Transgenic and genome-edited fruits: background, constraints, benefits, and commercial opportunities

Abstract

Breeding has been used successfully for many years in the fruit industry, giving rise to most of today’s commercial fruit cultivars. More recently, new molecular breeding techniques have addressed some of the constraints of conventional breeding. However, the development and commercial introduction of such novel fruits has been slow and limited with only five genetically engineered fruits currently produced as commercial varieties-virus-resistant papaya and squash were commercialized 25 years ago, whereas insect-resistant eggplant, non-browning apple, and pink-fleshed pineapple have been approved for commercialization within the last 6 years and production continues to increase every year. Advances in molecular genetics, particularly the new wave of genome editing technologies, provide opportunities to develop new fruit cultivars more rapidly. Our review, emphasizes the socioeconomic impact of current commercial fruit cultivars developed by genetic engineering and the potential impact of genome editing on the development of improved cultivars at an accelerated rate.

References

[1] Janick, J. in Plant Breeding Reviews Ch. 8, Vol. 25 (ed Janick, J. ) (Springer, 2005).

[2] Song, G., Prieto, H. & Orbovic, V. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tree fruit crops: methods, progress, and challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 226 (2019).

[3] Limera, C., Sabbadini, S., Sweet, J. B., Mezzetti, B. & Kühn-institut, J. New biotechnological tools for the genetic improvement of major woody fruit species. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1-16 (2017).

[4] Baranski, R., Klimek-Chodacka, M. & Lukasiewicz, A. Approved genetically modified (GM) horticultural plants: a 25-year perspective. Folia Hortic. 31, 3-49 (2019).

[5] Kramer, M. G. & Redenbaugh, K. Commercialization of a tomato with an antisense polygalacturonase gene: The FLAVR SAVR™ tomato story. Euphytica 79, 293-297 (1994).

[6] APHIS. Interpretative ruling on DNA Plant Technology Corporation petition for determination of non-regulated status of delayed-ripening tomato line 1345-4. Docket No. 94-092-2 (1994).

[7] APHIS. Interpretative ruling on Agritope, Inc. petition for determination of regulatory status of cherry tomatoes with a S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase gene. Docket No. 95-097-1 (1995).

[8] APHIS. Interpretative ruling on Zeneca Plant Science and Petoseed Company Inc. petition for release from regulation for modified lines B, Da-and F derived from T7 varieties of processing tomatoes. Docket No. 95-016-1 (1995).

[9] APHIS. Interpretive ruling on Monsanto petition of nonregulated status for insect resistant tomato line 5345. Docket number: 97-114-1 (1998).

[10] Fitch, M., Manshardt, R., Gonsalves, D., Slightom, J. & Sanford, J. Virus resistant papaya plants derived from tissues bombarded with the coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus. Nat. Biotechnol. 10, 1466-1472 (1992).

[11] Chen, G., Ye, C. M., Huang, J. C., Yu, M. & Li, B. J. Cloning of the papaya ringspot virus (PRSV) replicase gene and generation of PRSV-resistant papayas through the introduction of the PRSV replicase gene. Plant Cell Rep. 20, 272-277 (2001).

[12] Chen, Z. L. et al. Safety assessment for genetically modified sweet pepper and tomato. Toxicology 188, 297-307 (2003).

[13] Scorza, R. et al. Transgenic plums (Prunus domestica L.) express the plum pox virus coat protein gene. Plant Cell Rep. 14, 18-22 (1994).

[14] Shelton, A. M. et al. Bt Eggplant: a genetically engineered ‘minor’ crop comes of age in Bangladesh and the Philippines. ISB News Rep. (VTechWorks, 2017).

[15] USDA. USDA announces deregulation of non-browning apples. (2015). Available at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/stakeholders/downloads/2015/SA_arctic_apples.pdf [Accessed June 2020].

[16] Biosafety Clearing-House. Melon A and B . Country’s decision or any other communication (1999). Available at: http://bch.cbd.int/database/record.shtml?documentid=6351 [Accessed Sept 2020]

[17] Firoozbady, E. & Young, T. R. Pineapple plant named “Rose”. US Patent PP25,763 P3 (2015).

[18] Bruening, G. & Lyons, M. J. The case of the FLAVR SAVR tomato. Calif. Agric. 54, 6-7 (2000).

[19] APHIS. Petition for determination of nonregulated status-Melon. Petition number 98-350-01p (1999).

[20] Menz, J., Modrzejewski, D., Hartung, F., Wilhelm, R. & Sprink, T . Genome edited crops touch the market: a view on the global development and regulatory environment. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 586027 (2020).

[21] Álvarez, D. et al. Fruit crops in the era of genome editing-closing the regulatory gap. Plant Cell Rep. 40, 915-930 (2021).

[22] Conover, R. A. Distortion ringspot, a severe virus disease of papaya in Florida. Proc. Fl. State Hortic. Soc. 77, 440-444 (1964).

[23] Gonsalves, D., Basin, P., Ferreira, S., Sciences, E. P. & Resources, H. Transgenic papaya: a case for managing risks of papaya ringspot virus in Hawaii plant health progress. Plant Manag. Netw. 1, 1-5 (2003).

[24] Ye, C. & Li, H. 20 years of transgenic research in china for resistance to papaya ringspot virus. Transgenic Plant J. 4, 58-63 (2010).

[25] Wu, Z., Mo, C., Zhang, S. & Li, H. Characterization of papaya ringspot virus isolates infecting transgenic papaya ‘Huanong No.1’ in South China. Sci. Rep. 8, 8206 (2018).

[26] ChinaAg. Market reports-The splice must grow: The bright and shady sides of GM agriculture in China. (2016). Available at: https://www.chinaag.org/markets/gm-agriculture-in-china/ [Accessed May 2020].

[27] APHIS. Interpretive ruling on Asgrow Seed Company petition for determination of nonregulated status: Squash containing the coat protein genes from cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), watermelon mosaic virus 2 (WMV 2) and zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV). Docket No. 96-002-1 (1995).

[28] Tricoli, D. M. et al. Field evaluation of transgenic squash containing single or multiple virus coat protein gene constructs for resistance to cucumber mosaic virus, watermelon mosaic virus 2, and zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Nat. Biotechnol. 13, 1458-1465 (1995).

[29] Shelton, A. M., Sarwer, S. H., Hossain, M. J., Brookes, G. & Paranjape, V. Impact of Bt Brinjal cultivation in the market value chain in five districts of Bangladesh. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 1-12 (2020).

[30] Shelton, A. M. et al. Bt eggplant project in Bangladesh: History, present status, and future direction. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6, 1-6 (2018).

[31] Alam, S. N. et al. Development of an integrated pest management strategy for eggplant fruit and shoot borer in South Asia. AVRDC 3, (2003).

[32] Moon, K. M., Kwon, E. Bin, Lee, B. & Kim, C. Y. Recent trends in controlling the enzymatic browning of fruit and vegetable products. Molecules 25, 2754 (2020).

[33] APHIS. Interpretative rule on Okanagan Speciality Fruits petition for determination of nonregulated status: Arctic™ Apple (Malus × domestica). Events GD743 and GS784. Docket No. APHIS-2012-0025 (2012).

[34] Stowe, E. & Dhingra, A. Development of the Arctic^® Apple . Plant Breed. Rev. 44, 273-296 (2021).

[35] Okanagan Specialty Fruits . Arctic apples: our apples. (2020). Available at: https://arcticapples.com/our-apples/ [Accessed May 2020].

[36] Zhang, J. et al. Decreased protein abundance of lycopene á-cyclase contributes to red flesh in domesticated watermelon. Plant Physiol. 183, 1171-1183 (2020).

[37] Espley, R. V. et al. Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. Plant J 49, 414-427 (2007).

[38] Fitch, M. M. M., Manshardt, R. M., Gonsalves, D., Slightom, J. L. & Sanford, J. C. Stable transformation of papaya via microprojectile bombardment. Plant Cell Rep. 9, 189-194 (1990).

[39] Tennant, P. et al. Papaya ringspot virus resistance of transgenic Rainbow and SunUp is affected by gene dosage, plant development, and coat protein homology. Eur. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107, 645-653 (2001).

[40] Ivanov, K. I., Eskelin, K., Lõhmus, A. & Mäkinen, K. Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying potyvirus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 95, 1415-1429 (2014).

[41] Tennant, P. F. et al. Differential protection against papaya ringspot virus isolates in coat protein gene transgenic papaya and classically cross-protected papaya. Phytopathology 84, 1359-1366 (1994).

[42] Bhagirath, C. & Kadambini, G. The development and regulation of Bt Brinjal in India. ISAAA Briefs 38, xii + 102 (2009).

[43] Armstrong, J. & Lane, W. D. Genetically modified reduced-browning fruit-producing plant and produced fruit thereof, and method of obtaining such. US Patent 8,563,805 B2 (2013).

[44] Farré, G. et al. Engineering complex metabolic pathways in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 187-223 (2014).

[45] Adams, D. O. & Yang, S. F. Ethylene biosynthesis: Identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 76, 170-174 (1979).

[46] USDA. Regulation of biotech plants. (2020). Available at: https://www.usda.gov/topics/biotechnology/how-federal-government-regulates-biotech-plants [Accessed Oct 2020].

[47] APHIS. About the secure rule. (2020). Available at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/biotech-rule-revision/secure-rule/secure-about/340_2017_perdue_biotechreg [Accessed Oct 2020].

[48] COFEPRIS. Organismos Géneticamente Modificados. (2017). Available at: https://www.gob.mx/cofepris/acciones-y-programas/organismos-geneticamente-modificados [Accessed Aug 2020].

[49] Health Canada . Safety Assessment of the Flavr Savr™ Tomato. (1997). Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/information-safety-assessment-flavr-savr-tomato.html [Accessed Feb, June 2020].

[50] APHIS. Interpretative ruling on Monsanto Company petition for determination of regulatory status of tomatoes with delayed ripening gene. Docket No. 95-042-1 (1994).

[51] ILSI. A review of the environmental safety of the Cry1Ac protein. Environ. Biosaf. Res. 10, 27-49 (2011).

[52] FDA. New plant variety consultations, Pineapple event EF2-114. BNF No. 149 (2016).

[53] Fresh del Monte . Pinkglow pineapple. (2020). Available at: https://www.pinkglowpineapple.com/ [Accessed Dec 2020].

[54] Scorza, R. et al. ‘HoneySweet’-a transgenic plum pox virus resistant plum-from laboratory and experimental field plots, to regulatory approval. Acta Hortic. 974, 57-64 (2013).

[55] Scorza, R. et al. Honeysweet (C5), the first genetically engineered plum pox virus-resistant plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivar. HortScience 51, 601-603 (2016).

[56] Health Canada . Novel food information-Virus resistant squash line CZW-3. (1999). Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/virus-resistant-squash-line-czw-3.html [Accessed May 2020].

[57] ISAAA. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM Crops in 2017: Biotech crop adoption surges as economic benefits accumulate in 22 years. ISAAA Briefs 53, 1-143 (2017).

[58] APHIS. Interpretative ruling on Cornell University and the University of Hawaii petition for determination of nonregulated status for ‘Sunset’ papaya lines 55-1 and 63-1. Docket No. 96-024-1 (1996).

[59] APHIS. Interpretative ruling on University of Florida petition for determination of nonregulated status for X17-2 papaya resistant to papaya ringspot virus. Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054 (2009).

[60] Health Canada . Arctic^® Apple Events GD743 and GS784 . (2015). Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/novel-food-information-arctic-apple-events-gd743-gs784.html [Accessed June 2020].

[61] APHIS. Extended determination of nonregulated status for Okanagan Specialty Fruits non-browning Arctic^® apple (16-004-01p) . Docket No. APHIS- 2016-0043 (2016).

[62] Health Canada . Novel food Information-Arctic Fuji Apple event NF872. (2018). Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/arctic-fuji-apple/information.html [Accessed June 2020].

[63] Statistics Canada . Statistical Overview of the Canadian Fruit Industry 2019. Fruit export volume by commodity - metric tonnes. (2020). Available at: https://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/horticulture/horticulture-sector-reports/statistical-overview-of-the-canadian-fruit-industry-2019/?id=1564485377504 [Accessed Oct 2020].

[64] USDA. List of bioengineered foods, BE Apple crop. (2020). Available at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/BEAppleCropSummary.pdf [Accessed June 2020].

[65] Huang, J. & Wang, Q. Agricultural biotechnology development and policy in China. AgBioForum 5, 122-135 (2002).

[66] Bangladesh Biosafety . 2017 user’s guide to biosafety regulatory process for genetically engineered plants in Bangladesh. (2017). Available at: https://bangladeshbiosafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Users_Guide_to_Biosafety_Regulatory_Process_Bangladesh_2017.pdf [Accessed Aug 2020].

[67] Brookes, G. & Barfoot, P. GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996-2018. PG Econ. Ltd, UK 1-213 (2020).

[68] Brookes, G. & Barfoot, P. GM crop technology use 1996-2018: farm income and production impacts. GM Crop. Food 11, 242-261 (2020).

[69] Rashid, M., Hasan, M. & Matin, M. Socio-economic performance of Bt eggplant cultivation in Bangladesh. Bangladesh. J. Agric. Res. 43, 187-203 (2018).

[70] Ahmed, A., Hoddinott, J. F., Abedin, N. & Hossain, N. Z. Economic and health impacts of genetically modified eggplant: Results from a randomized controlled trial of Bt brinjal in Bangladesh. IFPRI Discussion paper 01866 (2019).

[71] Fresh Plaza . Non-browning fruit grower eyes big growth. (2019). Available at: https://www.freshplaza.com/article/9153190/non-browning-fruit-grower-eyes-big-growth/ [Accessed Sept 2020].

[72] Okanagan Specialty Fruits . Supply chain benefits of Arctic® apples. (2020). Available at: https://www.okspecialtyfruits.com/apple-supply-chain/ [Accessed Oct 2020].

[73] Wang, T., Zhang, H. & Zhu, H. CRISPR technology is revolutionizing the improvement of tomato and other fruit crops. Hortic. Res. 6, 77 (2019).

[74] Erpen-Dalla Corte, L. et al. Development of Improved Fruit, Vegetable, and Ornamental Crops Using the CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technique. Plants 8, 601 (2019).

[75] FAO. Food loss and waste database (2019). Available at: http://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/flw-data/en/ [Accessed Jan 2021].

[76] Szankowski, I. et al. Highly scab-resistant transgenic apple lines achieved by introgression of HcrVf2 controlled by different native promoter lengths. Tree Genet. Genomes 5, 349-358 (2009).

[77] Pompili, V., Dalla Costa, L., Piazza, S., Pindo, M. & Malnoy, M. Reduced fire blight susceptibility in apple cultivars using a high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-FLP/FRT-based gene editing system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 845-858 (2020).

[78] Dutt, M., Barthe, G., Irey, M. & Grosser, J. Transgenic citrus expressing an Arabidopsis NPR1 gene exhibit enhanced resistance against Huanglongbing (HLB; Citrus greening). PLoS ONE 10, 1-17 (2015).

[79] Tripathi, L. et al. Field trial of Xanthomonas wilt disease-resistant bananas in East Africa. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 868-870 (2014).

[80] Seo, H. H. et al. Overexpression of a defensin enhances resistance to a fruit-specific anthracnose fungus in pepper. PLoS One 9, 1-11 (2014).

[81] Ko, M. et al. Constitutive expression of a fungus-inducible carboxylesterase improves disease resistance in transgenic pepper plants. Planta 244, 379-392 (2016).

[82] Peng, A. et al. Engineering canker‐resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9‐targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 1509-1519 (2017).

[83] Wang, L. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of CsWRKY22 reduces susceptibility to Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri in Wanjincheng orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 13, 501-510 (2019).

[84] Jia, H., Orbovic, V., Jones, J. B. & Wang, N. Modification of the PthA4 effector binding elements in Type I CsLOB1 promoter using Cas9/sgRNA to produce transgenic Duncan grapefruit alleviating XccΔpthA4: DCsLOB1.3 infection. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 1291-1301 (2016).

[85] Jia, H. et al. Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 817-823 (2017).

[86] Malnoy, M., Venisse, J.-S., Brisset, M.-N. & Chevreau, E. Expression of bovine lactoferrin cDNA confers resistance to Erwinia amylovora in transgenic pear. Mol. Breed. 12, 231-244 (2003).

[87] Barbosa-Mendes, J. M. et al. Genetic transformation of Citrus sinensis cv. Hamlin with hrpN gene from Erwinia amylovora and evaluation of the transgenic lines for resistance to citrus canker. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.). 122, 109-115 (2009).

[88] Zou, X. et al. Transgenic citrus expressing synthesized cecropin B genes in the phloem exhibits decreased susceptibility to Huanglongbing. Plant Mol. Biol. 93, 341-353 (2017).

[89] Shekhawat, U. K. S., Ganapathi, T. R. & Hadapad, A. B. Transgenic banana plants expressing small interfering RNAs targeted against viral replication initiation gene display high-level resistance to banana bunchy top virus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 93, 1804-1813 (2012).

[90] Emran, A. M., Tabei, Y., Kobayashi, K., Yamaoka, N. & Nishiguchi, M. Molecular analysis of transgenic melon plants showing virus resistance conferred by direct repeat of movement gene of Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus. Plant Cell Rep. 31, 1371-1377 (2012).

[91] Lin, C.-Y. et al. Development of transgenic watermelon resistant to Cucumber mosaic virus and Watermelon mosaic virus by using a single chimeric transgene construct. Transgenic Res. 21, 983-993 (2012).

[92] Sidorova, T., Mikhailov, R., Pushin, A., Miroshnichenko, D. & Dolgov, S. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Russian commercial plum cv. “Startovaya” (Prunus domestica L.) with virus-derived hairpin RNA construct confers durable resistance to PPV infection in mature plants. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1-15 (2019).

[93] Chandrasekaran, J. et al. Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 1140-1153 (2016).

[94] Dandekar, A. M. et al. High levels of expression of full-length cryIA(c) gene from Bacillus thuringiensis in transgenic somatic walnut embryos. Plant Sci. 131, 181-193 (1998).

[95] Li, Y. et al. Overexpression of a Malus vacuolar Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter gene (MdNHX1) in apple rootstock M.26 and its influence on salt tolerance . Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 102, 337-345 (2010).

[96] Tian, N., Wang, J. & Xu, Z. Q. Overexpression of Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter gene AtNHX1 from Arabidopsis thaliana improves the salt tolerance of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) . South Afr. J. Bot. 77, 160-169 (2011).

[97] Subramanyam, K., Sailaja, K. V., Subramanyam, K., Muralidhara Rao, D. & Lakshmidevi, K. Ectopic expression of an osmotin gene leads to enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic chilli pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 105, 181-192 (2011).

[98] de Campos, M. K. F. et al. Drought tolerance and antioxidant enzymatic activity in transgenic ‘Swingle’ citrumelo plants over-accumulating proline. Environ. Exp. Bot. 72, 242-250 (2011).

[99] Malnoy, M., Jin, Q., Borejsza-Wysocka, E. E., He, S. Y. & Aldwinckle, H. S. Overexpression of the apple MpNPR1 gene confers increased disease resistance in Malus × domestica. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 20, 1568-1580 (2007).

[100] Jin, W. et al. Improved cold-resistant performance in transgenic grape (Vitis vinifera L.) overexpressing cold-inducible transcription factors AtDREB1b. HortScience 44, 35-39 (2009).

[101] Geng, J., Wei, T., Wang, Y., Huang, X. & Liu, J. H. Overexpression of PtrbHLH, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor from Poncirus trifoliata, confers enhanced cold tolerance in pummelo (Citrus grandis) by modulation of H₂O₂ level via regulating a CAT gene . Tree Physiol. 39, 2045-2054 (2019).

[102] Soyk, S. et al. Variation in the flowering gene SELF PRUNING 5G promotes day-neutrality and early yield in tomato. Nat. Genet. 49, 162-168 (2017).

[103] Tränkner, C. et al. Over-expression of an FT-homologous gene of apple induces early flowering in annual and perennial plants. Planta 232, 1309-1324 (2010).

[104] Endo, T. et al. Ectopic expression of an FT homolog from Citrus confers an early flowering phenotype on trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.). Transgenic Res. 14, 703-712 (2005).

[105] Srinivasan, C., Dardick, C., Callahan, A. & Scorza, R. Plum (Prunus domestica) trees transformed with poplar FT1 result in altered architecture, dormancy requirement, and continuous flowering. PLoS ONE 7, 1-11 (2012).

[106] Varkonyi‐Gasic, E. et al. Mutagenesis of kiwifruit CENTRORADIALIS‐like genes transforms a climbing woody perennial with long juvenility and axillary flowering into a compact plant with rapid terminal flowering. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 869-880 (2019).

[107] Dandekar, A. M. et al. Effect of down-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis on fruit flavor complex in apple fruit. Transgenic Res. 13, 373-384 (2004).

[108] Atkinson, R. G. et al. Dissecting the role of climacteric ethylene in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) ripening using a 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase knockdown line. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 3821-3835 (2011).

[109] López-Gómez, R. et al. Ripening in papaya fruit is altered by ACC oxidase cosuppression. Transgenic Res. 18, 89-97 (2009).

[110] Gao, M. et al. Gene expression and ethylene production in transgenic pear (Pyrus communis cv.‘La France’) with sense or antisense cDNA encoding ACC oxidase. Plant Sci. 173, 32-42 (2007).

[111] Park, J.-I. et al. Modification of sugar composition in strawberry fruit by antisense suppression of an ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Mol. Breed. 17, 269-279 (2006).

[112] Cutanda-Perez, M. C. et al. Ectopic expression of VlmybA1 in grapevine activates a narrow set of genes involved in anthocyanin synthesis and transport. Plant Mol. Biol. 69, 633-648 (2009).

[113] Lin-Wang, K. et al. An R2R3 MYB transcription factor associated with regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Rosaceae. BMC Plant Biol. 10, 50 (2010).

[114] Pons, E. et al. Metabolic engineering of β-carotene in orange fruit increases its in vivo antioxidant properties. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 17-27 (2014).

[115] Rugini, E., Bashir, M. A., Cristofori, V., Ruggiero, B. & Silvestri, C. A review of genetic improvement of main fruit trees through modern biotechnological tools and considerations of the cultivation and research of the engineered plant restrictions. Pakistan J. Agric. Sci. 57, 17-42 (2020).

[116] Albacete, A. et al. Unravelling rootstock×scion interactions to improve food security. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 2211-2226 (2015).

[117] Orbović, V. Editorial: new developments in Agrobacterium-Mediated transformation of tree fruit crops. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01253 (2019).

[118] Mitter, N. & Gleeson, M. Acceptance of disease-resistant GM rootstocks for non-GM fruit. In: XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014): III 1124.pp 91-96 (2014).

[119] Smolka, A., Li, X.-Y., Heikelt, C., Welander, M. & Zhu, L.-H. Effects of transgenic rootstocks on growth and development of non-transgenic scion cultivars in apple. Transgenic Res. 19, 933-948 (2010).

[120] Dandekar, A. M. et al. Trans-graft protection against Pierce’s disease mediated by transgenic grapevine rootstocks. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 84 (2019).

[121] Chen, L. et al. A method for the production and expedient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated non-transgenic mutant plants. Hortic. Res. 5, 1-12 (2018).

[122] Tian, S. et al. Engineering herbicide-resistant watermelon variety through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 1353-1356 (2018).

[123] Hu, B. et al. Engineering non-transgenic gynoecious cucumber using an improved transformation protocol and optimized CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol. Plant 10, 1575-1578 (2017).

[124] Zhou, J., Wang, G. & Liu, Z. Efficient genome editing of wild strawberry genes, vector development and validation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1868-1877 (2018).

[125] Nekrasov, V. et al. Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion. Sci. Rep. 7, 1-6 (2017).

[126] Veillet, F. et al. Transgene-free genome editing in tomato and potato plants using Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of a CRISPR/Cas9 cytidine base editor. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 1-10 (2019).

[127] Zhou, J. et al. Application and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in fruit crops. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 62, 269-286 (2020).

[128] Sattar, M. N. et al. CRISPR/Cas9: a practical approach in date palm genome editing. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1469 (2017).

[129] Nishitani, C. et al. Efficient genome editing in apple using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 6, 1-8 (2016).

[130] Malnoy, M. et al. DNA-free genetically edited grapevine and apple protoplast using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1-9 (2016).

[131] Osakabe, Y. et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in apple and grapevine. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2844-2863 (2018).

[132] Metje-Sprink, J., Menz, J., Modrzejewski, D. & Sprink, T. DNA-free genome editing: past, present and future. Front Plant Sci. 9, 1957 (2019).

[133] Woo, J. W. et al. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1162-1164 (2015).

[134] Kim, J., Chang, C. & Tucker, M. L. To grow old: regulatory role of ethylene and jasmonic acid in senescence. Front Plant Sci. 6, 20 (2015).

[135] Ghogare, R., Williamson-Benavides, B., Ramírez-Torres, F. & Dhingra, A. CRISPR-associated nucleases: the Dawn of a new age of efficient crop improvement. Transgenic Res. 29, 1-35 (2020).

[136] Begemann, M. B. et al. Precise insertion and guided editing of higher plant genomes using Cpf1 CRISPR nucleases. Sci. Rep. 7, 1-6 (2017).

[137] Jia, H., Zou, X., Orbovic, V. & Wang, N. in Plant Genome Editing with CRISPR Systems (ed Qi, Y.) 235-241 (Springer, 2019).

[138] Yao, J. L. et al. Ectopic expression of the PISTILLATA homologous MdPI inhibits fruit tissue growth and changes fruit shape in apple. Plant Direct 2 (2018).

[139] Jia, D. et al. Overexpression of a novel apple NAC transcription factor gene, MdNAC1, confers the dwarf phenotype in transgenic apple (Malus domestica). Genes (Basel) 9, 229 (2018).

[140] Pasquali, G., Biricolti, S., Locatelli, F., Baldoni, E. & Mattana, M. Osmyb4 expression improves adaptive responses to drought and cold stress in transgenic apples. Plant Cell Rep. 27, 1677-1686 (2008).

[141] Shao, X. et al. Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system to create MaGA20ox2 gene-modified semi-dwarf banana. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 17-19 (2020).

[142] Tripathi, J. N. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of endogenous banana streak virus in the B genome of Musa spp. overcomes a major challenge in banana breeding. Commun. Biol. 2, 1-11 (2019).

[143] Tripathi, L., Mwaka, H., Tripathi, J. N. & Tushemereirwe, W. K. Expression of sweet pepper Hrap gene in banana enhances resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11, 721-731 (2010).

[144] Namukwaya, B. et al. Transgenic banana expressing Pflp gene confers enhanced resistance to Xanthomonas wilt disease. Transgenic Res. 21, 855-865 (2012).

[145] Kaur, N. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 directed editing of lycopene epsilon-cyclase modulates metabolic flux for β-carotene biosynthesis in banana fruit. Metab. Eng. 59, 76-86 (2020).

[146] Song, Gqing & Chen, Q. Overexpression of the MADS-box gene K-domain increases the yield potential of blueberry. Plant Sci. 276, 22-31 (2018).

[147] Qi, X., Liu, C., Song, L., Li, Y. & Li, M. PaCYP78A9, a cytochrome P450, regulates fruit size in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1-14 (2017).

[148] Song, G. et al. Engineering cherry rootstocks with resistance to Prunus necrotic ring spot virus through RNA i‐mediated silencing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 702-708 (2013).

[149] Fagoaga, C. et al. Engineering of gibberellin levels in citrus by sense and antisense overexpression of a GA 20-oxidase gene modifies plant architecture. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1407-1420 (2007).

[150] Hao, G., Stover, E. & Gupta, G. Overexpression of a modified plant thionin enhances disease resistance to citrus canker and huanglongbing (HLB). Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1-11 (2016).

[151] Cervera, M. et al. Transgenic expression in citrus of single-chain antibody fragments specific to Citrus tristeza virus confers virus resistance. Transgenic Res. 19, 1001-1015 (2010).

[152] Vigne, E., Komar, V. & Fuchs, M. Field safety assessment of recombination in transgenic grapevines expressing the coat protein gene of Grapevine fanleaf virus. Transgenic Res. 13, 165-179 (2004).

[153] Zok, A. et al. Effect of Medicago sativa ferritin gene on stress tolerance in transgenic grapevine. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 100, 339-344 (2010).

[154] Kim, M. et al. Transformation of carotenoid biosynthetic genes using a micro-cross section method in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv. Hayward). Plant Cell Rep. 29, 1339-1349 (2010).

[155] Wang, C. et al. Molecular cloning and heterologous expression analysis of JrVTE1 gene from walnut (Juglans regia). Mol. Breed. 35, 1-12 (2015).

[156] Rubio, J. et al. Silencing of one copy of the translation initiation factor eIFiso4G in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina) impacts susceptibility to Plum pox virus (PPV) and small RNA production. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 1-12 (2019).

[157] Martín-Pizarro, C., Triviño, J. C. & Posé, D. Functional analysis of the TM6 MADS-box gene in the octoploid strawberry by CRISPR/Cas9-directed mutagenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 885-895 (2019).

[158] Lee, Y. K. & Kim, I. J. Modulation of fruit softening by antisense suppression of endo-β-1,4-glucanase in strawberry. Mol. Breed. 27, 375-383 (2011).

[159] Yu, Q. H. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-induced targeted mutagenesis and gene replacement to generate long-shelf life tomato lines. Sci. Rep. 7, 1-9 (2017).

[160] Klap, C. et al. Tomato facultative parthenocarpy results from Sl AGAMOUS-LIKE 6 loss of function. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 634-647 (2017).

[161] Li, X. et al. Lycopene is enriched in tomato fruit by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1-12 (2018).

[162] Tang, X. et al. Overexpression of Pto activates defense responses and confers broad resistance. Plant Cell 11, 15-29 (1999).