VcFT-induced mobile florigenic signals in transgenic and transgrafted blueberries

Guo-qing Song , Aaron Walworth , Tianyi Lin , Qiuxia Chen , Xiumei Han , L. Irina Zaharia , Gan-yuan Zhong

Horticulture Research ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 105

PDF (1089KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :105 DOI: 10.1038/s41438-019-0188-5
Article
research-article
VcFT-induced mobile florigenic signals in transgenic and transgrafted blueberries
Author information +
History +
PDF (1089KB)

Abstract

FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) can promote early flowering in annual species, but such role has not been well demonstrated in woody species. We produced self and reciprocal grafts involving non-transgenic blueberry (NT) and transgenic blueberry (T) carrying a 35S-driven blueberry FT (VcFT-OX). We demonstrated that the transgenic VcFT-OX rootstock promoted flowering of non-transgenic blueberry scions in the NT (scion):T (rootstock) grafts. We further analyzed RNA-Seq profiles and six groups of phytohormones in both NT:T and NT:NT plants. We observed content changes of several hormone metabolites, in a descending order, in the transgenic NT:T, non-transgenic NT:T, and non-transgenic NT:NT leaves. By comparing differential expression transcripts (DETs) of these tissues in relative to their control, we found that the non-transgenic NT:T leaves had many DETs shared with the transgenic NT:T leaves, but very few with the transgenic NT:T roots. Interestingly, a number of these shared DETs belong to hormone pathway genes, concurring with the content changes of hormone metabolites in both transgenic and non-transgenic leaves of the NT:T plants. These results suggest that phytohormones induced by VcFT-OX in the transgenic leaves might serve as part of the signals that resulted in early flowering in both transgenic plants and the non-transgenic NT:T scions.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guo-qing Song, Aaron Walworth, Tianyi Lin, Qiuxia Chen, Xiumei Han, L. Irina Zaharia, Gan-yuan Zhong. VcFT-induced mobile florigenic signals in transgenic and transgrafted blueberries. Horticulture Research, 2019, 6 (1) : 105 DOI:10.1038/s41438-019-0188-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bernier, G., Havelange, A., Houssa, C., Petitjean, A. & Lejeune, P. Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5, 1147-1155 (1993).

[2]

Cajlachjan, M. C. & Yarkovaja, L. M. New facts in support of the hormonal theory of plant development II. Comptes Rendus De L Academie Des Sciences De L URSS 15, 215-217 (1937).

[3]

Bernier, G. My favourite flowering image: the role of cytokinin as a flowering signal. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 5795-5799 (2013).

[4]

Kardailsky, I. et al. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286, 1962-1965 (1999).

[5]

Kobayashi, Y., Kaya, H., Goto, K., Iwabuchi, M. & Araki, T. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 286, 1960-1962 (1999).

[6]

Pin, P. A. et al. An antagonistic pair of FT homologs mediates the control of flowering time in sugar beet. Science 330, 1397-1400 (2010).

[7]

Wickland, D. P. & Hanzawa, Y. The FLOWERING LOCUS T/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 gene family: functional evolution and molecular mechanisms. Mol. Plant 8, 983-997 (2015).

[8]

Liu, Y. Y., Yang, K. Z., Wei, X. X. & Wang, X. Q. Revisiting the phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (PEBP) gene family reveals cryptic FLOWERING LOCUS T gene homologs in gymnosperms and sheds new light on functional evolution. New Phytol. 212, 730-744 (2016).

[9]

Putterill, J. & Varkonyi-Gasic, E. FT and florigen long-distance flowering control in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 33, 77-82 (2016).

[10]

Liu, L., Zhu, Y., Shen, L. & Yu, H. Emerging insights into florigen transport. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16, 7 (2013).

[11]

Giakountis, A. & Coupland, G. Phloem transport of flowering signals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11, 8 (2008).

[12]

Corbesier, L. et al. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316, 1030-1033 (2007).

[13]

Notaguchi, M. et al. Long-distance, graft-transmissible action of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T protein to promote flowering. Plant Cell Physiol. 49, 1645-1658 (2008).

[14]

Zhu, Y., Liu, L., Shen, L. & Yu, H. NaKR1 regulates long-distance movement of Flowering Locus T in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 2, 16075 (2016).

[15]

Yoo, S. J., Hong, S. M., Jung, H. S. & Ahn, J. H. The cotyledons produce sufficient FT protein to induce flowering: evidence from cotyledon micrografting in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 119-128 (2013).

[16]

Jaeger, K. E. & Wigge, P. A. FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 17, 5 (2007).

[17]

Mathieu, J., Warthmann, N., Küttner, F. & Schmid, M. Export of FT protein from phloem companion cells is sufficient for floral induction in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 17, 6 (2007).

[18]

Turck, F., Fornara, F. & Coupland, G. Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 573-594 (2008).

[19]

Tamaki, S. et al. FT-like proteins induce transposon silencing in the shoot apex during floral induction in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E901-E910 (2015).

[20]

Lu, K. J., Huang, N. C., Liu, Y. S., Lu, C. A. & Yu, T. S. Long-distance movement of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T RNA participates in systemic floral regulation. RNA Biol. 9, 653-662 (2012).

[21]

Huang, N. C., Luo, K. R. & Yu, T. S. Mobility of antiflowerigen and PEBP mRNAs in tomato-tobacco heterografts. Plant Physiol. 178, 783-794 (2018).

[22]

Ye, J. et al. The Jatropha FT ortholog is a systemic signal regulating growth and flowering time. Biotechnol. Biofuels 71, 10 (2014).

[23]

Bull, S. E. et al. FLOWERING LOCUS T triggers early and fertile flowering in glasshouse cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Plants (Basel) 6, 10.3390/plants6020022 (2017).

[24]

Zhang, H. et al. Precocious flowering in trees: the FLOWERING LOCUS T gene as a research and breeding tool in Populus. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 2549-2560 (2010).

[25]

Wenzel, S., Flachowsky, H. & Hanke, M.-V. The Fast-track breeding approach can be improved by heat-induced expression of the FLOWERING LOCUS T genes from poplar (Populus trichocarpa) in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 115, 127-137 (2013).

[26]

Srinivasan, C., Dardick, C., Callahan, A. & Scorza, R. Plum (Prunus domestica) trees transformed with poplar FT1 result in altered architecture, dormancy requirement, and continuous flowering. PLoS ONE 7, e40715 (2012).

[27]

Ionescu, I. A., Moller, B. L. & Sanchez-Perez, R. Chemical control of flowering time. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 369-382 (2017).

[28]

Fornara, F., de Montaigu, A. & Coupland, G. SnapShot: control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell 141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.024 (2010).

[29]

Busov, V. et al. Transgenic modification of gai or rgl1 causes dwarfing and alters gibberellins, root growth, and metabolite profiles in Populus. Planta 224, 288-299 (2006).

[30]

Hartweck, L. M. Gibberellin signaling. Planta 229, 1-13 (2008).

[31]

Daviere, J. M. & Achard, P. Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development 140, 1147-1151 (2013).

[32]

Ji, S. H., Gururani, M. A., Lee, J. W., Ahn, B. O. & Chun, S. C. Isolation and characterisation of a dwarf rice mutant exhibiting defective gibberellins biosynthesis. Plant Biol. (Stuttg.) 16, 428-439 (2014).

[33]

Yamaguchi, N. et al. A molecular framework for auxin-mediated initiation of flower primordia. Dev. Cell 24, 271-282 (2013).

[34]

Krizek, B. A. Auxin regulation of Arabidopsis flower development involves members of the AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE/PLETHORA (AIL/PLT) family. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 3311-3319 (2011).

[35]

Osugi, A. & Sakakibara, H. Q&A: How do plants respond to cytokinins and what is their importance?. BMC Biol. 13, 102 (2015).

[36]

Ren, B. et al. Genome-wide comparative analysis of type-A Arabidopsis response regulator genes by overexpression studies reveals their diverse roles and regulatory mechanisms in cytokinin signaling. Cell Res. 19, 1178-1190 (2009).

[37]

Achard, P. et al. The plant stress hormone ethylene controls floral transition via DELLA-dependent regulation of floral meristem-identity genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 6484-6489 (2007).

[38]

Domagalska, M. A. et al. Attenuation of brassinosteroid signaling enhances FLC expression and delays flowering. Development 134, 2841-2850 (2007).

[39]

Kutschera, U. & Wang, Z. Y. Brassinosteroid action in flowering plants: a Darwinian perspective. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3511-3522 (2012).

[40]

Ishiguro, S., Kawai-Oda, A., Ueda, J., Nishida, I. & Okada, K. The DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCIENCE gene encodes a novel phospholipase A1 catalyzing the initial step of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and flower opening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13, 2191-2209 (2001).

[41]

Takahash, M. & Morikawa, H. Nitrogen dioxide accelerates flowering without changing the number of leaves at flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signaling & Behavior 9, 10.4161/15592316.2014.970433 (2014).

[42]

Wang, Y. H. & Irving, H. R. Developing a model of plant hormone interactions. Plant Signal Behav. 6, 494-500 (2011).

[43]

Martinez, C., Pons, E., Prats, G. & Leon, J. Salicylic acid regulates flowering time and links defence responses and reproductive development. Plant J. 37, 209-217 (2004).

[44]

Rivas-San Vicente, M. & Plasencia, J. Salicylic acid beyond defence: its role in plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 3321-3338 (2011).

[45]

Gao, X., Walworth, A. E., Mackie, C. & Song, G. Q. Overexpression of blueberry FLOWERING LOCUS T is associated with changes in the expression of phytohormone-related genes in blueberry plants. Hortic. Res. 3, 16053 (2016).

[46]

Song, G. Q., Walworth, A., Zhao, D. Y., Jiang, N. & Hancock, J. F. The Vaccinium corymbosum FLOWERING LOCUS T-like gene (VcFT): a flowering activator reverses photoperiodic and chilling requirements in blueberry. Plant Cell Rep. 32, 1759-1769 (2013).

[47]

Walworth, A. E., Chai, B. & Song, G. Q. Transcript profile of flowering regulatory genes in VcFT-overexpressing blueberry plants. PLoS ONE 11, e0156993 (2016).

[48]

Casamali, B., Darnell, R. L., Kovaleski, A. P., Olmstead, J. W. & Williamson, J. G. Vegetative and reproductive traits of two southern highbush blueberry cultivars grafted onto Vaccinium arboreum rootstocks. Hortscience 51, 880-886 (2016).

[49]

King, R. W. et al. Regulation of flowering in the long-day grass Lolium temulentum by gibberellins and the FLOWERING LOCUS T gene. Plant Physiol. 141, 498-507 (2006).

[50]

Remay, A. et al. A survey of flowering genes reveals the role of gibberellins in floral control in rose. Theor. Appl Genet 119, 767-781 (2009).

[51]

Bouche, F. et al. Integrating roots into a whole plant network of flowering time genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci Rep-Uk 6, 29042 (2016).

[52]

Lee, J. & Lee, I. Regulation and function of SOC1, a flowering pathway integrator. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 2247-2254 (2010).

[53]

Xing, D., Zhao, H., Xu, R. & Li, Q. Q. Arabidopsis PCFS4, a homologue of yeast polyadenylation factor Pcf11p, regulates FCA alternative processing and promotes flowering time. Plant J. 54, 899-910 (2008).

[54]

Kiba, T., Takei, K., Kojima, M. & Sakakibara, H. Side-chain modification of cytokinins controls shoot growth in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 27, 452-461 (2013).

[55]

Jin, S. H. et al. Overexpression of glucosyltransferase UGT85A1 influences trans-zeatin homeostasis and trans-zeatin responses likely through O-glucosylation. Planta 237, 991-999 (2013).

[56]

Sudre, D. et al. Iron-dependent modifications of the flower transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, and hormonal content in an Arabidopsis ferritin mutant. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 2665-2688 (2013).

[57]

Ionescu, I. A. et al. Transcriptome and metabolite changes during hydrogen cyanamide-induced floral bud break in sweet cherry. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1233 (2017).

[58]

Schafer, M. et al. The role of cis-zeatin-type cytokinins in plant growth regulation and mediating responses to environmental interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 4873-4884 (2015).

[59]

Thomas, S. G., Phillips, A. L. & Hedden, P. Molecular cloning and functional expression of gibberellin 2-oxidases, multifunctional enzymes involved in gibberellin deactivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4698-4703 (1999).

[60]

Schomburg, F. M., Bizzell, C. M., Lee, D. J., Zeevaart, J. A. & Amasino, R. M. Overexpression of a novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases decreases gibberellin levels and creates dwarf plants. Plant Cell 15, 151-163 (2003).

[61]

Zhao, X. Y. et al. Over-expression of the AtGA2ox8 gene decreases the biomass accumulation and lignification in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 11, 471-481 (2010).

[62]

Rieu, I. et al. The gibberellin biosynthetic genes AtGA20ox1 and AtGA20ox2 act, partially redundantly, to promote growth and development throughout the Arabidopsis life cycle. Plant J. 53, 488-504 (2008).

[63]

King, R. W. et al. Selective deactivation of gibberellins below the shoot apex is critical to flowering but not to stem elongation of lolium. Mol. Plant 1, 9 (2008).

[64]

Dong, T., Park, Y. & Hwang, I. Abscisic acid: biosynthesis, inactivation, homeostasis and signalling. Essays Biochem. 58, 29-48 (2015).

[65]

Nafisi, M. et al. Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 monooxygenase 71A13 catalyzes the conversion of indole-3-acetaldoxime in camalexin synthesis. Plant Cell 19, 2039-2052 (2007).

[66]

Stepanova, A. N. et al. The Arabidopsis YUCCA1 flavin monooxygenase functions in the indole-3-pyruvic acid branch of auxin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 23, 3961-3973 (2011).

[67]

Mashiguchi, K. et al. The main auxin biosynthesis pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18512-18517 (2011).

[68]

Nakamura, M. et al. Activation of the cytochrome P450 gene, CYP72C1, reduces the levels of active brassinosteroids in vivo. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 833-840 (2005).

[69]

Bai, S. L. et al. Transcriptome analysis of japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) flower buds transitioning through endodormancy. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 1132-1151 (2013).

[70]

Li, J., Li, Y., Chen, S. & An, L. Involvement of brassinosteroid signals in the floral-induction network of Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 4221-4230 (2010).

[71]

George Thompson, A. M., Iancu, C. V., Neet, K. E., Dean, J. V. & Choe, J. Y. Differences in salicylic acid glucose conjugations by UGT74F1 and UGT74F2 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Rep. 7, 46629 (2017).

[72]

Vlot, A. C. et al. Identification of likely orthologs of tobacco salicylic acid-binding protein 2 and their role in systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 56, 445-456 (2008).

[73]

Widemann, E., Smirnova, E., Aubert, Y., Miesch, L. & Heitz, T. Dynamics of jasmonate metabolism upon flowering and across leaf stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants (Basel) 5, 15 (2016).

[74]

Kandel, S. et al. Characterization of a methyl jasmonate and wounding-responsive cytochrome P450 of Arabidopsis thaliana catalyzing dicarboxylic fatty acid formation in vitro. FEBS J. 274, 5116-5127 (2007).

[75]

Chehab, E. W. et al. Intronic T-DNA insertion renders Arabidopsis opr3 a conditional jasmonic acid-producing mutant. Plant Physiol. 156, 770-778 (2011).

[76]

Koo, A. J., Chung, H. S., Kobayashi, Y. & Howe, G. A. Identification of a peroxisomal acyl-activating enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 33511-33520 (2006).

[77]

Walworth, A., Wickenheiser, R. & Song, G. Rootstock-specific expression of VcFT in tobacco is insufficient to alter scion flowering regime. In vitro Cell Dev. Plant, 521 (2014).

[78]

Chen, Q. G. et al. FLOWERING LOCUS T mRNA is synthesized in specialized companion cells in Arabidopsis and Maryland Mammoth tobacco leaf veins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2830-2835 (2018).

[79]

Farrona, S. et al. Tissue-specific expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis is maintained independently of polycomb group protein repression. Plant Cell 23, 3204-3214 (2011).

[80]

Song, G. Q., Walworth, A. E. & Loescher, W. H. Grafting of genetically engineered plants. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 140, 203-213 (2015).

[81]

Qin, Z., Bai, Y. & Wu, L. Flowering on time: multilayered restrictions on FT in plants. Mol. Plant 10, 1365-1367 (2017).

[82]

Koshita, Y., Takahara, T., Ogata, T. & Goto, A. Involvement of endogenous plant hormones (IAA, ABA, GAs) in leaves and flower bud formation of satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.). Sci. Hortic.-Amst. 79, 185-194 (1999).

[83]

Ohto, M. et al. Effects of sugar on vegetative development and floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 127, 252-261 (2001).

[84]

Barbier, F. et al. Sucrose is an early modulator of the key hormonal mechanisms controlling bud outgrowth in Rosa hybrida. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 2569-2582 (2015).

[85]

Arrom, L. & Munne-Bosch, S. Hormonal changes during flower development in floral tissues of Lilium. Planta 236, 343-354 (2012).

[86]

Arrom, L. & Munne-Bosch, S. Sucrose accelerates flower opening and delays senescence through a hormonal effect in cut lily flowers. Plant Sci. 188, 41-47 (2012).

[87]

Bolouri Moghaddam, M. R. & Van den Ende, W. Sugars, the clock and transition to flowering. Front Plant Sci. 4, 22 (2013).

[88]

Wilkie, J. D., Sedgley, M. & Olesen, T. Regulation of floral initiation in horticultural trees. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 3215-3228 (2008).

[89]

Zeng, W. Q. et al. A genetic screen reveals Arabidopsis stomatal and/or apoplastic defenses against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Plos. Pathog. 7, e1002291 (2011).

[90]

Zamboni, A., Pierantoni, L. & De Franceschi, P. Total RNA extraction from strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo) and several other woodyplants. Iforest-Biogeosciences For. 1, 122-125 (2008).

[91]

Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494-1512 (2013).

[92]

Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498-2504 (2003).

[93]

Maere, S., Heymans, K. & Kuiper, M. BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 21, 3448-3449 (2005).

PDF (1089KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/