Multiple-population QTL mapping of maturity and fruit-quality traits reveals LG4 region as a breeding target in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.)

Abstract

Sweet cherry maturity date and fruit quality are relevant traits for its marketability, transport, and consumer acceptance. In this work, sweet cherry fruit development time, maturity date, and commercial fruit-quality traits (size, weight, firmness, soluble solid content, and titratable acidity) were investigated to improve the knowledge of their genetic control, and to identify alleles of breeding interest. Six sweet cherry populations segregating for these traits were used for QTL analyses. These populations descend from cross- and self-pollinations of local Spanish sweet cherries ‘Ambrunés’ and ‘Cristobalina’, and breed cultivars (‘Brooks’, ‘Lambert’, or ‘Vic’). The six populations (n = 411), previously genotyped with RosBREED Cherry 6 K SNP array, were phenotyped for 2 years. QTL analyses were conducted using a multifamily approach implemented by FlexQTL^™. Fruit development time, soluble solid content, and titratable acidity QTLs are first reported in sweet cherry in this work. Significant QTLs were detected for all the traits. Eighteen were more stable as they were detected for 2 years. Of these, nine are first reported in this work. The major QTLs for fruit development time, maturity date, firmness, and soluble solid content were identified on the same narrow region of linkage group 4. These traits also showed significant positive correlation (long fruit development time associated with late maturity, high firmness, and high SSC). NAC transcription factor genes identified on this LG4 region may be candidate genes for the regulation of these traits in sweet cherry, as previously described in syntenic regions of other Rosaceae species. Haplotypes of breeding interest on this LG4 genomic region were identified and will be useful for sweet cherry breeding from this and related plant material.

References

[1] Yue, C. et al. An evaluation of U.S. tart and sweet cherry producers trait prioritization: evidence from audience surveys. Hortscience 49, 931-937 (2014).

[2] Zheng, X. et al. What attributes are consumers looking for in sweet cherries? Evidence from choice experiments. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 45, 124-142 (2016).

[3] Dirlewanger, E., Claverie, J., Iezzoni, A., Wünsch, A. Sweet and sour cherries: linkage maps, QTL detection and marker assisted selection. In Genetics and Genomics of Rosaceae, Plant Genetics and Genomic: Crops and Model 291-313 (2009).

[4] Etienne, C. et al. Candidate genes and QTLs for sugar and organic acid content in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105, 145-159 (2002).

[5] Salazar, J. A. et al. Inheritance of reproductive phenology traits and related QTL identification in apricot. Tree Genet. Genomes 12, 71 (2016).

[6] Calle, A., Cai, L., Iezzoni, A. & Wünsch, A. Genetic dissection of bloom time in low chilling sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) using a multi-family QTL approach. Front. Plant Sci 10, 1647 (2020).

[7] Dirlewanger, E. et al. Comparison of the genetic determinism of two key phenological traits, flowering and maturity dates, in three Prunus species: peach, apricot and sweet cherry. Heredity 109, 280-292 (2012).

[8] Quero-García, J. et al. QTL detection of important agronomic traits for sweet cherry breeding. Acta Hortic. 1020, 57-64 (2014).

[9] Isuzugawa, K. et al. QTL analysis and candidate gene SNP for harvest day in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Acta Hortic. 1235, 33-40 (2019).

[10] Quilot, B. et al. QTL analysis of quality traits in an advanced backcross between Prunus persica cultivars and the wild relative species P. davidiana. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 884-897 (2004).

[11] Nuñez-Lillo, G. et al. Identification of candidate genes associated with mealiness and maturity date in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] using QTL analysis and deep sequencing. Tree Genet. Genomes 11, 86 (2015).

[12] Salazar, J. A. et al. Genotyping by sequencing for Snp-based linkage analysis and identification of QTLs linked to fruit quality traits in japanese plum (Prunus salicina lindl.). Front Plant Sci. 8, 476 (2017).

[13] Fresnedo-Ramírez, J. et al. QTL mapping of pomological traits in peach and related species breeding germplasm. Mol. Breed. 35, 1-19 (2015).

[14] Hernández Mora, J. R. et al. Integrated QTL detection for key breeding traits in multiple peach progenies. BMC Genomics 18, 404 (2017).

[15] Pirona, R. et al. Fine mapping and identification of a candidate gene for a major locus controlling maturity date in peach. BMC Plant Biol 13, 166 (2013).

[16] Migicovsky, Z. et al. Genome to phenome mapping in apple using historical data. Plant Genome 9, 2 (2016).

[17] Crisosto, C. H., Crisosto, G. M. & Metheney, P. Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28, 159-167 (2003).

[18] Whiting, M. D., Ophardt, D. & Mcferson, J. Chemical blossom thinners vary in their effect on sweet cherry fruit set, yield, fruit quality, and crop value. Hortic. Technol. 16, 66-70 (2006).

[19] Chauvin, M. A., Whiting, M. & Ross, C. F. The influence of harvest time on sensory properties and consumer acceptance of sweet cherries. Horttechnology 19, 748-754 (2009).

[20] Zhang, G. et al. Fruit size QTL analysis of an F1 population derived from a cross between a domesticated sweet cherry cultivar and a wild forest sweet cherry. Tree Genet. Genomes 6, 25-36 (2010).

[21] Rosyara, U. R. et al. Fruit size QTL identification and the prediction of parental QTL genotypes and breeding values in multiple pedigreed populations of sweet cherry. Mol. Breed. 32, 875-887 (2013).

[22] Campoy, J. A., Le Dantec, L., Barreneche, T., Dirlewanger, E. & Quero-García, J. New insights into fruit firmness and weight control in sweet cherry. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 33, 783-796 (2015).

[23] Calle, A., Balas, F., Cai, L., Iezzoni, A., López-Corrales, M., Serradilla, M. J., Wünsch, A. Fruit size and firmness QTLs alleles of breeding interest identified in a sweet cherry ‘Ambrunés’ × ‘Sweetheart’ population. Mol. Breed. (under review).

[24] Cai, L. et al. A fruit firmness QTL identified on linkage group 4 in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) is associated with domesticated and bred germplasm. Sci. Rep. 9, 5008 (2019).

[25] Eduardo, I. et al. QTL analysis of fruit quality traits in two peach intraspecific populations and importance of maturity date pleiotropic effect. Tree Genet. Genomes 7, 323-335 (2011).

[26] Zeballos, J. L. et al. Mapping QTLs associated with fruit quality traits in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] using SNP maps. Tree Genet. Genomes 12, 37 (2016).

[27] Salazar, J. A., Ruiz, D., Egea, J. & Martínez-Gómez, P. Transmission of fruit quality traits in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) and analysis of linked quantitative trait loci (QTLs) using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Report 31, 1506-1517 (2013).

[28] Shirasawa, K. et al. The genome sequence of sweet cherry (Prunus avium) for use in genomics-assisted breeding. DNA Res. 24, 499-508 (2017).

[29] Chavoshi, M. et al. Phenotyping protocol for sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) to facilitate an understanding of trait inheritance. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 68, 125-134 (2014).

[30] Piaskowski, J. et al. Genomic heritability estimates in sweet cherry reveal non-additive genetic variance is relevant for industry-prioritized traits. BMC Genet. 19, 23 (2018).

[31] Aranzana, M. J. et al. Prunus genetics and applications after de novo genome sequencing: achievements and prospects. Hortic. Res. 6, 58 (2019).

[32] Serra, O. et al. Genetic analysis of the slow-melting flesh character in peach. Tree Genet. Genomes. 13, 77 (2017).

[33] Olsen, A. N., Ernst, H. A. & Leggio, L. Lo & Skriver, K. NAC transcription factors: Structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 79-87 (2005).

[34] Ríos, P. et al. ETHQV6.3 is involved in melon climacteric fruit ripening and is encoded by a NAC domain transcription factor. Plant J. 91, 671-683 (2017).

[35] Gao, Y. et al. NOR-like1, is a new positive regulator of tomato fruit ripening. Hortic. Res. 5, 75 (2018).

[36] Cliff, M. A., Dever, M. C., Hall, J. W. & Girard, B. Development and evaluation of multiple regression models for prediction of sweet cherry liking. Food Res. Int. 28, 583-589 (1995).

[37] Bassi, D., Bartolozzi, F. & Muzzi, E. Patterns and heritability of carboxylic acids and soluble sugars in fruits of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Plant Breed. 115, 67-70 (1996).

[38] Dirlewanger, E. et al. Mapping QTLs controlling fruit quality in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98, 18-31 (1999).

[39] Morandi, B., Corelli Grappadelli, L., Rieger, M. & Lo Bianco, R. Carbohydrate availability affects growth and metabolism in peach fruit. Physiol. Plant. 133, 229-241 (2008).

[40] Boudehri, K. et al. Phenotypic and fine genetic characterization of the D locus controlling fruit acidity in peach. BMC Plant Biol. 9, 59 (2009).

[41] Serradilla, M. J. et al. Physicochemical and sensorial characterisation of four sweet cherry cultivars grown in Jerte Valley (Spain). Food Chem. 133, 1551-1559 (2012).

[42] Génard, M., Lescourret, F., Gomez, L. & Habib, R. Changes in fruit sugar concentrations in response to assimilate supply, metabolism and dilution: a modeling approach applied to peach fruit (Prunus persica). Tree Physiol. 23, 373-385 (2003).

[43] Kenis, K., Keulemans, J. & Davey, M. W. Identification and stability of QTLs for fruit quality traits in apple. Tree Genet. Genomes 4, 647-661 (2008).

[44] Illa, E. et al. Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 9 (2011).

[45] Wünsch, A. & Hormaza, J. I. Molecular characterisation of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genotypes using peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] SSR sequences. Heredity 89, 56-63 (2002).

[46] AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984).

[47] Team, R. C. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/ (2017).

[48] Calle, A., Cai, L., Iezzoni, A. & Wünsch, A. High-density linkage maps constructed in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) using cross- and self-pollination populations reveal chromosomal homozygosity in inbred families and non-syntenic regions with the peach genome. Tree Genet. Genomes 14, 37 (2018).

[49] Bink, M. C. A. M. et al. Bayesian analysis of complex traits in pedigreed plant populations. Euphytica 161, 85-96 (2008).

[50] Bink, M. C. A. M. et al. Bayesian QTL analyses using pedigreed families of an outcrossing species, with application to fruit firmness in apple. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 1073-1090 (2014).

[51] Voorrips, R. E. MapChart: Software for the Graphical Presentation of Linkage Maps and QTLs. J. Hered. 93, 77-78 (2002).