Grafting vigour is associated with DNA de-methylation in eggplant

Abstract

In horticulture, grafting is a popular technique used to combine positive traits from two different plants. This is achieved by joining the plant top part (scion) onto a rootstock which contains the stem and roots. Rootstocks can provide resistance to stress and increase plant production, but despite their wide use, the biological mechanisms driving rootstock-induced alterations of the scion phenotype remain largely unknown. Given that epigenetics plays a relevant role during distance signalling in plants, we studied the genome-wide DNA methylation changes induced in eggplant (Solanum melongena) scion using two interspecific rootstocks to increase vigour. We found that vigour was associated with a change in scion gene expression and a genome-wide hypomethylation in the CHH context. Interestingly, this hypomethylation correlated with the downregulation of younger and potentially more active long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements (LTR-TEs), suggesting that graft-induced epigenetic modifications are associated with both physiological and molecular phenotypes in grafted plants. Our results indicate that the enhanced vigour induced by heterografting in eggplant is associated with epigenetic modifications, as also observed in some heterotic hybrids.

References

[1] Gautier, A. T. et al. Merging genotypes: graft union formation and scion-rootstock interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 747-755 (2019).

[2] Goldschmidt, E. E. Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 727 (2014).

[3] Colla, G., Pérez-Alfocea, F. & Schwarz, D. Vegetable Grafting: Principles and Practices (CABI, 2017).

[4] Kumar, P., Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M. & Colla, G. Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efficiency. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1130. (2017).

[5] Warschefsky, E. J. et al. Rootstocks: diversity, domestication, and impacts on shoot phenotypes. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 418-437 (2016).

[6] Bai, S., Kasai, A., Yamada, K., Li, T. & Harada, T. A mobile signal transported over a long distance induces systemic transcriptional gene silencing in a grafted partner. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4561-4570 (2011).

[7] Lewsey, M. G. et al. Mobile small RNAs regulate genome-wide DNA methy- lation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E801-E810 (2016).

[8] Melnyk, C. W., Molnar, A. & Baulcombe, D. C. Intercellular and systemic movement of RNA silencing signals. EMBO J. 30, 3553-3563 (2011).

[9] Molnar, A. et al. Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epige- netic modification in recipient cells. Science 328, 872-875 (2010).

[10] Thieme, C. J. et al. Endogenous Arabidopsis messenger RNAs transported to distant tissues. Nat. Plants 1, 15025 (2015).

[11] Zhang, H., Lang, Z. & Zhu, J.-K. Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 489 (2018).

[12] Lee, J.-M. & Oda, M. in Horticultural Reviews (ed. Janic, J.) Ch. 2 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2010).

[13] Gisbert, C., Prohens, J., Raigón, M. D., Stommel, J. R. & Nuez, F. Eggplant relatives as sources of variation for developing new rootstocks: effects of grafting on eggplant yield and fruit apparent quality and composition. Sci. Hortic. 128, 14-22 (2011).

[14] Schwarz, D., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G. & Venema, J. H. Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Sci. Hortic. 127, 162-171 (2010).

[15] Bogoescu, M. I. R. V. & Doltu, M. Effect of grafting eggplant (Solanum mel- ongena L.) on its selected useful characters. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj.- Napoca Hortic. 72, 318-326 (2015).

[16] Miceli, A., Sabatino, L., Moncada, A., Vetrano, F. & D’Anna, F. Nursery and field evaluation of eggplant grafted onto unrooted cuttings of Solanum torvum Sw. Sci. Hortic. 178, 203-210 (2014).

[17] Wu, R. et al. Inter-species grafting caused extensive and heritable alterations of DNA methylation in Solanaceae plants. PLoS ONE 8, e61995 (2013).

[18] Melnyk, C. W. in Plant Hormones: Methods and Protocols (eds. Kleine-Vehn, J. & Sauer, M.) Ch. 2 (Springer, 2017).

[19] Wang, P. et al. Factors influencing gene family size variation among related species in a plant family, Solanaceae. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 2596-2613 (2018).

[20] Zhong, S. et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit develop- ment reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Bio- technol. 31, 154-159 (2013).

[21] Moglia, A. et al. Identification of DNA methyltransferases and demethylases in Solanum melongena L., and their transcription dynamics during fruit devel- opment and after salt and drought stresses. PLoS ONE 14, e0223581 (2019).

[22] Ge, S. X., Jung, D. & Yao, R. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics 36, 2628-2629 (2020).

[23] Saeki, N. et al. Molecular and cellular characteristics of hybrid vigour in a commercial hybrid of Chinese cabbage. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 45 (2016).

[24] Yang, M. et al. Genomic architecture of biomass heterosis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8101-8106 (2017).

[25] Barchi, L. et al. A chromosome-anchored eggplant genome sequence reveals key events in Solanaceae evolution. Sci. Rep. 9, 1-13 (2019).

[26] Drost, H.-G. LTRpred: de novo annotation of intact retrotransposons. J. Open Source Softw. 5, 2170 (2020).

[27] Blum, A. Heterosis, stress, and the environment: a possible road map towards the general improvement of crop yield. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 4829-4837 (2013).

[28] Catoni, M. & Cortijo, S. in Advances in Botanical Research Vol. 88 (eds. Mirouze, M., Bucher, E. & Gallusci, P.) Ch. 4 (Academic Press 2018).

[29] Groszmann, M. et al. Changes in 24-nt siRNA levels in Arabidopsis hybrids suggest an epigenetic contribution to hybrid vigor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2617-2622 (2011).

[30] Dapp, M. et al. Heterosis and inbreeding depression of epigenetic Arabidopsis hybrids. Nat. Plants 1, 15092 (2015).

[31] Lauss, K. et al. Parental DNA methylation states are associated with heterosis in epigenetic hybrids. Plant Physiol. 176, 1627-1645 (2018).

[32] Greaves, I. K. et al. Trans chromosomal methylation in arabidopsis hybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3570-3575 (2012).

[33] Harris, K. D. & Zemach, A. Contiguous and stochastic CHH methylation pat- terns of plant DRM2 and CMT2 revealed by single-read methylome analysis. Genome Biol. 21, 194 (2020).

[34] Du, J. et al. Dual binding of chromomethylase domains to H3K9me2- containing nucleosomes directs DNA methylation in plants. Cell 151, 167-180 (2012).

[35] Saze, H., Scheid, O. M. & Paszkowski, J. Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Nat. Genet. 34, 65-69 (2003).

[36] Kundariya, H. et al. MSH1-induced heritable enhanced growth vigor through grafting is associated with the RdDM pathway in plants. Nat. Commun. 11, 5343 (2020).

[37] Wang, Z. & Baulcombe, D. C. Transposon age and non-CG methylation. Nat. Commun. 11, 1-9 (2020).

[38] Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/ btu170 (2014).

[39] Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for bisulfite-seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571-1572 (2011).

[40] Ding, Q.-X., Liu, J. & Gao, L. The complete chloroplast genome of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 1, 843-844 (2016).

[41] Derrien, T. et al. Fast computation and applications of genome mappability. PLoS ONE 7, e30377 (2012).

[42] Catoni, M. et al. DNA sequence properties that predict susceptibility to epiallelic switching. EMBO J. 36, 617-628 (2017).

[43] Catoni, M., Tsang, J. M., Greco, A. P. & Zabet, N. R. DMRcaller: a versatile R/ bioconductor package for detection and visualization of differentially methylated regions in CpG and non-CpG contexts. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e114 (2018).

[44] Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105-1111 (2009).

[45] Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166-169 (2015).

[46] Catoni, M. & Zabet, N. R. In Plant Transposable Elements: Methods and Protocols (ed. Cho, J.) 219-238 (Springer, 2021).

[47] Lawrence, M. et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003118 (2013).

[48] Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).