Defining strawberry shape uniformity using 3D imaging and genetic mapping

Abstract

Strawberry shape uniformity is a complex trait, influenced by multiple genetic and environmental components. To complicate matters further, the phenotypic assessment of strawberry uniformity is confounded by the difficulty of quantifying geometric parameters ‘by eye’ and variation between assessors. An in-depth genetic analysis of strawberry uniformity has not been undertaken to date, due to the lack of accurate and objective data. Nonetheless, uniformity remains one of the most important fruit quality selection criteria for the development of a new variety. In this study, a 3D-imaging approach was developed to characterise berry shape uniformity. We show that circularity of the maximum circumference had the closest predictive relationship with the manual uniformity score. Combining five or six automated metrics provided the best predictive model, indicating that human assessment of uniformity is highly complex. Furthermore, visual assessment of strawberry fruit quality in a multi-parental QTL mapping population has allowed the identification of genetic components controlling uniformity. A “regular shape” QTL was identified and found to be associated with three uniformity metrics. The QTL was present across a wide array of germplasm, indicating a potential candidate for marker-assisted breeding, while the potential to implement genomic selection is explored. A greater understanding of berry uniformity has been achieved through the study of the relative impact of automated metrics on human perceived uniformity. Furthermore, the comprehensive definition of strawberry shape uniformity using 3D imaging tools has allowed precision phenotyping, which has improved the accuracy of trait quantification and unlocked the ability to accurately select for uniform berries.

References

[1] Carew, J. G., Morretini, M. & Battey, N. H. Misshapen fruits in strawberry. Small Fruits Rev. 2, 37-50 (2003).

[2] Nitsch, J. P. Growth and morphogenesis of the strawberry as related to auxin. Am. J. Bot. 37, 211 (1950).

[3] Kronenberg, H. G., Braak, J. P. & Zeilinga, A. E. Poor fruit setting in strawberries. Ii. Euphytica 8, 245-251 (1959).

[4] Thompson, P. A. Environmental effects on pollination and receptacle development in the strawberry. J. Hort. Sci. 46, 1-12 (1971).

[5] Darrow, G. M. The importance of sex in the strawberry. J. Heredity 16, 193-204 (1925).

[6] Darrow G. M. The Strawberry (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966).

[7] Gilbert, C. & Breen, P. J. Low pollen production as a cause of fruit malformation in strawberry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112, 56-60 (1987).

[8] Whitaker, V. M., Hasing, T., Chandler, C. K., Plotto, A. & Baldwin, E. Historical trends in strawberry fruit quality revealed by a Trial of University of Florida Cultivars and Advanced Selections. HortScience 46, 553-557 (2011).

[9] Chandler, C. K., Santos, B. M., Peres, N. A., Jouquand, C. & Plotto, A. ‘Florida Elyana’ strawberry. HortScience 44, 1775-1776 (2009).

[10] Zanin, D. S. et al. Agronomic performance of cultivars and advanced selections of strawberry in the South Plateau of Santa Catarina State. Rev. Ceres. 66, 159-167 (2019).

[11] Ariza, M. T., Soria, C., Medina-Mínguez, J. J. & Martínez-Ferri, E. Incidence of misshapen fruits in strawberry plants grown under tunnels is affected by cultivar, planting date, pollination, and low temperatures. HortScience 47, 1569-1573 (2012).

[12] Zhang, D. et al. Chloropicrin alternated with biofumigation increases crop yield and modifies soil bacterial and fungal communities in strawberry production. Sci. Total Environ. 675, 615-622 (2019).

[13] Faedi, W., Mourgues, F., & Rosati, C. Strawberry breeding and varieties: situation and perspectives. Acta Hort. 51, 51-59 (2001).

[14] Nielsen, J. A. & Lovell, P. H. Value of morphological characters for cultivar identification in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) . N.Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 28, 89-96 (2000).

[15] Ishikawa, T. et al. Classification of strawberry fruit shape by machine learning. ISPRS XLII-2, 463-470 (2018).

[16] Mir, J. I. et al. Diversity evaluation of fruit quality of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) germplasm through cluster and principal component analysis . Indian J. Plant Physiol. 22, 221-226 (2017).

[17] Akodagali, J. & Balaji, S. Computer vision and image analysis based techniques for automatic characterization of fruits a review. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 50, 6-12 (2012).

[18] Beyer, M., Hahn, R., Peschel, S., Harz, M. & Knoche, M. Analysing fruit shape in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) . Sci. Hort. 96, 139-150 (2002).

[19] Naik, S., Patel, B. & Pandey, R. Shape, size and maturity features extraction with fuzzy classifier for non-destructive mango (Mangifera indica L., cv. Kesar) grading . In 2015 IEEE Technological Innovation in ICT for Agriculture and Rural Development (TIAR). https://doi.org/10.1109/tiar.2015.7358522 (2015).

[20] Hiraoka, Y. & Kuramoto, N. Identification of Rhus succedanea L. cultivars using elliptic fourier descriptors based on fruit shape . Silvae Genet. 53, 221-226 (2004).

[21] Paproki, A., Sirault, X., Berry, S., Furbank, R. & Fripp, J. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 12, 63 (2012).

[22] Coupel-Ledru, A. et al. Multi-scale high-throughput phenotyping of apple architectural and functional traits in orchard reveals genotypic variability under contrasted watering regimes. Hortic. Res. 6, 52 (2019).

[23] Topp, C. N. et al. 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1695-E1704 (2013).

[24] Cockerton, H. M. et al. Genetic and phenotypic associations between root architecture, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonisation and low phosphate tolerance in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) . BMC Plant Biol. 20, 1-14 (2020).

[25] He, J. Q., Harrison, R. J. & Li, B. A novel 3D imaging system for strawberry phenotyping. Plant Methods 13, 93 (2017).

[26] Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J. & Reynolds, J. M. ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179, 300-314 (2012).

[27] Kovacs, L. et al. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 16, 137-145 (2007).

[28] Rife, T. W. & Poland, J. A. Field book: an open-source application for field data collection on android. Crop Sci. 54, 1624 (2014).

[29] Laganiere, R. OpenCV 3 Computer Vision Application Programming Cookbook (Packt Publishing Ltd, 2017).

[30] Podczeck, F., Rahman, S. R. & Newton, J. M. Evaluation of a standardised procedure to assess the shape of pellets using image analysis. Int J. Pharm. 192, 123-138 (1999).

[31] Taubin, G. Estimating the tensor of curvature of a surface from a polyhedral approximation. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.1995.466840 (1995).

[32] Lancaster, P. & Salkauskas, K. Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods. Math. Comput. 37, 141- 141 (1981).

[33] Gutierrez, P. A., Perez-Ortiz, M., Sanchez-Monedero, J., Fernandez-Navarro, F. & Hervas-Martinez, C. Ordinal Regression methods: survey and experimental study. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28, 127-146 (2016).

[34] Chakrabarti, A. & Ghosh, J. K. AIC, BIC and recent advances in model selection. Philos. Stat. 7, 583-605 (2011).

[35] Yamashita, T., Yamashita, K. & Kamimura, R. A stepwise AIC method for variable selection in linear regression. Commun. Stat. 36, 2395-2403 (2007).

[36] Verma, S., et al. Clarifying sub-genomic positions of QTLs for flowering habit and fruit quality in U.S. strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) breeding populations using pedigree-based QTL analysis . Hort. Res. 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.62 (2017).

[37] Vickerstaff, R. J. & Harrison, R. J. Crosslink: a fast, scriptable genetic mapper for outcrossing species. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/135277 (2017).

[38] Cockerton, H. M. et al. Identification of powdery mildew resistance QTL in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) . Theor. Appl Genet 131, 1995-2007 (2018).

[39] van Dijk, T. et al. Genomic rearrangements and signatures of breeding in the allo-octoploid strawberry as revealed through an allele dose based SSR linkage map. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 55 (2014).

[40] Butler, D., Cullis, B. R., Gilmour, A. R. & Gogel, B. J. Asreml: asreml () fits the linear mixed model. R package version 3 (2009).

[41] Granato, I. & Fritsche-Neto, R. snpReady: preparing genotypic datasets in order to run genomic; analysis. R package version 0.9. 6. (2018).

[42] Erbe, M., Pimentel, E. C. G., Sharifi, A. R. & Simianer, H. Assessment of cross-validation strategies for genomic prediction in cattle. In Proc. 9th WCGALP, Leipzig (2010).

[43] Gezan, S. A., Osorio, L. F., Verma, S. & Whitaker, V. M. An experimental validation of genomic selection in octoploid strawberry. Hort. Res. 11, 1-9 (2017).

[44] Garin, V., Wimmer, V., Mezmouk, S., Malosetti, M. & van Eeuwijk, F. How do the type of QTL effect and the form of the residual term influence QTL detection in multi-parent populations? A case study in the maize EU-NAM population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 1753-1764 (2017).

[45] Churchill, G. A. & Doerge, R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138, 963-971 (1994).

[46] Zeng, Z. B. Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10972-10976 (1993).

[47] Zeng, Z.-B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136, 1457-1468 (1994).

[48] Oo, L. M. & Aung, N. Z. A simple and efficient method for automatic strawberry shape and size estimation and classification. Biosyst. Eng. 170, 96-107 (2018).

[49] Kochi, N. et al. A 3D shape-measuring system for assessing strawberry fruits. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 12, 395-404 (2018).

[50] Aho, K., Derryberry, D. & Peterson, T. Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC. Ecology 95, 631-636 (2014).

[51] Castro, P. & Lewers, K. S. Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for fruit-quality traits and number of weeks of flowering in the cultivated strawberry. Mol. Breed. 36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0559-7 (2016).

[52] Lerceteau-Köhler, E. et al. Genetic dissection of fruit quality traits in the octoploid cultivated strawberry highlights the role of homoeo-QTL in their control. Theor. Appl Genet. 124, 1059-1077 (2012).

[53] Liao, X. et al. Interlinked regulatory loops of ABA catabolism and biosynthesis coordinate fruit growth and ripening in woodland strawberry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11542-E11550 (2018).

[54] Wang, S.-M. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of shortened fruit mutant in woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) using RNA-Seq . J. Integr. Agric. 16, 828-844 (2017).

[55] Ariza, M. T., Soria, C., Medina, J. J. & Martínez-Ferri, E. Fruit misshapen in strawberry cultivars (Fragaria × ananassa) is related to achenes functionality . Ann. Appl. Biol. 158, 130-138 (2011).

[56] Pipattanawong, R., Yamane, K., Fujishige, N., Bang, S.-W. & Yamaki, Y. Effects of high temperature on pollen quality, ovule fertilization and development of embryo and achene in ‘Tochiotome’ strawberry. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 78, 300-306 (2009).