LsAP2 regulates leaf morphology by inhibiting CIN-like TCP transcription factors and repressing LsKAN2 in lettuce

Abstract

Leaf size and flatness directly affect photosynthesis and are closely related to agricultural yield. The final leaf size and shape are coordinately determined by cell proliferation, differentiation, and expansion during leaf development. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is one of the most important leafy vegetables worldwide, and lettuce leaves vary in shape and size. However, the molecular mechanisms of leaf development in lettuce are largely unknown. In this study, we showed that the lettuce APETALA2 (LsAP2) gene regulates leaf morphology. LsAP2 encodes a transcriptional repressor that contains the conserved EAR motif, which mediates interactions with the TOPLESS/TOPLESS-RELATED (TPL/TPR) corepressors. Overexpression of LsAP2 led to small and crinkly leaves, and many bulges were seen on the surface of the leaf blade. LsAP2 physically interacted with the CINCINNATA (CIN)-like TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR (TCP) transcription factors and inhibited their transcriptional activation activity. RNA sequencing analysis showed that LsAP2 affected the expression of auxin- and polarity-related genes. In addition, LsAP2 directly repressed the abaxial identity gene KANADI2 (LsKAN2). Together, these results indicate that LsAP2 regulates leaf morphology by inhibiting CIN-like TCP transcription factors and repressing LsKAN2, and our work provides insights into the regulatory mechanisms of leaf development in lettuce.

References

[1] Du, F., Guan, C. & Jiao, Y. Molecular mechanisms of leaf morphogenesis. Mol. Plant 11, 1117-1134 (2018).

[2] Gonzalez, N., Vanhaeren, H. & Inze, D. Leaf size control: complex coordination of cell division and expansion. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 332-340 (2012).

[3] Tsukaya, H. Mechanism of leaf-shape determination. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 477-496 (2006).

[4] Zhu, X. G., Long, S. P. & Ort, D. R. Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 235-261 (2010).

[5] Tsukaya, H. Leaf development. Arabidopsis Book 11, e0163 (2013).

[6] Yamaguchi, T., Nukazuka, A. & Tsukaya, H. Leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity specification and lamina outgrowth: evolution and development. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 1180-1194 (2012).

[7] McConnell, J. R. et al. Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 411, 709-713 (2001).

[8] Xu, L. et al. Novel as1 and as2 defects in leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity reveal the requirement for ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2 and ERECTA functions in specifying leaf adaxial identity. Development 130, 4097-4107 (2003).

[9] Kelley, D. R., Arreola, A., Gallagher, T. L. & Gasser, C. S. ETTIN (ARF3) physically interacts with KANADI proteins to form a functional complex essential for integument development and polarity determination in Arabidopsis. Development 139, 1105-1109 (2012).

[10] Kerstetter, R. A., Bollman, K., Taylor, R. A., Bomblies, K. & Poethig, R. S. KANADI regulates organ polarity in Arabidopsis. Nature 411, 706-709 (2001).

[11] Siegfried, K. R. et al. Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development 126, 4117-4128 (1999).

[12] Martin-Trillo, M. & Cubas, P. TCP genes: a family snapshot ten years later. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 31-39 (2010).

[13] Crawford, B. C., Nath, U., Carpenter, R. & Coen, E. S. CINCINNATA controls both cell differentiation and growth in petal lobes and leaves of Antirrhinum. Plant Physiol. 135, 244-253 (2004).

[14] Challa, K. R., Rath, M. & Nath, U. The CIN-TCP transcription factors promote commitment to differentiation in Arabidopsis leaf pavement cells via both auxin-dependent and independent pathways. PLoS Genet. 15, e1007988 (2019).

[15] Nath, U., Crawford, B. C., Carpenter, R. & Coen, E . Genetic control of surface curvature. Science 299, 1404-1407 (2003).

[16] Palatnik, J. F. et al. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 425, 257-263 (2003).

[17] Ori, N. et al. Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR319 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato. Nat. Genet. 39, 787-791 (2007).

[18] Koyama, T., Sato, F. & Ohme-Takagi, M. Roles of miR319 and TCP transcription factors in leaf development. Plant Physiol. 175, 874-885 (2017).

[19] Reyes-Chin-Wo, S. et al. Genome assembly with in vitro proximity ligation data and whole-genome triplication in lettuce. Nat. Commun. 8, 14953 (2017).

[20] Zhang, L. et al. RNA sequencing provides insights into the evolution of lettuce and the regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 8, 2264 (2017).

[21] Yang, X. et al. A novel integrated non-targeted metabolomic analysis reveals significant metabolite variations between different lettuce (Lactuca sativa. L) varieties. Hortic. Res. 5, 33 (2018).

[22] Zhang, S. et al. Plant-derived RNAi therapeutics: A strategic inhibitor of HBsAg. Biomaterials 210, 83-93 (2019).

[23] Seki, K. et al. A CIN-like TCP transcription factor (LsTCP4) having retro-transposon insertion associates with a shift from salinas type to empire type in crisphead lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Hortic. Res. 7, 15 (2020).

[24] Su, W. et al. Characterization of four polymorphic genes controlling red leaf colour in lettuce that have undergone disruptive selection since domestication. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 479-490 (2020).

[25] Yu, C. et al. Upregulation of a KN1 homolog by transposon insertion promotes leafy head development in lettuce. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 33668-33678 (2020).

[26] Luo, C. et al. The APETALA2 transcription factor LsAP2 regulates seed shape in lettuce. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 2463-2476 (2021).

[27] Zumajo-Cardona, C. & Pabon-Mora, N. Evolution of the APETALA2 gene lineage in seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1818-1832 (2016).

[28] Chen, Z. et al. LCM-seq reveals the crucial role of LsSOC1 in heat-promoted bolting of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Plant J. 95, 516-528 (2018).

[29] Yang, J. et al. PlantEAR: functional analysis platform for plant EAR motif-containing proteins. Front. Genet. 9, 590 (2018).

[30] Causier, B., Ashworth, M., Guo, W. & Davies, B. The TOPLESS interactome: a framework for gene repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 158, 423-438 (2012).

[31] Krogan, N. T., Hogan, K. & Long, J. A. APETALA2 negatively regulates multiple floral organ identity genes in Arabidopsis by recruiting the co-repressor TOPLESS and the histone deacetylase HDA19. Development 139, 4180-4190 (2012).

[32] Tao, Q. et al. The TIE1 transcriptional repressor links TCP transcription factors with TOPLESS/TOPLESS-RELATED corepressors and modulates leaf development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 421-437 (2013).

[33] Lan, J. & Qin, G. The regulation of CIN-like TCP transcription factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4498 (2020).

[34] Wei, B. et al. The molecular mechanism of sporocyteless/nozzle in controlling Arabidopsis ovule development. Cell Res. 25, 121-134 (2015).

[35] Suzuki, T., Sakurai, K., Ueguchi, C. & Mizuno, T. Two types of putative nuclear factors that physically interact with histidine-containing phosphotransfer (Hpt) domains, signaling mediators in His-to-Asp phosphorelay, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 37-45 (2001).

[36] Qi, X. et al. The heterologous expression of a Chrysanthemum nankingense TCP transcription factor blocks cell division in yeast and Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 4848 (2019).

[37] Weijers, D. & Wagner, D. Transcriptional responses to the auxin hormone. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 67, 539-574 (2016).

[38] Chandler, J. W. Auxin response factors. Plant, Cell Environ. 39, 1014-1028 (2016).

[39] Staswick, P. E. et al. Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. Plant Cell 17, 616-627 (2005).

[40] Ren, H. & Gray, W. M. SAUR proteins as effectors of hormonal and environmental signals in plant growth. Mol. Plant 8, 1153-1164 (2015).

[41] Zhou, Y. et al. Genetic control of seed shattering in rice by the APETALA2 transcription factor SHATTERING ABORTION1. Plant Cell 24, 1034-1048 (2012).

[42] Chung, M. Y. et al. A tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) APETALA2/ERF gene, SlAP2a, is a negative regulator of fruit ripening. Plant J. 64, 936-947 (2010).

[43] Liu, P., Liu, J., Dong, H. & Sun, J. Functional regulation of Q by microRNA172 and transcriptional co-repressor TOPLESS in controlling bread wheat spikelet density. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 495-506 (2018).

[44] Wurschum, T., Gross-Hardt, R. & Laux, T. APETALA2 regulates the stem cell niche in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Plant Cell 18, 295-307 (2006).

[45] Wollmann, H., Mica, E., Todesco, M., Long, J. A. & Weigel, D. On reconciling the interactions between APETALA2, miR172 and AGAMOUS with the ABC model of flower development. Development 137, 3633-3642 (2010).

[46] Nicolas, M. & Cubas, P. TCP factors: new kids on the signaling block. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 33, 33-41 (2016).

[47] Guan, C. et al. Spatial auxin signaling controls leaf flattening in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 27, 2940-2950.e4 (2017).

[48] Reinhart, B. J. et al. Establishing a framework for the Ad/abaxial regulatory network of Arabidopsis: ascertaining targets of class III homeodomain leucine zipper and KANADI regulation. Plant Cell 25, 3228-3249 (2013).

[49] Jefferson, R. A., Kavanagh, T. A. & Bevan, M. W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6, 3901-3907 (1987).

[50] Sgamma, T., Pape, J., Massiah, A. & Jackson, S. Selection of reference genes for diurnal and developmental time-course real-time PCR expression analyses in lettuce. Plant Methods 12, 21 (2016).

[51] Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔCT Method . Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).

[52] Liu, Z. et al. Plasma membrane CRPK1-mediated phosphorylation of 14-3-3 proteins induces their nuclear import to fine-tune CBF signaling during cold response. Mol. Cell 66, 117-128 (2017).

[53] Ohta, M., Matsui, K., Hiratsu, K., Shinshi, H. & Ohme-Takagi, M. Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell 13, 1959-1968 (2001).

[54] Hellens, R. P. et al. Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods 1, 13 (2005).

[55] Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947-2948 (2007).

[56] Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731-2739 (2011).

[57] Chen, H. et al. Firefly luciferase complementation imaging assay for protein-protein interactions in plants. Plant Physiol. 146, 368-376 (2008).

[58] Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357-360 (2015).

[59] Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).

[60] Mao, X., Cai, T., Olyarchuk, J. G. & Wei, L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics 21, 3787-3793 (2005).