A high-quality Actinidia chinensis (kiwifruit) genome

Haolin Wu , Tao Ma , Minghui Kang , Fandi Ai , Junlin Zhang , Guanyong Dong , Jianquan Liu

Horticulture Research ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 117

PDF (948KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :117 DOI: 10.1038/s41438-019-0202-y
Article
research-article
A high-quality Actinidia chinensis (kiwifruit) genome
Author information +
History +
PDF (948KB)

Abstract

Actinidia chinensis (kiwifruit) is a perennial horticultural crop species of the Actinidiaceae family with high nutritional and economic value. Two versions of the A. chinensis genomes have been previously assembled, based mainly on relatively short reads. Here, we report an improved chromosome-level reference genome of A. chinensis (v3.0), based mainly on PacBio long reads and Hi-C data. The high-quality assembled genome is 653 Mb long, with 0.76% heterozygosity. At least 43% of the genome consists of repetitive sequences, and the most abundant long terminal repeats were further identified and account for 23.38% of our novel genome. It has clear improvements in contiguity, accuracy, and gene annotation over the two previous versions and contains 40,464 annotated protein-coding genes, of which 94.41% are functionally annotated. Moreover, further analyses of genetic collinearity revealed that the kiwifruit genome has undergone two whole-genome duplications: one affecting all Ericales families near the K-T extinction event and a recent genus-specific duplication. The reference genome presented here will be highly useful for further molecular elucidation of diverse traits and for the breeding of this horticultural crop, as well as evolutionary studies with related taxa.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haolin Wu, Tao Ma, Minghui Kang, Fandi Ai, Junlin Zhang, Guanyong Dong, Jianquan Liu. A high-quality Actinidia chinensis (kiwifruit) genome. Horticulture Research, 2019, 6 (1) : 117 DOI:10.1038/s41438-019-0202-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Liu, Y. et al. Rapid radiations of both kiwifruit hybrid lineages and their parents shed light on a two-layer mode of species diversification. New Phytol. 215, 877-890 (2017).

[2]

Huang, S. et al. Draft genome of the kiwifruit Actinidia chinensis. Nat. Commun. 4, 2640 (2013).

[3]

Pilkington, S. M. et al. A manually annotated Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis (kiwifruit) genome highlights the challenges associated with draft genomes and gene prediction in plants. BMC Genomics 19, 257 (2018).

[4]

Daccord, N. et al. High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development. Nat. Genet. 49, 1099 (2017).

[5]

Du, H. et al. Sequencing and de novo assembly of a near complete indica rice genome. Nat. Commun. 8, 15324 (2017).

[6]

Zhang, J. et al. Extensive sequence divergence between the reference genomes of two elite indica rice varieties Zhenshan 97 and Minghui 63. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E5163-E5171 (2016).

[7]

Shi, J. et al. Chromosome conformation capture resolved near complete genome assembly of broomcorn millet. Nat. Commun. 10, 464 (2019).

[8]

Wei, C. et al. Draft genome sequence of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis provides insights into the evolution of the tea genome and tea quality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4151-E4158 (2018).

[9]

Teh, B. T. et al. The draft genome of tropical fruit durian (Durio zibethinus). Nat. Genet. 49, 1633 (2017).

[10]

Wang, J. et al. Two likely auto-tetraploidization events shaped kiwifruit genome and contributed to establishment of the Actinidiaceae family. iScience 7, 230-240 (2018).

[11]

Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).

[12]

Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357 (2015).

[13]

Chaisson, M. J. & Tesler, G. Mapping single molecule sequencing reads using basic local alignment with successive refinement (BLASR): application and theory. BMC Bioinforma. 13, 238 (2012).

[14]

Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210-3212 (2015).

[15]

Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119 (2013).

[16]

Tang, W. et al. Chromosome-scale genome assembly of kiwifruit Actinidia eriantha with single-molecule sequencing and chromatin interaction mapping. GigaScience 8, giz027 (2019).

[17]

Ou, S. & Jiang, N. LTR_retriever: a highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiol. 176, 1410-1422 (2018).

[18]

Ou, S., Chen, J. & Jiang, N. Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR Assembly Index (LAI). Nucl. Acids Res. 46, e126- e126 (2018).

[19]

Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 45-48 (2000).

[20]

Hunter, S. et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucl. Acids Res. 37, D211-D215 (2008).

[21]

Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25 (2000).

[22]

Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 27-30 (2000).

[23]

Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178-2189 (2003).

[24]

Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586-1591 (2007).

[25]

Zhang, L. et al. The draft genome assembly of Rhododendron delavayi Franch. var. delavayi. Gigascience 6, 1-11 (2017).

[26]

De, BieT., Cristianini, N., Demuth, J. P. & Hahn, M. W. CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics 22, 1269-1271 (2006).

[27]

Van de. Peer, Y., Mirachi, E. & Marcha, K. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Genet. Rev. 18, 411-424 (2017).

[28]

Wang, Y. et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucl. Acids Res. 40, e49- e49 (2012).

[29]

Xia, E. et al. The tea tree genome provides insights into tea flavor and independent evolution of caffeine biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 10, 866-877 (2017).

[30]

Price, A. L., Jones, N. C. & Pevzner, P. A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 21, i351-i358 (2005).

[31]

Koren, S. et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 27, 722 (2017).

[32]

Xie, T. et al. De novo plant genome assembly based on chromatin interactions: a case study of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 8, 489-492 (2015).

[33]

Chakraborty, M., Baldwin-Brown, J. G., Long, A. D. & Emerson, J. Contiguous and accurate de novo assembly of metazoan genomes with modest long read coverage. Nucl. Acids Res. 44, e147- e147 (2016).

[34]

Parra, G., Bradnam, K. & Korf, I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23, 1061-1067 (2007).

[35]

Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 16, 259 (2015).

[36]

Kielbasa, S. M., Wan, R., Sato, K., Horton, P. & Frith, M. C. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res. 21, 487-493 (2011).

[37]

Tarailo‐Graovac, M. & Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 25, 4.10.11-14.10.14 (2009).

[38]

Jurka, J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462-467 (2005).

[39]

Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucl. Acids Res. 35, W265-W268 (2007).

[40]

Ellinghaus, D., Kurtz, S. & Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinforma. 9, 18 (2008).

[41]

Birney, E., Clamp, M. & Durbin, R. GeneWise and genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988-995 (2004).

[42]

Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494 (2013).

[43]

Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucl. Acids Res. 31, 5654-5666 (2003).

[44]

Stanke, M., Steinkamp, R., Waack, S. & Morgenstern, B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucl. Acids Res. 32, W309-W312 (2004).

[45]

Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 9, 1 (2008).

[46]

Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402 (1997).

[47]

Conesa, A. et al. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21, 3674-3676 (2005).

[48]

Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772-780 (2013).

[49]

Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540-552 (2000).

[50]

Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312-1313 (2014).

PDF (948KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/