Transcripts switched off at the stop of phloem unloading highlight the energy efficiency of sugar import in the ripening V. vinifera fruit

Abstract

Transcriptomic changes at the cessation of sugar accumulation in the pericarp of Vitis vinifera were addressed on single berries re-synchronised according to their individual growth patterns. The net rates of water, sugars and K⁺ accumulation inferred from individual growth and solute concentration confirmed that these inflows stopped simultaneously in the ripe berry, while the small amount of malic acid remaining at this stage was still being oxidised at low rate. Re-synchronised individual berries displayed negligible variations in gene expression among triplicates. RNA-seq studies revealed sharp reprogramming of cell-wall enzymes and structural proteins at the stop of phloem unloading, associated with an 80% repression of multiple sugar transporters and aquaporins on the plasma or tonoplast membranes, with the noticeable exception of H⁺/sugar symporters, which were rather weakly and constitutively expressed. This was verified in three genotypes placed in contrasted thermo-hydric conditions. The prevalence of SWEET suggests that electrogenic transporters would play a minor role on the plasma membranes of SE/CC complex and the one of the flesh, while sucrose/H⁺ exchangers dominate on its tonoplast. Cis-regulatory elements present in their promoters allowed to sort these transporters in different groups, also including specific TIPs and PIPs paralogs, and cohorts of cell wall-related genes. Together with simple thermodynamic considerations, these results lead to propose that H⁺/sugar exchangers at the tonoplast, associated with a considerably acidic vacuolar pH, may exhaust cytosolic sugars in the flesh and alleviate the need for supplementary energisation of sugar transport at the plasma membrane.

References

[1] Nevo, O., Razafimandimby, D., Jeffrey, J. A. J., Schulz, S. & Ayasse, M. Fruit scent as an evolved signal to primate seed dispersal. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat4871 (2018).

[2] Colombié, S. et al. Respiration climacteric in tomato fruits elucidated by constraint-based modelling. N. Phytol. 213, 1726-1739 (2017).

[3] Keller, M. & Shrestha, P. M. Solute accumulation differs in the vacuoles and apoplast of ripening grape berries. Planta 239, 633-642 (2014).

[4] Shahood, R., Torregrosa, L., Savoi, S. & Romieu, C . First quantitative assessment of growth, sugar accumulation and malate breakdown in a single ripening berry. OENO One 54, 1077-1092 (2020).

[5] Nieves-Cordones, M. et al. Characterization of the grapevine Shaker K+ channel VvK3.1 supports its function in massive potassium fluxes necessary for berry potassium loading and pulvinus-actuated leaf movements. N. Phytol. 222, 286-300 (2019).

[6] Massonnet, M. et al. Ripening transcriptomic program in red and white grapevine varieties correlates with berry skin anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Physiol. 174, 2376-2396 (2017).

[7] Fasoli, M. et al. Timing and order of the molecular events marking the onset of berry ripening in grapevine. Plant Physiol. 178, 1187-1206 (2018).

[8] Guillaumie, S. et al. Transcriptional analysis of late ripening stages of grapevine berry. BMC Plant Biol. 11, 165 (2011).

[9] Cramer, G. R. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of the late stages of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) berry ripening reveals significant induction of ethylene signaling and flavor pathways in the skin . BMC Plant Biol. 14, 1-21 (2014).

[10] Ghan, R. et al. The common transcriptional subnetworks of the grape berry skin in the late stages of ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 17, 94 (2017).

[11] Cramer, G. R., Cochetel, N., Ghan, R., Destrac-Irvine, A. & Delrot, S. A sense of place: transcriptomics identifies environmental signatures in Cabernet Sauvignon berry skins in the late stages of ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 41 (2020).

[12] Palumbo, M. C. et al. Integrated network analysis identifies fight-club nodes as a class of hubs encompassing key putative switch genes that induce major transcriptome reprogramming during grapevine development. Plant Cell 26, 4617-4635 (2014).

[13] Coombe, B. G. Research on development and ripening of the grape berry. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 43, 101-110 (1992).

[14] Zhang, X. Y. et al. A shift of phloem unloading from symplasmic to apoplasmic pathway is involved in developmental onset of ripening in grape berry. Plant Physiol. 142, 220-232 (2006).

[15] Coombe, B. G. & McCarthy, M. G. Dynamics of grape berry growth and physiology of ripening. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 6, 131-135 (2000).

[16] Zhang, Y. & Keller, M. Discharge of surplus phloem water may be required for normal grape ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 585-595 (2017).

[17] Bigard, A. et al. The kinetics of grape ripening revisited through berry density sorting. OENO One 53, 709-724 (2019).

[18] Terrier, N., Ageorges, A., Abbal, P. & Romieu, C. Generation of ESTs from grape berry at various developmental stages. J. Plant Physiol. 158, 1575-1583 (2001).

[19] Lund, S. T., Peng, F. Y., Nayar, T., Reid, K. E. & Schlosser, J. Gene expression analyses in individual grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries during ripening initiation reveal that pigmentation intensity is a valid indicator of developmental staging within the cluster . Plant Mol. Biol. 68, 301-315 (2008).

[20] Gouthu, S. et al. A comparative study of ripening among berries of the grape cluster reveals an altered transcriptional programme and enhanced ripening rate in delayed berries. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 5889-5902 (2014).

[21] Carbonell-Bejerano, P. et al. Reducing sampling bias in molecular studies of grapevine fruit ripening: transcriptomic assessment of the density sorting method. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 28, 109-129 (2016).

[22] Rienth, M. et al. Day and night heat stress trigger different transcriptomic responses in green and ripening grapevine (Vitis vinifera) fruit . BMC Plant Biol. 14, 108 (2014).

[23] Rienth, M. et al. Temperature desynchronizes sugar and organic acid metabolism in ripening grapevine fruits and remodels their transcriptome. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 164 (2016).

[24] Ghaffari, S., Reynard, J. S. & Rienth, M. Single berry reconstitution prior to RNA-sequencing reveals novel insights into transcriptomic remodeling by leafroll virus infections in grapevines. Sci. Rep. 10, 12905 (2020).

[25] Campayo, A. et al. The application of ozonated water rearranges the Vitis vinifera L. leaf and berry transcriptomes eliciting defence and antioxidant responses. Sci. Rep. 11, 8114 (2021).

[26] Fasoli, M. et al. The grapevine expression atlas reveals a deep transcriptome shift driving the entire plant into a maturation program. Plant Cell 24, 3489-3505 (2012).

[27] Bigard, A., Romieu, C., Sire, Y. & Torregrosa, L. Vitis vinifera L. diversity for cations and acidity is suitable for breeding fruits coping with climate warming . Front. Plant Sci. 11, 01175 (2020).

[28] Dimopoulos, N. et al. Drought stress modulates cuticular wax composition of the grape berry. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 3126-3141 (2020).

[29] Frumkin, I. et al. Gene architectures that minimize cost of gene expression. Mol. Cell 65, 142-153 (2017).

[30] Ma, S., Shah, S., Bohnert, H. J., Snyder, M. & Dinesh-Kumar, S. P. Incorporating motif analysis into gene co-expression networks reveals novel modular expression pattern and new signaling pathways. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003840 (2013).

[31] Zenoni, S., D’Incà, E. & Tornielli, G.B. Genetic dissection of grape berry ripening control: defining a role for NAC transcription factors. Acta Hortic. 56, 387-402 (2019).

[32] Huang, T., Yang, J., Yu, D., Han, X. & Wang, X. Bioinformatics analysis of WRKY transcription factors in grape and their potential roles prediction in sugar and abscisic acid signaling pathway. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 30, 67-80 (2020).

[33] Torregrosa, L. J.-M., Rienth, M., Romieu, C. & Pellegrino, A. The microvine, a model for studies in grapevine physiology and genetics. OENO One 3, 373-391 (2019).

[34] Tilbrook, J. & Tyerman, S. D. Cell death in grape berries: varietal differences linked to xylem pressure and berry weight loss. Funct. Plant Biol. 35, 173-184 (2008).

[35] Dal Santo, S. et al. Genome-wide analysis of the expansin gene superfamily reveals grapevine-specific structural and functional characteristics. PLoS ONE 8, e62206 (2013).

[36] Schlosser, J. et al. Cellular expansion and gene expression in the developing grape (Vitis vinifera L.) . Protoplasma 232, 255 (2008).

[37] Wong, D. C. J., Zhang, L., Merlin, I., Castellarin, S. D. & Gambetta, G. A. Structure and transcriptional regulation of the major intrinsic protein gene family in grapevine. BMC Genomics 19, 248 (2018).

[38] Stanfield, R. C., Hacke, U. G. & Laur, J. Are phloem sieve tubes leaky conduits supported by numerous aquaporins? Am. J. Bot. 104, 719-732 (2017).

[39] Zhang, Z. et al. VvSWEET10 mediates sugar accumulation in grapes. Genes 10, 255 (2019).

[40] Chen, L.-Q. et al. Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science 335, 207-211 (2012).

[41] Ren, R. et al. Coexpression of sucrose synthase and the SWEET transporter, which are associated with sugar hydrolysis and transport, respectively, increases the hexose content in Vitis vinifera L. grape berries . Front. Plant Sci. 11, 321 (2020).

[42] Breia, R. et al. VvSWEET7 is a mono- and disaccharide transporter up-regulated in response to Botrytis cinerea infection in grape berries. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1753 (2020).

[43] Afoufa-Bastien, D. et al. The Vitis vinifera sugar transporter gene family: phylogenetic overview and macroarray expression profiling. BMC Plant Biol. 10, 245 (2010).

[44] Fillion, L. et al. Cloning and expression of a hexose transporter gene expressed during the ripening of grape berry. Plant Physiol. 120, 1083-1094 (1999).

[45] Lijavetzky, D. et al. Berry flesh and skin ripening features in Vitis vinifera as assessed by transcriptional profiling. PLoS ONE 7, e39547 (2012).

[46] Murcia, G., Pontin, M. & Piccoli, P. Role of ABA and Gibberellin A3 on gene expression pattern of sugar transporters and invertases in Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec during berry ripening. Plant Growth Regul. 84, 275-283 (2018).

[47] Murcia, G. et al. ABA and GA3 increase carbon allocation in different organs of grapevine plants by inducing accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates in leaves, enhancement of phloem area and expression of sugar transporters. Physiol. Plant. 156, 323-337 (2016).

[48] Terrier, N. et al. Isogene specific oligo arrays reveal multifaceted changes in gene expression during grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) development . Planta 222, 832-847 (2005).

[49] Jaillon, O. et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449, 463-467 (2007).

[50] Kuang, L., Chen, S., Guo, Y. & Ma, H. Quantitative proteome analysis reveals changes in the protein landscape during grape berry development with a focus on vacuolar transport proteins. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 641 (2019).

[51] Schulz, A. et al. Proton-driven sucrose symport and antiport are provided by the vacuolar transporters SUC4 and TMT1/2. Plant J. 68, 129-136 (2011).

[52] Wei, X., Liu, F., Chen, C., Ma, F. & Li, M. The Malus domestica sugar transporter gene family: identifications based on genome and expression profiling related to the accumulation of fruit sugars. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 569 (2014).

[53] Jung, B. et al. Identification of the transporter responsible for sucrose accumulation in sugar beet taproots. Nat. Plants 1, 1-6 (2015).

[54] Cheng, J. et al. Overexpression of the tonoplast sugar transporter CmTST2 in melon fruit increases sugar accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 511-523 (2018).

[55] Savoi, S., Herrera, J. C., Forneck, A. & Griesser, M. Transcriptomics of the grape berry shrivel ripening disorder. Plant Mol. Biol. 100, 285-301 (2019).

[56] Zeng, L., Wang, Z., Vainstein, A., Chen, S. & Ma, H. Cloning, localization, and expression analysis of a new tonoplast monosaccharide transporter from Vitis vinifera L. J. Plant Growth Regul. 30, 199-212 (2011).

[57] Sarry, J.-E. et al. Grape berry biochemistry revisited upon proteomic analysis of the mesocarp. Proteomics 4, 201-215 (2004).

[58] Terrier, N., Sauvage, F.-X., Ageorges, A. & Romieu, C. Changes in acidity and in proton transport at the tonoplast of grape berries during development. Planta 213, 20-28 (2001).

[59] Zhen, Q. et al. Developing gene-tagged molecular markers for evaluation of genetic association of apple SWEET genes with fruit sugar accumulation. Hortic. Res. 5, 1-12 (2018).

[60] Li, J. et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of EjSWEET15, enconding for a sugar transporter from loquat. Sci. Hortic. 272, 109552 (2020).

[61] Breia, R. et al. Plant SWEETs: from sugar transport to plant-pathogen interaction and more unexpected physiological roles. Plant Physiol. 186, 836-852 (2021).

[62] Chaïb, J. et al. The grape microvine - a model system for rapid forward and reverse genetics of grapevines. Plant J. 62, 1083-1092 (2010).

[63] Escudier, J.-L. et al. De la vigne au vin: des créations variétales adaptées au changement climatique et résistant aux maladies cryptogamiques Partie 1/2: La résistance variétale. Rev. Oenologues Tech. Vitivinic. Oenologiques 44, 16-18 (2017).

[64] Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671-675 (2012).

[65] Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114-2120 (2014).

[66] Canaguier, A. et al. A new version of the grapevine reference genome assembly (12X.v2) and of its annotation (VCost.v3). Genom. Data 14, 56-62 (2017).

[67] Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357-360 (2015).

[68] Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166-169 (2015).

[69] Nueda, M. J., Tarazona, S. & Conesa, A. Next maSigPro: updating maSigPro bioconductor package for RNA-seq time series. Bioinformatics 30, 2598-2602 (2014).

[70] Ernst, J. & Bar-Joseph, Z. STEM: a tool for the analysis of short time series gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 191 (2006).

[71] Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

[72] O’Malley, R. C. et al. Cistrome and epicistrome features shape the regulatory dna landscape. Cell 165, 1280-1292 (2016).

[73] Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576-589 (2010).

[74] Minio, A. et al. Iso-Seq allows genome-independent transcriptome profiling of grape berry development. G3 (Bethesda) 9, 755-767 (2019).

[75] Vondras, A. M. et al. The genomic diversification of grapevine clones. BMC Genomics 20, 972 (2019).

[76] Zhou, Y. et al. The population genetics of structural variants in grapevine domestication. Nat. Plants 5, 965-979 (2019).

[77] Massonnet, M. et al. The genetic basis of sex determination in grapes. Nat. Commun. 11, 2902 (2020).