High-quality assembly and methylome of a Tibetan wild tree peony genome (Paeonia ludlowii) reveal the evolution of giant genome architecture

Pei-Xuan Xiao , Yuanrong Li , Jin Lu , Hao Zuo , Gesang Pingcuo , Hong Ying , Fan Zhao , Qiang Xu , Xiuli Zeng , Wen-Biao Jiao

Horticulture Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (12) : 241

PDF (3083KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (12) :241 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhad241
Article
research-article
High-quality assembly and methylome of a Tibetan wild tree peony genome (Paeonia ludlowii) reveal the evolution of giant genome architecture
Author information +
History +
PDF (3083KB)

Abstract

Tree peony belongs to one of the Saxifragales families, Paeoniaceae. It is one of the most famous ornamental plants, and is also a promising woody oil plant. Although two Paeoniaceae genomes have been released, their assembly qualities are still to be improved. Additionally, more genomes from wild peonies are needed to accelerate genomic-assisted breeding. Here we assemble a high-quality and chromosome-scale 10.3-Gb genome of a wild Tibetan tree peony, Paeonia ludlowii, which features substantial sequence divergence, including around 75% specific sequences and gene-level differentials compared with other peony genomes. Our phylogenetic analyses suggest that Saxifragales and Vitales are sister taxa and, together with rosids, they are the sister taxon to asterids. The P. ludlowii genome is characterized by frequent chromosome reductions, centromere rearrangements, broadly distributed heterochromatin, and recent continuous bursts of transposable element (TE) movement in peony, although it lacks recent whole-genome duplication. These recent TE bursts appeared during the uplift and glacial period of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, perhaps contributing to adaptation to rapid climate changes. Further integrated analyses with methylome data revealed that genome expansion in peony might be dynamically affected by complex interactions among TE proliferation, TE removal, and DNA methylation silencing. Such interactions also impact numerous recently duplicated genes, particularly those related to oil biosynthesis and flower traits. This genome resource will not only provide the genomic basis for tree peony breeding but also shed light on the study of the evolution of huge genome structures as well as their protein-coding genes.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Pei-Xuan Xiao, Yuanrong Li, Jin Lu, Hao Zuo, Gesang Pingcuo, Hong Ying, Fan Zhao, Qiang Xu, Xiuli Zeng, Wen-Biao Jiao. High-quality assembly and methylome of a Tibetan wild tree peony genome (Paeonia ludlowii) reveal the evolution of giant genome architecture. Horticulture Research, 2023, 10 (12) : 241 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhad241

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32270685), the Tibet Economic Forest Seedling Cultivation Project (202375), and the local Science and Technology innovation projects of the central government (XZ202301YD0037C). We thank the high-performance computing platform at the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement at Huazhong Agricultural University.

Author contributions

W.B.J. and X.Z. conceived and designed the project. Y.L., G.P., H.Y., and F.Z. collected samples and prepared sequencing libraries. P.X.X. and Y.L. led the data analyses, with contributions from J.L. and H.Z. W.B.J. coordinated the project with help from X.Z. and Q.X. W.B.J. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from X.Z. and Q.X.

Data availability

All raw sequencing data and assembly sequences have been deposited at the National Genomics Data Center (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn) under BioProject accession number PRJCA016714. The assembly sequences and annotation files have been deposited in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23537670).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]

Yang Y, Sun M, Li S. et al. Germplasm resources and genetic breeding of Paeonia: a systematic review . Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 107

[2]

Kamenetsky-Goldstein R, Yu X . Cut peony industry: the first 30 years of research and new horizons. Hortic Res. 2022; 9: uhac079

[3]

Yu S, Du S, Yuan J. et al. Fatty acid profile in the seeds and seed tissues of Paeonia L. species as new oil plant resources . Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 26944

[4]

Wang X, Liang H, Guo D. et al. Integrated analysis of transcriptomic and proteomic data from tree peony (P. ostii) seeds reveals key developmental stages and candidate genes related to oil biosynthesis and fatty acid metabolism . Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 111

[5]

Zhang X, Zhai Y, Yuan J. et al. New insights into Paeoniaceae used as medicinal plants in China. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 18469

[6]

Zhang XX, Zuo JQ, Wang YT. et al. PoDPBT, a BAHD acyltransferase, catalyses the benzoylation in paeoniflorin biosynthesis in Paeonia ostii . Plant Biotechnol J. 2023; 21: 14-6

[7]

Fu PK, Yang CY, Tsai TH. et al. Moutan cortex radicis improves lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in rats through anti-inflammation. Phytomedicine. 2012; 19: 1206-15

[8]

Stern FC . A Study of the Genus Paeonia . London: Royal Horticultural Society; 1946

[9]

Hong D. Peonies of the World: Taxonomy and Phytogeography . Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2010.

[10]

Hong D . Peonies of the World: Part III. Phylogeny and Evolution . Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2021.

[11]

Li Y, Guo L, Wang Z. et al. Genome-wide association study of 23 flowering phenology traits and 4 floral agronomic traits in tree peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) reveals five genes known to regulate flowering time . Hortic Res. 2023; 10: uhac263

[12]

Yuan J, Jiang S, Jian J. et al. Genomic basis of the giga-chromosomes and giga-genome of tree peony Paeonia ostii . Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 7328

[13]

Sun J, Guo H, Liu M. et al. Histology and transcriptomic profiling reveal the dynamics of seed coat and endosperm formation in tree peony (Paeonia ostii) . Hortic Res. 2022; 9: uhac106

[14]

Li S, Zhang L, Sun M. et al. Biogenesis of flavor-related linalool is diverged and genetically conserved in tree peony (Paeonia × suffruticosa) . Hortic Res. 2023; 10: uhac253

[15]

Luo X, Sun D, Wang S. et al. Integrating full-length transcriptomics and metabolomics reveals the regulatory mechanisms underlying yellow pigmentation in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.) flowers . Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 235

[16]

Lv S, Cheng S, Wang Z. et al. Draft genome of the famous ornamental plant Paeonia suffruticosa . Ecol Evol. 2020; 10: 4518-30

[17]

Hong D, Zhou S, He X. et al. Current status of wild tree peony species with special reference to conservation. Biodivers Sci. 2017; 25: 781-93

[18]

Zhao Y-J, Yin G-S, Gong X . RAD-sequencing improves the genetic characterization of a threatened tree peony (Paeonia ludlowii) endemic to China: implications for conservation . Plant Diversity. 2023; 45: 513-22

[19]

Yang Y, He C, Wu Y. et al. Characterization of stilbenes, in vitro antioxidant and cellular anti-photoaging activities of seed coat extracts from 18 Paeonia species . Ind Crops Prod. 2022; 177: 114530

[20]

Chen T-Q, Sun Y, Yuan T . Transcriptome sequencing and gene expression analysis revealed early ovule abortion of Paeonia ludlowii . BMC Genomics. 2023; 24: 1-18

[21]

Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X. et al. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021; 18: 170-5

[22]

Nurk S, Walenz BP, Rhie A. et al. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res. 2020; 30: 1291-305

[23]

Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM. et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14: e1005944

[24]

Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020; 37: 1530-4

[25]

Sayyari E, Whitfield JB, Mirarab S . DiscoVista: interpretable visualizations of gene tree discordance. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018; 122: 110-5

[26]

Zeng L, Zhang N, Zhang Q. et al. Resolution of deep eudicot phylogeny and their temporal diversification using nuclear genes from transcriptomic and genomic datasets. New Phytol. 2017; 214: 1338-54

[27]

Tarullo C, Rose JP, Sytsma KJ. et al. Using a supermatrix approach to explore phylogenetic relationships, divergence times, and historical biogeography of Saxifragales. Turk J Bot. 2021; 45: 440-56

[28]

Jian S, Soltis PS, Gitzendanner MA. et al. Resolving an ancient, rapid radiation in Saxifragales. Syst Biol. 2008; 57: 38-57

[29]

Vekemans D, Proost S, Vanneste K. et al. Gamma paleohexaploidy in the stem lineage of core eudicots: significance for MADS-box gene and species diversification. Mol Biol Evol. 2012; 29: 3793-806

[30]

Jiao WB, Accinelli GG, Hartwig B. et al. Improving and correcting the contiguity of long-read genome assemblies of three plant species using optical mapping and chromosome conformation capture data. Genome Res. 2017; 27: 778-86

[31]

Xing Y, Ree RH . Uplift-driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017; 114: E3444-51

[32]

Zhang T, Qiao Q, Novikova PY. et al. Genome of Crucihimalaya himalaica, a close relative of Arabidopsis, shows ecological adaptation to high altitude . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019; 116: 7137-46

[33]

Zhao Z, Qiao Y, Wang S. et al. Geological characteristics and evolution of the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan plateau since the late Cenozoic. Front Earth Sci. 2008; 2: 209-16

[34]

Niu S, Li J, Bo W. et al. The Chinese pine genome and methylome unveil key features of conifer evolution. Cell. 2022; 185: 204-217.e14

[35]

Jayakodi M, Golicz AA, Kreplav J. et al. The giant diploid faba genome unlocks variation in a global protein crop. Nature. 2023; 615: 652-9

[36]

Sork VL, Cokus SJ, Fitz-Gibbon ST. et al. High-quality genome and methylomes illustrate features underlying evolutionary success of oaks. Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 2047

[37]

Tang H, Bowers JE, Wang X. et al. Synteny and collinearity in plant genomes. Science. 2008; 320: 486-8

[38]

Appels R, Eversole K, Stein N. et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018; 361: eaar7191

[39]

Sun X, Zhu S, Li N. et al. A chromosome-level genome assembly of garlic (Allium sativum) provides insights into genome evolution and allicin biosynthesis . Mol Plant. 2020; 13: 1328-39

[40]

Lou H, Song L, Li X. et al. The Torreya grandis genome illuminates the origin and evolution of gymnosperm-specific sciadonic acid biosynthesis . Nat Commun. 2023; 14: 1315

[41]

Liu Y, Wang S, Li L. et al. The Cycas genome and the early evolution of seed plants . Nat Plants. 2022; 8: 389-401

[42]

Xiong X, Gou J, Liao Q. et al. The Taxus genome provides insights into paclitaxel biosynthesis . Nat Plants. 2021; 7: 1026-36

[43]

Marchant DB, Chen G, Cai S. et al. Dynamic genome evolution in a model fern. Nat Plants. 2022; 8: 1038-51

[44]

Huang X, Wang W, Gong T. et al. The flying spider-monkey tree fern genome provides insights into fern evolution and arborescence. Nat Plants. 2022; 8: 500-12

[45]

Panchy N, Lehti-Shiu M, Shiu SH . Evolution of gene duplication in plants. Plant Physiol. 2016; 171: 2294-316

[46]

Marçais G, Kingsford C . A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 764-70

[47]

Guan D, McCarthy SA, Wood J. et al. Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2020; 36: 2896-8

[48]

Chakraborty M, Baldwin-Brown JG, Long AD. et al. Contiguous and accurate de novo assembly of metazoan genomes with modest long read coverage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44: e147

[49]

Wu L, Nie L, Xu Z. et al. Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of three Paeonia section Moutan species (Paeoniaceae) . Front Genet. 2020; 11: 980

[50]

Servant N, Varoquaux N, Lajoie BR. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 2015; 16: 259

[51]

Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhao Q. et al. Assembly of allele-aware, chromosomal-scale autopolyploid genomes based on Hi-C data. Nat Plants. 2019; 5: 833-45

[52]

Robinson JT, Turner D, Durand NC. et al. Juicebox.js provides a cloud-based visualization system for Hi-C data. Cell Syst. 2018; 6: 256-258.e1

[53]

Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M. et al. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 38: 4647-54

[54]

Li H, Birol I . Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34: 3094-100

[55]

Langmead B, Salzberg SL . Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012; 9: 357-9

[56]

Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C. et al. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37: 907-15

[57]

Rhie A, Walenz BP, Koren S. et al. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 2020; 21: 1-27

[58]

Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R. et al. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24: 637-44

[59]

Majoros WH, Pertea M, Salzberg SL . TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20: 2878-9

[60]

Korf I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC bioinformatics. 2004; 5: 59-9

[61]

Slater GS, Birney E . Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinform. 2005; 6: 1-11

[62]

Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015; 33: 290-5

[63]

Haas BJ, Salzberg SL, Zhu W. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 2008; 9: R7-22

[64]

Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR . Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 2933-5

[65]

Kalvari I, Argasinska J, Quinones-Olvera N. et al. Rfam 13.0: shifting to a genome-centric resource for non-coding RNA families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46: D335-42

[66]

Wucher V, Legeai F, Hédan B. et al. FEELnc: a tool for long non-coding RNA annotation and its application to the dog transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45: e57

[67]

Bru C, Courcelle E, Carrere S. et al. The ProDom database of protein domain families: more emphasis on 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33: D212-5

[68]

Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR. et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43: D222-6

[69]

Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P. et al. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95: 5857-64

[70]

Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D. et al. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47: D419-26

[71]

Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: 1236-40

[72]

Cantalapiedra CP, Hernandez-Plaza A, Letunic I. et al. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 38: 5825-9

[73]

Tian F, Yang DC, Meng YQ. et al. PlantRegMap: charting functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 48: D1104-13

[74]

Goel M, Sun H, Jiao WB. et al. SyRI: finding genomic rearrangements and local sequence differences from whole-genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 2019; 20: 1-13

[75]

Goel M, Schneeberger K . Plotsr: visualizing structural similarities and rearrangements between multiple genomes. Bioinformatics. 2022; 38: 2922-6

[76]

Ou S, Su W, Liao Y. et al. Benchmarking transposable element annotation methods for creation of a streamlined, comprehensive pipeline. Genome Biol. 2019; 20: 275

[77]

Flynn JM, Hubley R, Goubert C. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 9451-7

[78]

Li W, Godzik A . Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22: 1658-9

[79]

Chen N . Using repeat masker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2004; 5: 4-10

[80]

Zhang RG, Li GY, Wang XL. et al. TEsorter: an accurate and fast method to classify LTR-retrotransposons in plant genomes. Hortic Res. 2022; 9: uhac017

[81]

Wan T, Liu Z, Leitch IJ. et al. The Welwitschia genome reveals a unique biology underpinning extreme longevity in deserts . Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 4247

[82]

Katoh K, Standley DM . MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30: 772-80

[83]

Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Lucas-Lledó JI. et al. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana . Science. 2010; 327: 92-4

[84]

Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27: 573-80

[85]

Lang T, Li G, Wang H. et al. Physical location of tandem repeats in the wheat genome and application for chromosome identification. Planta. 2019; 249: 663-75

[86]

Emms DM, Kelly S . OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019; 20: 1-14

[87]

Edgar RC . MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32: 1792-7

[88]

Suyama M, Torrents D, Bork P . PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: W609-12

[89]

Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldon T . trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 1972-3

[90]

Zhang C, Rabiee M, Sayyari E. et al. ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees. Bioinformatics. 2018; 19: 15-30

[91]

Zhang C, Scornavacca C, Molloy EK. et al. ASTRAL-pro: quartet-based species-tree inference despite paralogy. Mol Biol Evol. 2020; 37: 3292-307

[92]

Yang Z . PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24: 1586-91

[93]

Letunic I, Bork P . Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49: W293-6

[94]

Mendes FK, Vanderpool D, Fulton B. et al. CAFE 5 models variation in evolutionary rates among gene families. Bioinformatics. 2021; 36: 5516-8

[95]

Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009; 10: 1-9

[96]

Sun P, Jiao B, Yang Y. et al. WGDI: a user-friendly toolkit for evolutionary analyses of whole-genome duplications and ancestral karyotypes. Mol Plant. 2022; 15: 1841-51

[97]

He W, Yang J, Jing Y. et al. NGenomeSyn: an easy-to-use and flexible tool for publication-ready visualization of syntenic relationships across multiple genomes. Bioinformatics. 2023; 39: btad121

[98]

Krueger F, Andrews SR . Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 1571-2

[99]

Zhou Q, Lim JQ, Sung WK. et al. An integrated package for bisulfite DNA methylation data analysis with indel-sensitive mapping. Bioinformatics. 2019; 20: 1-11

[100]

Qiao X, Li Q, Yin H. et al. Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization-diploidization cycles in plants. Genome Biol. 2019; 20: 1-23

[101]

Zhang Z, Xiao J, Wu J. et al. ParaAT: a parallel tool for constructing multiple protein-coding DNA alignments. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012; 419: 779-81

[102]

Wang D, Zhang Y, Zhang Z. et al. KaKs_Calculator 2.0: a toolkit incorporating gamma-series methods and sliding window strategies. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2010; 8: 77-80

[103]

Eddy SR . Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 1998; 14: 755-63

PDF (3083KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/