Low temperature upregulates cwp expression and modifies alternative splicing patterns, increasing the severity of cwp-induced tomato fruit cuticular microfissures

Abstract

The cwp (cuticular water permeability) gene controls the development of cuticular microfissuring and subsequent fruit dehydration in tomato. The gene underwent silencing in the evolution of the fleshy cultivated tomato but is expressed in the primitive wild tomato relatives. The introgression of the expressed allele from the wild S. habrochaites (cwp^h) into the cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leads to the phenotype of fruit water loss during and following ripening. In this report, we show that low temperature impacts on the severity of the cuticular microfissure phenotype via a combination of effects on both expression and alternative splicing of cwp^h. The cwp gene, comprising four exons and three introns, undergoes post-transcriptional alternative splicing processes, leading to seven alternative transcripts that differ in reading-frame lengths. Transgenic plants expressing each of the alternative transcripts identified the longest reading frame (VAR1) as the functional splice variant. Low temperature led to a strong upregulation of cwp^h expression, compounded by an increase in the relative proportion of the functional VAR1 transcript, leading to increased severity of microfissuring of the cuticle. In summary, we demonstrate the molecular mechanism behind the horticultural phenomenon of the low-temperature effect on cuticular microfissures in the dehydrating tomato.

References

[1] Jeffree, C. E. in Biology of the Plant Cuticle (eds Riederer, M. and Muller, C.) 11-125 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, 2006).

[2] Nawrath, C. Unraveling the complex network of cuticular structure and function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 281-287 (2006).

[3] Hovav, R., Chehanovsky, N., Moy, M., Jetter, R. & Schaffer, A. A. The identification of a gene (Cwp1), silenced during solanum evolution, which causes cuticle microfissuring and dehydration when expressed in tomato fruit. Plant J. 52, 627-639 (2007).

[4] Bargel, H. & Neinhuis, C. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit growth and ripening as related to the biomechanical properties of fruit skin and isolated cuticle. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1049-1060 (2005).

[5] Wilson, L. A. & Sterlin, C. Studies on the cuticle of tomato fruit, I. fine structure of the cuticle. Zeit Pflanz. 77, 359-371 (1976).

[6] Spooner, D. M., Peralta, I. E. & Knapp, S. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]. Taxon 54, 43-61 (2005).

[7] Yeats, T. H. et al. The fruit cuticles of wild tomato species exhibit architectural and chemical diversity, providing a new model for studying the evolution of cuticle function. Plant J. 69, 655-666 (2011).

[8] Peet, M. M. Fruit cracking in tomato. HortTechnology 2, 216-223 (1992).

[9] Dorais, M. D. A., Dermers, W., van Iepern, S. & Papadoupoulos, A. P. Cuticle cracking in tomato fruit. Hort. Rev. 30, 163-184 (2004).

[10] Hen-Avivi, S., Lashbrooke, J., Costa, F. & Aharoni, A. Scratching the surface, genetic regulation of cuticle assembly in fleshy fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4653-4664 (2014).

[11] Isaacson, T. et al. Cutin deficiency in the tomato fruit cuticle consistently affects resistance to microbial infection and biomechanical properties, but not transpirational water loss. Plant J. 60, 363-377 (2009).

[12] Jiang, F. et al. Disassembly of the fruit cell wall by the ripening-associated polygalacturonase and expansin influences tomato cracking. Hortic. Res. 6, 17 (2019).

[13] Lashbrooke, J. et al. The tomato MIXTA-like transcription factor coordinates fruit epidermis conical cell development and cuticular lipid biosynthesis and assembly. Plant Physiol. 169, 2553-2571 (2015).

[14] Leide, J., Hildebrandt, U., Reussing, K., Riederer, M. & Vogg, G. The developmental pattern of tomato fruit wax accumulation and its impact on cuticular transpiration barrier properties, effects of a deficiency in a beta-ketoacyl-coenzyme A synthase (LeCER6). Plant Physiol. 144, 1667-1679 (2007).

[15] Moctezuma, E., Smith, D. L. & Gross, K. C. Antisense suppression of a beta-galactosidase gene (TBG6) in tomato increases fruit cracking. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 2025-2033 (2003).

[16] Adams, S. R., Cockshull, K. E. & Cave, C. R. J. Effect of temperature on the growth and development of tomato fruits. Ann. Bot. 88, 869-877 (2001).

[17] Baker, E. A., Bukovac, M. J. & Hunt, G. M. in The Plant Cuticle (eds Culter D. F., Alvin K. L., Price, C. E.) 33-44 (Academic Press, London, 1982).

[18] Dominguez, E., Cuartero, J. & Heredia, A. An overview on plant cuticle biomechanics. Plant Sci. 18, 77-84 (2011).

[19] Domínguez, E. et al. Tomato fruit continues growing while ripening, affecting cuticle properties and cracking. Physiol. Plant. 146, 473-486 (2012).

[20] España, L. et al. Biomechanical properties of the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit cuticle during development are modulated by changes in the relative amounts of its components. New Phytol. 202, 790-802 (2014).

[21] Segado, P., Domínguez, E. & Heredia, A. Ultrastructure of the epidermal cell wall and cuticle of tomato fruit (Solanum lycopersicum l.) during development. Plant Physiol. 170, 935-946 (2016).

[22] Knight, M. R. & Knight, H. Low-temperature perception leading to gene expression and cold tolerance in higher plants. New Phytol. 195, 737-751 (2012).

[23] Lurie, S., Handos, A., Fallik, E. & Shapira, R. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit gene expression at high temperature effects on tomato fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 110, 1207-1214 (1996).

[24] Sanchez-Bel, P. et al. Proteome changes in tomato fruits prior to visible symptoms of chilling injury are linked to defensive mechanisms, uncoupling of photosynthetic processes and protein degradation machinery. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 470-484 (2012).

[25] Chen, H. et al. A comparison of the low temperature transcriptomes of two tomato genotypes that differ in freezing tolerance, Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum habrochaites. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 132 (2015).

[26] Keller, M. et al. Alternative splicing in tomato pollen in response to heat stress. DNA Res. 24, 205-217 (2017).

[27] Sun, Y. & Xiao, H. Identification of alternative splicing events by RNA sequencing in early growth tomato fruits. BMC Genomics 16, 948 (2015).

[28] Wang, G., Weng, L., Li, M. & Xiao, H. Response of gene expression and alternative splicing to distinct growth environments in tomato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, E475 (2017).

[29] Laloum, T., Martin, G. & Duque, P. Alternative splicing control of abiotic stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 140-150 (2018).

[30] Mastrangelo, A. M., Marone, D., Laidò, G., De Leonardis, A. M. & De Vita, P. Alternative splicing, enhancing ability to cope with stress via transcriptome plasticity. Plant Sci. 185-186, 40-49 (2012).

[31] Shang, X., Cao, Y. & Ma, L. Alternative splicing in plant genes, a means of regulating the environmental fitness of plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, E432 (2017).

[32] Carvalho, R. F., Feijão, C. V. & Duque, P. On the physiological significance of alternative splicing events in higher plants. Protoplasma 250, 639-650 (2013).

[33] Lareau, L. F., Green, R. E., Bhatnagar, R. S. & Brenner, S. E. The evolving roles of alternative splicing. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 273-282 (2004).

[34] Stamm, S. et al. Function of alternative splicing. Gene 344, 1-20 (2005).

[35] Werneke, J. M., Chatfield, J. M. & Ogren, W. L. Alternative mRNA splicing generates the two ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase polypeptides in spinach and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1, 815-825 (1989).

[36] Filichkin, S. A. et al. Genome-wide mapping of alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 20, 45-58 (2010).

[37] Marquez, Y., Brown, J. W. S., Simpson, C., Barta, A. & Kalyna, M. Transcriptome survey reveals increased complexity of the alternative splicing landscape in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 22, 1184-1195 (2012).

[38] Reddy, A. S., Marquez, Y., Kalyna, M. & Barta, A. Complexity of the alternative splicing landscape in plants. Plant Cell 25, 3657-3683 (2013).

[39] Chamala, S., Feng, G., Chavarro, C. & Barbazuk, W. B. Genome-wide identification of evolutionarily conserved alternative splicing events in flowering plants. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3, 33 (2015).

[40] Aoki, K. et al. Large-scale analysis of full-length cDNAs from the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivar Micro-Tom, a reference system for the Solanaceae genomics. BMC Genomics 11, 210 (2010).

[41] Ner-Gaon, H., Leviatan, N., Rubin, E. & Fluhr, R. Comparative cross-species alternative splicing in plants. Plant Physiol. 144, 1632-1641 (2007).

[42] Meissner, R. et al. A new model system for tomato genetics. Plant J. 12, 1465-1472 (1997).

[43] Miron, D. & Schaffer, A. A. Sucrose phosphate synthase, sucrose synthase, and invertase activities in developing fruit of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and the sucrose accumulating Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. and Bonpl.. Plant Physiol. 95, 623-627 (1991).

[44] Shammai, A. et al. Natural genetic variation for expression of a SWEET transporter among wild species of Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) determines the hexose composition of ripening tomato fruit. Plant J. 96, 343-357 (2018).

[45] Kopylova, E., Noé, L. & Touzet, H. SortMeRNA, fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics 28, 3211-3217 (2012).

[46] Kim, D. et al. TopHat2, accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R3-R6 (2013).

[47] Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511-515 (2010).

[48] Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR, a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139-140 (2010).

[49] Gentleman, R. C. et al. Bioconductor, open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80 (2004).

[50] Wang, B. B. & Brendel, V. Genome wide comparative analysis of alternative splicing in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7175-7180 (2006).

[51] Gleave, A. P. A versatile binary vector system with a T-DNA organisational structure conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome. Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 1203-1207 (1992).

[52] Dubrovina, A. S., Kiselev, K. V. & Zhuravlev, Y. N. The role of canonical and noncanonical pre-mRNA splicing in plant stress responses. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 264314 (2013). Article ID.

[53] Staiger, D. & Brown, J. W. Alternative splicing at the intersection of biological timing, development, and stress responses. Plant Cell 25, 3640-3656 (2013).

[54] Bournay, A. S., Hedley, P. E., Maddison, A., Waugh, R. & Machray, G. C. Exon skipping induced by cold stress in a potato invertase gene transcript. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2347-2351 (1996).

[55] Seo, P. J., Park, M. J. & Park, C. M. Alternative splicing of transcription factors in plant responses to low temperature stress, mechanisms and functions. Planta 237, 1415-1424 (2013).

[56] Calixto, C. P. G. et al. Rapid and dynamic alternative splicing impacts the arabidopsis cold response transcriptome. Plant Cell 30, 1424-1444 (2018).

[57] Verhage, L. et al. Splicing-related genes are alternatively spliced upon changes in ambient temperatures in plants. PLoS ONE 12, e0172950 (2017).

[58] Kalyna, M. et al. Alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated decay modulate expression of important regulatory genes in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2454-2469 (2011).

[59] Ohtani, M. & Wachter, A. NMD-based gene regulation - a strategy for fitness enhancement in plants?. Plant Cell Physiol. 60, 1953-1960 (2019).

[60] Filichkin, S., Priest, H. D., Megraw, M. & Mockler, T. C. Alternative splicing in plants, directing traffic at the crossroads of adaptation and environmental stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 24, 125-135 (2015).