The BnSEP-BnTFL1s module regulates inflorescence architecture based on light duration in Brassica napus L

Abstract

Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) with determinate inflorescence (DTI) exhibits desirable traits, including reduced plant height, enhanced lodging resistance, and consistent maturity, making them valuable breeding resources. DTI is modulated by BnaA10.TFL1 and BnaC09.TFL1 (BnaA10/C09.TFL1), which encode the TERMINAL FLOWER 1 protein, a key regulator of flowering time and meristem identity. However, the underlying functional and regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we demonstrated that variations in the promoter region of BnaA10/C09.TFL1, rather than the coding region, contributed to the transition from indeterminate inflorescence (IDTI) to DTI in B. napus. Specifically, BnaA10.SEP inhibited BnaA10/C09.TFL1 expression by binding to the GT1-motif in the promoter region of BnaA10/C09.TFL1^DTI, contributing to the IDTI phenotype under short-day conditions. Meanwhile, two novel DTI mutants were successfully generated through the simultaneous knockout of BnaA10/C09.TFL1 using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Furthermore, BnaA10/C09.TFL1 and its homolog BnaA02.FT interacted with BnaA07.14-3-3 instead of directly binding to BnaA08.FD to regulate the development of different inflorescence architectures. Overall, the BnaA10.SEP-BnaA10/C09.TFL1-BnaA07.14-3-3-BnaA08.FD module revealed a new mechanism for DTI formation and a promising strategy for modifying inflorescence architecture traits in B. napus.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Qinghai Provincial High-level Scientist Responsibility System Project (2022-NK-170), Major Project of the Ministry of Agriculture 2030 (2022ZD04009), and Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-12).

Author contributions

K.L. and D.D. designed the study. L.Z., X.Z., and S.L. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. L.Z. wrote the manuscript. H.L., J.Y., and Y.Y. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary data published online. Raw RNA-seq reads generated in this study have been deposited into the CNGB Sequence Archive (CNSA) of China National GeneBank Database (CNGBdb; https://db.cngb.org/) with accession numbers CNP0005923.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this work.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1] Lee C, Kim SJ, Jin S. et al. Genetic interactions reveal the antago-nistic roles of FT/TSF and TFL1 in the determination of inflores-cence meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2019; 99:452-464

[2] Hanano S, Goto K. Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1 is involved in the regulation of flowering time and inflorescence development through transcriptional repression. Plant Cell. 2011; 23:3172-3184

[3] Kaneko-Suzuki M, Kurihara-Ishikawa R, Okushita-Terakawa C. et al. TFL1-like proteins in rice antagonize rice FT-like protein in inflorescence development by competition for complex forma-tion with 14-3-3 and FD. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018; 59:458-468

[4] Wen C, Zhao W, Liu W. et al. CsTFL1 inhibits determinate growth and terminal flower formation through interaction with CsNOT2a in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Development. 2019; 146:180166

[5] Zhu Y, Klasfeld S, Jeong CW. et al. TERMINAL FLOWER 1-FD complex target genes and competition with FLOWERING LOCUS T. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:5118

[6] Goslin K, Zheng B, Serrano-Mislata A. et al. Transcription factor interplay between LEAFY and APETALA1/CAULIFLOWER during floral initiation. Plant Physiol. 2017; 174:1097-1109

[7] Desmond Bradley OR, Vincent C, Carpenter R. et al. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science. 1997; 275: 80-83

[8] Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE. et al. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science (New York, NY). 2000; 288:1613-1616

[9] Fornara F, Panigrahi KC, Gissot L. et al. Arabidopsis DOF transcrip-tion factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. Dev Cell. 2009; 17:75-86

[10] Song YH, Kubota A, Kwon MS. et al. Molecular basis of flowering under natural long-day conditions in Arabidopsis. Nat Plants. 2018; 4:824-835

[11] Schoof H, Lenhard M, Haecker A. et al. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems in maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell. 2000; 100: 635-644

[12] Luo X, Liu B, Xie L. et al. The TaSOC1-TaVRN1 module integrates photoperiod and vernalization signals to regulate wheat flower-ing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2024; 22:635-649

[13] Zhang S, Yao J, Wang L. et al. Role of grapevine SEPALLATA-related MADS-box gene VvMADS39 in flower and ovule devel-opment. Plant J. 2022; 111:1565-1579

[14] Zhang C, Wei L, Yu X. et al. Functional conservation and diver-gence of SEPALLATA-like genes in the development of two-type florets in marigold. Plant Sci. 2021; 309:110938

[15] Zahn LM, Kong H, Leebens-Mack JH. et al. The evolution of the SEPALLATA subfamily of MADS-box genes: a preangiosperm ori-gin with multiple duplications throughout angiosperm history. Genetics. 2005; 169:2209-2223

[16] de Folter S, Immink RGH, Kieffer M. et al. Comprehensive inter-action map of the Arabidopsis MADS box transcription factors. Plant Cell. 2005; 17:1424-1433

[17] Teper-Bamnolker P, Samach A. The flowering integrator FT reg-ulates SEPALLATA3 and FRUITFULL accumulation in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell. 2005; 17:2661-2675

[18] Li K, Yao Y, Xiao L. et al. Fine mapping of the Brassica napus Bnsdt1 gene associated with determinate growth habit. Theor Appl Genet. 2017; 131:193-208

[19] Li K, Chen C, Jia Y. et al. Effect of determinate inflorescence on agronomic traits of Brassica napus. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin. 2021; 30:689-697

[20] Li K, Xu L, Jia Y. et al. A novel locus (Bnsdt2) in a TFL1 homologue sustaining determinate growth in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21:1-14

[21] Jia Y, Li K, Liu H. et al. Characterization of the BnA10.tfl1 gene controls determinate inflorescence trait in Brassica napus L. Agronomy. 2019; 9:722

[22] Zhao X, Zan L, He N. et al. BnaC09. tfl1 controls determi-nate inflorescence trait in Brassica napus. Mol Breed. 2024; 44:68

[23] Wickland DP, Hanzawa Y. The FLOWERING LOCUS T/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 gene family: functional evolution and molecular mechanisms. Mol Plant. 2015; 8:983-997

[24] Zhang Y, Zhang D, Yu H. et al. Location and mapping of the determinate growth habit of Brassica napus by bulked segregant analysis (BSA) using whole genome re-sequencing. Sci Agric Sin. 2018; 51:3029-3039

[25] Wu H. Phenotypic Comparison and Genetic Analysis of Determinate Florescence Mutants in Brassica napus L. Northwest A&F University; 2024:Yang Ling

[26] Zhu Z, Tan L, Fu Y. et al. Genetic control of inflorescence archi-tecture during rice domestication. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2200

[27] Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Frary A. et al. fw2. 2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science. 2000; 289: 85-88

[28] Han F, Yuan K, Sun W. et al. A natural mutation in the promoter of Ms-cd1 causes dominant male sterility in Brassica oleracea. Nat Commun. 2023; 14:6212

[29] Ruan B, Shang L, Zhang B. et al. Natural variation in the promoter of TGW2 determines grain width and weight in rice. New Phytol. 2020; 227:629-640

[30] Wang Y, Chen W, Xing M. et al. Wild rice GL12 synergistically improves grain length and salt tolerance in cultivated rice. Nat Commun. 2024; 15:9453

[31] Strasser B, Alvarez MJ, Califano A. et al. A complementary role for ELF3 and TFL1 in the regulation of flowering time by ambient temperature. Plant J. 2009; 58:629-640

[32] Rantanen M, Kurokura T, Mouhu K. et al. Light quality reg-ulates flowering in FvFT1/FvTFL1 dependent manner in the woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 271

[33] Wen H, Pan J, Chen Y. et al. TERMINAL FLOWER 1 and TERMINAL FLOWER 1d respond to temperature and photoperiod signals to inhibit determinate growth in cucumber. Plant Cell Environ. 2021; 44:2580-2592

[34] Jiang Y, Zhu Y, Zhang L. et al. EjTFL1 genes promote growth but inhibit flower bud differentiation in loquat. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:576

[35] Zhang X, Campbell R, Ducreux LJM. et al. TERMINAL FLOWER-1/CENTRORADIALIS inhibits tuberisation via protein interac-tion with the tuberigen activation complex. Plant J. 2020; 103: 2263-2278

[36] Taoka K-i, Ohki I, Tsuji H. et al. 14-3-3 proteins act as intra-cellular receptors for rice Hd3a florigen. Nature. 2011; 476: 332-335

[37] Huo X, Wu S, Zhu Z. et al. NOG1 increases grain production in rice. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:1497

[38] Wang J, Zhang C, Chen Y. et al. The BnTFL1-BnGF14nu-BnFD module regulates flower development and plant architecture in Brassica napus. Crop J. 2023; 11:1696-1710

[39] Dai C, Li Y, Li L. et al. An efficient agrobacterium-mediated transformation method using hypocotyl as explants for Brassica napus. Mol Breed. 2020; 40:1-13

[40] Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25:402-408

[41] LaSarre B, Federle MJ. EMSA analysis of DNA binding by Rgg proteins. Bio Protoc. 2013; 3:e838

[42] Ye S, Hua S, Ma T. et al. Genetic and multi-omics analy-ses reveal BnaA07.PAP2In-184-317 as the key gene conferring anthocyanin-based color in Brassica napus flowers. JExp Bot. 2022; 73:6630-6645