Genomic prediction of fruit texture and training population optimization towards the application of genomic selection in apple

Abstract

Texture is a complex trait and a major component of fruit quality in apple. While the major effect of MdPG1, a gene controlling firmness, has already been exploited in elite cultivars, the genetic basis of crispness remains poorly understood. To further improve fruit texture, harnessing loci with minor effects via genomic selection is therefore necessary. In this study, we measured acoustic and mechanical features in 537 genotypes to dissect the firmness and crispness components of fruit texture. Predictions of across-year phenotypic values for these components were calculated using a model calibrated with 8,294 SNP markers. The best prediction accuracies following cross-validations within the training set of 259 genotypes were obtained for the acoustic linear distance (0.64). Predictions for biparental families using the entire training set varied from low to high accuracy, depending on the family considered. While adding siblings or half-siblings into the training set did not clearly improve predictions, we performed an optimization of the training set size and composition for each validation set. This allowed us to increase prediction accuracies by 0.17 on average, with a maximal accuracy of 0.81 when predicting firmness in the ‘Gala’ × ‘Pink Lady’ family. Our results therefore identified key genetic parameters to consider when deploying genomic selection for texture in apple. In particular, we advise to rely on a large training population, with high phenotypic variability from which a ‘tailored training population’ can be extracted using a priori information on genetic relatedness, in order to predict a specific target population.

References

[1] Hoehn, E., Baumgartner, D., Gasser, F. & Gabioud, S. Ripening regulation and consumer expectations. Acta Hortic. 796, 83-91 (2008).

[2] Johnston, J. W., Hewett, E. W. & Hertog, M. L. A. T. M. Postharvest softening of apple (Malus domestica) fruit: A review . N. Zeal. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 3, 145-160 (2002).

[3] Bourne, M. C. in Food Texture and Viscosity 2nd edn, Ch. 7 (Elsevier, 2002).

[4] Costa, F. et al. Texture dynamics during postharvest cold storage ripening in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) . Postharvest Biol. Technol. 69, 54-63 (2012).

[5] Costa, F. et al. Assessment of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit texture by a combined acoustic-mechanical profiling strategy . Postharvest Biol. Technol. 61, 21-28 (2011).

[6] Longhi, S. et al. Mapping survey dissects the complex fruit texture physiology in apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) . J. Exp. Bot. 63, 1107-1121 (2012).

[7] Di Guardo, M. et al. Deciphering the genetic control of fruit texture in apple by multiple family-based analysis and genome-wide association. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 1451-1466 (2017).

[8] Giovannoni, J . Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 725-749 (2001).

[9] Longhi, S. et al. A candidate gene based approach validates Md-PG1 as the main responsible for a QTL impacting fruit texture in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) . BMC Plant Biol. 13, 37 (2013).

[10] Goddard, M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136, 245-257 (2009).

[11] Varshney, R. K. et al. Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops? Nat. Biotechnol. 12, 1172-117 (2012).

[12] Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829 (2001).

[13] Heffner, E. L., Sorrells, M. E. & Jannink, J.-L. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 49, 1-12 (2009).

[14] Crossa, J. et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 961-975 (2017).

[15] Rincent, R. et al. Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: Comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.) . Genetics 192, 715-728 (2012).

[16] Laloë, D. Precision and information in linear models of genetic evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 25, 557-576 (1993).

[17] Isidro, J. et al. Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 145-158 (2015).

[18] Akdemir, D., Sanchez, J. I. & Jannink, J.-L. Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm. Genet. Sel. Evol. 47, 38 (2015).

[19] Akdemir, D. & Isidro-Sánchez, J. Design of training populations for selective phenotyping in genomic prediction. Sci. Rep. 9, 1446 (2019).

[20] McClure, K. A., Sawler, J., Gardner, K. M., Money, D. & Myles, S. Genomics: a potential panacea for the perennial problem. Am. J. Bot. 101, 1780-1790 (2014).

[21] Muranty, H. et al. Accuracy and responses of genomic selection on key traits in apple breeding. Hortic. Res. 2, 15060 (2015).

[22] Minamikawa, M. F. et al. Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction in citrus: Potential of genomics-assisted breeding for fruit quality traits. Sci. Rep. 7, 1-13 (2017).

[23] Biscarini, F. et al. Genome-enabled predictions for fruit weight and quality from repeated records in European peach progenies. BMC Genom. 18, 432 (2017).

[24] Kumar, S. et al. Genome-enabled estimates of additive and nonadditive genetic variances and prediction of apple phenotypes across environments. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 5, 2711-2718 (2015).

[25] Kumar, S. et al. Genomic selection for fruit quality traits in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) . PLoS ONE 7, e36674 (2012).

[26] McClure, K. A. et al. A genome-wide association study of apple quality and scab resistance. Plant Genome 11, 1-14 (2018).

[27] Migicovsky, Z. et al. Genome to phenome mapping in apple using historical data. Plant Genome 9, 1-15 (2016).

[28] Würschum, T., Reif, J. C., Kraft, T., Janssen, G. & Zhao, Y. Genomic selection in sugar beet breeding populations. BMC Genet. 14, 85 (2013).

[29] Zhou, Y., Isabel Vales, M., Wang, A. & Zhang, Z. Systematic bias of correlation coefficient may explain negative accuracy of genomic prediction. Brief. Bioinform. 18, 44-753 (2016).

[30] Kouassi, A. B. et al. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for apple fruit-quality traits using pedigreed plant material in Europe. Tree Genet. Genomes 5, 659-672 (2009).

[31] Ben Sadok, I. et al. Apple fruit texture QTLs: year and cold storage effects on sensory and instrumental traits. Tree Genet. Genomes 11, 119 (2015).

[32] Cornille, A. et al. A multifaceted overview of apple tree domestication. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 770-782 (2019).

[33] Urrestarazu, J. et al. Analysis of the genetic diversity and structure across a wide range of germplasm reveals prominent gene flow in apple at the European level. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 130 (2016).

[34] Clark, S. A., Hickey, J. M., Daetwyler, H. D. & van der Werf, J. H. J. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genet. Sel. Evol. 44, 4 (2012).

[35] Voss-Fels, K. P., Cooper, M. & Hayes, B. J. Accelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 669-686 (2019).

[36] Daetwyler, H. D., Bansal, U. K., Bariana, H. S., Hayden, M. J. & Hayes, B. J. Genomic prediction for rust resistance in diverse wheat landraces. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 1795-1803 (2014).

[37] Lorenz, A. J. & Smith, K. P. Adding genetically distant individuals to training populations reduces genomic prediction accuracy in barley. Crop Sci. 55, 2657-2667 (2015).

[38] Brandariz, S. P. & Bernardo, R. Small ad hoc versus large general training populations for genomewide selection in maize biparental crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 347-353 (2019).

[39] Schulthess, A. W. et al. Multiple-trait- and selection indices-genomic predictions for grain yield and protein content in rye for feeding purposes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 129, 273-287 (2016).

[40] Roth, M. The apple REFPOP, a population dedicated to multi-trait genomic selection in a multi-environment design. In: Proceedings of the XV EUCARPIA Fruit Breeding and Genetics Symposium. Acta Hortic. Poster N° 620 (2019).

[41] Cirilli, M. et al. The multi-site PeachRefPop collection: a true cultural heritage and international scientific tool for fruit trees. Plant Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.01412 (2020).

[42] Bianco, L. et al. Development and validation of a 20K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) whole genome genotyping array for apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) . PLoS ONE 9, e110377 (2014).

[43] Di Guardo, M. et al. ASSIsT: an automatic SNP scoring tool for in- and out-breeding species. Bioinformatics 31, 3873-3874 (2015).

[44] Clayton, D. snpStats: SnpMatrix and XSnpMatrix classes and methods. https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.snpStats. R package version 1.36.0. (2019).

[45] Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1-48 (2015).

[46] Lê, S., Josse, J. & Husson, F. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 25, 1-18 (2008).

[47] Endelman, J. B. & Jannink, J. L. Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 11, 1405-1413 (2012).

[48] VanRaden, P. M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 11, 4414-4423 (2008).

[49] Endelman, J. B. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome J. 4, 250-255 (2011).

[50] Warnes, G. et al. gplots: various R programming tools for plotting data. http://cran.r-project.org/package=gplots, R package 2.17.0 (2015).

[51] Jombart, T., Devillard, S. & Balloux, F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 11, 94 (2010).

[52] Jombart, T. Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403-1405 (2008).

[53] Goudet, J. Hierfstat, a package for r to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 184-186 (2005).

[54] Akdemir, D. STPGA: selection of training populations by genetic algorithm, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=STPGA, R package version 4.0 (2017).

[55] R Core Team . R: language and environment for statistical computing. Computer program at, https://www.r-project.org (2008).

[56] Wickham, H. (ed). ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis . (Springer, 2016).