Morphological, phenological, and transcriptional analyses provide insight into the diverse flowering traits of a mutant of the relic woody plant Liriodendron chinense

Yu Sheng , Zhaodong Hao , Ye Peng , Siqin Liu , Lingfeng Hu , Yongbao Shen , Jisen Shi , Jinhui Chen

Horticulture Research ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 174

PDF (3838KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) :174 DOI: 10.1038/s41438-021-00610-2
Article
research-article
Morphological, phenological, and transcriptional analyses provide insight into the diverse flowering traits of a mutant of the relic woody plant Liriodendron chinense
Author information +
History +
PDF (3838KB)

Abstract

Flowering is crucial to plant reproduction and controlled by multiple factors. However, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of flowering in perennial plants are still largely unknown. Here, we first report a super long blooming 1 (slb1) mutant of the relict tree Liriodendron chinense possessing a prolonged blooming period of more than 5 months, in contrast to the 1 month blooming period in the wild type (WT). Phenotypic characterization showed that earlier maturation of lateral shoots was caused by accelerated axillary bud fate, leading to the phenotype of continuous flowering in slb1 mutants. The transcriptional activity of genes related to hormone signaling (auxin, cytokinin, and strigolactone), nutrient availability, and oxidative stress relief further indicated active outgrowth of lateral buds in slb1 mutants. Interestingly, we discovered a unique FT splicing variant with intron retention specific to slb1 mutants, representing a potential causal mutation in the slb1 mutants. Surprisingly, most slb1 inbred offspring flowered precociously with shorter juvenility (~4 months) than that (usually 8–10 years) required in WT plants, indicating heritable variation underlying continuous flowering in slb1 mutants. This study reports an example of a perennial tree mutant that flowers continuously, providing a rare resource for both breeding and genetic research.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yu Sheng, Zhaodong Hao, Ye Peng, Siqin Liu, Lingfeng Hu, Yongbao Shen, Jisen Shi, Jinhui Chen. Morphological, phenological, and transcriptional analyses provide insight into the diverse flowering traits of a mutant of the relic woody plant Liriodendron chinense. Horticulture Research, 2021, 8 (1) : 174 DOI:10.1038/s41438-021-00610-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Lee, J. H., Lee, J. S. & Ahn, J. H. Ambient temperature signaling in plants: an emerging field in the regulation of flowering time. J. Plant Biol. 51, 321-326 (2008).

[2]

Zhu, C. et al. Genome sequencing and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of an early flowering Mini-Citrus (Fortunella hindsii). Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 2199-2210 (2019).

[3]

Bouche, F., Lobet, G., Tocquin, P. & Perilleux, C. FLOR-ID: an interactive data-base of flowering-time gene networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res 44, 1167-1171 (2016).

[4]

Wahl, V. et al. Regulation of flowering by trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 339, 704-707 (2013).

[5]

Wei, Q. et al. Control of chrysanthemum flowering through integration with an aging pathway. Nat. Commun. 8, 1-11 (2017).

[6]

Wang, J.-W. Regulation of flowering time by the miR156-mediated age pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4723-4730 (2014).

[7]

Boss, P. K., Bastow, R. M., Mylne, J. S. & Dean, C. Multiple pathways in the decision to flower: enabling, promoting, and resetting. Plant Cell 16, S18-S31 (2004).

[8]

Su, Y. et al. Phosphorylation of histone H2A at serine 95: a plant-specific mark involved in flowering time regulation and H2A.Z deposition. Plant Cell 29, 2197-2213 (2017).

[9]

Teotia, S. & Tang, G. To bloom or not to bloom: role of microRNAs in plant flowering. Mol. Plant 8, 359-77 (2015).

[10]

Jing, Y., Guo, Q. & Lin, R. The chromatin-remodeling factor PICKLE antagonizes polycomb repression of FT to promote flowering. Plant Physiol. 181, 656-668 (2019).

[11]

Chao, L. et al. Genome-wide characterization of the MADS-Box gene family in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and assessment of its roles in flowering and floral organogenesis. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1390 (2016).

[12]

Coen, E. S. & Meyerowitz, E. M. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353, 31-37 (1991).

[13]

Jia, T., Wei, D., Meng, S., Allan, A. C. & Zeng, L. Identification of regulatory genes implicated in continuous flowering of Longan (Dimocarpus longan L.). PLoS ONE 9, e114568 (2014).

[14]

Iwata, H. et al. The TFL1 homologue KSN is a regulator of continuous flowering in rose and strawberry. Plant J. 69, 116-125 (2012).

[15]

Wang, R. et al. PEP1 regulates perennial flowering in Arabis alpina. Nature 459, 423-427 (2009).

[16]

Chen, J. et al. Liriodendron genome sheds light on angiosperm phylogeny and species-pair differentiation. Nat. Plants 5, 18-25 (2019).

[17]

Wilde, H. D. & Merkle, S. A. Genetic Transformation in Liriodendron tulipifera L. (Yellow Poplar) (Springer, 1994).

[18]

Merkle et al. Propagation of Liriodendron hybrids via somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 34, 191-198 (1993).

[19]

Merkle, S. A. & Sommer, H. E. Yellow-Poplar (Liriodendron spp.) (Springer, 1991).

[20]

Fu, L. & Chin, C. M. China plant red data book-rare and endangered plants (Science Press, 1992).

[21]

Fan, R., Yin, Z. & You, L. The occurence and organogensis of mixed bud of Liriodendron chinense. Sci. Silvae Sin. 28, 65-69 (1992).

[22]

You, L. & Fan, R. Initiation and differentiation of mixed bud in Liriodendron tulipifera L. J. Nanjing Forestry Univ. 17, 49-54 (1993).

[23]

Lee, J. & Lee, I. Regulation and function of SOC1, a flowering pathway inte-grator. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 2247-2254 (2010).

[24]

Kimura, Y. et al. A flowering integrator, SOC1, affects stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 640-649 (2015).

[25]

Park, H. Y., Lee, H. T., Lee, J. H. & Kim, J. K. Arabidopsis U2AF65 regulates flowering time and the growth of pollen tubes. Front Plant Sci. 10, 569 (2019).

[26]

Xiao, J. et al. JACALIN-LECTIN LIKE1 regulates the nuclear accumulation of GLYCINE-RICH RNA-BINDING PROTEIN7, influencing the RNA processing of FLOWERING LOCUS C antisense transcripts and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 169, 2102-2117 (2015).

[27]

Yoo, S. K., Wu, X., Lee, J. S. & Ahn, J. H. AGAMOUS‐LIKE 6 is a floral promoter that negatively regulates the FLC/MAF clade genes and positively regulates FT in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 65, 62-76 (2011).

[28]

Ruelens, P. et al. FLOWERING LOCUS C in monocots and the tandem origin of angiosperm-specific MADS-box genes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2280 (2013).

[29]

Bouchard, R. et al. Immunophilin-like TWISTED DWARF1 modulates auxin efflux activities of Arabidopsis P-glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 30603-30612 (2006).

[30]

Jing, H. et al. Peptidyl-prolyl isomerization targets rice Aux/IAAs for protea-somal degradation during auxin signalling. Nat. Commun. 6, 7395 (2015).

[31]

Xi, W., Gong, X., Yang, Q., Yu, H. & Liou, Y. Pin1At regulates PIN1 polar locali-zation and root gravitropism. Nat. Commun. 7, 10430 (2016).

[32]

Kieber, J.J. & Schaller, G.E. Cytokinin signaling in plant development. Dev. 145, dev149344 (2018).

[33]

Smith, S. M. & Li, J. Signalling and responses to strigolactones and karrikins. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 21, 23-29 (2014).

[34]

Dornelas, M. C., Van Lammeren, A. A. M. & Kreis, M. Arabidopsis thaliana SHAGGY-related protein kinases (AtSK11 and 12) function in perianth and gynoecium development. Plant J. 21, 419-429 (2000).

[35]

Navarro, C. et al. Molecular and genetic interactions between STYLOSA and GRAMINIFOLIA in the control of Antirrhinum vegetative and reproductive development. Dev 131, 3649-3659 (2004).

[36]

Varaud, E. et al. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 8 regulates Arabidopsis petal growth by interacting with the bHLH transcription factor BIGPETALp. Plant Cell 23, 973-983 (2011).

[37]

Ji, L. et al. ARGONAUTE10 and ARGONAUTE1 Regulate the Termination of Floral Stem Cells Through Two MicroRNAs in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 7, e1001358 (2011).

[38]

Ripoll, J. J., Ferrandiz, C., Martinezlaborda, A. & Vera, A. PEPPER, a novel K-homology domain gene, regulates vegetative and gynoecium development in Arabidopsis. Dev. Biol. 289, 346-359 (2006).

[39]

Pnueli, L. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to repro-ductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Dev 125, 1979-1989 (1998).

[40]

Jiang, K., Liberatore, K. L., Park, S. J., Alvarez, J. P. & Lippman, Z. B. Tomato yield heterosis is triggered by a dosage sensitivity of the florigen pathway that fine-tunes shoot architecture. PLoS Genet 9, e1004043 (2013).

[41]

Maurya, J. P., Miskolczi, P. C., Mishra, S., Singh, R. K. & Bhalerao, R. P. A genetic framework for regulation and seasonal adaptation of shoot architecture in hybrid aspen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11523-11530 (2020).

[42]

Singh, R. K. et al. A genetic network mediating the control of bud break in hybrid aspen. Nat. Commun. 9, 4173 (2018).

[43]

Rae, G.M., David, K. & Wood, M. The dormancy marker DRM1/ARP associated with dormancy but a broader role in planta. Dev. Biol. J. 2013, (2013).

[44]

Lee, J., Han, C.-T. & Hur, Y. Molecular characterization of the Brassica rapa auxin-repressed, superfamily genes, BrARP1 and BrDRM1. Mol. Biol. Rep. 40, 197-209 (2013).

[45]

Wang, B., Smith, S. M. & Li, J. Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 437-468 (2018).

[46]

Barbier, F., Dun, E. A., Kerr, S. C., Chabikwa, T. G. & Beveridge, C. A. An update on the signals controlling shoot branching. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 220-236 (2019).

[47]

Mason, M. G., Ross, J., Babst, B. A., Wienclaw, B. N. & Beveridge, C. A. Sugar demand, not auxin, is the initial regulator of apical dominance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6092-6097 (2014).

[48]

Balla, J., Kalousek, P., Reinohl, V., Friml, J. & Prochazka, S. Competitive canali-zation of PIN-dependent auxin flow from axillary buds controls pea bud outgrowth. Plant J. 65, 571-577 (2011).

[49]

Sharma, N. et al. A Flowering Locus C homolog is a vernalization-regulated repressor in Brachypodium and is cold regulated in wheat. Plant Physiol. 173, 1301-1315 (2017).

[50]

Flachowsky, H. et al. The MdTFL1 gene of apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) reduces vegetative growth and generation time. Tree Physiol. 32, 1288-301 (2012).

[51]

Freiman, A. et al. Development of a transgenic early flowering pear (Pyrus communis L.) genotype by RNAi silencing of PcTFL1-1 and PcTFL1-2. Planta 235, 1239-1251 (2012).

[52]

Wigge, P. A. et al. Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Sci. (N. Y., N. Y.) 309, 1056 (2005).

[53]

Qin, Z. et al. Regulation of FT splicing by an endogenous cue in temperate grasses. Nat. Commun. 8, 14320 (2017).

[54]

Xia, W., Liu, R., Zhang, J., Mason, A. S. & Xiao, Y. Alternative splicing of flowering time gene FT is associated with halving of time to flowering in coconut. Sci. Rep. 10, 11640 (2020).

[55]

Tu, Z., Hao, Z., Zhong, W. & Li, H. Identification of suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR assays in Liriodendron chinense (Hemsl.) Sarg. Forests 10, 441 (2019).

PDF (3838KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/