Gibberellin induced shot berry formation in cv. Early Sweet is a direct consequence of high fruit set

Abstract

The ‘seedless’ table grape industry relies mainly on stenospermocarpic cultivars, in which endosperm abortion results in berries with seed rudiments and low levels of bioactive gibberellin (GA). Application of GA to enhance berry sizing in these cultivars is often accompanied by adverse effects, one of which is increased proportions of very small berries (termed shot berries). Manual removal of these berries, which is essential to improve uniformity and market value, increases production cost and exposes the cluster to damage. Unraveling the physiological causes of shot berry formation is thus of both scientific and practical value. This study focuses on understanding the GA-mediated regulation of shot berry formation in Vitis vinifera cv. Early Sweet, known for a high proportion of shot berries, which severely damage cluster appearance. As GA is known to induce the parthenocarpic fruit set, we first tested the assumption that the parthenocarpic nature of a fruitlet is a primary cause for shot berry development. We then examined the consequence of the flower load on the proportion of shot berries in the cluster. Our data suggests that: (1) contrary to prior assumptions, the parthenocarpic nature of a fruitlet is not the primary cause for shot berry development, demonstrated by the fact that parthenocarpic fruitlets develop into a full-size berries; (2) the proportion of shot berries on a cluster is a function of the initial flower load on the inflorescence, with high initial flower load resulting in greater shot berry percentage in the cluster; (3) GA treatment bypasses the natural regulation of flower load, resulting in high fruitlet density and increased competition among fruitlets; (4) variation of flower load within the cluster influences berry size uniformity to a greater extent than does the variation in number of cluster per vine. The identity of the factors that determine the fate of a given flower on a high-load cluster remains an open question.

References

[1] May, P. Flowering and Fruit Set in Grapevines. (Lythrum Press, Adelaide, Australia, 2004).

[2] Isoda, R. Carry-over effects of SADH and CCC on shoot growth and berry set of Kyoho grapes. Vitis 28, 145-151 (1989).

[3] Collins, C. & Dry, P. R. Response of fruit set and other yield components to shoot topping and 2-chlorethyltrimethyl-ammonium chloride application. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 15, 256-267 (2009).

[4] Friend, A. P., Creasy, G. L., Trought, M. C. & Lang, A. Use of tagging to trace capfall and development of individual Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir flowers. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 54, 313-317 (2003).

[5] Friend, A. P. & Trought, M. C. Delayed winter spur-pruning in New Zealand can alter yield components of Merlot grapevines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 13, 157-164 (2007).

[6] Cholet, C., Mondolot, L. & Ary, C. New histochemical observations of shot grapevine berries. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 8, 126-131 (2002).

[7] Colin, L., Cholet, C. & Geny, L. Relationships between endogenous polyamines, cellular structure and arrested growth of grape berries. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 8, 101-108 (2002).

[8] Usha, K., Kashyap, D. & Singh, B. Influence of gibberellic acid and N6-benzyladenine on the development of seed and shot berries in the seedless grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Perlette. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 56, 1009- 1009 (2005).

[9] Baby, T., Gilliham, M., Tyerman, S. D. & Collins, C. Differential fruit set between grapevine cultivars is related to differences in pollen viability and amine concentration in flowers. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 22, 149-158 (2016).

[10] Shinozaki, Y. et al. Ethylene suppresses tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit set through modification of gibberellin metabolism. Plant J. 83, 237-251 (2015).

[11] Joldersma, D. & Liu, Z. The Making of Virgin Fruit: the Molecular and Genetic Basis of Parthenocarpy. (Oxford University Press, UK, 2018).

[12] Motomura, Y. & Hideo, I. Exogenous gibberellin as responsible for the seedless berry development of grapes. II. Role and effects of the prebloom gibberellin application as concerned with the flowering, seedlessness and seedless berry development of Delaware and Campbell early grapes. Tohoku J. Agric. Res. 23, 15-32 (1972).

[13] Iwahori, S., Weaver, R. J. & Pool, R. M. Gibberellin-like activity in berries of seeded and seedless Tokay grapes. Plant Physiol. 43, 333-337 (1968).

[14] Cheng, C. et al. Effect of GA₃ treatment on seed development and seed-related gene expression in grape . PLoS ONE 8, e80044 (2013).

[15] Weaver, R. J. Effect of gibberellic acid on fruit set and berry enlargement in seedless grapes of Vitis vinifera. Nature 181, 851-852 (1958).

[16] Weaver, R. J. & Pool, R. M. Relation of ringing to gibberellin-like activity in berries of Vitis vinifera L. Nature 206, 318-319 (1965).

[17] Ebadi, A., Sedgley, M., May, P. & Coombe, B. Seed development and abortion in Vitis vinifera L., cv. Chardonnay. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, 703-712 (1996).

[18] Harrell, D. & Williams, L. The influence of girdling and gibberellic acid application at fruitset on Ruby Seedless and Thompson Seedless grapes. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 38, 83-88 (1987).

[19] Winkler, A., Cook, J., Kliewer, W. & Lider, L. General Viticulture (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1974).

[20] Mullins, M. G., Bouquet, A. & Williams, L. E. Biology of the Grapevine (Cambridge University Press, 1992).

[21] Weaver, R. J. in Advances in Chemistry, Vol. 28 (American Chemical Society Publications, 1961).

[22] Khajuria, H. & Bakshi, J. A note on pollen germination and shot-berry formation in Perlette grapes. Progressive Horticulture 17, 78-79 (1985).

[23] Dokoozlian, N. & Peacock, W. Gibberellic acid applied at bloom reduces fruit set and improves size of ‘Crimson Seedless’ table grapes. HortScience 36, 706-709 (2001).

[24] Weaver, R. J. & McCune, S. B. Further studies with gibberellin on Vitis vinifera grapes. Botanical Gaz. 121, 155-162 (1960).

[25] Conde, C. et al. Biochemical changes throughout grape berry development and fruit and wine quality. Food 1, 1-22 (2007).

[26] Srinivasan, C. & Mullins, M. G. Physiology of flowering in the grapevine-a review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 32, 47-63 (1981).

[27] Agüero, C., Vigliocco, A., Abdala, G. & Tizio, R. Effect of gibberellic acid and uniconazol on embryo abortion in the stenospermocarpic grape cultivars Emperatriz and Perlon. Plant Growth Regul. 30, 9-16 (2000).

[28] Hu, J. et al. Potential sites of bioactive gibberellin production during reproductive growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20, 320-336 (2008).

[29] Bush, D. R. Identifying the pathways that control resource allocation in higher plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 8669-8671 (2020).

[30] Zamski, E. & Schaffer, A. A. Photoassimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops: Source-Sink Relationships (1996).

[31] Coombe, B. G. Fruit set and development in seeded grape varieties as affected by defoliation, topping, girdling, and other treatments. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 10, 85-100 (1959).

[32] Coombe, B. G. The effect of removing leaves, flowers and shoot tips on fruit-set in Vitis vinifera L. J. Horticultural Sci. 37, 1-15 (1962).

[33] Buttrose, M. The effect of reducing leaf area on the growth of roots, stems and berries of Gordo grape-vines. Vitis 5, 455-464 (1966).

[34] Wardlaw, I. F. The control of carbon partitioning in plants. N. Phytologist 116, 341-381 (1990).

[35] Keller, M. The Science of Grapevines. (Academic Press, 2020).

[36] Coombe, B. G. Research on development and ripening of the grape berry. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 43, 101-110 (1992).

[37] Coombe, B. & Bishop, G. Development of the grape berry. II. Changes in diameter and deformability during veraison. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 31, 499-509 (1980).

[38] Coombe, B. G. The development of fleshy fruits. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27, 207-228 (1976).

[39] Weaver, R. J., Shindy, W. & Kliewer, W. M. Growth regulator induced movement of photosynthetic products into fruits of ‘Black Corinth’ grapes. Plant Physiol. 44, 183-188 (1969).