Involvement of ethylene receptors in the salt tolerance response of Cucurbita pepo

Abstract

Abiotic stresses have a negative effect on crop production, affecting both vegetative and reproductive development. Ethylene plays a relevant role in plant response to environmental stresses, but the specific contribution of ethylene biosynthesis and signalling components in the salt stress response differs between Arabidopsis and rice, the two most studied model plants. In this paper, we study the effect of three gain-of-function mutations affecting the ethylene receptors CpETR1B, CpETR1A, and CpETR2B of Cucurbita pepo on salt stress response during germination, seedling establishment, and subsequent vegetative growth of plants. The mutations all reduced ethylene sensitivity, but enhanced salt tolerance, during both germination and vegetative growth, demonstrating that the three ethylene receptors play a positive role in salt tolerance. Under salt stress, etr1b, etr1a, and etr2b germinate earlier than WT, and the root and shoot growth rates of both seedlings and plants were less affected in mutant than in WT. The enhanced salt tolerance response of the etr2b plants was associated with a reduced accumulation of Na⁺ in shoots and leaves, as well as with a higher accumulation of compatible solutes, including proline and total carbohydrates, and antioxidant compounds, such as anthocyanin. Many membrane monovalent cation transporters, including Na⁺/H⁺ exchangers (NHXs), K⁺ efflux antiporters (KEAs), high-affinity K⁺ transporters (HKTs), and K⁺ uptake transporters (KUPs) were also highly upregulated by salt in etr2b in comparison with WT. In aggregate, these data indicate that the enhanced salt tolerance of the mutant is led by the induction of genes that exclude Na⁺ in photosynthetic organs, while maintaining K⁺/Na⁺ homoeostasis and osmotic adjustment. If the salt response of etr mutants occurs via the ethylene signalling pathway, our data show that ethylene is a negative regulator of salt tolerance during germination and vegetative growth. Nevertheless, the higher upregulation of genes involved in Ca²⁺ signalling (CpCRCK2A and CpCRCK2B) and ABA biosynthesis (CpNCED3A and CpNCED3B) in etr2b leaves under salt stress likely indicates that the function of ethylene receptors in salt stress response in C. pepo can be mediated by Ca²⁺ and ABA signalling pathways.

References

[1] Zhang, P., Zhang, J. & Chen, M. Economic impacts of climate change on agriculture: the importance of additional climatic variables other than temperature and precipitation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 83, 8-31 (2016).

[2] Montanarella, L. et al (eds). Status of the World’s Soil Resources (Swsr)-main Report. (FAO, 2015).

[3] Isayenkov, S. V. & Maathuis, F. J. M. Plant salinity stress: many unanswered questions remain. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 80 (2019).

[4] Gull, A., Ahmad Lone, A. & Ul Islam Wani, N. in Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants (ed. De Oliveira, A.) 3-9 (IntechOpen, 2019).

[5] Demidchik, V. & Maathuis, F. J. M. Physiological roles of nonselective cation channels in plants: from salt stress to signalling and development. N. Phytol. 175, 387-404 (2007).

[6] Jiang, Z. et al. Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx. Nature 572, 341-346 (2019).

[7] Van Zelm, E., Zhang, Y. & Testerink, C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 403-433 (2020).

[8] Choi, W. G., Toyota, M., Kim, S. H., Hilleary, R. & Gilroy, S. Salt stress-induced Ca2+ waves are associated with rapid, long-distance root-to-shoot signaling in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6497-6502 (2014).

[9] Manishankar, P., Wang, N., Köster, P., Alatar, A. A. & Kudla, J. Calcium signaling during salt stress and in the regulation of ion homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 4215-4226 (2018).

[10] Sunarpi et al. Enhanced salt tolerance mediated by AtHKT1 transporter-induced Na+ unloading from xylem vessels to xylem parenchyma cells. Plant J. 44, 928-938 (2005).

[11] Pardo, J. M. Biotechnology of water and salinity stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21, 185-196 (2010).

[12] Rodríguez-Rosales, M. P. et al. Plant NHX cation/proton antiporters. Plant Signal. Behav. 4, 265-276 (2009).

[13] Bassil, E. et al. The Arabidopsis Na+/H+ antiporters NHX1 and NHX2 control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth, flower development, and reproduction. Plant Cell 23, 3482-3497 (2011).

[14] Reguera, M. et al. pH regulation by NHX-type antiporters is required for receptor-mediated protein trafficking to the vacuole in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27, 1200-1217 (2015).

[15] Apse, M. P., Aharon, G. S., Snedden, W. A. & Blumwald, E. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science (80-.) 285, 1256-1258 (1999).

[16] Zhang, H. X. & Blumwald, E. Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 765-768 (2001).

[17] Mian, A. et al. Over-expression of an Na+- and K+- permeable HKT transporter in barley improves salt tolerance. Plant J. 68, 468-479 (2011).

[18] Slama, I., Abdelly, C., Bouchereau, A., Flowers, T. & Savouré, A. Diversity, distribution and roles of osmoprotective compounds accumulated in halophytes under abiotic stress. Ann. Bot. 115, 433-447 (2015).

[19] Munns, R. & Gilliham, M. Salinity tolerance of crops-what is the cost? N. Phytol. 208, 668-673 (2015).

[20] Niu, M. et al. Root respiratory burst oxidase homologue-dependent H2O2 production confers salt tolerance on a grafted cucumber by controlling Na+ exclusion and stomatal closure. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 3465-3476 (2018).

[21] Keunen, E., Peshev, D., Vangronsveld, J., Van Den Ende, W. & Cuypers, A. Plant sugars are crucial players in the oxidative challenge during abiotic stress: extending the traditional concept. Plant. Cell Environ. 36, 1242-1255 (2013).

[22] Lockhart, J. Salt of the earth: ethylene promotes salt tolerance by enhancing Na/K homeostasis. Plant Cell 25, 3150 (2013).

[23] Verma, R. K. et al. Overexpression of ABA receptor PYL10 gene confers drought and cold tolerance to indica rice. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1488 (2019).

[24] Tao, J. J. et al. The role of ethylene in plants under salinity stress. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 1-12 (2015).

[25] Arraes, F. B. et al. Implications of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in soybean drought stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 1-20 (2015).

[26] Albacete, A. et al. Rootstock-mediated changes in xylem ionic and hormonal status are correlated with delayed leaf senescence, and increased leaf area and crop productivity in salinized tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 928-938 (2009).

[27] Riyazuddin, R. et al. Ethylene: a master regulator of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Biomolecules 10, 959 (2020).

[28] Peng, J. et al. Salt-induced stabilization of EIN3/EIL1 confers salinity tolerance by deterring ROS accumulation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004664 (2014).

[29] Dong, H. et al. Loss of ACS7 confers abiotic stress tolerance by modulating ABA sensitivity and accumulation in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4875-4887 (2011).

[30] Chen, D. et al. A wheat aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene, TaACO1, negatively regulates salinity stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 33, 1815-1827 (2014).

[31] Li, C. H. et al. The receptor-like kinase SIT1 mediates salt sensitivity by activating MAPK3/6 and regulating ethylene homeostasis in rice. Plant Cell 26, 2538-2553 (2014).

[32] Yang, C., Lu, X., Ma, B., Chen, S. Y. & Zhang, J. S. Ethylene signaling in rice and Arabidopsis: conserved and diverged aspects. Mol. Plant 8, 495-505 (2015).

[33] Ju, C. & Chang, C. Mechanistic insights in ethylene perception and signal transduction. Plant Physiol. 169, 85-95 (2015).

[34] Binder, B. M., Chang, C. & Schaller, G. E. in Annual Plant Reviews.Vol. 44 (ed. McManus, M. T.) 117-145 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).

[35] Hua, J. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Ethylene responses are negatively regulated by a receptor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 94, 261-271 (1998).

[36] Wilson, R. L., Kim, H., Bakshi, A. & Binder, B. M. The ethylene receptors ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 and ETHYLENE RESPONSE2 have contrasting roles in seed germination of Arabidopsis during salt stress. Plant Physiol. 165, 1353-1366 (2014).

[37] Wilson, R. L., Bakshi, A. & Binder, B. M. Loss of the ETR1 ethylene receptor reduces the inhibitory effect of far-red light and darkness on seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 433 (2014).

[38] Bakshi, A. et al. Identification of regions in the receiver domain of the ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 ethylene receptor of Arabidopsis important for functional divergence. Plant Physiol. 169, 219-232 (2015).

[39] Bakshi, A. et al. Ethylene receptors signal via a noncanonical pathway to regulate abscisic acid responses. Plant Physiol. 176, 910-929 (2018).

[40] Wang, Y. et al. Ethylene enhances seed germination and seedling growth under salinity by reducing oxidative stress and promoting chlorophyll content via ETR2 pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1066 (2020).

[41] García, A. et al. Phenomic and genomic characterization of a mutant platform in Cucurbita pepo. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1049 (2018).

[42] García, A. et al. The ethylene receptors CpETR1A and CpETR2B cooperate in the control of sex determination in Cucurbita pepo. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 154-167 (2020).

[43] García, A., Aguado, E., Garrido, D., Martínez, C. & Jamilena, M. Two androecious mutations reveal the crucial role of ethylene receptors in the initiation of female flower development in Cucurbita pepo. Plant J. 103, 1548-1560 (2020).

[44] Montero-Pau, J. et al. De novo assembly of the zucchini genome reveals a whole-genome duplication associated with the origin of the Cucurbita genus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1161-1171 (2018).

[45] Zhao, X. C. & Schaller, G. E. Effect of salt and osmotic stress upon expression of the ethylene receptor ETR1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 562, 189-192 (2004).

[46] Yang, L., Zu, Y. G. & Tang, Z. H. Ethylene improves Arabidopsis salt tolerance mainly via retaining K+ in shoots and roots rather than decreasing tissue Na+ content. Environ. Exp. Bot. 86, 60-69 (2013).

[47] Gharbi, E. et al. Inhibition of ethylene synthesis reduces salt-tolerance in tomato wild relative species Solanum chilense. J. Plant Physiol. 210, 24-37 (2017).

[48] Chiwocha, S. D. et al. The etr1-2 mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana affects the abscisic acid, auxin, cytokinin and gibberellin metabolic pathways during maintenance of seed dormancy, moist-chilling and germination. Plant J. 42, 35-48 (2005).

[49] Wang, Y., Wang, T., Li, K. & Li, X. Genetic analysis of involvement of ETR1 in plant response to salt and osmotic stress. Plant Growth Regul. 54, 261-269 (2008).

[50] Li, Z., Peng, J., Wen, X. & Guo, H. ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 is a senescence-associated gene that accelerates age-dependent leaf senescence by directly repressing miR164 transcription in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 3311-3328 (2013).

[51] Beaudoin, N., Serizet, C., Gosti, F. & Giraudat, J. Interactions between abscisic acid and ethylene signaling cascades. Plant Cell 12, 1103-1115 (2000).

[52] Bleecker, A. B., Estelle, M. A., Somerville, C. & Kende, H. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science.(80-.) 241, 1086-1089 (1988).

[53] Grbic, V. & Bleecker, A. B. Ethylene regulates the timing of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 8, 595-602 (1995).

[54] Tholen, D., Voesenek, L. A. C. J. & Poorter, H. Ethylene insensitivity does not increase leaf area or relative growth rate in Arabidopsis, Nicotiana tabacum, and Petunia x hybrida. Plant Physiol. 134, 1803-1812 (2004).

[55] Cao, W. H. et al. in Advances in Plant Ethylene Research (eds Klee, H. et al) 333-339 (Springer, 2007).

[56] Kazan, K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 219-229 (2015).

[57] DeFalco, T. A., Bender, K. W. & Snedden, W. A. Breaking the code: Ca2+ sensors in plant signalling. Biochem. J. 425, 27-40 (2010).

[58] Osakabe, Y. et al. Osmotic stress responses and plant growth controlled by potassium transporters in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 609-624 (2013).

[59] Verslues, P. E. & Bray, E. A. Role of abscisic acid (ABA) and Arabidopsis thaliana ABA-insensitive loci in low water potential-induced ABA and proline accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 201-212 (2006).

[60] Leidi, E. O. et al. The AtNHX1 exchanger mediates potassium compartmentation in vacuoles of transgenic tomato. Plant J. 61, 495-506 (2010).

[61] Fukuda, A., Nakamura, A., Hara, N., Toki, S. & Tanaka, Y. Molecular and functional analyses of rice NHX-type Na+/H+ antiporter genes. Planta 233, 175-188 (2011).

[62] Berthomieu, P. et al. Functional analysis of AtHKT1 in Arabidopsis shows that Na+ recirculation by the phloem is crucial for salt tolerance. EMBO J. 22, 2004-2014 (2003).

[63] Garciadeblás, B., Senn, M. E., Bañuelos, M. A. & Rodríguez-Navarro, A. Sodium transport and HKT transporters: the rice model. Plant J. 34, 788-801 (2003).

[64] Horie, T., Hauser, F. & Schroeder, J. I. HKT transporter-mediated salinity resistance mechanisms in Arabidopsis and monocot crop plants. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 660-668 (2009).

[65] Kobayashi, N. I. et al. OsHKT1;5 mediates Na+ exclusion in the vasculature to protect leaf blades and reproductive tissues from salt toxicity in rice. Plant J. 91, 657-670 (2017).

[66] Kunz, H. H. et al. Plastidial transporters KEA1, -2, and -3 are essential for chloroplast osmoregulation, integrity, and pH regulation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7480-7485 (2014).

[67] Zhu, X. et al. K+ efflux antiporters 4, 5, and 6 mediate pH and K+ homeostasis in endomembrane compartments. Plant Physiol. 178, 1657-1678 (2018).

[68] Yang, T. et al. The role of a potassium transporter OsHAK5 in potassium acquisition and transport from roots to shoots in rice at low potassium supply levels. Plant Physiol. 166, 945-959 (2014).

[69] Han, M., Wu, W., Wu, W. H. & Wang, Y. Potassium transporter KUP7 is involved in K+ acquisition and translocation in Arabidopsis root under K+-limited conditions. Mol. Plant. 9, 437-446 (2016).

[70] Grabov, A. Plant KT/KUP/HAK potassium transporters: single family-multiple functions. Ann. Bot. 99, 1035-1041 (2007).

[71] Nahar, K., Hasanuzzaman, M. & Fujita, M. in Osmolytes and Plants Acclimation to Changing Environment: Emerging Omics Technologies (eds Iqbal, N., Nazar, R. & Khan, N. A.) 37-68 (Springer, 2015).

[72] Argiolas, A., Puleo, G. L., Sinibaldi, E. & Mazzolai, B. Osmolyte cooperation affects turgor dynamics in plants. Sci. Rep. 6, 1-8 (2016).

[73] Gharsallah, C., Fakhfakh, H., Grubb, D. & Gorsane, F. Effect of salt stress on ion concentration, proline content, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression in tomato cultivars. AoB Plants 8, plw055 (2016).

[74] Hayat, S. et al. Role of proline under changing environments: a review. Plant Signal. Behav. 7, 1456-1466 (2012).

[75] Khedr, A. H. A., Abbas, M. A., Wahid, A. A. A., Quick, W. P. & Abogadallah, G. M. Proline induces the expression of salt-stress-responsive proteins and may improve the adaptation of Pancratium maritimum L. to salt-stress. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 2553-2562 (2003).

[76] Simon-Sarkadi, L., Kocsy, G., Várhegyi, Á., Galiba, G. & De Ronde, J. A. Stress-induced changes in the free amino acid composition in transgenic soybean plants having increased proline content. Biol. Plant. 50, 793-796 (2006).

[77] Yu, Z. et al. How plant hormones mediate salt stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 1117-1130 (2020).

[78] Ranal, M. A. & De Santana, D. G. How and why to measure the germination process? Rev. Bras. Bot. 29, 1-11 (2006).

[79] Abrahám, E., Hourton-Cabassa, C., Erdei, L. & Szabados, L. Methods for determination of proline in plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 639, 317-331 (2010).

[80] Chow, P. S. & Landhäusser, S. M. A method for routine measurements of total sugar and starch content in woody plant tissues. Tree Physiol. 24, 1129-1136 (2004).

[81] Mancinelli, A. L. Interaction between light quality and light quantity in the photoregulation of anthocyanin production. Plant Physiol. 92, 1191-1195 (1990).

[82] Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔCT method . Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).

[83] Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547-1549 (2018).