Conductivity of the phloem in mango (Mangifera indica L.)

Miguel Barceló-Anguiano , José I. Hormaza , Juan M. Losada

Horticulture Research ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 150

PDF (1969KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) :150 DOI: 10.1038/s41438-021-00584-1
Article
research-article
Conductivity of the phloem in mango (Mangifera indica L.)
Author information +
History +
PDF (1969KB)

Abstract

Mango (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae), the fifth most consumed fruit worldwide, is one of the most important fruit crops in tropical regions, but its vascular anatomy is quite unexplored. Previous studies examined the xylem structure in the stems of mango, but the anatomy of the phloem has remained elusive, leaving the long-distance transport of photoassimilates understudied. We combined fluorescence and electron microscopy to evaluate the structure of the phloem tissue in the tapering branches of mango trees, and used this information to describe the hydraulic conductivity of its sieve tube elements following current models of fluid transport in trees. We revealed that the anatomy of the phloem changes from current year branches, where it was protected by pericyclic fibres, to older ones, where the lack of fibres was concomitant with laticiferous canals embedded in the phloem tissue. Callose was present in the sieve plates, but also in the walls of the phloem sieve cells, making them discernible from other phloem cells. A scaling geometry of the sieve tube elements-including the number of sieve areas and the pore size across tapering branches-resulted in an exponential conductivity towards the base of the tree. These evaluations in mango fit with previous measurements of the phloem architecture in the stems of forest trees, suggesting that, despite agronomic management, the phloem sieve cells scale with the tapering branches. The pipe model theory applied to the continuous tubing system of the phloem appears as a good approach to understand the hydraulic transport of photoassimilates in fruit trees.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Miguel Barceló-Anguiano, José I. Hormaza, Juan M. Losada. Conductivity of the phloem in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Horticulture Research, 2021, 8 (1) : 150 DOI:10.1038/s41438-021-00584-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

FAO. Major Tropical Fruits Preliminary Results 2019 (FAO, 2020).

[2]

Hallé, F., Oldeman, R. A. & Tomlinson, P. B. Tropical Trees and Forests. An Architectural Analysis (Springer, 1978).

[3]

Schaffers, B., Whiley, A. W. & Crane, J. H. Handbook of Environmental Physiology of Fruit Crops, vol. II: Subtropical and Tropical Crops. Mango (CRC, 1994).

[4]

Whiley, A. W. Environmental effects on phenology and physiology of mango - a review. Act. Hort 341, 168-176 (1993).

[5]

Sukhvibul, N., Whiley, A. W., Smith, M. K., Hetherington, S. E. & Vithanage, V. Effect of temperature on inflorescence and floral development in four mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars. Sci. Hort. 82, 67-84 (1999).

[6]

Galán Saúco, V. El Cultivo Del Mango. 2a edn (Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, 2009).

[7]

Pérez, V., Herrero, M. & Hormaza, J. I. Self-fertility and preferential cross-fertilization in mango (Mangifera indica). Sci. Hortic. 213, 373-378 (2016).

[8]

Pérez, V., Herrero, M. & Hormaza, J. I. Pollen performance in mango (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae): andromonoecy and effect of temperature. Sci. Hortic. 253, 439-446 (2019).

[9]

Boudon, F. et al. V-Mango: a functional-structural model of mango tree growth, development and fruit production. Ann. Bot. 126, 745-763 (2020).

[10]

Normand, F., Bissery, C., Damour, G. & Lauri, P. É. Hydraulic and mechanical stem properties affect leaf-stem allometry in mango cultivars. N. Phytol. 178, 590-602 (2008).

[11]

Kurian, R. M. & Iyer, C. P. A. Stem anatomical characters in relation to tree vigour in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Sci. Hort. 50, 245-253 (1992).

[12]

Esau, K. The Phloem (Gebr. Borntraeger, 1969).

[13]

Heo, J. O., Roszak, P., Furuta, K. M. & Helariutta, Y. Phloem development: current knowledge and future perspectives. Am. J. Bot. 101, 1393-1402 (2014).

[14]

Savage, J. A. et al. Maintenance of carbohydrate transport in tall trees. Nat. Plants 3, 965-972 (2017).

[15]

Losada, J. M. & Holbrook, N. M. Scaling of phloem hydraulic resistance in stems and leaves of the understory angiosperm shrub Illicium parviflorum. Am. J. Bot. 106, 244-259 (2019).

[16]

Clerx, L. E., Rockwell, F. E., Savage, J. A. & Holbrook, N. M. Ontogenetic scaling of phloem sieve tube anatomy and hydraulic resistance with tree height in Quercus rubra. Am. J. Bot. 107, 852-863 (2020).

[17]

Mullendore, D. L., Windt, C. W., Van As, H. & Knoblauch, M. Sieve tube geometry in relation to phloem flow. Plant Cell 22, 579-593 (2010).

[18]

Liesche, J., Pace, M. R., Xu, Q., Li, Y. & Chen, S. Height-related scaling of phloem anatomy and the evolution of sieve element end wall types in woody plants. N. Phytol. 214, 245-256 (2016).

[19]

Jensen, K. H. et al. Modeling the hydrodynamics of phloem sieve plates. Front. Plant Sci. 3, 151 (2012).

[20]

Jensen, K. H., Valente, A. X. & Stone, H. A. Flow rate through microfilters: Influence of the pore size distribution, hydrodynamic interactions, wall slip, and inertia. Phys. Fluids 26, 052004 (2014).

[21]

Pace, M. R., Alcántara, S., Lohmann, L. G. & Angyalossy, V. Secondary phloem diversity and evolution in Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae). Ann. Bot. 116, 333-358 (2015).

[22]

Münch, E. Die Stoffbewegungen in der Pflanze (Gustav Fischer, 1930).

[23]

Torode, T. A. et al. Branched pectic galactan in phloem-sieve-element cell walls: implications for cell mechanics. Plant Physiol. 176, 1547-1558 (2018).

[24]

Ray, D. M. & Savage, J. A. Immunodetection of cell wall pectin galactan opens up new avenues for phloem research. Plant Physiol. 183, 1435-1437 (2020).

[25]

Lawton, J. R. S. & Canny, M. J. The proportion of sieve elements in the phloem of some tropical trees. Planta 95, 351-354 (1970).

[26]

Currier, H. B. & Strugger, S. Aniline blue and fluorescence microscopy of callose in bulb scales of Allium cepa L. Protoplasma 45, 552-559 (1956).

[27]

Venning, F. D. The ontogeny of the laticiferous canals in the Anacardiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 35, 637-644 (1948).

[28]

Joel, D. M. & Fahn, A. Ultrastructure of the resin ducts of Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae). 2. Resin secretion in the primary stem ducts. Ann. Bot 46, 779-783 (1980).

[29]

Pickard, W. F. Laticifers and secretory ducts: two other tube systems in plants. N. Phytol. 177, 877-888 (2007).

[30]

Milburn, J. A., Kallarackal, J. & Baker, D. A. Water relations of the banana. I. Predicting the water relations of the field-grown banana using the exuding latex. Funct. Plant Biol. 17, 57-68 (1990).

[31]

Devakumar, G. et al. Studies on soil-plant-atmosphere system in Hevea. 11. Seasonal effects on water relations and yield, lndian. J. Nat. Rubber Res. 1, 45 (1988).

[32]

Pongsomboon, W. Effects of Temperature and Water Stress on Tree Growth, Flowering, Fruit Growth and Retention of Mango (Mangifera indica L.), Ph.D. Thesis, Kasetsart University (1991).

[33]

Sevanto, S. Phloem transport and drought. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 1751-1759 (2014).

[34]

Normand, F. & Lauri, P. É. Assessing allometric models to predict vegetative growth of mango (Mangifera indica; Anacardiaceae) at the current‐year branch scale. Am. J. Bot. 99, 425-437 (2012).

[35]

Olson, M. E. & Rosell, J. A. Vessel diameter-stem diameter scaling across woody angiosperms and the ecological causes of xylem vessel diameter variation. N. Phytol. 197, 1204-1213 (2012).

[36]

Olson, M. E., Anfodillo, T., Rosell, J. A. & Martínez‐Méndez, N. Across climates and species, higher vapour pressure deficit is associated with wider vessels for plants of the same height. Plant Cell Environ. 43, 3068-3080 (2020).

[37]

Olson, M. et al. Xylem vessel‐diameter-shoot‐length scaling: ecological significance of porosity types and other traits. Ecol. Monogr. 90, e01410 (2020).

[38]

Petit, G. & Crivellaro, A. Comparative axial widening of phloem and xylem conduits in small woody plants. Trees 28, 915-921 (2014).

[39]

Liesche, J., Windt, C., Bohr, T., Schulz, A. & Jensen, K. H. Slower phloem transport in gymnosperm trees can be attributed to higher sieve element resistance. Tree Physiol. 35, 376-386 (2015).

[40]

Knoblauch, M. et al. Testing the Münch hypothesis of long distance phloem transport in plants. Elife 5, e15341 (2016).

[41]

Lehnebach, R., Beyer, R., Letort, V. & Lehnebach, P. H. The pipe model theory half a century on: a review. Ann. Bot. 121, 773-795 (2018).

[42]

Hughes, J. & McCully, M. E. The use of an optical brightener in the study of plant structure. Stain Technol. 50, 319-329 (1975).

[43]

Schindelin, J., Rueden, C. T., Hiner, M. C. & Eliceiri, K. W. The ImageJ ecosystem: an open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 82, 518-529 (2015).

[44]

Orians, C. M., van Vuuren, M. M., Harris, N. L., Babst, B. A. & Ellmore, G. S. Differential sectoriality in long-distance transport in temperate tree species: evidence from dye flow, 15 N transport, and vessel element pitting. Trees 18, 501-509 (2004).

PDF (1969KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/