Functional conservation of the grapevine candidate gene INNER NO OUTER for ovule development and seed formation

Abstract

Seedlessness represents a highly appreciated trait in table grapes. Based on an interesting case of seedless fruit production described in the crop species Annona squamosa, we focused on the Vitis vinifera INNER NO OUTER (INO) gene as a candidate. This gene encodes a transcription factor belonging to the YABBY family involved in the determination of abaxial identity in several organs. In Arabidopsis thaliana, this gene was shown to be essential for the formation and asymmetric growth of the ovule outer integument and its mutation leads to a phenotypic defect of ovules and failure in seed formation. In this study, we identified in silico the V. vinifera orthologue and investigated its phylogenetic relationship to INO genes from other species and its expression in different organs in seeded and seedless varieties. Applying cross-species complementation, we have tested its functionality in the Arabidopsis ino-1 mutant. We show that the V. vinifera INO successfully rescues the ovule outer integument growth and seeds set and also partially complements the outer integument asymmetric growth in the Arabidopsis mutant, differently from orthologues from other species. These data demonstrate that VviINO retains similar activity and protein targets in grapevine as in Arabidopsis. Potential implications for grapevine breeding are discussed.

References

[1] Varoquaux, F., Blanvillain, R., Delseny, M. & Gallois, P. Less is better: new approaches for seedless fruit production. Trends Biotechnol. 18, 233-242 (2000).

[2] Stout, A. in New York State Agricultural Experimental Station, Technical bulletin 238 (The station Cornell University, 1936).

[3] Ledbetter, C. A. & R., D. Seedlessness in grapes. Hort. Rev. 11, 25 (1989).

[4] Delfino, P., Zenoni, S., Imanifard, Z., Tornielli, G. B. & Bellin, D. Selection of candidate genes controlling veraison time in grapevine through integration of meta-QTL and transcriptomic data. BMC Genomics 20, 739 (2019).

[5] Vezzulli, S., Doligez, A. & Bellin, D. in The Grape Genome (eds Cantu, D. & Walker, M. A.) 103-136 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).

[6] Bouquet, A. & Danglot, Y. Inheritance of seedlessness in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis - J. Grapevine Res. 35, 7 (1996).

[7] Lahogue, F., This, P. & Bouquet, A. Identification of a codominant scar marker linked to the seedlessness character in grapevine. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97, 950-959 (1998).

[8] Mejia, N. et al. Identification of QTLs for seedlessness, berry size, and ripening date in a seedless x seedless table grape progeny. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 58, 499-507 (2007).

[9] Di Genova, A. et al. Whole genome comparison between table and wine grapes reveals a comprehensive catalog of structural variants. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 7 (2014).

[10] Kim, M. S., Hur, Y. Y., Kim, J. H. & Jeong, S. C. Genome resequencing, improvement of variant calling, and population genomic analyses provide insights into the seedlessness in the genus vitis. G3 (Bethesda) 10, 3365-3377 (2020).

[11] Royo, C. et al. The major origin of seedless grapes is associated with a missense mutation in the MADS-Box gene VviAGL11. Plant Physiol. 177, 1234-1253 (2018).

[12] Lora, J., Hormaza, J. I., Herrero, M. & Gasser, C. S. Seedless fruits and the disruption of a conserved genetic pathway in angiosperm ovule development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5461-5465 (2011).

[13] Villanueva, J. M. et al. INNER NO OUTER regulates abaxial-adaxial patterning in Arabidopsis ovules. Genes Dev. 13, 3160-3169 (1999).

[14] Sawa, S. et al. FILAMENTOUS FLOWER, a meristem and organ identity gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a protein with a zinc finger and HMG-related domains. Genes Dev. 13, 1079-1088 (1999).

[15] Siegfried, K. R. et al. Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development 126, 4117-4128 (1999).

[16] Bowman, J. L. The YABBY gene family and abaxial cell fate. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3, 17-22 (2000).

[17] Gaiser, J. C., Robinson-Beers, K. & Gasser, C. S. The Arabidopsis SUPERMAN gene mediates asymmetric growth of the outer integument of ovules. Plant Cell 7, 333-345 (1995).

[18] Baker, S. C., Robinson-Beers, K., Villanueva, J. M., Gaiser, J. C. & Gasser, C. S. Interactions among genes regulating ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 145, 1109-1124 (1997).

[19] Schneitz, K., Hulskamp, M., Kopczak, S. D. & Pruitt, R. E. Dissection of sexual organ ontogenesis: a genetic analysis of ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 124, 1367-1376 (1997).

[20] Meister, R. J., Kotow, L. M. & Gasser, C. S. SUPERMAN attenuates positive INNER NO OUTER autoregulation to maintain polar development of Arabidopsis ovule outer integuments. Development 129, 4281-4289 (2002).

[21] Yamada, T., Ito, M. & Kato, M. Expression pattern of INNER NO OUTER homologue in Nymphaea (water lily family, Nymphaeaceae). Dev. Genes Evol. 213, 510-513 (2003).

[22] Yamada, T. et al. Ancestral expression patterns and evolutionary diversification of YABBY genes in angiosperms. Plant J. 67, 26-36 (2011).

[23] Arnault, G. et al. Evidence for the extensive conservation of mechanisms of ovule integument development since the most recent common ancestor of living angiosperms. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1352 (2018).

[24] Gasser, C. S. & Skinner, D. J. Development and evolution of the unique ovules of flowering plants. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 131, 373-399 (2019).

[25] McAbee, J. M., Kuzoff, R. K. & Gasser, C. S. Mechanisms of derived unitegmy among Impatiens species. Plant Cell 17, 1674-1684 (2005).

[26] Lora, J., Hormaza, J. I. & Herrero, M. Transition from two to one integument in Prunus species: expression pattern of INNER NO OUTER (INO), ABERRANT TESTA SHAPE (ATS) and ETTIN (ETT). N. Phytol. 208, 584-595 (2015).

[27] Skinner, D. J., Brown, R. H., Kuzoff, R. K. & Gasser, C. S. Conservation of the role of INNER NO OUTER in development of unitegmic ovules of the Solanaceae despite a divergence in protein function. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 143 (2016).

[28] Zhang, S. et al. Genome-wide analysis of the YABBY gene family in grapevine and functional characterization of VvYABBY4. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1207 (2019).

[29] Vitulo, N. et al. A deep survey of alternative splicing in grape reveals changes in the splicing machinery related to tissue, stress condition and genotype. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 99 (2014).

[30] Canaguier, A. et al. A new version of the grapevine reference genome assembly (12X.v2) and of its annotation (VCost.v3). Genomics Data 14, 56-62 (2017).

[31] Grimplet, J. et al. The grapevine gene nomenclature system. BMC Genomics 15, 1077 (2014).

[32] Tompa, P., Schad, E., Tantos, A. & Kalmar, L. Intrinsically disordered proteins: emerging interaction specialists. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 35, 49-59 (2015).

[33] Schneitz, K., Baker, S. C., Gasser, C. S. & Redweik, A. Pattern formation and growth during floral organogenesis: HUELLENLOS and AINTEGUMENTA are required for the formation of the proximal region of the ovule primordium in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125, 2555-2563 (1998).

[34] Meister, R. J. et al. Definition and interactions of a positive regulatory element of the Arabidopsis INNER NO OUTER promoter. Plant J. 37, 426-438 (2004).

[35] Meister, R. J., Oldenhof, H., Bowman, J. L. & Gasser, C. S. Multiple protein regions contribute to differential activities of YABBY proteins in reproductive development. Plant Physiol. 137, 651-662 (2005).

[36] Gallagher, T. L. & Gasser, C. S. Independence and interaction of regions of the INNER NO OUTER protein in growth control during ovule development. Plant Physiol. 147, 306-315 (2008).

[37] Shang, X., Cao, Y. & Ma, L. Alternative splicing in plant genes: a means of regulating the environmental fitness of plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020432 (2017).

[38] Chaudhary, S., Jabre, I., Reddy, A. S. N., Staiger, D. & Syed, N. H. Perspective on alternative splicing and proteome complexity in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 496-506 (2019).

[39] Macarena, S., Fernando, L. L., Monica, V., Rafael, V. & Bernardo, G. Incomplete processing of peroxidase transcripts in the lignin degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 242, 37-44 (2005).

[40] Lora, J., Laux, T. & Hormaza, J. I. The role of the integuments in pollen tube guidance in flowering plants. N. Phytol. 221, 1074-1089 (2019).

[41] Soltis, P. S. Ancient and recent polyploidy in angiosperms. N. Phytol. 166, 5-8 (2005).

[42] Pratt, C. Reproductive anatomy in cultivated grapes-a review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 22, 92-109 (1971).

[43] Striem, M. J., Spiegel-Roy, P., Baron, I. & Sahar, N. The degrees of development of the seed-coat and the endosperm as separate subtraits of stenospermocarpic seedlessness in grapes. Vitis - J. Grapevine Res. 31, 7 (1992).

[44] Doligez, A. et al. New stable QTLs for berry weight do not colocalize with QTLs for seed traits in cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). BMC Plant Biol. 13, 217 (2013).

[45] Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 54, 5.6.1-5.6.37 (2016).

[46] Pierri, C. L., Parisi, G. & Porcelli, V. Computational approaches for protein function prediction: a combined strategy from multiple sequence alignment to molecular docking-based virtual screening. Biochim Biophys. Acta 1804, 1695-1712 (2010).

[47] Symons, G. M. et al. Grapes on steroids. Brassinosteroids are involved in grape berry ripening. Plant Physiol. 140, 150-158 (2006).

[48] Bottcher, C., Boss, P. K. & Davies, C. Acyl substrate preferences of an IAA-amido synthetase account for variations in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berry ripening caused by different auxinic compounds indicating the importance of auxin conjugation in plant development. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4267-4280 (2011).

[49] Gleave, A. P. A versatile binary vector system with a T-DNA organisational structure conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome. Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 1203-1207 (1992).