CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the polygalacturonase FaPG1 gene improves strawberry fruit firmness

Gloria López-Casado , Cristina Sánchez-Raya , Pablo D. Ric-Varas , Candelas Paniagua , Rosario Blanco-Portales , Juan Muñoz-Blanco , Sara Pose , Antonio J. Matas , Jose A. Mercado

Horticulture Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) : 011

PDF (1260KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) :011 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhad011
Article
research-article
CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the polygalacturonase FaPG1 gene improves strawberry fruit firmness
Author information +
History +
PDF (1260KB)

Abstract

Firmness is one of the most important fruit quality traits in strawberries. The postharvest shelf life of this soft fruit is highly limited by the loss of firmness, where cell wall disassembly plays an important role. Previous studies demonstrated that the polygalacturonase FaPG1 has a key role in remodelling pectins during strawberry softening. In this study, FaPG1 knockout strawberry plants have been generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system delivered via Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Ten independent lines, cv. “Chandler”, were obtained, and all of them were successfully edited as determined by PCR amplification and T7 endonuclease assay. The targeted mutagenesis insertion and deletion rates were analyzed using targeted deep sequencing. The percentage of edited sequences varied from 47% up to almost 100%, being higher than 95% for seven of the selected lines. Phenotypic analyses showed that 7 out of the eight lines analyzed produced fruits significantly firmer than the control, ranging from 33 to 70% increase in firmness. There was a positive relationship between the degree of FaPG1 editing and the rise in fruit firmness. Minor changes were observed in other fruit quality traits, such as colour, soluble solids, titratable acidity or anthocyanin content. Edited fruits showed a reduced softening rate during postharvest, displayed a reduced transpirational water loss, and were less damaged by Botrytis cinerea inoculation. The analysis of four potential off-target sites revealed no mutation events. In conclusion, editing the FaPG1 gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system is an efficient method for improving strawberry fruit firmness and shelf life.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gloria López-Casado, Cristina Sánchez-Raya, Pablo D. Ric-Varas, Candelas Paniagua, Rosario Blanco-Portales, Juan Muñoz-Blanco, Sara Pose, Antonio J. Matas, Jose A. Mercado. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the polygalacturonase FaPG1 gene improves strawberry fruit firmness. Horticulture Research, 2023, 10 (3) : 011 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhad011

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades and FEDER EU funds (grant numbers AGL2017-86531-C2-1R and PID2020-118468RB-C21), and the University of Malaga (grant number B1-2020_09). CS-R was awarded a PhD Fellowship from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PRE2018-085509), PhD Program Advanced Biotechnology, University of Málaga. We thank Botanisches Institut (Germany) for sharing CRISPR/Cas plasmids for gene editing and Dr. Vela-Corcia (IHSM “La Mayora”-UMA-CSIC, Spain) for providing Botrytis strain B05.10.

Authors’ contributions

AJM, JM-B and JAM conceived the original project; GL-C, CS-R, CP and PDR-V performed the experiments; SP and RB-P supervised the experiments; GL-C and JAM wrote the article with the contributions of all the authors.

Data availability

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Conflict of interests statement

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

[1]

Zhang Y, Seeram NP, Lee R et al. Isolation and identification of strawberry phenolics with antioxidant and human cancer cell antiproliferative properties. J Agric Food Chem. 2008; 56: 670-5.

[2]

Hancock JF, Sjulin TM, Lobos GA. Strawberries. In: Hancock JF (ed.), Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding. The Netherlands: Springer Dordrecht Publisher, 2008, 393-437.

[3]

Goulao LF, Oliveira CM . Cell wall modification during fruit ripening: when a fruit is not the fruit. Trends in Food Sci Technol. 2008; 19: 4-25.

[4]

Mercado JA, Pliego-Alfaro F, Quesada MA . Fruit shelf life and potential for its genetic improvement. In: Jenks MA, Bebeli PJ, eds. Breeding for Fruit Quality. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: Oxford, 2011, 81-104.

[5]

Brummell DA . Cell wall disassembly in ripening fruit. Funct Plant Biol. 2006; 33: 103-19.

[6]

Posé S, Paniagua C, Matas AJ et al. A nanostructural view of the cell wall disassembly process during fruit ripening and postharvest storage by atomic force microscopy. Trends in Food Sci Technol. 2019; 87: 47-58.

[7]

Moya-León MA, Mattus-Araya E, Herrera R . Molecular events occurring during softening of strawberry fruit. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 615.

[8]

Figueroa CR, Rosli HG, Civello PM et al. Changes in cell wall polysaccharides and cell wall degrading enzymes during ripening of Fragaria chiloensis and Fragaria × ananassa fruits. Sci Hortic. 2010; 124: 454-62.

[9]

Redgwell RJ, Macrae E, Hallett I et al. In vivo and in vitro swelling of cell walls during fruit ripening. Planta. 1997; 203: 162-73.

[10]

Paniagua C, Santiago-Doménech N, Kirby AR et al. Structural changes in cell wall pectins during strawberry fruit development. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017; 118: 55-63.

[11]

Jiménez-Bermúdez S, Redondo-Nevado J, Muñoz-Blanco J et al. Manipulation of strawberry fruit softening by antisense expression of a pectate lyase gene. Plant Physiol. 2002; 128: 751-9.

[12]

Atkinson RG, Sutherland PW, Johnston SL et al. Down-regulation of POLYGALACTURONASE1 alters firmness, tensile strength and water loss in apple (malus × domestica) fruit. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12: 129.

[13]

Paniagua C, Blanco-Portales R, Barceló-Muñoz M et al. Antisense down-regulation of the strawberry β-galactosidase gene FaβGal4 increases cell wall galactose levels and reduces fruit softening. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 619-31.

[14]

Quesada MA, Blanco-Portales R, Posé S et al. Antisense downregulation of the FaPG1 gene reveals an unexpected central role for polygalacturonase in strawberry fruit softening. Plant Physiol. 2009; 150: 1022-32.

[15]

Redondo-Nevado J, Moyano E, Medina-Escobar N et al. A fruit-specific and developmentally regulated endopolygalacturonase gene from strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa cv Chandler). J Exp Bot. 2001; 52: 1941-5.

[16]

Paniagua C, Ric-Varas P, García-Gago JA et al. Elucidating the role of polygalacturonase genes in strawberry fruit softening. J Exp Bot. 2020; 71: 7103-17.

[17]

Villarreal NM, Rosli HG, Martínez GA et al. Polygalacturonase activity and expression of related genes during ripening of strawberry cultivars with contrasting fruit firmness. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2008; 47: 141-50.

[18]

Wilson FM, Harrison K, Armittage AD et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of phytoene desaturase in diploid and octoploid strawberry. Plant Methods. 2019; 15: 45.

[19]

Jung C, Capistrano-Gossmann G, Braatz J et al. Recent developments in genome editing and applications in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 2017; 137: 1-9.

[20]

Jiang WZ, Zhou HB, Bi H et al. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41: e188.

[21]

Miao J, Guo DS, Zhang JZ et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res. 2013; 23: 1233-6.

[22]

Brooks C, Nekrasov V, Lippman ZB et al. Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-Associated9 system. Plant Physiol. 2014; 166: 1292-7.

[23]

Bui T, Tran TTH, Bui APN . CRISPR/Cas9 applications in breeding and improvement of tomatoes, Solanum lycopersicum: a review. Biosci Biotechnol Res Commun. 2020; 13: 1668-72.

[24]

Malnoy M, Viola R, Jung MH et al. DNA-free genetically edited gravepine and apple protoplast using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1904.

[25]

Osakabe Y, Liang Z, Ren C et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in apple and gravepine. Nat Protoc. 2018; 13: 2844-63.

[26]

Xing S, Jia M, Wei L et al. CRISPR/Cas9-introduced single and multiple mutagenesis in strawberry. J Genet Genom. 2018; 45: 685-7.

[27]

Zhou J, Wang G, Liu Z . Efficient genome editing of wild strawberry genes, vector development and validation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 1868-77.

[28]

Feng J, Dai C, Luo H et al. Reporter gene expression reveals precise auxin synthesis sites during fruit and root development in wild strawberry. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70: 563-74.

[29]

Martín-Pizarro C, Triviño JC, Posé D . Functional analysis of the TM6 MADS-box gene in the octoploid strawberry by CRISPR/Cas9-directed mutagenesis. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70: 885-95.

[30]

Gao Q, Luo H, Li Y et al. Genetic modulation of RAP alters fruit coloration in both wild and cultivated strawberry. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 1550-61.

[31]

Chandler CK, Folta K, Dale A et al. Strawberry. In: Badenes ML, Byrne DH, eds. Fruit Breeding. New York, NY: Springer, 2012, 305-25.

[32]

Liu T, Li M, Liu Z et al. Reannotation of the cultivated strawberry genome and establishment of a strawberry genome database. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 41.

[33]

Hardigan MA, Feldmann MJ, Pincot DDA et al. Blueprint for phasing and assembling the genomes of heterozygous polyploids: application to the octoploid genome of strawberry. bioRxiv. 2021: 1-12.

[34]

Pompili V, Dalla-Costa L, Piazza S et al. Reduced fire blight susceptibility in apple cultivars using a high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-FLP/FRT-based gene editing system. Plant Biotechol J. 2020; 18: 845-58.

[35]

Rexova-Benkova L. Evidence for the role of carboxyl groups in activity of endopolygalacturonase of aspergillus Niger chemical modification by carbodiimide reagent. Collect Czechoslov Chem Commun. 1990; 55: 1389-95.

[36]

Markovic O, Janecek S . Pectin degrading glycoside hydrolases of family 28: sequence-structural features, specificities and evolution. Protein Eng. 2001; 14: 615-31.

[37]

Bussink HJD, Buxton FP, Visser J . Expression and sequence comparison of the aspergillus Niger and aspergillus tubingensis genes encoding polygalacturonase-II. Curr Genet. 1991; 19: 467-74.

[38]

Suutarinen J, Änäkäinen L, Autio K . Comparison of light microscopy and spatially resolved Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) microscopy in the examination of cell wall components in strawberries. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 1998; 31: 595-601.

[39]

Kramer PJ, Boyer JS . Water Relations of Plants and Soils. California: Academic Press; 1995.

[40]

Zhang D, Hussain A, Manghwar H et al. Genome editing with the CRISPR-Cas system: an art, ethics and global regulatory perspective. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 1651-69.

[41]

Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI et al. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2015; 33: 1162-4.

[42]

Barceló M, Wallin A, Medina JJ et al. Isolation and culture of strawberry protoplasts and field evaluation of regenerated plants. Sci Hortic. 2019; 256: 1-8.

[43]

Wang D, Samsulrizal NH, Yan C et al. Characterization of CRISPR mutants targeting genes modulating pectin degradation in ripening tomato. Plant Physiol. 2019; 179: 544-57.

[44]

Gambino G, Perrone I, Gribaudo I . A rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants. Phytochem Anal. 2008; 19: 520-5.

[45]

Schmil S, Fauser F, Puchta H . CRISPR/Cas-mediated site specific mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using Cas9 nuclease and paired nickases. In: Murata M, (ed.). Chromosome and Genomic Engineering in Plants: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1469. New York, NY: Humana Press, 2016.

[46]

Barceló M, El-Mansouri I, Mercado JA et al. Regeneration and transformation via agrobacterium tumefaciens of the strawberry cultivar Chandler. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1998; 54: 29-36.

[47]

Margara J . Bases de la Multiplication Vegetative. Versailles: INRA; 1984.

[48]

Murashige T, Skoog F . A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962; 15: 473-97.

[49]

Mercado JA, el Mansouri I, Jiménez-Bermúdez S et al. A convenient protocol for extraction and purification of DNA from Fragaria. In vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 1999; 35: 152-3.

[50]

Guschin DY, Waite AJ, Katibah GE et al. A rapid and general assay for monitoring endogenous gene modification. Methods Mol Biol. 2010; 649: 247-56.

[51]

Nunes MCN, Brecht JK, Morais AMMB et al. Physicochemical changes during strawberry development in the field compared with those that occur in harvested fruit during storage. J Sci Food Agric. 2006; 86: 180-90.

[52]

Giusti M, Wrolstad RE . Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV-visible spectroscopy. In: Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. 2001, F1.2.1-13.

[53]

Pedersen S, Amtssygehus A . Multiplex relative gene expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR using the iCycler iQ detection system. BioRadiations. 2001; 107: 10-1.

[54]

Redgwell RJ, Melton LD, Brasch DJ . Cell wall dissolution in ripening kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa): solubilization of the pectic polymers. Plant Physiol. 1992; 98: 71-81.

[55]

Filisetti-Cozzi TMCC, Carpita NC . Measurement of uronic acids without interference from neutral sugars. Anal Biochem. 1991; 197: 157-62.

[56]

Gross KC . A rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method for assaying polygalacturonase using 2-cyanoacetamide. HortScience. 1982; 17: 933-4.

PDF (1260KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/