Deciphering the underlying genetics of galling resistance to the blueberry stem gall wasp in northern highbush blueberry

Scott J. Teresi , Mélanie J.A. Body , Alder Fulton , Adrian E. Platts , Marivi Colle , Philip D. Fanning , Jacquelyn A. Perkins , Rodrigo R. Amadeu , Juliana Benevenuto , Patricio Munoz , Jack C. Schultz , Rufus Isaacs , Patrick P. Edger

Horticulture Research ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (11) : 197

PDF (2723KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (11) :197 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhaf197
Article
research-article
Deciphering the underlying genetics of galling resistance to the blueberry stem gall wasp in northern highbush blueberry
Author information +
History +
PDF (2723KB)

Abstract

Certain specialist herbivorous insects have evolved elegant mechanisms to manipulate the physiology of their host plants, including the ability to redirect the fate of plant cells toward the creation of a novel, tumor-like organ, called ‘galls’. While some plants have evolved resistance to gall-inducing insects, the underlying genetic mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we focused on the chalcid gall-inducing wasp, Hemadas nubilipennis (Ormyridae) and its host plant, highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae). To identify the genetic basis of resistance to gall induction in blueberry, we developed a genetic mapping population derived from the susceptible ‘Liberty’ and resistant ‘Draper’ cultivars. We identified four quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with galling resistance, with candidate genes in these regions associated with plant defense, biotic stress response, and phytohormone metabolism. Furthermore, we analyzed gene expression on days one through seven post-oviposition in both susceptible and resistant genotypes, compared to controls, to identify genes and pathways that may contribute to galling resistance. Gene expression analyses, including genes within the four identified QTL regions, revealed a robust early defense response in the resistant genotype, marked by upregulation of defense, stress, and immunity genes following oviposition, ultimately leading to insect death. Conversely, the susceptible genotype exhibited a delayed and weaker response, allowing gall development and insect survival. We expect these results to serve as a resource that will enable breeding programs to employ molecular approaches for selection of resistant cultivars, while also guiding future research aimed at studying the evolution of galling resistance.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Scott J. Teresi, Mélanie J.A. Body, Alder Fulton, Adrian E. Platts, Marivi Colle, Philip D. Fanning, Jacquelyn A. Perkins, Rodrigo R. Amadeu, Juliana Benevenuto, Patricio Munoz, Jack C. Schultz, Rufus Isaacs, Patrick P. Edger. Deciphering the underlying genetics of galling resistance to the blueberry stem gall wasp in northern highbush blueberry. Horticulture Research, 2025, 12(11): 197 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhaf197

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by MSU AgBioResearch and Rackham Foundation Endowment to P.P.E., United States Department of Agriculture NIFA Crop Protection and Pest Management Program (2018-70006-28917) to R.I. and P.P.E., Specialty Crop Research Initiative (USDA-SCRI) 2019-51181-30015 to P.P.E, USDA HATCH Project MICL02742 to P.P.E., and National Science Foundation Research Traineeship Program (DGE-1828149). We would like to thank the Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research at MSU for computational resources, and Pete Callow, Beth Alger, Alexys Kelsey, Henry Pointon, and Parker Graham for their assistance with plant care and phenotyping for gall resistance.

Author contributions

P.P.E. conceived and designed the project; M.C. collected the samples and extracted the RNA; J.B. and P.M. led the development of the genotyping array; M.C., P.D.F., J.A.P., and R.I. led phenotyping for gall resistance; S.J.T., M.J.A.B., A.F., A.E.P., R.R.A., and P.P.E. performed bioinformatic and statistical analyses; S.J.T. and P.P.E. were in charge of data submission; M.B., S.J.T., J.C.S., and P.P.E. wrote the manuscript draft, and all coauthors reviewed and revised the manuscript.

Data availability

Genomic target sequence capture and RNA-seq data that were generated for this study are available at NCBI SRA under BioProject PRJNA842728. All version-controlled code related to the analyses can be found at https://github.com/sjteresi/Blueberry_RNA_Seq_Expression_Analysisand https://github.com/sjteresi/Blueberry_Network_Rewiring.Annotated scripts and READMEs containing additional information can be found in the GitHub repositories.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1]

Ehrlich PR, Raven PH. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevo-lution. Evolution. 1964; 18:586-608

[2]

Fürstenberg-Hägg J, Zagrobelny M, Bak S. Plant defense against insect herbivores. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14:10242-97

[3]

Mithöfer A, Boland W. Plant defense against herbivores: chem-ical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012; 63:431-50

[4]

Erb M. Plant defenses against herbivory: closing the fitness gap. Trends Plant Sci. 2017; 23:187-94

[5]

Schoonhoven LM, Van Loon B, van Loon JJA. et al. Insect-Plant Biology. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2005

[6]

Pieterse CMJ, Dicke M. Plant interactions with microbes and insects: from molecular mechanisms to ecology. Trends Plant Sci. 2007; 12:564-9

[7]

Pimental D, Goodman RM. Economic impact of insects. In: Goodman RM (ed.), Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science. New York, USA: CRC Press, 2004,407-9

[8]

Kerchev PI, Fenton B, Foyer CH. et al. Plant responses to insect herbivory: interactions between photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species and hormonal signalling pathways. Plant Cell Environ. 2012; 35:441-53

[9]

Bernays EA. Interaction of insects and plants. Sci Prog. 1992; 76: 247-71

[10]

Bronstein JL, Alarcón R, Geber M. The evolution of plant-insect mutualisms. New Phytol. 2006; 172:412-28

[11]

Edwards PJ, Wratten SD. Ecology of Insect-Plant Interactions. UK: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.. 1980:

[12]

Kessler A, Baldwin IT. Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002; 53: 299-328

[13]

Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006; 444:323-9

[14]

Mithöfer A, Boland W. Recognition of herbivory-associated molecular patterns. Plant Physiol. 2008; 146:825-31

[15]

Body M, Kaiser W, Dubreuil G. et al. Leaf-miners co-opt microor-ganisms to enhance their nutritional environment. JChemEcol. 2013; 39:969-77

[16]

Giron D, Huguet E, Stone GN. et al. Insect-induced effects on plants and possible effectors used by galling and leaf-mining insects to manipulate their host-plant. J Insect Physiol. 2016; 84: 70-89

[17]

Schultz JC, Edger PP, Body MJA. et al. A galling insect activates plant reproductive programs during gall development. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:1833

[18]

Gutzwiller F, Dedeine F, Kaiser W. et al. Correlation between the green-island phenotype and Wolbachia infections during the evolutionary diversification of Gracillariidae leaf-mining moths. Ecology. 2015; 5:4049-62

[19]

Lieutier F, Bermudez-Torres K, Cook J. et al. Chapter three - from plant exploitation to mutualism. In: Sauvion N, Thiéry D, Calatayud P-A (eds.), Advances in Botanical Research, Vol. 81. Academic Press, 2004,55-109

[20]

Tooker JF, Giron D. The evolution of endophagy in herbivorous insects. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:581816

[21]

Shorthouse J, Wool D, Raman A. Gall-inducing insects -nature’s most sophisticated herbivores. Basic Appl Ecol. 2005; 6: 407-11

[22]

Gullan PJ, Miller DR, Cook LG. Gall-inducing scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha:Coccoidea). In: Raman A, Schae-fer CW, Withers TW ( Enfield, New Hampshire,eds.), Biology, Ecology, and Evolution of Gallinducing Arthropods. USA: Science Publishers, 2004,159-229

[23]

Salle JL. Biology of gall inducers and evolution of gall induc-tion in Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera:Eulophidae, Eurytomidae, Pteromalidae, Tanaostigmatidae, Torymidae). In: Raman A, Schaefer CW, Withers TW ( New Hamp-shire,eds.), Biology, Ecology and Evolution of Gall-Inducing Arthropods, Volume 1 and 2. Enfield, USA: Science Publishers, 2005,507-37

[24]

Roskam JC. Evolution of the gall-inducing guild. In: Shorthouse JD, Rohfritsch O (eds.), Biology of Insect-Induced Galls. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 1992,34-49

[25]

Roskam HC. Phylogeny of gall midges (Cecidomyiidae). In: Raman A, Schaefer CW, Withers TW (eds.), Biology, Ecol-ogy and Evolution of Gall-Inducing Arthropods, Volume 1 and and Enfield, New Hampshire, USA: Science Publishers, 2005, 305-19

[26]

Stone GN, Schönrogge K. The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003; 18:512-22

[27]

Raman A, Schafer CW, Withers TM. Galls and gall-inducing arthropods:an overview of their biology, ecology, and evolution. In: Withers TM ( Ecology,ed.), Biology, and Evolution of Gall-Inducing Arthropods. Enfield, New Hampshire, USA: Science Publishers, 2005,1-33

[28]

Espírito-Santo MM, Wilson Fernandes G. How Many Species of Gall-Inducing Insects Are There on Earth, and Where Are They?. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2007; 100:95-9

[29]

Collins JA, Drummond FA. The blueberry gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): a recent pest of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium; Ericales: Ericaceae) and its impact on potential yield. J Econ Entomol. 2019; 112:1151-61

[30]

Nacro S, Heinrichs EA, Dakouo D. Estimation of rice yield losses due to the African rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzivora Harris and Gagne. Int J Pest Manag. 1996; 42:331-4

[31]

Yin L, Burkness EC, Hutchison WD. et al. Effects of foliar Phyl-loxera (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) infestations on wine grape photosynthesis, yield, and fruit quality. J Entomol Sci. 2021; 56: 504-18

[32]

Schmid RB, Knutson A, Giles KL. et al. Hessian fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) biology and management in wheat. J Integr Pest Manag. 2018; 9:14

[33]

Chen M-S, Liu X, Yang Z. et al. Unusual conservation among genes encoding small secreted salivary gland proteins from a gall midge. BMC Evol Biol. 2010; 10:296

[34]

Hogenhout SA, Bos JIB. Effector proteins that modulate plant-insect interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011; 14:422-8

[35]

Matsukura K, Matsumura M, Tokuda M. Host manipulation by the orange leafhopper Cicadulina bipunctata: gall induction on distant leaves by dose-dependent stimulation. Naturwis-senschaften. 2009; 96:1059-66

[36]

Sopow SL, Shorthouse JD, Strong W. et al. Evidence for long-distance, chemical gall induction by an insect. Ecol Lett. 2003; 6: 102-5

[37]

Body MJA, Zinkgraf MS, Whitham TG. et al. Heritable phytohormone profiles of poplar genotypes vary in resis-tance to a galling aphid. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2019; 32: 654-72

[38]

Cornell HV. The secondary chemistry and complex morphol-ogy of galls formed by the Cynipinae (Hymenoptera): why and how. Am Midl Nat. 1983; 110:225-34

[39]

Shorthouse JD, Rohfritsch O. Biology of Insect-Induced Galls. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 1992,285

[40]

Suzuki H, Yokokura J, Ito T. et al. Biosynthetic pathway of the phytohormone auxin in insects and screening of its inhibitors. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2014; 53:66-72

[41]

Tooker JF, Helms AM. Phytohormone dynamics associated with gall insects, and their potential role in the evolution of the gall-inducing habit. JChemEcol. 2014; 40:742-53

[42]

Richardson RA, Body M, Warmund MR. et al. Morphometric analysis of young petiole galls on the narrow-leaf cottonwood, Populus angustifolia, by the sugarbeet root aphid, Pemphigus betae. Protoplasma. 2017; 254:203-16

[43]

Mishra P, Saini P, Patni V. Biochemical dynamics during devel-opment of insect-induced plant galls: a review. J Plant Dis Prot. 2024; 131:1803-18

[44]

Isaacs R, Fanning P, Van Timmeren S, Perkins J, Garcia-Salazar C. Biology and Management of Stem Gall Wasp in Highbush Blueberries. 2020. Last accessed August 5th, 2025. Last accessed August 5th, 2025.

[45]

The Natural History Museum London.Taxon Record: Hemadas Nubilipennis Ashmead, 1887. Universal Chalcidoidea Database. Accessed August 5, 2025. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/data/chalcidoids/database/detail.dsml?FamilyCode=PZ& VALAUTHOR=%28Ashmead%29&VALGENUS=Hemadas& HOMCODE=0&VALDATE=1887&VALSPECIES=nubilipennis&ValidAuthBracket=false&&listPageURL=listChalcids%2 edsml%3famp%3bFamily%3dPteromalidae%26Species%3 dnubilipennis%26amp%3bSuperfamily%3dChalcidoidea%26 amp%3bGenus%3dHemadas&tab=distribution

[46]

Blueberry Stem Gall Wasp—Hemadas nubilipennis (Ashmead, 1887). Maryland Biodiverty Project.

[47]

Zhang M, Zhou C, Song Z. et al. The first identification of genomic loci in plants associated with resistance to galling insects: a case study in Eucalyptus L’Hér. (Myrtaceae). Sci Rep. 2018; 8:2319

[48]

Torello Marinoni D, Nishio S, Valentini N. et al. Development of high-density genetic linkage maps and identification of loci for chestnut gall wasp resistance in Castanea spp. Plants. 2020; 9:1048

[49]

Moriya S, Iwanami H, Takahashi S. et al. Evaluation and inher-itance of crown gall resistance in apple rootstocks. J Japan Soc Hotic Sci. 2008; 77:236-41

[50]

Data and Insights Center. USHBC. 2020. https://ushbc.blueberry.org/all-resources/data-and-insights-center/ (31 May 2025, date last accessed).

[51]

Blueberry Outlook. https://www.reportlinker.com/p05815076/?utm_source=PRN (22 November 2024, date last accessed).

[52]

Isaacs R, Edger P, Fanning P. AgBioResearch. AgBioResearch. 2019. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/combating-the-blueberry-stem-gall-wasp (22 November 2024, date last accessed).

[53]

DeVisser AK, Vandervoort C, Isaacs R. et al. Systemic insecti-cides for control of stem gall wasp in highbush blueberry. JEcon Entomol. 2023; 116:1737-49

[54]

Shorthouse JD, West A, Landry RW. et al. Structural damage by female Hemadas nubilipennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) as a factor in gall induction on lowbush blueberry. Can Entomol. 1986; 118:249-54

[55]

West A, Shorthouse JD. Initiation and development of the stem gall induced by Hemadas nubilipennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium (Ericaceae). Can J Bot. 1989; 67:2187-98

[56]

De Vos M, Jander G. Choice and no-choice assays for testing the resistance of A. thaliana to chewing insects. JVisExp. 2008; 15:e683

[57]

Giolai M, Paajanen P, Verweij W. et al. Targeted capture and sequencing of gene-sized DNA molecules. Biotechniques. 2016; 61:315-22

[58]

Benevenuto J, Ferrão LFV, Amadeu RR. et al. How can a high-quality genome assembly help plant breeders. Gigascience. 2019;8:giz068

[59]

Ferrão LFV, Amadeu RR, Benevenuto J. et al. Genomic selection in an outcrossing autotetraploid fruit crop: lessons from blueberry breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 676326

[60]

Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal. 2011; 17:10-2

[61]

Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:1754-60

[62]

Colle M, Leisner CP, Wai CM. et al. Haplotype-phased genome and evolution of phytonutrient pathways of tetraploid blue-berry. Gigascience. 2019; 8:8

[63]

Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021; 10:10

[64]

GATK.https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/ (31 May 2025, date last accessed).

[65]

Mengist MF, Bostan H, de Paola D. et al. Autopolyploid inheri-tance and a heterozygous reciprocal translocation shape chro-mosome genetic behavior in tetraploid blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). New Phytol. 2023; 237:1024-39

[66]

Jacobs M, Thompson S, Platts AE. et al. Uncovering genetic and metabolite markers associated with resistance against anthracnose fruit rot in northern highbush blueberry. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad169

[67]

Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27:2156-8

[68]

Lipka AE, Tian F, Wang Q. et al. GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28:2397-9

[69]

Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996; 5:299-314

[70]

Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai CQ. et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010; 42:355-60

[71]

Yang S, Zhou X. Accurate and scalable construction of poly-genic scores in large biobank data sets. Am J Hum Genet. 2020; 106:679-93

[72]

Bradski G. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb’s J Software Tools. 2000; 120:122-5

[73]

Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29:15-21

[74]

Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30:2114-20

[75]

Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A. et al. The sequence alignmen-t/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2078-9

[76]

Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31:166-9

[77]

Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26:139-40

[78]

Tang H, Lyons E, Pedersen B. et al. Screening synteny blocks in pairwise genome comparisons through integer programming. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12:102

[79]

Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids. 1997; 25:3389-402

[80]

Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9:559

[81]

Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J. Others. topGO: enrichment analy-sis for gene ontology. R package version 2.61.1. 2025. https://bioconductor.org/packages/topGO

[82]

Berardini TZ, Mundodi S, Reiser L. et al. Functional annotation of the Arabidopsis genome using controlled vocabularies. Plant Physiol. 2004; 135:745-55

[83]

Wang YE, Kutnetsov L, Partensky A. et al. WebMeV: a cloud platform for analyzing and visualizing cancer genomic data. Cancer Res. 2017; 77:e11-4

[84]

Huang M, Liu X, Zhou Y. et al. BLINK: a package for the next level of genome-wide association studies with both individuals and markers in the millions. Gigascience. 2019; 8:8

[85]

Clare SJ, Driskill M, Millar TR. et al. Development of a tar-geted genotyping platform for reproducible results within tetraploid and hexaploid blueberry. Front Hortic. 2024; 2: 1339310

[86]

Colinet D, Cazes D, Belghazi M. et al. Extracellular superoxide dismutase in insects: characterization, function, and interspe-cific variation in parasitoid wasp venom. JBiolChem. 2011; 286: 40110-21

[87]

JiangZ, GeS, XingL. et al. RLP1.1, a novel wheat receptor-like protein gene, is involved in the defence response against Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. JExp Bo.. 2013; 64: 3735-46

[88]

Rao S, Zhou Z, Miao P. et al. Roles of receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase VII members in pattern-triggered immune signaling. Plant Physiol. 2018; 177:1679-90

[89]

Viswanath KK, Kuo S-Y, Tu C-W. et al. The role of plant tran-scription factors in the fight against plant viruses. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24:24

[90]

Yuan M, Jiang Z, Bi G. et al. Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity. Nature. 2021; 592: 105-9

[91]

Couto D, Zipfel C. Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016; 16:537-52

[92]

Ngou BPM, Ahn H-K, Ding P. et al. Mutual potentiation of plant immunity by cell-surface and intracellular receptors. Nature. 2021; 592:110-5

[93]

Jung HW, Panigrahi GK, Jung GY. et al. Pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity involves proteolytic degradation of core nonsense-mediated mRNA decay fac-tors during the early defense response. Plant Cell. 2020; 32: 1081-101

[94]

Hoffmann N, Benske A, Betz H. et al. Laccases and peroxidases co-localize in lignified secondary cell walls throughout stem development. Plant Physiol. 2020; 184:806-22

[95]

Kumar P, Khanal S, da Silva M. et al. Transcriptome analysis of a nematode resistant and susceptible upland cotton line at two critical stages of Meloidogyne incognita infection and development. PLoS One. 2019; 14:e0221328

[96]

Qin S, Fan C, Li X. et al. LACCASE14 is required for the deposition of guaiacyl lignin and affects cell wall digestibility in poplar. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020; 13:197

[97]

Ibanez F, Suh JH, Wang Y. et al. Long-term, sustained feeding by Asian citrus psyllid disrupts salicylic acid homeostasis in sweet orange. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19:493

[98]

Mao D, Yu F, Li J. et al. FERONIA receptor kinase inter-acts with S-adenosylmethionine synthetase and suppresses S-adenosylmethionine production and ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2015; 38:2566-74

[99]

Jasrotia S, Jasrotia R. Role of ethylene in combating biotic stress. In: Singh S, Husain T, Singh VP, Tripathi DK, Prasad SM, Dubey NK,eds. Ethylene in Plant Biology. Hoboken: Wiley, 2022, 388-97

[100]

Kutty NN, Mishra M. Dynamic distress calls: volatile info chem-icals induce and regulate defense responses during herbivory. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1135000

[101]

Mendy B, Wang’ombe MW, Radakovic ZS. et al. Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase NILR1 is required for induction of innate immunity to parasitic nematodes. PLoS Pathog. 2017; 13:e1006284

[102]

Bassetti N, Caarls L, Bukovinszkine’Kiss G. et al. Genetic anal-ysis reveals three novel QTLs underpinning a butterfly egg-induced hypersensitive response-like cell death in Brassica rapa. BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22:140

[103]

Little D, Gouhier-Darimont C, Bruessow F. et al. Oviposition by pierid butterflies triggers defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007; 143: 784-800

PDF (2723KB)

241

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/