Auxin response and transport during induction of pedicel abscission in tomato

Abstract

Auxin plays a central role in control of organ abscission, and it is thought that changes in the auxin gradient across the abscission zone are the primary determinant of the onset of abscission. The nature of this gradient, whether in concentration, flow, or perhaps in the response system has not conclusively been determined. We employed a DR5::GUS auxin response reporter system to examine the temporal and spatial distribution of the auxin response activity in response to developmental and environmental cues during pedicel abscission in tomato. In pedicels of young and fully open flowers, auxin response, as indicated by GUS activity, was predominantly detected in the vascular tissues and was almost entirely confined to the abscission zone (AZ) and to the distal portion of the pedicel, with a striking reduction in the proximal tissues below the AZ-a ‘step’, rather than a gradient. Following pollination and during early fruit development, auxin response increased substantially throughout the pedicel. Changes in GUS activity following treatments that caused pedicel abscission (flower removal, high temperature, darkness, ethylene, or N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) treatment) were relatively minor, with reduced auxin response in the AZ and some reduction above and below it. Expression of genes encoding some auxin efflux carriers (PIN) and influx carriers (AUX⁄LAX) was substantially reduced in the abscission zone of NPA-treated pedicels, and in pedicels stimulated to abscise by flower removal. Our results suggest that changes in auxin flow distribution through the abscission zone are likely more important than the auxin response system in the regulation of abscission.

References

[1] Addicott, F. T. Abscission (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1982).

[2] Roberts, J. A., Elliott, K. A. & Gonzalez-Carranza, Z. H. Abscission, dehiscence, and other cell separation processes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 131-158 (2002).

[3] McKim, S. M. et al. The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes are essential for abscission zone formation in Arabidopsis. Development 135, 1537-1546 (2008).

[4] Tucker, M. & Kim, J. Abscission research: What we know and what we still need to study. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 11, 1-7, https://doi.org/10.2212/spr.2015.2.1 (2015).

[5] Taylor, J. E. & Whitelaw, C. A. Signals in abscission. N. Phytologist 151, 323-339 (2001).

[6] Bleecker, A. B. & Patterson, S. E. Last exit: senescence, abscission, and meristem arrest in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 9, 1169-1179 (1997).

[7] Basu, M. M. et al. The manipulation of auxin in the abscission zone cells of arabidopsis flowers reveals that indoleacetic acid signaling is a prerequisite for organ shedding. Plant Physiol. 162, 96-106 (2013).

[8] Nakano, T. & Ito, Y. Molecular mechanisms controlling plant organ abscission. Plant Biotechnol. 30, 209-216 (2013).

[9] Patterson, S. E. & Bleecker, A. B. Ethylene-dependent and -independent processes associated with floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 134, 194-203 (2004).

[10] Lanahan, M. B., Yen, H. C., Giovannoni, J. J. & Klee, H. J. The never ripe mutation blocks ethylene perception in tomato. Plant Cell 6, 521-530 (1994).

[11] Okabe, Y. et al. Tomato TILLING technology: development of a reverse genetics tool for the efficient isolation of mutants from micro-tom mutant libraries. Plant Cell Physiol. 52, 1994-2005 (2011).

[12] Abeles, F. B. & Rubinstein, B. Regulation of ethylene evolution and leaf abscission by auxin. Plant Physiol. 39, 963-969 (1964).

[13] Meir, S., Hunter, D. A., Chen, J. C., Halaly, V. & Reid, M. S. Molecular changes occurring during acquisition of abscission competence following auxin depletion in Mirabilis jalapa. Plant Physiol. 141, 1604-1616 (2006).

[14] Meir, S. et al. Microarray analysis of the abscission-related transcriptome in the tomato flower abscission zone in response to auxin depletion. Plant Physiol. 154, 1929-1956 (2010).

[15] Ma, C., Jiang, C.-Z. & Gao, J. Regulatory Mechanisms Underlying Activation of Organ Abscission. Annu. Plant Rev. 4, 27-56, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119312994.apr0741 (2021).

[16] Addicott, F. T., Lynch, R. S. & Carns, H. R. Auxin gradient theory of abscission regulation. Science 121, 644-645 (1955).

[17] Jacobs, W. P., Shield, J. A. & Osborne, D. J. Senescence factor & abscission of coleus leaves. Plant Physiol. 37, 104-106 (1962).

[18] Louie, D. S. J. & Addicott, F. T. Applied auxin gradients and abscission in explants. Plant Physiol. 45, 654-657 (1970).

[19] Najeeb, U., Sarwar, M., Atwell, B. J., Bange, M. P. & Tan, D. K. Y. Endogenous ethylene concentration is not a major determinant of fruit abscission in heat-stressed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1615 (2017).

[20] Reddy, V. R., Baker, D. N. & Hodges, H. F. Temperature effects on cotton canopy growth, photosynthesis, and respiration. Agron. J. 83, 699-704 (1991).

[21] Baten, M. A., Khatun, R., Khan, M. M. K., Hassan, M. M. & Hoque, A. Effect of temperature on flower and pod abscission and yield of three soybean genotypes. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 8, 89-92 (2016).

[22] Aloni, B., Karni, L. Z., Zaidman, Z. & Schaffer, A. A. Changes of carbohydrates in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) flowers in relation to their abscission under different shading regimes. Ann. Bot. 78, 163-168 (1996).

[23] Byers, R. E., Carbaugh, D. H., Presley, C. N. & Wolf, T. K. The influence of low light on apple fruit abscission. J. Horticultural Sci. 66, 7-17 (1991).

[24] Byers, R. E. Influence of temperature and darkness on apple fruit abscission and chemical thinning. J. Tree Fruit. Prod. 3, 41-53 (2002).

[25] Zhu, H. et al. Transcriptomics of shading-induced and NAA-induced abscission in apple (Malus Domestica) reveals a shared pathway involving reduced photosynthesis, alterations in carbohydrate transport and signaling, and hormone crosstalk. BMC Plant Biol. 11, 138 (2011).

[26] Ferree, D. C., McArtney, S. J. & Scurlock, D. M. Influence of irradiance and period of exposure on fruit set of French-American hybrid grapes. J. Am. Soc. Horticultural Sci. 126, 283 (2001).

[27] Ulmasov, T., Murfett, J., Hagen, G. & Guilfoyle, T. J. Aux/lAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. Plant Cell 9, 1963-1971 (1997).

[28] Koenig, D., Bayer, E., Kang, J., Kuhlemeier, C. & Sinha, N. Auxin patterns Solanum lycopersicum leaf morphogenesis. Development 136, 2997-3006 (2009).

[29] Dubreuil, C., Jin, X., Grönlund, A. & Fischer, U. A local auxin gradient regulates root cap self-renewal and size homeostasis. Curr. Biol. 28, 2581-2587 (2018).

[30] Ma, C. et al. A KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX protein regulates abscission in tomato by modulating the auxin pathway. Plant Physiol. 167, 844-853 (2015).

[31] Shi, Z. et al. SlPIN1 regulates auxin efflux to affect flower abscission process. Sci. Rep. 7, 14919 (2017).

[32] Meir, S., Sundaresan, S., Riov, J., Agarwal, I. & Philosoph-Hadas, S. Role of auxin depletion in abscission control. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 11, 1-15 (2015).

[33] Hanzawa, T. et al. Cellular Auxin homeostasis under high temperature is regulated through a SORTING NEXIN1-dependent endosomal trafficking pathway. Plant Cell 25, 3424-3433 (2013).

[34] Zhu, J. et al. Low temperature inhibits root growth by reducing auxin accumulation via ARR1/12. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 727-736 (2014).

[35] Franklin, K. A. et al. PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) regulates auxin biosynthesis at high temperature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20231-20235 (2011).

[36] Sun, J., Qi, L., Li, Y., Chu, J. & Li, C. PIF4-mediated activation of YUCCA8 expression integrates temperature into the auxin pathway in regulating Arabidopsis hypocotyl growth. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002594 (2012).

[37] Jiang, C. Z., Lu, F., Imsabai, W., Meir, S. & Reid, M. S. Silencing polygalacturonase expression inhibits tomato petiole abscission. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 973-979 (2008).

[38] Estrada-Melo, A. C., Chao, Reid, M. S. & Jiang, C. Z. Overexpression of an ABA biosynthesis gene using a stress-inducible promoter enhances drought resistance in petunia. Horticulture Res. 2, 15013 (2015).

[39] Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).

[40] Yin, D. et al. PhERF2, an ethylene-responsive element binding factor, plays an essential role in waterlogging tolerance of petunia. Horticulture Res. 6, 83 (2019).