and germination. eLife. 2017;6:e2336f1

[66] Litthauer S, Jones MA. SAL1-PAP retrograde signalling extends circadian period by reproducing the loss of exoribonuclease (XRN) activity. Plant Signal Behav. 2018; 13:e1500066

[67] Jeh HE, Sanchez R, Beltrán J. et al. Sensory plastid-associated PsbP DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 3 triggers plant growth-and defense-related epigenetic responses. Plant J. 2023; 115: 414-33

[68] Luo J, Tang S, Peng X. et al. Elucidation of cross-talk and speci-ficity of early response mechanisms to salt and PEG-simulated drought stresses in Brassica napus using comparative proteomic analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0138974

[69] Brunkard JO, Runkel AM, Zambryski PC. The cytosol must flow: intercellular transport through plasmodesmata. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015; 35:13-20

[70] Verhoeven KJF, Preite V. Epigenetic variation in asexually repro-ducing organisms. Evolution (N Y). 2014; 68:644-55

[71] Van Antro M, Prelovsek S, Ivanovic S. et al. DNA methylation in clonal duckweed (Lemna minor L.) lineages reflects cur-rent and historical environmental exposures. Mol Ecol. 2023; 32: 428-43

[72] Hofmeister BT, Denkena J, Colomé-Tatché M. et al. A genome assembly and the somatic genetic and epigenetic mutation rate in a wild long-lived perennial Populus trichocarpa. Genome Biol. 2020; 21:259

[73] Liang D, Zhang Z, Wu H. et al. Single-base-resolution methy-lomes of Populus trichocarpa reveal the association between DNA methylation and drought stress. BMC Genet. 2014; 15:S9

[74] Sow MD, Le Gac A, Fichot R. et al. RNAi suppression of DNA methylation affects the drought stress response and genome integrity in transgenic poplar. New Phytol. 2021; 232: 80-97

[75] Li J, Han F, Yuan T. et al. The methylation landscape of giga-genome and the epigenetic timer of age in Chinese pine. Nat Commun. 2023; 14:1947

[76] Seisenberger S, Peat JR, Hore TA. et al. Reprogramming DNA methylation in the mammalian life cycle: building and breaking epigenetic barriers. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013; 368:20110330

[77] Tang WWC, Kobayashi T, Irie N. et al. Specification and epi-genetic programming of the human germ line. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17:585-600

[78] Kawashima T, Berger F. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant sexual reproduction. Nat Rev Genet. 2014; 15:613-24

[79] Ono A, Kinoshita T. Epigenetics and plant reproduction: mul-tiple steps for responsibly handling succession. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2021; 61:102032

[80] Walker J, Gao H, Zhang J. et al. Sexual-lineage-specific DNA methylation regulates meiosis in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet. 2018; 50:130-7

[81] Hsieh P-H, He S, Buttress T. et al. Arabidopsis male sexual lineage exhibits more robust maintenance of CG methylation than somatic tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 113:15132-7

[82] He S, Feng X. DNA methylation dynamics during germline development. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022; 64:2240-51

[83] Bilichak A, Kovalchuk I. Transgenerational response to stress in plants and its application for breeding. JExp Bot. 2016; 67: 2081-92

[84] Oberkofler V, Pratx L, Bäurle I. Epigenetic regulation of abiotic stress memory: maintaining the good things while they last. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2021;61:10200f7

[85] Liu J, Feng L, Gu X. et al. An H3K27me3 demethylase-HSFA2 reg-ulatory loop orchestrates transgenerational thermomemory in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2019; 29:379-90

[86] Panda K, Mohanasundaram B, Gutierrez J. et al. The plant response to high CO2 levels is heritable and orchestrated by DNA methylation. New Phytol. 2023; 238:2427-39

[87] Nguyen NH, Vu NT, Cheong J-J. Transcriptional stress mem-ory and transgenerational inheritance of drought tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23:12918

[88] Jeynes-Cupper K, Catoni M. Long distance signalling and epige-netic changes in crop grafting. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1121704

[89] Jin Q, Chachar M, Ahmed N. et al. Harnessing epigenetics through grafting: revolutionizing horticultural crop produc-tion. Horticulturae. 2023; 9:672

[90] Lewsey MG, Hardcastle TJ, Melnyk CW. et al. Mobile small RNAs regulate genome-wide DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:E801-10

[91] Wu R, Wang X, Lin Y. et al. Inter-species grafting caused extensive and heritable alterations of DNA methylation in Solanaceae plants. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61f995

[92] Tsaballa A, Xanthopoulou A, Madesis P. et al. Vegetable grafting from a molecular point of view: the involvement of epigenetics in rootstock-Scion interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11:621999.

[93] Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Bassett A. et al. Mobile 24 nt small RNAs direct transcriptional gene silencing in the root meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol. 2011; 21:1678-83

[94] Avramidou E, Kapazoglou A, Aravanopoulos FA. et al. Global DNA methylation changes in Cucurbitaceae inter-species graft-ing. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 2015; 15:112-6

[95] Cao L, Yu N, Li J. et al. Heritability and reversibility of DNA methylation induced by in vitro grafting between Brassica juncea and B. oleracea. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:27233

[96] Yamamuro C, Zhu J-K, Yang Z. Epigenetic modifications and plant hormone action. Mol Plant. 2016; 9:57-70

[97] Berger MMJ, Gallusci P, Teyssier E. Roles of epigenetic mech-anisms in grafting and possible applications. In: Mirouze M, Bucher E, Gallusci P,eds. Advances in Botanical Research. Elsevier: New York, NY, 2018,203-46

[98] Zhang F, Wang L, Qi B. et al. EIN2 mediates direct regulation of histone acetylation in the ethylene response. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017; 114:10274-9

[99] Kapazoglou A, Tani E, Avramidou EV. et al. Epigenetic changes and transcriptional reprogramming upon woody plant grafting for crop sustainability in a changing environment. Front Plant Sci. 2021;11:61f3004

[100] Okuma N, Soyano T, Suzaki T. et al. MIR2111-5 locus and shoot-accumulated mature miR2111 systemically enhance nodu-lation depending on HAR1 in Lotus japonicus. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:5192

[101] Bhogale S, Mahajan AS, Natarajan B. et al. MicroRNA156: a potential graft-transmissible microRNA that modulates plant architecture and tuberization in Solanum tuberosum ssp. andi-gena. Plant Physiol. 2014; 164:1011-27

[102] Liu K, Wang T, Xiao D. et al. The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad008

[103] Sharma S, Chauhan A, Kumar R. et al. Horticultural crops tack-ling stresses: genetic and epigenetic alterations. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2022; 69:11-38

[104] Zhong S, Fei Z, Chen Y-R. et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 154-9

[105] Liu R, How-Kit A, Stammitti L. et al. A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015; 112:10804-9

[106] Lang Z, Wang Y, Tang K. et al. Critical roles of DNA demethyla-tion in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:E4511-9

[107] Huang H, Liu R, Niu Q. et al. Global increase in DNA methylation during orange fruit development and ripening. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019; 116:1430-6

[108] Hu G, Huang B, Wang K. et al. Histone posttranslational modifications rather than DNA methylation underlie gene reprogramming in pollination-dependent and pollination-independent fruit set in tomato. New Phytol. 2021; 229:902-19

[109] Yang X, Yan J, Zhang Z. et al. Regulation of plant architecture by a new histone acetyltransferase targeting gene bodies. Nat Plants. 2020; 6:809-22

[110] Tang M, Xue W, Li X. et al. Mitotically heritable epigenetic modifications of CmMYB6 control anthocyanin biosynthesis in chrysanthemum. New Phytol. 2022; 236:1075-88

[111] Chachar S, Chachar M, Riaz A. et al. Epigenetic modification for horticultural plant improvement comes of age. Sci Hortic. 2022; 292:110633

[112] Dunham I, Kundaje A, Aldred SF. et al. An integrated encyclope-dia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012; 489: 57-74

[113] Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007; 128:693-705

[114] Kundaje A, Meuleman W, Ernst J. et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature. 2015; 518:317-30

[115] Heintzman ND, Stuart RK, Hon G. et al. Distinct and predic-tive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2007; 39:311-8

[116] Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10: 295-304

[117] Maher KA, Bajic M, Kajala K. et al. Profiling of accessible chro-matin regions across multiple plant species and cell types reveals common gene regulatory principles and new control modules. Plant Cell. 2018; 30:15-36

[118] Lu Y, Zhou D-X, Zhao Y. Understanding epigenomics based on the rice model. Theor Appl Genet. 2020; 133:1345-63

[119] Lu Z, Marand AP, Ricci WA. et al. The prevalence, evolution and chromatin signatures of plant regulatory elements. Nat Plants. 2019; 5:1250-9

[120] Jiang G, Li Z, Ding X. et al. WUSCHEL-related homeobox tran-scription factor SlWOX13 regulates tomato fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 2024; 194:2322-37

[121] Tian F, Yang D-C, Meng Y-Q. et al. PlantRegMap: chart-ing functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D1104-13

[122] Abdulraheem MI, Xiong Y, Moshood AY. et al. Mechanisms of plant epigenetic regulation in response to plant stress: recent discoveries and implications. Plants. 2024; 13:13

[123] Seem K, Kaur S, Kumar S. et al. Epigenome editing for targeted DNA (de) methylation: a new perspective in modulating gene expression. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2024; 59:69-98

[124] Kumar S, Mohapatra T. Dynamics of DNA methylation and its functions in plant growth and development. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:596236

[125] Daccord N, Celton J-M, Linsmith G. et al. High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development. Nat Genet. 2017; 49:1099-106

[126] Venios X, Gkizi D, Nisiotou A. et al. Emerging roles of epigenetics in grapevine and winegrowing. Plants. 2024; 13:515

[127] Ding G, Cao L, Zhou J. et al. DNA methylation correlates with the expression of drought-responsive genes and drought resistance in rice. Agronomy. 2022; 12:1445

[128] Kasai A, Bai S, Hojo H. et al. Epigenome editing of potato by grafting using transgenic tobacco as siRNA donor. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0161729

[129] Zhang T, Marand AP, Jiang J. PlantDHS: a database for DNase I hypersensitive sites in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D1148-53

[130] Deng L, Zhou Q, Zhou J. et al. 3D organization of regulatory elements for transcriptional regulation in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 2023; 24:181

[131] Liu Y, Tian T, Zhang K. et al. PCSD: a plant chromatin state database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D1157-67

[132] Ding K, Sun S, Luo Y. et al. PlantCADB: a comprehensive plant chromatin accessibility database. Genom Proteom Bioin-form. 2023; 21:311-23

[133] Yang CJ, Kursel LE, Studer AJ. et al. A gene for genetic background in Zea mays: fine-mapping enhancer of teosinte branched1.2 to a YABBY class transcription factor. Genetics. 2016; 204:1573-85

[134] Zhang S, Qin B, Zou Y. et al. Genome editing of the qPL6 promoter creates novel alleles for high-yielding rice. Rice. 2025; 18:46

[135] Liu Y, Zhang W, Zhang K. et al. Genome-wide mapping of DNase I hypersensitive sites reveals chromatin accessibility changes in Arabidopsis euchromatin and heterochromatin regions under extended darkness. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:4093

[136] Peng Y, Xiong D, Zhao L. et al. Chromatin interaction maps reveal genetic regulation for quantitative traits in maize. Nat Commun. 2019; 10:2632

[137] Rodríguez-Leal D, Lemmon ZH, Man J. et al. Engineering quanti-tative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell. 2017; 171:470-480.e8