SISTER OF TM3 activates FRUITFULL1 to regulate inflorescence branching in tomato

Abstract

Selection for favorable inflorescence architecture to improve yield is one of the crucial targets in crop breeding. Different tomato varieties require distinct inflorescence-branching structures to enhance productivity. While a few important genes for tomato inflorescence-branching development have been identified, the regulatory mechanism underlying inflorescence branching is still unclear. Here, we confirmed that SISTER OF TM3 (STM3), a homolog of Arabidopsis SOC1, is a major positive regulatory factor of tomato inflorescence architecture by map-based cloning. High expression levels of STM3 underlie the highly inflorescence-branching phenotype in ST024. STM3 is expressed in both vegetative and reproductive meristematic tissues and in leaf primordia and leaves, indicative of its function in flowering time and inflorescence-branching development. Transcriptome analysis shows that several floral development-related genes are affected by STM3 mutation. Among them, FRUITFULL1 (FUL1) is downregulated in stm3cr mutants, and its promoter is bound by STM3 by ChIP-qPCR analysis. EMSA and dual-luciferase reporter assays further confirmed that STM3 could directly bind the promoter region to activate FUL1 expression. Mutation of FUL1 could partially restore inflorescence-branching phenotypes caused by high STM3 expression in ST024. Our findings provide insights into the molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying inflorescence development in tomato.

References

[1] Wang, B., Smith, S. M. & Li, J. Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 437-468 (2018).

[2] Welty, N., Radovich, C., Meulia, T. & van der Knaap, E. Inflorescence development in two tomato species. Can. J. Bot. 85, 111-118 (2007).

[3] Lippman, Z. B. et al. The making of a compound inflorescence in tomato and related nightshades. PLoS Biol. 6, e288 (2008).

[4] Teo, Z. W., Song, S., Wang, Y. Q., Liu, J. & Yu, H. New insights into the regulation of inflorescence architecture. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 158-165 (2014).

[5] Clark, S. E., Williams, R. W. & Meyerowitz, E. M. The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 89, 575-585 (1997).

[6] Fletcher, J. C., Brand, U., Running, M. P., Simon, R. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283, 1911-1914 (1999).

[7] Jeong, S., Trotochaud, A. E. & Clark, S. E. The Arabidopsis CLAVATA2 gene encodes a receptor-like protein required for the stability of the CLAVATA1 receptor-like kinase. Plant Cell 11, 1925-1934 (1999).

[8] Schoof, H. et al. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems is maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 100, 635-644 (2000).

[9] Ohyama, K., Shinohara, H., Ogawa-Ohnishi, M. & Matsubayashi, Y . A glycopeptide regulating stem cell fate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 578-580 (2009).

[10] Stahl, Y. & Simon, R. Plant primary meristems: shared functions and regulatory mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 53-58 (2010).

[11] Pautler, M., Tanaka, W., Hirano, H. Y. & Jackson, D. Grass meristems I: shoot apical meristem maintenance, axillary meristem determinacy, and the floral transition. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 302-312 (2013).

[12] Xu, C. et al. A cascade of arabinosyltransferases controls shoot meristem size in tomato. Nat. Genet. 47, 784-792 (2015).

[13] Rodriguez-Leal, D. et al. Evolution of buffering in a genetic circuit controlling plant stem cell proliferation. Nat. Genet. 51, 786-792 (2019).

[14] Molinero-Rosales, N., Latorre, A., Jamilena, M. & Lozano, R. SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS regulates the transition and maintenance of flowering in tomato. Planta 218, 427-434 (2004).

[15] Lifschitz, E. et al. The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6398-6403 (2006).

[16] Quinet, M. et al. Characterization of tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) mutants affected in their flowering time and in the morphogenesis of their reproductive structure. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 1381-1390 (2006).

[17] Szymkowiak, E. J. & Irish, E. E. Interactions between jointless and wild-type tomato tissues during development of the pedicel abscission zone and the inflorescence meristem. Plant Cell 11, 159-175 (1999).

[18] Thouet, J., Quinet, M., Lutts, S., Kinet, J. M. & Perilleux, C. Repression of floral meristem fate is crucial in shaping tomato inflorescence. PLoS One 7, e31096 (2012).

[19] Molinero-Rosales, N. et al. FALSIFLORA, the tomato orthologue of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, controls flowering time and floral meristem identity. Plant J.: Cell Mol. Biol. 20, 685-693 (1999).

[20] Zheng, H. & Kawabata, S. Identification and validation of new alleles of FALSIFLORA and COMPOUND INFLORESCENCE genes controlling the number of branches in tomato inflorescence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071572 (2017).

[21] MacAlister, C. A. et al. Synchronization of the flowering transition by the tomato TERMINATING FLOWER gene. Nat. Genet. 44, 1393-1398 (2012).

[22] Xu, C., Park, S. J., Van Eck, J. & Lippman, Z. B. Control of inflorescence architecture in tomato by BTB/POZ transcriptional regulators. Genes Dev. 30, 2048-2061 (2016).

[23] Park, S. J., Jiang, K., Schatz, M. C. & Lippman, Z. B. Rate of meristem maturation determines inflorescence architecture in tomato. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 639-644 (2012).

[24] Soyk, S. et al. Bypassing negative epistasis on yield in tomato imposed by a domestication gene. Cell 169, 1142-1155 e1112 (2017).

[25] Soyk, S. et al. Duplication of a domestication locus neutralized a cryptic variant that caused a breeding barrier in tomato. Nat. Plants 5, 471-479 (2019).

[26] Alonge, M. et al. Major impacts of widespread structural variation on gene expression and crop improvement in tomato. Cell 182, 145-161 e123 (2020).

[27] Lee, J. & Lee, I. Regulation and function of SOC1, a flowering pathway integrator. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 2247-2254 (2010).

[28] Immink, R. G. et al. Characterization of SOC1’s central role in flowering by the identification of its upstream and downstream regulators. Plant Physiol. 160, 433-449 (2012).

[29] Tao, Z. et al. Genome-wide identification of SOC1 and SVP targets during the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J.: Cell Mol. Biol. 70, 549-561 (2012).

[30] Liu, C. et al. A conserved genetic pathway determines inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis and rice. Dev. Cell 24, 612-622 (2013).

[31] Reynard, G. B. New source of the j2 gene governing jointless pedicel in tomato. Science 134, 2102 (1961).

[32] Zhang, S. et al. Enhancer-promoter interaction of SELF PRUNING 5G shapes photoperiod adaptation. Plant Physiol. 178, 1631-1642 (2018).

[33] Lee, H. et al. The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 14, 2366-2376 (2000).

[34] Leseberg, C. H. et al. Interaction study of MADS-domain proteins in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 2253-2265 (2008).

[35] Irish, V. F. The flowering of Arabidopsis flower development. Plant J.: Cell Mol. Biol. 61, 1014-1028 (2010).

[36] Ferrandiz, C., Gu, Q., Martienssen, R. & Yanofsky, M. F. Redundant regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture by FRUITFULL, APETALA1, and CAULIFLOWER. Development 127, 725-734 (2000).

[37] Teper-Bamnolker, P. & Samach, A. The flowering integrator FT regulates SEPALLATA3 and FRUITFULL accumulation in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell 17, 2661-2675 (2005).

[38] Bemer, M. et al. FRUITFULL controls SAUR10 expression and regulates Arabidopsis growth and architecture. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 3391-3403 (2017).

[39] Balanza, V. et al. Genetic control of meristem arrest and life span in Arabidopsis by a FRUITFULL-APETALA2 pathway. Nat. Commun. 9, 565 (2018).

[40] Fornes, O. et al. JASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D87-D92 (2020).

[41] Lee, S., Kim, J., Han, J. J., Han, M. J. & An, G. Functional analyses of the flowering time gene OsMADS50, the putative SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in rice. Plant J.: Cell Mol. Biol. 38, 754-764 (2004).

[42] Zhong, X. et al. Cloning and expression analysis of GmGAL1, SOC1 homolog gene in soybean. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39, 6967-6974 (2012).

[43] Na, X. et al. Cloning and functional analysis of the flowering gene GmSOC1-like, a putative SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION CO1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in soybean. Plant Cell Rep. 32, 1219-1229 (2013).

[44] Alter, P. et al. Flowering time-regulated genes in maize include the transcription factor ZmMADS1. Plant Physiol. 172, 389-404 (2016).

[45] Samach, A. et al. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 288, 1613-1616 (2000).

[46] Bemer, M. et al. The tomato FRUITFULL homologs TDR4/FUL1 and MBP7/FUL2 regulate ethylene-independent aspects of fruit ripening. Plant Cell 24, 4437-4451 (2012).

[47] Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114-2120 (2014).

[48] Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).

[49] Zhang, S. et al. Detection of major loci associated with the variation of 18 important agronomic traits between Solanum pimpinellifolium and cultivated tomatoes. Plant J.: Cell Mol. Biol. 95, 312-323 (2018).

[50] Lin, T. et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat. Genet. 46, 1220-1226 (2014).

[51] Chen, S. et al. Genome editing to integrate seed size and abiotic stress tolerance traits in Arabidopsis reveals a role for DPA4 and SOD7 in the regulation of inflorescence architecture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112695 (2019).

[52] Deng, L. et al. Efficient generation of pink-fruited tomatoes using CRISPR/Cas9 system. J. Genet Genomics 45, 51-54 (2018).

[53] Song, J. et al. Variations in both FTL1 and SP5G, two tomato FT paralogs, control day-neutral flowering. Mol. Plant 13, 939-942 (2020).

[54] Liu, X. et al. AGAMOUS terminates floral stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis by directly repressing WUSCHEL through recruitment of Polycomb Group proteins. Plant Cell 23, 3654-3670 (2011).

[55] Meng, Y., Li, H., Wang, Q., Liu, B. & Lin, C. Blue light-dependent interaction between cryptochrome2 and CIB1 regulates transcription and leaf senescence in soybean. Plant Cell 25, 4405-4420 (2013).

[56] Eschenfeldt, W. H., Lucy, S., Millard, C. S., Joachimiak, A. & Mark, I. D. A family of LIC vectors for high-throughput cloning and purification of proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 498, 105-115 (2009).

[57] Hajdukiewicz, P., Svab, Z. & Maliga, P. The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 25, 989-994 (1994).