Depicting the battle between nectarine and Monilinia laxa: the fruit developmental stage dictates the effectiveness of the host defenses and the pathogen’s infection strategies

Abstract

Infections by the fungus Monilinia laxa, the main cause of brown rot in Europe, result in considerable losses of stone fruit. Herein, we present a comprehensive transcriptomic approach to unravel strategies deployed by nectarine fruit and M. laxa during their interaction. We used M. laxa-inoculated immature and mature fruit, which was resistant and susceptible to brown rot, respectively, to perform a dual RNA-Seq analysis. In immature fruit, host responses, pathogen biomass, and pathogen transcriptional activity peaked at 14–24 h post inoculation (hpi), at which point M. laxa appeared to switch its transcriptional response to either quiescence or death. Mature fruit experienced an exponential increase in host and pathogen activity beginning at 6 hpi. Functional analyses in both host and pathogen highlighted differences in stage-dependent strategies. For example, in immature fruit, M. laxa unsuccessfully employed carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) for penetration, which the fruit was able to combat with tightly regulated hormone responses and an oxidative burst that challenged the pathogen’s survival at later time points. In contrast, in mature fruit, M. laxa was more dependent on proteolytic effectors than CAZymes, and was able to invest in filamentous growth early during the interaction. Hormone analyses of mature fruit infected with M. laxa indicated that, while jasmonic acid activity was likely useful for defense, high ethylene activity may have promoted susceptibility through the induction of ripening processes. Lastly, we identified M. laxa genes that were highly induced in both quiescent and active infections and may serve as targets for control of brown rot.

References

[1] Rungjindamai, N., Jeffries, P. & Xu, X. M. Epidemiology and management of brown rot on stone fruit caused by Monilinia laxa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 140, 1-17 (2014).

[2] Martini, C. & Mari, M. Monilinia fructicola, Monilinia laxa (Monilinia Rot, Brown Rot). In (ed. Silvia Bautista-Baños) Postharvest Decay: Control Strategies 233-265 (Elsevier, 2014).

[3] RosBREED. RosBREED peach brown rot. https://www.rosbreed.org/node/424 (Accessed January 16, 2020).

[4] Usall, J., Casals, C., Sisquella, M., Palou, L. & De Cal, A. Alternative technologies to control postharvest diseases of stone fruits. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 11, 1-6 (2015).

[5] Byrne, D. H. Fruit Breeding. Fruit Breeding, Handbook of Plant Breeding (Springer US, 2012).

[6] Ma, Z., Yoshimura, M. A., Holtz, B. A. & Michailides, T. J. Characterization and PCR-based detection of benzimidazole-resistant isolates of Monilinia laxa in California. Pest Manag. Sci. 61, 449-457 (2005).

[7] Mari, M., Casalini, L., Baraldi, E., Bertolini, P. & Pratella, G. C. Susceptibility of apricot and peach fruit to Monilinia laxa during phenological stages. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30, 105-109 (2003).

[8] Gununu, P. R., Munhuweyi, K., Obianom, P. C. & Sivakumar, D. Assessment of eleven South African peach cultivars for susceptibility to brown rot and blue mould. Sci. Hortic. 254, 1-6 (2019).

[9] Luo, Y., Michailides, T. J., Morgan, D. P., Krueger, W. H. & Buchner, R. P. Inoculum dynamics, fruit infection, and development of brown rot in prune orchards in California. Phytopathology 95, 1132-1136 (2005).

[10] Angelini, R. M. D. M. et al. De novo assembly and comparative transcriptome analysis of Monilinia fructicola, Monilinia laxa and Monilinia fructigena, the causal agents of brown rot on stone fruits. BMC Genomics 19, 1-21 (2018).

[11] Garcia-Benitez, C., Melgarejo, P., Sandin-España, P., Sevilla-Morán, B. & De Cal, A. Degrading enzymes and phytotoxins in Monilinia spp. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 154, 305-318 (2019).

[12] Lee, M.-H. & Bostock, R. M. Induction, regulation, and role in pathogenesis of appressoria in Monilinia fructicola. Phytopathology 96, 1072-1080 (2006).

[13] Garcia-Benitez, C., Melgarejo, P., De Cal, A. & Fontaniella, B. Microscopic analyses of latent and visible Monilinia fructicola infections in nectarines. PLoS ONE 11, 1-16 (2016).

[14] Mari, M. et al. Stone fruits. in Postharvest Pathology of Fresh Horticultural Produce (eds. Palou, L. & Smilanick, J. L.) 111-140 (CRC Press, 2019).

[15] Lee, M. H. & Bostock, R. M. Fruit exocarp phenols in relation to quiescence and development of Monilinia fructicola infections in Prunus spp.: a role for cellular redox? Phytopathology 97, 269-277 (2007).

[16] Villarino, M., Sandín-España, P., Melgarejo, P. & De Cal, A. High chlorogenic and neochlorogenic acid levels in immature peaches reduce Monilinia laxa infection by interfering with fungal melanin biosynthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 3205-3213 (2011).

[17] Naranjo-Ortíz, M. A. et al. Genome sequence of the brown rot fungal pathogen Monilinia laxa. BMC Res. Notes 11, 1-2 (2018).

[18] Cerboneschi, M. et al. Indole-3-acetic acid in plant-pathogen interactions: a key molecule for in planta bacterial virulence and fitness. Res. Microbiol. 167, 774-787 (2016).

[19] Brummell, D. A., Dal Cin, V., Crisosto, C. H. & Labavitch, J. M. Cell wall metabolism during maturation, ripening and senescence of peach fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 2029-2039 (2004).

[20] Zipfel, C. Plant pattern-recognition receptors. Trends Immunol. 35, 345-351 (2014).

[21] Pandey, D., Rajendran, S. R. C. K., Gaur, M., Sajeesh, P. K. & Kumar, A. Plant defense signaling and responses against necrotrophic fungal pathogens. J. Plant Growth Regul. 35, 1159-1174 (2016).

[22] Kombrink, A., Sánchez-Vallet, A. & Thomma, B. P. H. J. The role of chitin detection in plant-pathogen interactions. Microbes Infect. 13, 1168-1176 (2011).

[23] Jones, J. D. G. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323-329 (2006).

[24] Valero-Jiménez, C. A., Veloso, J., Staats, M. & Van Kan, J. A. L. Comparative genomics of plant pathogenic Botrytis species with distinct host specificity. BMC Genomics 20, 203 (2019).

[25] Zhu, W. et al. BcCFEM1, a CFEM domain-containing protein with putative GPI-anchored site, is involved in pathogenicity, conidial production, and stress tolerance in Botrytis cinerea. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1807 (2017).

[26] McDowell, J. M. & Dangl, J. L. Signal transduction in the plant immune response. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 79-82 (2000).

[27] Van Der Ent, S. & Pieterse, C. M. J. Ethylene: multi-tasker in plant-attacker interactions. in Annual Plant Reviews (ed. Michael T. M.) Vol. 44, 343-377 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2012).

[28] Blanco-Ulate, B., Vincenti, E., Powell, A. L. T. & Cantu, D. Tomato transcriptome and mutant analyses suggest a role for plant stress hormones in the interaction between fruit and Botrytis cinerea. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 1-16 (2013).

[29] Zhu, Z. & Tian, S. Resistant responses of tomato fruit treated with exogenous methyl jasmonate to Botrytis cinerea infection. Sci. Hortic. 142, 38-43 (2012).

[30] Zhang, L., Zhang, F., Melotto, M., Yao, J. & He, S. Y. Jasmonate signaling and manipulation by pathogens and insects. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 1371-1385 (2017).

[31] Oetiker, J. H. & Yang, S. F. The role of ethylene in fruit ripening. Acta Hortic. 398, 167-178 (1995).

[32] Tadiello, A. et al. On the role of ethylene, auxin and a GOLVEN-like peptide hormone in the regulation of peach ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 1-17 (2016).

[33] Baró-Montel, N. et al. Double-sided battle: the role of ethylene during Monilinia spp. infection in peach at different phenological stages. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 144, 324-333 (2019).

[34] Schouten, A. et al. Functional analysis of an extracellular catalase of Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 3, 227-238 (2002).

[35] Torres, M. A., Jones, J. D. G. & Dangl, J. L. Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 141, 373-378 (2006).

[36] Li, H., Zhang, Z., He, C., Qin, G. & Tian, S. Comparative proteomics reveals the potential targets of BcNoxR, a putative regulatory subunit of NADPH oxidase of Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 29, 990-1003 (2016).

[37] Kim, Hjin, Chen, C., Kabbage, M. & Dickman, M. B. Identification and characterization of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum NADPH oxidases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 7721-7729 (2011).

[38] Lin, Z., Wu, J., Jamieson, P. A. & Zhang, C. Alternative oxidase is involved in the pathogenicity, development, and oxygen stress response of Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology 109, 1679-1688 (2019).

[39] Bartwal, A., Mall, R., Lohani, P., Guru, S. K. & Arora, S. Role of secondary metabolites and brassinosteroids in plant defense against environmental stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 32, 216-232 (2013).

[40] Collado, I. G., Sánchez, A. J. M. & Hanson, J. R. Fungal terpene metabolites: biosynthetic relationships and the control of the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Nat. Prod. Rep. 24, 674-686 (2007).

[41] Veloso, J. & van Kan, J. A. L. Many shades of grey in Botrytis-host plant interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 613-622 (2018).

[42] Poussereau, N., Creton, S., Billon-Grand, G., Rascle, C. & Fevre, M. Regulation of acp1, encoding a non-aspartyl acid protease expressed during pathogenesis of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Microbiology 147, 717-726 (2001).

[43] Baró-Montel, N. et al. Pectin methyl esterases and rhamnogalacturonan hydrolases: weapons for successful Monilinia laxa infection in stone fruit? Plant Pathol. 68, 1381-1393 (2019).

[44] Baró-Montel, N. et al. Developing a methodology for identifying brown rot resistance in stone fruit. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 154, 287-303 (2018).

[45] Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114-2120 (2014).

[46] Langmead, B. & Slazberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignmnet with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).

[47] Verde, I. et al. The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat. Genet. 45, 487-494 (2013).

[48] Verde, I. et al. The Peach v2.0 release: high-resolution linkage mapping and deep resequencing improve chromosome-scale assembly and contiguity. BMC Genomics 18, 1-18 (2017).

[49] Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

[50] Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., Von Heijne, G. & Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785-786 (2011).