SlGRAS4 accelerates fruit ripening by regulating ethylene biosynthesis genes and SlMADS1 in tomato

Abstract

GRAS proteins are plant-specific transcription factors that play crucial roles in plant development and stress responses. However, their involvement in the ripening of economically important fruits and their transcriptional regulatory mechanisms remain largely unclear. Here, we demonstrated that SlGRAS4, encoding a transcription factor of the GRAS family, was induced by the tomato ripening process and regulated by ethylene. Overexpression of SlGRAS4 accelerated fruit ripening, increased the total carotenoid content and increased PSY1 expression in SlGRAS4-OE fruit compared to wild-type fruit. The expression levels of key ethylene biosynthesis genes (SlACS2, SlACS4, SlACO1, and SlACO3) and crucial ripening regulators (RIN and NOR) were increased in SlGRAS4-OE fruit. The negative regulator of tomato fruit ripening, SlMADS1, was repressed in OE fruit. Exogenous ethylene and 1-MCP treatment revealed that more endogenous ethylene was derived in SlGRAS4-OE fruit. More obvious phenotypes were observed in OE seedlings after ACC treatment. Yeast one-hybrid and dual-luciferase assays confirmed that SlGRAS4 can directly bind SlACO1 and SlACO3 promoters to activate their transcription, and SlGRAS4 can also directly repress SlMADS1 expression. Our study identified that SlGRAS4 acts as a new regulator of fruit ripening by regulating ethylene biosynthesis genes in a direct manner. This provides new knowledge of GRAS transcription factors involved in regulating fruit ripening.

References

[1] Giovannoni, J., Nguyen, C., Ampofo, B., Zhong, S. & Fei, Z. The epigenome and transcriptional dynamics of fruit ripening. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 61-84 (2016).

[2] Adams, D. O. & Yang, S. F. Ethylene biosynthesis-identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 170-174 (1979).

[3] Boller, T., Herner, R. C. & Kende, H. Assay for and enzymatic formation of an ethylene precursor, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Planta 145, 293-303 (1979).

[4] Liu, M., Pirrello, J., Chervin, C., Roustan, J. P. & Bouzayen, M. Ethylene control of fruit ripening: revisiting the complex network of transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 169, 2380-2390 (2015).

[5] Mcmurchie, E. J., Mcglasson, W. B. & Eaks, I. L. Treatment of fruit with propylene gives information about the biogenesis of ethylene. Nature 237, 235-236 (1972).

[6] Nakatsuka, A. et al. Differential expression and internal feedback regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase, and ethylene receptor genes in tomato fruit during development and ripening. Plant Physiol. 118, 1295-1305 (1998).

[7] Barry, C. S., Llop-Tous, M. I. & Grierson, D. The regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene expression during the transition from system-1 to system-2 ethylene synthesis in tomato. Plant Physiol. 123, 979-986 (2000).

[8] Ito, Y. et al. Re-evaluation of the rin mutation and the role of RIN in the induction of tomato ripening. Nat. Plants 3, 866-874 (2017).

[9] Fujisawa, M., Nakano, T. & Ito, Y. Identification of potential target genes for the tomato fruit-ripening regulator RIN by chromatin immunoprecipitation. BMC Plant Biol. 11, 26 (2011).

[10] Martel, C., Vrebalov, J., Tafelmeyer, P. & Giovannoni, J. J. The tomato MADS-Box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 157, 1568-1579 (2011).

[11] Masaki, F., Toshitsugu, N., Yoko, S. & Yasuhiro, I. A large-scale identification of direct targets of the tomato MADS box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR reveals the regulation of fruit ripening. Plant Cell 25, 371-386 (2013).

[12] Zhong, S. L. et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 154-159 (2013).

[13] Giovannoni, J. J. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16, S170-S180 (2004).

[14] Sonia, O. et al. Systems biology of tomato fruit development: combined transcript, protein, and metabolite analysis of tomato transcription factor (Nor, Rin) and ethylene receptor (Nr) mutants reveals novel regulatory interactions. Plant Physiol. 157, 405-425 (2011).

[15] Wang, R. et al. Re-evaluation of transcription factor function in tomato fruit development and ripening with CRISPR/Cas9-mutagenesis. Sci. Rep. 9, 1696 (2019).

[16] Gao, Y. et al. Re-evaluation of the nor mutation and the role of the NAC-NOR transcription factor in tomato fruit ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 3560-3574 (2020).

[17] Manning, K. et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 38, 948-952 (2006).

[18] Gao, Y. et al. Diversity and redundancy of the ripening regulatory networks revealed by the fruitENCODE and the new CRISPR/Cas9 CNR and NOR mutants. Hortic. Res. 6, 39 (2019).

[19] Itkin, M. et al. TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE 1 is a component of the fruit ripening regulatory network. Plant J. 60, 1081-1095 (2009).

[20] Marian, B. et al. The tomato FRUITFULL homologs TDR4/FUL1 and MBP7/FUL2 regulate ethylene-independent aspects of fruit ripening. Plant Cell 24, 4437-4451 (2012).

[21] Dong, T. T. et al. A tomato MADS-Box transcription factor, SlMADS1, acts as a negative regulator of fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 163, 1026-1036 (2013).

[22] Yin, W. et al. Suppression of the MADS-box gene SlMBP8 accelerates fruit ripening of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 118, 235 (2017).

[23] Yin, W. et al. Suppression of SlMBP15 inhibits plant vegetative growth and delays fruit ripening in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 9, 938 (2018).

[24] Zhu, M. K. et al. A new tomato NAC (NAM/ATAF1/2/CUC2) transcription factor, SlNAC4, functions as a positive regulator of fruit ripening and carotenoid accumulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 119-135 (2014).

[25] Meng, C. et al. Suppression of tomato SlNAC1 transcription factor delays fruit ripening. J. Plant Physiol. 193, 88-96 (2016).

[26] Rumyana, K. et al. Transcriptome and metabolite profiling show that APETALA2a is a major regulator of tomato fruit ripening. Plant Cell 23, 923-941 (2011).

[27] Liu, M. C. et al. The chimeric repressor version of an ethylene response factor (ERF) family member, Sl-ERF.B3, shows contrasting effects on tomato fruit ripening. N. Phytol. 203, 206-218 (2014).

[28] Li, X. Y. et al. Control of tillering in rice. Nature 422, 618-621 (2003).

[29] Huang, W. et al. Overexpression of a tomato miR171 target gene SlGRAS24 impacts multiple agronomical traits via regulating gibberellin and auxin homeostasis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 472-488 (2017).

[30] Liu, Y. et al. Overexpression of SlGRAS40 in tomato enhances tolerance to abiotic stresses and influences auxin and gibberellin signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1659 (2017).

[31] Liu, Y. et al. SlGRAS4 mediates a novel regulatory pathway promoting chilling tolerance in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1620-1633 (2020).

[32] Shinozaki, Y. et al. High-resolution spatiotemporal transcriptome mapping of tomato fruit development and ripening. Nat. Commun. 9, 364 (2018).

[33] Zhang, L. et al. The SlFSR gene controls fruit shelf-life in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 2897-2909 (2018).

[34] Carrera, E. et al. Characterization of the procera tomato mutant shows novel functions of the SlDELLA protein in the control of flower morphology, cell division and expansion, and the auxin-signaling pathway during fruit-set and development. Plant Physiol. 160, 1581-1596 (2012).

[35] Zhou, S. E. et al. Manipulation of plant architecture and flowering time by down-regulation of the GRAS transcription factor SlGRAS26 in Solanum lycopersicum. Plant Sci. 271, 81-93 (2018).

[36] Li, M. et al. Silencing GRAS2 reduces fruit weight in tomato. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 60, 498-513 (2018).

[37] Hamilton, A. J., Lycett, G. W. & Grierson, D. Antisense gene that inhibits synthesis of the hormone ethylene in transgenic plants. Nature 346, 284-287 (1990).

[38] Oeller, P. W. et al. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA. Science 254, 437-439 (1991).

[39] Picton, S. et al. Altered fruit ripening and leaf senescence in tomatoes expressing an antisense ethylene-forming enzyme transgene. Plant J. 3, 469-481 (1993).

[40] Zhang, J. L. et al. A tomato MADS-box protein, SlCMB1, regulates ethylene biosynthesis and carotenoid accumulation during fruit ripening. Sci. Rep. 8, 3413 (2018).

[41] Kou, X. et al. SNAC4 and SNAC9 transcription factors show contrasting effects on tomato carotenoids biosynthesis and softening. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 144, 9-19 (2018).

[42] Xiao, Y. Y. et al. Banana ethylene response factors are involved in fruit ripening through their interactions with ethylene biosynthesis genes. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 2499-2510 (2013).

[43] Han, Y. C., Fu, C. C., Kuang, J. F., Chen, J. Y. & Lu, W. J. Two banana fruit ripening-related C2H2 zinc finger proteins are transcriptional repressors of ethylene biosynthetic genes. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 116, 8-15 (2016).

[44] Yin, X. R., Allan, A. C., Chen, K. S. & Ferguson, I. B. Kiwifruit EIL and ERF genes involved in regulating fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 153, 1280-1292 (2010).

[45] Vrebalov, J. et al. Fleshy fruit expansion and ripening are regulated by the tomato SHATTERPROOF gene TAGL1. Plant Cell 21, 3041-3062 (2009).

[46] Lin, Z. et al. A tomato HD-Zip homeobox protein, LeHB-1, plays an important role in floral organogenesis and ripening. Plant J. 55, 301-310 (2010).

[47] Gao, Y. et al. A NAC transcription factor, NOR-like1, is a new positive regulator of tomato fruit ripening. Hortic. Res. 5, 75 (2018).

[48] Deng, H. et al. A novel tomato F-box protein, SlEBF3, is involved in tuning ethylene signaling during plant development and climacteric fruit ripening. Plant J. 95, 648-658 (2018).

[49] Yang, L. et al. Functional characterization of SlSAHH2 in tomato fruit ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1312 (2017).