Complex migration history is revealed by genetic diversity of tomato samples collected in Italy during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries

Abstract

Native to South America, the tomato is now grown almost worldwide. During its domestication and improvement, important selection signatures were fixed in certain agronomic and adaption traits. Such traits include fruit morphology, which became a major target for selection over the centuries. However, little is known about precisely when some mutations arose and how they spread through the germplasm. For instance, elongated fruit variants, originating both via mutations in SUN and OVATE genes, may have arisen prior to domestication or during tomato cultivation in Europe. To gain insights into the tomato admixture and selection pattern, the genome of two tomato herbarium specimens conserved in the Herbarium Porticense (PORUN) was sequenced. Comparison of the DNA of herbarium samples collected in Italy between 1750 and 1890 with that of living tomato accessions yielded insights into the history of tomato loci selection. Interestingly, the genotype of the more recent sample (LEO90), classified in 1890 as the oblungum variety, shows several private variants in loci implicated in fruit shape determination, also present also in wild tomato samples. In addition, LEO90, sampled in the nineteenth century, is genetically more distant from cultivated varieties than the SET17 genotype, collected in the eighteenth century, suggesting that elongated tomato varieties may originate from a cross between a landrace and a wild ancestor. Findings from our study have major implications for the understanding of tomato migration patterns and for the conservation of allelic diversity and loci recovery.

References

[1] Aflitos, S. et al. Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole-genome sequencing. Plant J. 80, 136-148 (2014).

[2] Lin, T. et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat. Genet. 46, 1220-1226 (2014).

[3] Blanca, J. et al. Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS ONE 7, e48198 (2012).

[4] Sim, S.-C. et al. High-density SNP genotyping of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) reveals patterns of genetic variation due to breeding. PLoS ONE 7, e45520 (2012).

[5] Gao, L. et al. The tomato pan-genome uncovers new genes and a rare allele regulating fruit flavor. Nat. Genet. 51, 1044-1051 (2019).

[6] Rodriguez, G. R. et al. Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC, and FAS in the tomato germplasm and the relationship to fruit shape diversity. Plant Physiol. 156, 275-285 (2011).

[7] Liu, J., Van Eck, J., Cong, B. & Tanksley, S. D. A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13302-13306 (2002).

[8] Frary, A. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289, 85-88 (2000).

[9] Xiao, H., Jiang, N., Schaffner, E., Stockinger, E. J. & van der Knaap, E. A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319, 1527-1530 (2008).

[10] Wu, S. et al. A common genetic mechanism underlies morphological diversity in fruits and other plant organs. Nat. Commun. 9, 4734 (2018).

[11] Ames, M. & Spooner, D. M. DNA from herbarium specimens settles a controversy about origins of the European potato. Am. J. Bot. 95, 252-257 (2008).

[12] Di Donato, A., Filippone, E., Ercolano, M. R. & Frusciante, L. Genome sequencing of ancient plant remains: findings, uses and potential applications for the study and improvement of modern crops. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 441 (2018).

[13] Ronconi, A. Osservazioni del dottor Agostino Ronconi su la flora napolitana lettera prima (stamperia Flautino, Napoli, 1811).

[14] D'Ayala, M. Vita di Domenico Cirillo. Arch. Stor. Ital. 3, 107-145 (1870).

[15] De Natale, A. & Cellinese, N. Imperato, Cirillo, and a series of unfortunate events: a novel approach to assess the unknown provenance of historical herbarium specimens. Taxon 58, 963-970 (2009).

[16] De Natale, A. In I Musei delle Scienze Agrarie. L’evoluzione delle Wunderkammern 52-74 (COINOR, Napoli, 2007).

[17] Peralta, I. E., Spooner, D. M. & Knapp, S. Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect. Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Syst. Bot. Monogr. 84, 1-186 (2008).

[18] Rizzi, E., Lari, M., Gigli, E., De Bellis, G. & Caramelli, D. Ancient DNA studies: new perspectives on old samples. Genet. Sel. Evol. 44, 21 (2012).

[19] Gugerli, F., Parducci, L. & Petit, R. J. Ancient plant DNA: review and prospects. New Phytol. 166, 409-418 (2005).

[20] Stevens, M. A. & Rick, C. M. in The Tomato Crop 35-109 (Springer, 1986).

[21] Tieman, D. et al. A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor. Science (80-) 355, 391-394 (2017).

[22] Codignola L . In Trade in the Eighteenth Century, History of European Ideas, XXXIV, No. 4, 465-472 (Oxford University Press, 2008)

[23] Beddows, I., Reddy, A., Kloesges, T. & Rose, L. E. Population genomics in wild tomatoes-the interplay of divergence and admixture. Genome Biol. Evol. 9, 3023-3038 (2017).

[24] Rick, C. M. The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomatoes of western south America. Econ. Bot. 12, 346-367 (1958).

[25] Pradheep, K., Veeraragavathatham, D. & Auxcilia, J. Heterosis and combining ability studies in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) with an emphasis to virus resistance. Madras J. Agric. 93, 239-247 (2006).

[26] Razifard H., et al. Genomic evidence for complex domestication history of the cultivated tomato in Latin America. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1118-1132 (2020).

[27] Zsögön, A. et al. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1211-1216 (2018).

[28] Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).

[29] Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289-290 (2004).

[30] Wickham, H. ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 3, 180-185 (2011).