Single-nucleus RNA-seq and ATAC-seq analyses provide molecular insights into cadmium-stress response in alfalfa roots
Yuqi Zhang , Hao Liu , Ming Xu , Mengjia Xie , Shuhan Deng , Xinyue Ma , Li Zhao , Fei He , Mingna Li , Ruicai Long , Xue Wang , Junmei Kang , Qingchuan Yang , Lin Chen
Horticulture Research ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (8) : 117
Soil cadmium (Cd) pollution threatens global food security. Elucidating plant cellular responses to Cd stress is critical for the breeding of low-Cd-accumulating crops. Here, we investigated Cd-responsive regulatory mechanisms in alfalfa at single-cell resolution and identified key Cd-associated genes. Eight major root cell types were annotated, with significant remodeling under Cd stress. Under Cd stress, root endodermal and phloem cells adopt distinct adaptive strategies: endodermal cells shift toward a Cd sequestration and detoxification state, whereas phloem cells exhibit a response gradient ranging from basic defense to systemic regulation. Integrated multiomics analyses revealed cell-type-specific genome-wide changes in chromatin accessibility, which positively correlated with gene expression-particularly in promoter regions. Key genes including MsGSH1, MsMT2A, MsHMP47, and MsABCC3 were shown to increase Cd tolerance in yeast. Coexpression network analysis revealed 10 cell-type-specific modules, with the calmodulin-like gene MsCML acting as a highly interconnected hub gene, whose overexpression significantly improved Cd tolerance. These findings provide valuable genetic resources and a theoretical basis for the precise breeding of low-Cd-accumulating forage, with implications for understanding Cd-responsive epigenetic and transcriptional regulation in plants.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
Modeling transcriptional regulation. Nat Genet. 2015; 47: 1 |
| [86] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |