Optimizing the CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in grape by using grape promoters

Abstract

The efficacy of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) has been documented, but the optimization of this system, as well as CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing, has not been explored in this species. Herein, we identified four VvU3 and VvU6 promoters and two ubiquitin (UBQ) promoters in grapevine and demonstrated that the use of the identified VvU3/U6 and UBQ2 promoters could significantly increase the editing efficiency in grape by improving the expression of sgRNA and Cas9, respectively. Furthermore, we conducted multiplex genome editing using the optimized CRISPR/Cas9 vector that contained the conventional multiple sgRNA expression cassettes or the polycistronic tRNA-sgRNA cassette (PTG) by targeting the sugar-related tonoplastic monosaccharide transporter (TMT) family members TMT1 and TMT2, and the overall editing efficiencies were higher than 10%. The simultaneous editing of TMT1 and TMT2 resulted in reduced sugar levels, which indicated the role of these two genes in sugar accumulation in grapes. Moreover, the activities of the VvU3, VvU6, and UBQ2 promoters in tobacco genome editing were demonstrated by editing the phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Our study provides materials for the optimization of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. To our knowledge, our simultaneous editing of the grape TMT family genes TMT1 and TMT2 constitutes the first example of multiplex genome editing in grape. The multiplex editing systems described in this manuscript expand the toolbox of grape genome editing, which would facilitate basic research and molecular breeding in grapevine.

References

[1] Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262-1278 (2014).

[2] Mackelprang, R. & Lemaux, P. G. Genetic engineering and editing of plants: an analysis of new and persisting questions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 2.1-2.29 (2020).

[3] Belhaj, K., Chrparro-Garcia, A., Kamoun, S., Patron, N. J. & Nekrasov, V. Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 32, 76-84 (2015).

[4] Yin, K., Gao, C. & Qiu, J. L. Progress and prospects in plant genome editing. Nat. Plants 3, 17107 (2017).

[5] Malzahn, A., Lowder, L. & Qi, Y. Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR. Cell Biosci. 7, 21 (2017).

[6] Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).

[7] Jiang, W. et al. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e188 (2013).

[8] Sun, X. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 5, 10342 (2015).

[9] Ng, H. & Dean, N. Dramatic improvement of CRISPR/Cas9 editing in Candida albicans by increased single guide RNA expression. mSphere 2, e00385-16 (2017).

[10] Long, L. et al. Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in cotton by improved sgRNA expression. Plant Methods 14, 85 (2018).

[11] Nekrasov, V., Staskawicz, B., Weigel, D., Jones, J. D. & Kamoun, S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 691-693 (2013).

[12] Mao, Y. et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol. Plant 6, 2008-2011 (2013).

[13] Zhang, Z. et al. A multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 platform for fast and efficient editing of multiple genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 35, 1519-1533 (2016).

[14] Zhong, Z. et al. Intron-based single transcript unit CRISPR systems for plant genome editing. Rice 13, 8 (2020).

[15] Zeng, Y., Wen, J., Zhao, W., Wang, Q. & Huang, W. Rational improvement of rice yield and cold tolerance by editing the three genes OsPIN5b, GS3, and OsMYB30 with the CRISPR-Cas9 System. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1663 (2020).

[16] Lowder, L. G. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 169, 971-985 (2015).

[17] Friedland, A. E. et al. Heritable genome editing in C elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Methods 10, 741-743 (2013).

[18] Li, X., Jiang, D. H., Yong, K. & Zhang, D. B. Varied transcriptional efficiencies of multiple Arabidopsis U6 small nuclear RNA genes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 49, 222-229 (2007).

[19] Venema, J ., Vos, H. R., Faber, A. W., van Venrooij, W. J. & Raué, H. A. Yeast Rrp9p is an evolutionarily conserved U3 snoRNP protein essential for early pre-rRNA processing cleavages and requires box C for its association. RNA 6, 1660-1671 (2000).

[20] Marz, M. & Stadler, P. F. Comparative analysis of eukaryotic U3 snoRNA. RNA Biol. 6, 503-507 (2009).

[21] Hao, Y. et al. Shortened snRNA promoters for efficient CRISPR/Cas-based multiplex genome editing in monocot plants. Sci. China Life Sci. 63, 933-935 (2020).

[22] Shockey, J . Gene editing in plants: assessing the variables through a simplified case study. Plant Mol. Biol. 103, 75-89 (2020).

[23] Ma, X. et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1274-1284 (2015).

[24] Wang, P. et al. High efficient multisites genome editing in allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 137-150 (2018).

[25] Charrier, A. et al. Efficient targeted mutagenesis in apple and first time edition of pear using the CRISPR-Cas9 System. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 40 (2019).

[26] Liu, H. et al. Efficient induction of haploid plants in wheat by editing of TaMTL using an optimized Agrobacterium-mediated CRISPR system. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 1337-1349 (2020).

[27] Ren, C. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera L.). Sci. Rep. 6, 32289 (2016).

[28] Nakajima, I. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape. PLoS ONE 12, e0177966 (2017).

[29] Wang, X. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 844-855 (2018).

[30] Osakabe, Y. et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in apple and grapevine. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2844-2863 (2018).

[31] Ren, C. et al. Knockout of VvCCD8 gene in grapevine affects shoot branching. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 47 (2020).

[32] Minkenberg, B., Wheatley, M. & Yang, Y. CRISPR/Cas9-enabled multiplex genome editing and its application. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 149, 111-132 (2017).

[33] He, Y. et al. Self-cleaving ribozymes enable the production of guide RNAs from unlimited choices of promoters for CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing. J. Genet. Genomics 44, 469-472 (2017).

[34] Tang, X. et al. Single transcript unit CRISPR 2.0 systems for robust Cas9 and Cas12a mediated plant genome editing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 1431-1445 (2019).

[35] Armario Najera, V., Twyman, R. M., Christou, P. & Zhu, C. Applications of multiplex genome editing in higher plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 59, 93-102 (2019).

[36] Xie, K., Minkenberg, B. & Yang, Y. Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3570-3575 (2015).

[37] Li, T. et al. Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1160-1163 (2018).

[38] Kwon, C. T. et al. Rapid customization of Solanaceae fruit crops for urban agriculture. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 182-188 (2020).

[39] Sunitha, S. & Rock, C. D. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of TAS4 and MYBA7 loci in grapevine rootstock 101-14. Transgenic Res. 29, 355-367 (2020).

[40] Ren, F. et al. Efficiency optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 612 (2019).

[41] Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J. & Gao, C. Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2395-2410 (2014).

[42] Kim, S., Bae, T., Hwang, J. & Kim, J. S. Rescue of high-specificity Cas9 variants using sgRNAs with matched 5’ nucleotides. Genome Biol. 18, 218 (2017).

[43] Zhang, D. et al. Perfectly matched 20-nucleotide guide RNA sequences enable robust genome editing using high-fidelity SpCas9 nucleases. Genome Biol. 18, 191 (2017).

[44] Zhang, P. et al. Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-mediated metabolic engineering increases soya bean isoflavone content and resistance to soya bean mosaic virus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1384-1395 (2020).

[45] Lecourieux, F., Lecourieux, D., Vignault, C. & Delrot, S. A sugar-inducible protein kinase, VvSK1, regulates hexose transport and sugar accumulation in grapevine cells. Plant Physiol. 152, 1096-1106 (2010).

[46] Afoufa-Bastien, D. et al. The Vitis vinifera sugar transporter gene family: phylogenetic overview and macroarray expression profiling. BMC Plant Biol. 10, 245 (2010).

[47] Doench, J. G. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184-191 (2016).

[48] Doench, J. G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262-1267 (2014).

[49] Peterson, B. A. et al. Genome-wide assessment of efficiency and specificity in CRISPR/Cas9 mediated multiple site targeting in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 11, e0162169 (2016).

[50] Qi, W. et al. High-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex gene editing using the glycine tRNA-processing system-based strategy in maize. BMC Biotechnol. 16, 58 (2016).

[51] Wang, Y. et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 947-952 (2014).

[52] Kuhn, N. et al. Berry ripening: recently heard through the grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4543-4559 (2014).

[53] Jung, B. et al. Identification of the transporter responsible for sucrose accumulation in sugar beet taproots. Nat. Plants 1, 14001 (2015).

[54] Ren, Y. et al. A tonoplast sugar transporter underlies a sugar accumulation QTL in watermelon. Plant Physiol. 176, 836-850 (2018).

[55] Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔCT method . Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).

[56] Zhang, Z. et al. VvSWEET10 mediates sugar accumulation in grapes. Genes 10, 255 (2019).

[57] Baltes, N. J., Gil-Humanes, J., Cermak, T., Atkins, P. A. & Voytas, D. F. DNA replicons for plant genome engineering. Plant Cell 26, 151-163 (2014).