Promoter variation affects binding affinity of the transcription factor MdWRKY20 to the Cell Wall Invertase 1 gene and decreases fructose content in apple fruit

Zhengyang Wang , Chunlei Zhang , Nanxiang Yang , Jian Huang , Fengwang Ma , Mingjun Li

Horticulture Research ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 330

PDF (2776KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) :330 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhaf330
Articles
research-article
Promoter variation affects binding affinity of the transcription factor MdWRKY20 to the Cell Wall Invertase 1 gene and decreases fructose content in apple fruit
Author information +
History +
PDF (2776KB)

Abstract

Apple sweetness is primarily attributed to the high content and perceived sweet taste of fructose. A previous study used an F1 hybrid population of Malus × domestica [‘Honeycrisp’ (HC) × ‘Qinguan’ (QG) (2n = 34)] to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for fructose content in fruit, revealing a stable QTL on linkage group (LG) 03 in the HC genetic map. In this study, gene ontology (GO) and kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analyses of genes within this interval in combination with RNA-sequencing identified a cell wall invertase gene MdCWINV1, whose expression was highly associated with the dynamic changes in fructose content in parental fruits. The coding sequences were conserved between the two cultivars, while the promoters carried 73 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Based on transcriptional regulatory element prediction, a unique SNP, CWINV1pro-1080 (A/C), located at −1080 bp upstream of the ATG start codon in the HC-P1 haplotype, was identified and predicted to affect the binding of the transcription factor MdWRKY20. β-glucuronidase (GUS) assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ChIP-qPCR), dual-luciferase assays, and genetic transformation confirmed that MdWRKY20 specifically binds to the CWINV1pro-1080 (A) haplotype and significantly suppresses MdCWINV1 expression, reduces CWINV activity, and consequently decreases fructose accumulation. This study elucidated the functional role of MdCWINV1 as a key gene regulating fructose content and clarified how natural mutations in its promoter influence gene expression and sugar composition.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhengyang Wang, Chunlei Zhang, Nanxiang Yang, Jian Huang, Fengwang Ma, Mingjun Li. Promoter variation affects binding affinity of the transcription factor MdWRKY20 to the Cell Wall Invertase 1 gene and decreases fructose content in apple fruit. Horticulture Research, 2026, 13 (3) : 330 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhaf330

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32102330). We are grateful to Dr. J. Zhang and Miss W. Cao (Horticulture Science Research Center, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China) for providing professional technical assistance with GC-MS analysis.

Author contributions

M.L., F.M., and Z.W. designed the research; Z.W., C.Z., and N.Y. performed the research; Z.W., C.Z., J.H., and M.L. analyzed the data; Z.W. and C.Z. wrote the paper; and M.L. and Z.W. supervised the research.

Data availability

All relevant data supporting our findings are available in the manuscript and Supplementary Materials. RNA sequencing data have been deposited in NCBI under accession number PRJNA1344609.

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1]

Desnoues E, Baldazzi V, Génard M. et al. Dynamic QTLs for sugars and enzyme activities provide an overview of genetic control of sugar metabolism during peach fruit development. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67:3419-31

[2]

Bordonaba JG, Terry LA. Manipulating the taste-related composition of strawberry fruits (Fragaria × ananassa) from different cultivars using deficit irrigation. Food Chem. 2010; 122:1020-6

[3]

Li MJ, Li PM, Ma FW. et al. Sugar metabolism and accumulation in the fruit of transgenic apple trees with decreased sorbitol synthesis. Hortic Res. 2018; 5:60

[4]

Ruan YL. Signaling role of sucrose metabolism in development. Mol Plant. 2012; 5:763-5

[5]

Li MJ, Feng FJ, Cheng LL. Expression patterns of genes involved in sugar metabolism and accumulation during apple fruit development. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e33055

[6]

Pangborn R. Relative taste intensities of selected sugars and organic acids. J Food Sci. 1963; 28:726-33

[7]

Wang ZY, Liang YH, Jin YR. et al. Ectopic expression of apple hexose transporter MdHT2.2 reduced the salt tolerance of tomato seedlings with decreased ROS-scavenging ability. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020; 156:504-13

[8]

Yu JQ, Liu XL, Wang WY. et al. MdCIbHLH1 modulates sugar metabolism and accumulation in apple fruits by coordinating carbohydrate synthesis and allocation. Hortic Plant J. 2025; 11:578-92

[9]

Ruan YL. Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014; 65:33-67

[10]

Minami A, Kang XJ, Carter CJ. A cell wall invertase controls nectar volume and sugar composition. Plant J. 2021; 107:1016-28

[11]

Liu H, Yao XH, Fan JW. et al. Cell wall invertase 3 plays critical roles in providing sugars during pollination and fertilization in cucumber. Plant Physiol. 2024; 195:1293-311

[12]

Roitsch T, Ehness R. Regulation of source/sink relations by cytokinins. Plant Growth Regul. 2000; 32:359-67

[13]

Wang E, Wang J, Zhu XD. et al. Control of rice grain-filling and yield by a gene with a potential signature of domestication. Nat Genet. 2008; 40:1370-4

[14]

Zanor MI, Osorio S, Nunes-Nesi A. et al. RNA interference of LIN5 in tomato confirms its role in controlling brix content, uncovers the influence of sugars on the levels of fruit hormones, and demonstrates the importance of sucrose cleavage for normal fruit development and fertility. Plant Physiol. 2009; 150:1204-18

[15]

Liao SJ, Wang L, Li J. et al. Cell wall invertase is essential for ovule development through sugar signaling rather than provision of carbon nutrients. Plant Physiol. 2020; 183:1126-44

[16]

Yan W, Wu XY, Li YA. et al. Cell wall invertase 3 affects cassava productivity via regulating sugar allocation from source to sink. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:541

[17]

Wang ZY, Wei XY, Yang JJ. et al. Heterologous expression of the apple hexose transporter MdHT2.2 altered sugar concentration with increasing cell wall invertase activity in tomato fruit. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18:540-52

[18]

Wang JF, Wang YP, Zhang J. et al. The NAC transcription factor ClNAC68 positively regulates sugar content and seed develop-ment in watermelon by repressing ClINV and ClGH3.6. Hortic Res. 2021; 8:264

[19]

Wei LZ, Mao WW, Jia MR. et al. FaMYB44.2, a transcrip-tional repressor, negatively regulates sucrose accumulation in strawberry receptacles through interplay with FaMYB10. J Exp Bot. 2018; 69:4805-20

[20]

Ma QJ, Sun MH, Lu J. et al. Transcription factor AREB2 is involved in soluble sugar accumulation by activating sugar transporter and amylase genes. Plant Physiol. 2017; 174:2348-62

[21]

Zhu LC, Zhang CX, Yang NX. et al. Apple vacuolar sugar transporters regulated by MdDREB2A enhance drought resistance by promoting accumulation of soluble sugars and activating ABA signaling. Hortic Res. 2024;11:uhae251

[22]

Wang ZY, Ma BQ, Yang NX. et al. Variation in the promoter of the sorbitol dehydrogenase gene MdSDH2 affects binding of the transcription factor MdABI3 and alters fructose content in apple fruit. Plant J. 2022; 109:1183-98

[23]

Li BY, Qu ST, Kang JY. et al. The MdCBF1/2-MdTST1/2 module regulates sugar accumulation in response to low temperature in apple. Plant J. 2024; 118:787-801

[24]

KochK. Sucrosemetabolism:regulatorymechanismsandpivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004; 7:235-46

[25]

Lemoine R, La Camera S, Atanassova R. et al. Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front Plant Sci. 2013; 4:272

[26]

Huang DM, Wu B, Chen G. et al. Genome-wide analysis of the passion fruit invertase gene family reveals involvement of PeCWINV5 in hexose accumulation. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24:836

[27]

Yuan HZ, Pang FH, Cai WJ. et al. Genome-wide analysis of the invertase genes in strawberry (Fragariac × ananassa). JIntegr Agric. 2021; 20:2652-65

[28]

Zhang SL, Zhang Z, Sun X. et al. Identification and characterization of invertase family genes reveal their roles in vacuolar sucrose metabolism during Pyrus × bretschneideri Rehd. fruit development. Genomics. 2021; 113:1087-97

[29]

Wang XQ, Li LM, Yang PP. et al. The role of hexokinases from grape berries (Vitis × vinifera L.) in regulating the expression of cell wall invertase and sucrose synthase genes. Plant Cell Rep. 2014; 33:337-47

[30]

Ren Y, Guo SG, Zhang J. et al. A tonoplast sugar transporter underlies a sugar accumulation QTL in watermelon. Plant Physiol. 2018; 176:836-50

[31]

Li A, Chen J, Lin Q. et al. Transcription factor MdWRKY32 participates in starch-sugar metabolism by binding to the MdBam5 promoter in apples during postharvest storage. J Agric Food Chem. 2021; 69:14906-14

[32]

Wei W, Cheng MN, Ba LJ. et al. Pitaya HpWRKY3 is associated with fruit sugar accumulation by transcriptionally modulating sucrose metabolic genes HpINV2 and HpSuSy1. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20:1890

[33]

Zhang LH, Xu Y, Luo ZX. et al. Overexpression of a transcription factor MdWRKY126 altered soluble sugar accumulation in apple and tomato fruit. Hortic Plant J. 2025; 11:989-98

[34]

Zhu LC, Li BY, Wu LM. et al. MdERDL6-mediated glucose efflux to the cytosol promotes sugar accumulation in the vacuole through up-regulating TSTs in apple and tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021; 118:e2022788118

[35]

Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Affourtit J. et al. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Nat Genet. 2010; 42:833-9

[36]

Ye J, Zhang Y, Cui HH. et al. WEGO 2.0: a web tool for analyzing and plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W71-5

[37]

Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S. et al. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W182-5

[38]

Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G. et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30:325-7

[39]

Tian F, Yang DC, Meng YQ. et al. PlantRegMap: charting functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D1104-13

[40]

Yang JJ, Zhu LC, Cui WF. et al. Increased activity of MdFRK2, a high-affinity fructokinase, leads to upregulation of sorbitol metabolism and downregulation of sucrose metabolism in apple leaves. Hortic Res. 2018; 5:71

[41]

Jia DJ, Shen F, Wang Y. et al. Apple fruit acidity is genetically diversified by natural variations in three hierarchical epistatic genes: MdSAUR37, MdPP2CH and MdALMTII. Plant J. 2018; 95:427-43

PDF (2776KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/